Heterodimerization with vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 (VEGFR-2) is necessary for VEGFR-3 activity

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.08.237Get rights and content

Abstract

VEGFR-3 is essential for vascular development and maintenance of lymphatic vessel’s integrity. Little is known about its cooperative effect with other receptors of the same family. Contrary to VEGFR-2, stimulation of VEGFR-3 by VEGF-C and -D failed to enhance its phosphorylation either in HEK293T or in PAE cells. These ligands were unable to induce angiogenesis of PAEC expressing VEGFR-3 alone. In the presence of VEGFR-2, VEGF-C and -D induced heterodimerization of VEGFR-3 with VEGFR-2. This heterodimerization was associated with enhanced VEGFR-3 phosphorylation and subsequent cellular responses as evidenced by the formation of capillary-like structures in PAE cells and proliferation of primary human endothelial cells expressing both receptors. Taken together, these results show for the first time that VEGFR-3 needs to be associated to VEGFR-2 to induce ligand-dependent cellular responses.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Cells, antisera, and other reagents. Polyclonal antiserum to Flk-1/KDR (VEGFR-2) was from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Heidelberg, Germany). Recombinant human VEGF-A and VEGF-D were obtained from R&D Systems (Lille, France) and VEGF-C was from ReliaTech (Braunschweig, Germany). The horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated monoclonal antibody anti-phosphotyrosine PY20 was from Zymed, San Francisco, CA. Agarose-conjugated monoclonal anti-HA antibody and the HRP-conjugated anti-HA were from Santa Cruz

Angiogenesis of PAEC expressing VEGFR-2 or VEGFR-3

PAEC stably expressing either VEGFR-2 or VEGFR-3 were subjected to VEGF-A, -C or -D in the Matrigel model. Morphology of the cells in Matrigel is illustrated in Fig. 1A and the quantification of the total tubules length is shown in Fig. 1B. The results indicate that in PAEC expressing VEGFR-2, VEGF-A induced a potent angiogenic response, whereas VEGF-C had a less pronounced effect and VEGF-D was totally inactive. In VEGFR-3-expressing PAEC, none of the three ligands were able to induce tubule

Discussion

In this paper, we have demonstrated for the first time that VEGF-C and VEGF-D are unable to enhance the basal level of VEGFR-3 phosphorylation unless it is co-expressed with VEGFR-2. Our results indicate that the VEGFR-3 kinase function is not defective per se but that the receptor alone did not seem to be able to couple to one or several cellular signal transduction molecules. Using “wild-type” VEGFR-3 constructs, phosphorylation of the receptor was undetectable unless the cells were

References (30)

  • T. Matsumoto et al.

    VEGF receptor signal transduction

    Sci. STKE

    (2001)
  • A. Kaipainen et al.

    Expression of the fms-like tyrosine kinase 4 gene becomes restricted to lymphatic endothelium during development

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA

    (1995)
  • E. Kukk et al.

    VEGF-C receptor binding and pattern of expression with VEGFR-3 suggests a role in lymphatic vascular development

    Development

    (1996)
  • K. Pajusola et al.

    Signalling properties of FLT4, a proteolytically processed receptor tyrosine kinase related to two VEGF receptors

    Oncogene

    (1994)
  • M.B. Marron et al.

    Evidence for heterotypic interaction between the receptor tyrosine kinases TIE-1 and TIE-2

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (53)

    • Presence of trophoblast in the uterine lumen affects VEGF-C expression in porcine endometrium

      2019, Theriogenology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Authors indicated the positive correlation between localization of three receptors, Flt1, Flk1 and Flt4 which could act as the confirmation of the presence and importance of Flk1/Flt4 dimers in blood vessels remodeling. Alam et al. (2004) suggested that heterodimerization of Flt4 with Flk1 is needed for appropriate cellular response to VEGF-C [41]. Presence of both receptors in endometrial epithelial cells suggest the role of VEGF-C in proliferation and/or differentiation of these cells.

    • Cancer stem cells, lymphangiogenesis, and lymphatic metastasis

      2015, Cancer Letters
      Citation Excerpt :

      In VEGF-A transgenic mice, blocking antibodies against VEGFR-1 and VEGFR-2 potently inhibited lymphatic vessel enlargement. In addition, VEGF-A enhanced the heterodimerization of VEGFR-3 with VEGFR-2 and the phosphorylation of VEGFR-3, therefore providing proliferative stimuli to LECs [60]. Other factors identified as inducers of lymphangiogenesis include hepatocyte growth factor (HGF), angiopoietins 1 and 2 (Ang-1, -2), fibroblast growth factor-2 (FGF-2), insulin-like growth factors 1 and 2 (IGF-1, -2), platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGFBB), and endothelin-1 (ET-1).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text