Elsevier

Brain and Cognition

Volume 63, Issue 3, April 2007, Pages 203-220
Brain and Cognition

Ocular motor indicators of executive dysfunction in fragile X and Turner syndromes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2006.08.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Fragile X and Turner syndromes are two X-chromosome-related disorders associated with executive function and visual spatial deficits. In the present study, we used ocular motor paradigms to examine evidence that disruption to different neurological pathways underlies these deficits. We tested 17 females with fragile X, 19 females with Turner syndrome, and 40 females with neither disorder who comprised the comparison group. Group differences emerged for both the fragile X and Turner syndrome groups, each relative to the comparison group: Females with fragile X had deficits in generating memory-guided saccades, predictive saccades, and saccades made in the overlap condition of a gap/overlap task. Females with Turner syndrome showed deficits in generating memory-guided saccades, but not during either the predictive saccade or gap/overlap task. Females with Turner syndrome, but not females with fragile X, showed deficits in visually guided saccades and anti-saccades. These findings indicate that different brain regions are affected in the two disorders, and suggest that different pathways lead to the similar cognitive phenotypes described for fragile X and Turner syndromes.

Introduction

Fragile X and Turner syndromes are two X-chromosome-related disorders associated with neuropsychological deficits. Despite reports of deficits in memory, spatial, and executive function skills for persons with either disorder (as reviewed by Mazzocco & McCloskey, 2005), it remains unclear what primary neurobiological mechanisms underlie these corresponding cognitive phenotypes. The present study of ocular motor behavior was designed to investigate possible mechanisms underlying the impairments associated with fragile X and Turner syndromes. Following a brief introduction to each disorder, we describe how ocular motor studies help to delineate neurological pathways that underlie cognitive deficits.

Section snippets

Fragile X syndrome

Fragile X syndrome is the most common known hereditary cause of mental retardation, occurring in approximately 1 per 4000 to 9000 individuals (Crawford, Acuna, & Sherman, 2001). In most individuals with fragile X, the disorder results from a mutation of a single gene on the X-chromosome (Verkerk et al., 1991). As an X-linked disorder, fragile X affects males more severely than it affects females. Nearly all males with fragile X (Bailey, Hatton, & Skinner, 1998), and approximately half of

Contribution of ocular motor assessment to neuropsychological theory

Eye movement studies can be a useful complement to other diagnostic and exploratory methods, because ocular motor assessments afford a degree of quantification about signal processing and timing (i.e., latencies) that is not found in methods such as MRI and neuropsychological testing alone. Consequently, with judicious use of specific ocular motor paradigms, it is possible to assess involvement of areas known to be associated with ocular motor control. For example, in a study of the cognitive

The present study

In the present study, we used five eye movement testing paradigms based on the model of the ocular motor system described above, in order to measure neuropsychological performance implicated by ocular motor behavior. These paradigms were used to test the ability to generate reflexive saccades (visually guided saccade paradigm), disengage fixation (gap/overlap paradigm), inhibit reflexive saccades and generate a volitional saccades (anti-saccade paradigm), inhibit and initiate volitional

Methods

Informed consent for this study was obtained according to procedures approved by an institutional review board, prior to carrying out any of the procedures. Participants 18 years of age or older signed consent forms, whereas children below 18 years of age signed an assent form in the presence of the examiner. Parents of children under 18 years of age signed consent forms. All consent and assent forms indicated that participation was voluntary.

Preliminary analyses

There was no group difference in age at testing across the three participant groups, p = 0.498. As expected, there was an inverse correlation between age and the other variables measured. Therefore, age was included as a covariate in the subsequent parametric analyses.

Primary analyses using three group comparisons

The results of the three-group MANCOVA were significant for the majority of dependent variables. These are summarized in Table 2. Results of the subsequent planned pairwise comparisons are summarized in Table 3, Table 4, and are

Discussion

The aim of the present study was to use eye movement paradigms to infer differences in the underlying neurobiological mechanisms in children with fragile X or Turner syndrome, two developmental disorders with globally similar cognitive phenotypes. Based upon previous neuropsychological and neuroimaging studies, we hypothesized that girls with Turner syndrome would have difficulty in generating visually guided saccades, but that girls with either syndrome would show deficits in latencies during

References (88)

  • B.F. Pennington et al.

    The neuropsychological phenotype in Turner syndrome

    Cortex

    (1985)
  • L.H. Snyder et al.

    Intention-related activity in the posterior parietal cortex: a review

    Vision Research

    (2000)
  • B.S. Spektor et al.

    Differential D1 and D2 receptor-mediated effects on immediate early gene induction in a transgenic mouse model of Huntington’s disease

    Brain Research Molecular Brain Research

    (2002)
  • L. Tamm et al.

    Abnormal prefrontal cortex function during response inhibition in Turner syndrome: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence

    Biological Psychiatry

    (2003)
  • C.M. Temple

    Oral fluency and narrative production in children with Turner’s syndrome

    Neuropsychologia

    (2002)
  • C.M. Temple et al.

    Patterns of spatial functioning in Turner’s syndrome

    Cortex

    (1995)
  • A.J. Verkerk et al.

    Identification of a gene (FMR-1) containing a CGG repeat coincident with a breakpoint cluster region exhibiting length variation in fragile X syndrome

    Cell

    (1991)
  • M.T. Abrams et al.

    Molecular-neurobehavioral associations in females with the fragile X full mutation

    American Journal of Medical Genetics

    (1994)
  • D. Alexander et al.

    Defective figure drawing, geometric and human, in Turner’s syndrome

    Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

    (1966)
  • D.B. Bailey et al.

    Early developmental trajectories of males with fragile X syndrome

    American Journal of Mental Retardation

    (1998)
  • U. Balottin et al.

    Cognitive functions in Turner’s syndrome

    Minerva Pediatrica

    (1998)
  • B.G. Bender et al.

    Neuropsychological impairment in 42 adolescents with sex chromosome abnormalities

    American Journal of Medical Genetics

    (1993)
  • L. Bennetto et al.

    Profile of cognitive functioning in women with the fragile X mutation

    Neuropsychology

    (2001)
  • L. Bon et al.

    The dorsomedial frontal cortex of the macaca monkey: fixation and saccade-related activity

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1992)
  • A.M. Bronstein et al.

    Predictive ocular motor control in Parkinson’s disease

    Brain

    (1985)
  • L. Buchanan et al.

    A re-examination of the visuospatial deficit in Turner syndrome: contributions of working memory

    Developmental Neuropsychology

    (1998)
  • C. Condy et al.

    Neural substrate of antisaccades: role of subcortical structures

    Neurology

    (2004)
  • K.M. Cornish et al.

    Differential impact of the FMR-1 full mutation on memory and attention functioning: a neuropsychological perspective

    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

    (2001)
  • E.B. Cutrell et al.

    Electrical microstimulation of primate posterior parietal cortex initiates orienting and alerting components of covert attention

    Experimental Brain Research

    (2002)
  • P.T. Elkington et al.

    The effect of electromagnetic stimulation of the posterior parietal cortex on eye movements

    Eye

    (1992)
  • T.K. Elliott et al.

    Positron emission tomography and neuropsychological correlates in children with Turner’s syndrome

    Developmental Neuropsychology

    (1996)
  • J.L. Friás et al.

    Health supervision for children with Turner syndrome

    Pediatrics

    (2003)
  • S. Funahashi et al.

    Dorsolateral prefrontal lesions and oculomotor delayed-response performance: evidence for mnemonic “scotomas”

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (1993)
  • B. Gaymard et al.

    A direct prefrontotectal tract against distractibility in the human brain

    Annals of Neurology

    (2003)
  • B. Gaymard et al.

    The frontal eye field is involved in spatial short-term memory but not in reflexive saccade inhibition

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1999)
  • B. Gaymard et al.

    Cortical control of saccades

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1998)
  • B. Gaymard et al.

    Effects of anterior cingulate cortex lesions on ocular saccades in humans

    Experimental Brain Research

    (1998)
  • M.C. Goldberg et al.

    Evidence of normal cerebellar control of the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) in children with high-functioning autism

    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

    (2000)
  • O. Hikosaka et al.

    Role of the basal ganglia in the control of purposive saccadic eye movements

    Physiological Reviews

    (2000)
  • E. Isotolo et al.

    Cognitive control of predictive eye tracking: influence of instructions

    Experimental Brain Research

    (2005)
  • I. Israel et al.

    Cortical control of vestibular-guided saccades in man

    Brain

    (1995)
  • P. Jäkälä et al.

    Fragile-X: neuropsychological test performance, CGG triplet repeat lengths, and hippocampal volumes

    Journal of Clinical Investigation

    (1997)
  • J. Kirk et al.

    Differentiating aspects of executive dysfunction in girls with fragile X or Turner syndrome using the Contingency Naming Test

    Developmental Neuropsychology

    (2005)
  • A.G. Lasker et al.

    Ocular motor behavior of children with neurofibromatosis 1

    Journal of Child Neurology

    (2003)
  • Cited by (31)

    • Characterizing Emergent Anxiety Through the Lens of Fragile X

      2016, International Review of Research in Developmental Disabilities
      Citation Excerpt :

      At a more basic level, FXS is also associated with pervasive attention orienting difficulties that may contribute to anxiety emergence by restricting social experiences of affected individuals. A number of studies have reported atypical attention orienting in individuals with FXS across the lifespan, with longer latencies to disengage attention from visual stimuli reported among infants (Roberts, Hatton, Long, Anello, & Colombo, 2011; Tonnsen et al., under review), school-aged individuals (Lasker, Mazzocco, & Zee, 2007), and young adults (Lasker et al., 2007). Indeed, flexible orienting of attention is a core component of self-regulation and, when impaired, compromises an individual's ability to effectively interact with his or her environment.

    • Genetic Syndromes as Model Pathways to Mathematical Learning Difficulties: Fragile X, Turner, and 22q Deletion Syndromes

      2015, Development of Mathematical Cognition: Neural Substrates and Genetic Influences: Volume 2
    • Exploring inhibitory deficits in female premutation carriers of fragile X syndrome: Through eye movements

      2014, Brain and Cognition
      Citation Excerpt :

      One of the most sensitive behavioural methods for investigating neural (dys)function is assessment of ocular motility. Ocular motor paradigms have been used extensively in a range of neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative conditions to examine not only control of lower level motor control processes, but of higher order cognitive control processes, in particular response inhibition and working memory (Fielding, Georgiou-Karistianis, Millist, & White, 2006; Fielding et al., 2010; Lasker, Mazzocco, & Zee, 2007). The networks and nodes implicated in generating saccadic eye movement are well defined, spanning almost the entire brain: distributed throughout the neocortex (particularly prefrontal areas), subcortical and cerebellar regions (Leigh & Zee, 2006).

    • Exceptional lexical skills but executive language deficits in school starters and young adults with Turners syndrome: Implications for X chromosome effects on brain function

      2012, Brain and Language
      Citation Excerpt :

      The dominant focus in exploration of neuropsychological function in TS has been of non-verbal deficits in space form perception (McGlone, 1985; Money, 1963); directional sense (Alexander, Walker & Money, 1964) drawing (Alexander, Erhardt, & Money, 1966; Temple & Carney, 1995); right–left discrimination (Rovet & Netley, 1981; Shucard et al., 1992); visuo-spatial memory (Bishop et al., 2000; Cornoldi et al., 2001; Pennington et al., 1985; Shucard et al., 1992); locating objects in space (Shucard et al., 1992); memory for matrix positions (Rovet & Netley, 1981, 1982) and visuo-motor integration (McCauley, Kay, Ito, & Treder, 1987; Temple & Carney, 1995), though there is intact performance on measures of tactile spatial skill and on some traditional measures of visuo-perceptual skill (Mazzocco, Bhatia, & Lesniak-Karpiak, 2006; Temple & Carney, 1995). The cognitive phenotype also includes impaired executive functions, though different studies focus upon different tasks (Haberecht et al., 2001; Kirk, Mazzocco, & Kover, 2005; Lasker, Mazzocco, & Zee, 2007; Romans, Roeltgen, Kushner, & Ross, 1997; Tamm et al., 2003; Temple, 2002; Temple, Carney, & Mullarkey, 1996). It has been argued that there is a motor deficit (e.g. Nijhuis-van der Sanden, Eling, & Otten, 2003), though motor response times are intact (Simon et al., 2008).

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported by Grants NS 35356 awarded to Dr. M.B. Denckla and Grant RO1 HD 34061 awarded to Dr. Mazzocco. The authors thank the children who participated in this study and the children’s parents; and acknowledge Research Assistants D. Lanham, J. Teisl, and G.F. Myers.

    View full text