11
Risk assessment in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Conditioning

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beha.2006.09.004Get rights and content

After the introduction of cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation in the 1970s, a variety of conditioning regimens has been developed. However, none has proven to be superior. Fractionation of the irradiation results in less toxic side-effects, but the total dose has to be increased to obtain similar immunosuppressive effects. Data from randomized trials indicate that among patients with myeloid leukaemia, busulfan in combination with cyclophosphamide results in similar outcome, while a regimen containing total body irradiation is probably still the best for patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Busulfan treatment can be optimized by targeted steady-state concentration or with the use of intravenous preparations. Intensified regimens decrease the relapse incidence, but because of a higher mortality from transplant-related causes survival is unchanged. Reduced-intensity conditioning can reduce transplant-related mortality and offer otherwise ineligible patients a potentially curative treatment. Long-term results are unknown.

Section snippets

Total body irradiation

Because of its immunosuppressive properties, activity against a wide range of malignant disorders, even in chemoresistant diseases, and penetration of sanctuary sites such as the central nervous system and testicles, total body irradiation (TBI) has been an important part of the conditioning for malignant disorders for the last 35 years.4 However, there are concerns about late adverse effects such as secondary malignancies. Both radiation from dual opposing 60Co sources and linear accelerators

Cyclophosphamide

The alkylating agent cyclophosphamide (CY) is strongly immunosuppressive and also an effective anti-neoplastic agent, but is not marrow-ablative. Dose-limiting toxicity is haemorrhagic myocarditis. When used as a single agent, the maximum tolerated dose is approximately 200 mg/kg, and infusion of HSCs has no impact on survival.13 Following animal studies it was shown that CY can be substituted for TBI in the conditioning.14

CY 50 mg/kg/day for 4 successive days is one of the most common

Chemotherapy-based high-dose regimens

A wide range of high-dose chemotherapy regimens has been developed. Different mechanisms have driven this research. To decrease the incidence of relapse, disease-specific chemotherapy regimens were developed. In small children, attempts have been made to avoid detrimental effects from irradiation on growth and central nervous system development.27 Furthermore, chemotherapy regimens may avoid or diminish late complications from irradiation such as second malignancies, cataract, and sterility.28,

Radioimmunotherapy

Replacing, or augmenting, the external-beam TBI with more selective irradiation of the bone marrow might reduce the risk of relapse while causing only limited toxicity to non-target organs. A variety of antibodies (anti-CD20, anti-CD33, anti-CD45, and anti-CD66) have been labelled with different β-emitters (131I, 90Y and 188Re).52 Dose-escalation and distribution studies have been performed, and clinical trials with radioimmunotherapy in combination with both conventional myeloablative

Reduced intensity conditioning

The curative effect of allo-HSCT is partly mediated by the graft-versus-tumour (GVT) effect from immunocompetent cells originating from the graft. Evidence of this GVT effect was first seen in animal studies and later in clinical trials.54, *55 Patients with graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) have a reduced incidence of relapse, whereas recipients of syngeneic, or T-cell-depleted grafts, have a higher risk of relapse.56 The ultimate proof of the potent GVT effect is the reinduction of remission

Individualization

A common trend in recent years is the individualization of the transplant procedure. With a variety of conditioning regimens, stem-cell sources and methods of GVHD prevention, the complexity has increased substantially. Conditioning regimen depends on both the disease and the age and co-morbidity of the patient. Patients with high risks for TRM and a low risk for relapse should probably receive a different conditioning regimen from patients with low risk for TRM and a high relapse risk. Some

Summary

The conditioning given before allo-HSCT has evolved from a standard maximized radiochemotherapy into an individualized treatment. Depending on disease, age, co-morbidity, previous treatment, stem-cell source and type of donor, the composition of the conditioning may vary considerably. However, the number of prospective randomized trials comparing different conditioning regimens is low. A conventional myeloablative preparative regimen is still the gold standard for eligible patients. BUCY

References (79)

  • D. Blaise et al.

    Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia in first remission: a randomized trial of a busulfan-cytoxan versus cytoxan-total body irradiation as preparative regimen: a report from the Groupe d'Etudes de la Greffe de Moelle Osseuse

    Blood

    (1992)
  • A. Devergie et al.

    Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia in first chronic phase: a randomized trial of busulfan-cytoxan versus cytoxan body irradiation as preparative regimen: a report from the French Society of Bone Marrow Graft (SFGM)

    Blood

    (1995)
  • R.A. Clift et al.

    Marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: a randomized study comparing cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation with busulfan and cyclophosphamide

    Blood

    (1994)
  • O. Ringdén et al.

    A randomized trial comparing busulfan with total body irradiation as conditioning in allogeneic marrow transplant recipients with leukemia: a report from the Nordic Bone Marrow Transplantation Group

    Blood

    (1994)
  • G. Socie et al.

    Busulfan plus cyclophosphamide compared with total-body irradiation plus cyclophosphamide before marrow transplantation for myeloid leukemia: long-term follow-up of 4 randomized studies

    Blood

    (2001)
  • K.G. Blume et al.

    A prospective randomized comparison of total body irradiation-etoposide versus busulfan-cyclophosphamide as preparatory regimens for bone marrow transplantation in patients with leukemia who were not in first remission: a Southwest Oncology Group study

    Blood

    (1993)
  • J.T. Slattery et al.

    Marrow transplantation for chronic myeloid leukemia: the influence of plasma busulfan levels on the outcome of transplantation

    Blood

    (1997)
  • L.B. Grochow et al.

    Busulfan disposition in children

    Blood

    (1990)
  • B.S. Andersson et al.

    Acute safety and pharmacokinetics of intravenous busulfan when used with oral busulfan and cyclophosphamide as pretransplantation conditioning therapy: a phase I study

    Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation

    (2000)
  • A. Kashyap et al.

    Intravenous versus oral busulfan as part of a busulfan/cyclophosphamide preparative regimen for allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: decreased incidence of hepatic venoocclusive disease (HVOD), HVOD-related mortality, and overall 100-day mortality

    Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation

    (2002)
  • J.G. Jurcic et al.

    Targeted alpha particle immunotherapy for myeloid leukemia

    Blood

    (2002)
  • M.M. Horowitz et al.

    Graft-versus-leukemia reactions after bone marrow transplantation

    Blood

    (1990)
  • R. Storb et al.

    Stable mixed hematopoietic chimerism in DLA-identical littermate dogs given sublethal total body irradiation before and pharmacological immunosuppression after marrow transplantation

    Blood

    (1997)
  • P.A. McSweeney et al.

    Hematopoietic cell transplantation in older patients with hematologic malignancies: replacing high-dose cytotoxic therapy with graft-versus-tumor effects

    Blood

    (2001)
  • E. Holler et al.

    Increased serum levels of tumor necrosis factor a precede major complications of bone marrow transplantation

    Blood

    (1990)
  • P.D. Kottaridis et al.

    In vivo CAMPATH-1H prevents graft-versus-host disease following nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation

    Blood

    (2000)
  • F. Baron et al.

    Kinetics of engraftment in patients with hematologic malignancies given allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative conditioning

    Blood

    (2004)
  • D. Niederwieser et al.

    Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) following reduced-intensity conditioning in patients with acute leukemias

    Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology

    (2005)
  • A.Y. Ho et al.

    Reduced-intensity allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia with multilineage dysplasia using fludarabine, busulphan, and alemtuzumab (FBC) conditioning

    Blood

    (2004)
  • L. Barkholt et al.

    Allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for metastatic renal carcinoma in Europe

    Annals of Oncology

    (2006)
  • M.L. Sorror et al.

    Comparing morbidity and mortality of HLA-matched unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation after nonmyeloablative and myeloablative conditioning: influence of pretransplantation comorbidities

    Blood

    (2004)
  • R. Diaconescu et al.

    Morbidity and mortality with nonmyeloablative compared with myeloablative conditioning before hematopoietic cell transplantation from HLA-matched related donors

    Blood

    (2004)
  • E.P. Alyea et al.

    Comparative outcome of nonmyeloablative and myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for patients older than 50 years of age

    Blood

    (2005)
  • F.B. Petersen et al.

    Marrow transplantation following escalating doses of fractionated total body irradiation and cyclophosphamide–a phase I trial

    International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics

    (1992)
  • S. Slavin et al.

    Nonmyeloablative stem cell transplantation and cell therapy as an alternative to conventional bone marrow transplantation with lethal cytoreduction for the treatment of malignant and nonmalignant hematologic diseases

    Blood

    (1998)
  • L.O. Jacobson et al.

    Effect of spleen protection on mortality following x-irradiation

    The Journal of Laboratory and Clinical Medicine

    (1949)
  • J.M. Main et al.

    Successful skin homografts after the administration of high dosage X radiation and homologous bone marrow

    Journal of the National Cancer Institute

    (1955)
  • E.D. Thomas et al.

    Supralethal whole body irradiation and isologous marrow transplantation in man

    The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    (1959)
  • E.D. Thomas et al.

    Bone-marrow transplantation. Parts I and II

    The New England Journal of Medicine

    (1975)
  • Cited by (34)

    • The mythological chimera and new era of relapse prediction post-transplant

      2023, Blood Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Multiple factors are associated with relapse post allo-HCT. While the shift from myeloablative conditioning (MAC) to reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens has reduced transplant related mortality and expanded transplant as an option for adult patients >60 years or with comorbidities, it is, in general, also associated with a greater risk of relapse [27–30]. Several studies have shown that chronic GVHD is associated with a lower risk of relapse in leukemia [31,32].

    • Viral infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy Stem Cell Engineering Committee review on the role of cellular therapy in prevention and treatment

      2022, Cytotherapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is a potentially curative therapy for many patients with malignant and non-malignant blood disorders. [1] However, the morbidity and mortality related to disease relapse, regimen-related toxicity, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and opportunistic infections limit the success of HSCT in these applications.[2–4] Central to the paradigm of HSCT is the immunosuppression required to allow engraftment of donor cells within the host, and to prevent GVHD due to the alloreactive donor cells attacking the host tissues.

    • Comparison of outcomes of idarubicin intensified TBI-CY and traditional TBI-CY conditioning regimen for high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: A single center experience

      2015, Leukemia Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Etoposide (VP-16), thiotepa and Ara-C have been proposed with CY plus TBI in intensified regimens [8–11]. However until now, the satisfying conditioning regimens for high-risk ALL patients are still controversial [1,12–13]. Idarubicin (IDA, 4-demethoxydaunorubicin) has shown more excellent anti-leukemia effect for acute myelocytic leukemia (AML) and ALL patients than conventional anthracyclines [14].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text