2
Determinants of skeletal fragility

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2005.07.004Get rights and content

Strategies to reduce fracture risk must be based on a sound understanding of the mechanisms that underline the increased incidence of fractures with age and with certain diseases. There is evidence that in addition to bone minerals density, other factors influence bone strength. The chapter reviews the biomechanical aspects of age-related fractures, including the interacting roles of traumatic loading and bone strength, and the factors that determine a bones resistances to fracture. Also discussed are the mechanisms by which anti-catabolic and anabolic therapies for osteoporosis may affect bone strength. Finally, several current and future methodologies for improving assessment of bone strength in patients are evaluated.

Section snippets

Biomechanics of age-related fractures

From a mechanical perspective, fractures represent a structural failure of the bone, whereby the forces applied to the bone exceed its load-bearing capacity (Figure 1). The forces applied to the bone will depend on the specific activity, and will vary with the rate and direction of the applied loads. For example, the loads applied to the proximal femur during a fall will depend on the height of the fall, the direction of the fall (forwards, backwards, sideways), the impact surface, the extent

Determinants of whole bone strength

The ability of a bone to resist fracture (or ‘whole bone strength’) depends on the amount of bone (i.e. mass), the spatial distribution of the bone mass (i.e. shape and microarchitecture), and the intrinsic properties of the materials that comprise the bone (Figure 3). Bone remodeling—specifically the balance between formation and resorption—is the biologic process that mediates changes in the traits that influence bone strength. Thus, diseases and drugs that impact bone remodeling will

Material versus structural properties of bone

In any discussion of bone strength, it is important to distinguish between the material and structural properties of bone. During any activity, a complex distribution of forces (or loads) is applied to the skeleton. With the imposition of these forces, bones undergo deformations. This relationship between the forces applied to the bone and the resulting deformations characterizes the structural behavior, or structural properties, of the whole bone. Thus, structural properties are influenced by

Role of bone geometry

With regard to whole bone biomechanical behavior, the overall size of the bone (i.e. mass) as well as its shape (i.e. distribution of mass) play important roles. Consistently, laboratory testing of the strength of human cadaveric vertebrae, distal radii and proximal femora has shown, not surprisingly, that larger bones are stronger than smaller bones.5, 28, 29, 30, 31 Moreover, clinical observations support the importance of bone size. For example, a decreased cross-sectional area of the radius

Trabecular microarchitecture

Although bone density is among the strongest predictors of the mechanical behavior of trabecular bone, both empirical observations and theoretical analyses show that aspects of the trabecular microarchitecture influence trabecular bone strength as well.14, 15, 44 Trabecular architecture can be described by the shape of the basic structural elements and their orientation. The trabecular structure is generally characterized by the number of trabeculae in a given volume, their average thickness,

Role of bone matrix properties

In addition to macro- and microarchitecture, features of the bone matrix itself influence bone mechanical properties. Thus, characteristics that affect bone mechanical properties include the composition of the matrix, include (but are not limited to) the relative ratio of inorganic (i.e. mineral) to organic (i.e. water, collagen and non-collagenous proteins); the degree of matrix mineralization; mineral crystal size and maturation; the extent and nature of collagen cross-links; and the amount

Summary

In summary, this chapter reviews several concepts related to the biomechanical aspects of skeletal fragility. First, fractures occur when the loads applied to bone exceed its strength. Therefore, strategies to reduce fractures should consider interventions aimed at reducing the loads applied to bone as well as to maintaining or increasing bone strength. Second, whole bone strength is determined by the amount of bone (i.e. size or mass), the spatial distribution of the bone mass (i.e. shape or

References (91)

  • M.L. Bouxsein et al.

    Prediction of the strength of the elderly proximal femur by bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements of the heel and tibia

    Bone

    (1999)
  • E.M. Lochmuller et al.

    Mechanical strength of the thoracolumbar spine in the elderly: prediction from in situ dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, quantitative computed tomography (QCT), upper and lower limb peripheral QCT, and quantitative ultrasound

    Bone

    (2002)
  • E. Seeman

    Pathogenesis of bone fragility in women and men

    Lancet

    (2002)
  • L. Gibson

    The mechanical behaviour of cancellous bone

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1985)
  • S. Majumdar et al.

    High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: three-dimensional trabecular bone architecture and biomechanical properties

    Bone

    (1998)
  • R. Goulet et al.

    The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1994)
  • D. Ulrich et al.

    The ability of three-dimensional structural indices to reflect mechanical aspects of trabecular bone

    Bone

    (1999)
  • M.J. Silva et al.

    Modeling the mechanical behavior of vertebral trabecular bone: effects of age-related changes in microstructure

    Bone

    (1997)
  • O.C. Yeh et al.

    Biomechanical effects of intraspecimen variations in trabecular architecture: a three-dimensional finite element study

    Bone

    (1999)
  • J.E. Aaron et al.

    Trabecular architecture in women and men of similar bone mass with and without vertebral fracture: II. three-dimensional histology [In Process Citation]

    Bone

    (2000)
  • B. Borah et al.

    Risedronate preserves bone architecture in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis as measured by three-dimensional microcomputed tomography

    Bone

    (2004)
  • J. Currey

    The mechanical consequences of variation in the mineral content of bone

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1969)
  • P.J. Meunier et al.

    Bone mineral density reflects bone mass but also the degree of mineralization of bone: therapeutic implications

    Bone

    (1997)
  • G.Y. Boivin et al.

    Alendronate increases bone strength by increasing the mean degree of mineralization of bone tissue in osteoporotic women

    Bone

    (2000)
  • P. Roschger et al.

    Alendronate increases degree and uniformity of mineralization in cancellous bone and decreases the porosity in cortical bone of osteoporotic women

    Bone

    (2001)
  • P.D. Delmas

    How does antiresorptive therapy decrease the risk of fracture in women with osteoporosis?

    Bone

    (2000)
  • A.M. Parfitt

    Targeted and nontargeted bone remodeling: relationship to basic multicellular unit origination and progression

    Bone

    (2002)
  • D.B. Burr

    Targeted and nontargeted remodeling

    Bone

    (2002)
  • X. Cheng et al.

    Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry

    Bone

    (1997)
  • P. Nicholson et al.

    Assessment of the strength of the proximal femur in vitro: relationship with ultrasonic measurements of the calcaneus

    Bone

    (1997)
  • E.M. Lochmuller et al.

    Prediction of vertebral failure loads from spinal and femoral dual- energy X-ray absorptiometry, and calcaneal ultrasound: an in situ analysis with intact soft tissues

    Bone

    (1998)
  • US Department of Health ad Human Services. Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the surgeon general. US Department...
  • Anonymous

    Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy

    The Journal of the American Medical Association

    (2001)
  • M. Bouxsein

    Biomechanics of age-related fractures

  • J. Lotz et al.

    Stress distributions within the proximal femur during gait and falls: implications for osteoporotic fracture

    Osteoporosis International

    (1995)
  • J.H. Keyak et al.

    Prediction of femoral fracture load using automated finite element modeling

    Journal of Biomechanics

    (1998)
  • M.C. Nevitt et al.

    Type of fall and risk of hip and wrist fractures: the study of osteoporotic fractures

    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society

    (1993)
  • S.L. Greenspan et al.

    Fall severity and bone mineral density as risk factors for hip fracture in ambulatory elderly

    The Journal of the American Medical Association

    (1994)
  • H.H. Jones et al.

    Humeral hypertrophy in response to exercise

    The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

    (1977)
  • J. Bonadio et al.

    A murine skeletal adaptation that significantly increases cortical bone mechanical properties

    The Journal of Clinical Investigation

    (1993)
  • M.L. Bouxsein

    Bone quality: where do we go from here?

    Osteoporosis International

    (2003)
  • D.R. Carter et al.

    Bone compressive strength: the influence of density and strain rate

    Science

    (1976)
  • D.R. Carter et al.

    The compressive behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure

    The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

    (1977)
  • T.M. Keaveny et al.

    Biomechanics of trabecular bone

    Annual Reviews in Biomedical Engineering

    (2001)
  • J. Currey

    Effects of porosity and mineral content on the Young's modulus of bone

    European Society of Biomechanics

    (1986)
  • Cited by (145)

    • A computational insight on damage-based constitutive modelling in femur mechanics

      2022, European Journal of Mechanics, A/Solids
      Citation Excerpt :

      Nevertheless, actual clinical standards suffer from a lack of specificity, resulting uneffective in a number of cases actually characterized by a high risk of fracture (Damron et al., 2016; Mac Niocaill et al., 2011; Seeman and Delmas, 2006; Stone et al., 2003; Damron et al., 2003). This limitation is essentially due to the fact that actual clinical assessment strategies disregard a number of subject-specific mechanical determinants, strictly related to specific loading characteristics, bone morphology, and dominant biomechanical features at both macro- and microscale (Bouxsein, 2005). Personalized finite-element (FE) modelling approaches, based on diagnostic imaging techniques, have been widely employed to investigate the mechanical behaviour of femurs, proving to be effective for tracing some quantitative and reliable estimates of femur fracture risk (Eggermont et al., 2020; Damron et al., 2016; Yosibash et al., 2014; Keyak et al., 2005).

    • Composition and characteristics of trabecular bone in osteoporosis and osteoarthritis

      2020, Bone
      Citation Excerpt :

      Pathologies known to enlarge the HA crystal size in animal studies (i.e., ovariectomized mice, rachitic rats, and osteopontin-null mice) have been found to increase bone fragility, ductility, and brittleness [30]. Nevertheless, conditions which decrease the crystal size (i.e., Osteogenesis imperfecta mice, hypophosphatemic mice, osteopetrotic rats) have also been found to have a detrimental effect on the mechanical properties of bone causing brittleness and reduced ductility [30–32]. This relation between mechanical properties and the grain size of poly crystalline materials is well explained by the Hall-Petch model that stipulates that above a critical crystal size an inverse correlation exists between material toughness and crystal size while this relation is reversed when the crystal size falls beneath the optimal critical size.

    • Increasing fluoride content deteriorates rat bone mechanical properties

      2020, Bone
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, we aimed to investigate how increased fluoride content affects bone mechanical properties. Among the factors that can affect whole bone mechanical behavior are bone density, geometry, microarchitecture, and inherent tissue mechanical properties [28]. Although the influences of bone geometry and microarchitecture on whole bone strength and fracture risk are well documented, the contribution of bone tissue material properties is less well understood [29,30].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text