Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery
The use of contralateral free extended latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap for a tertiary failed breast reconstruction: Is it still an option?
Introduction
Currently, management of severe complications of breast reconstruction is a complex challenge for the plastic surgeon.1, 2 Although these events are infrequent and there have been few reports concerning their surgical management, this group of patients is not negligible.1, 2, 3, 4 In addition, many patients presenting for secondary or tertiary reconstruction are not suitable candidates for conventional flaps because of either previous donor-site surgery or lack of sufficient tissue.3, 4
Delayed management of a previous unsuccessful reconstruction is debatable.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 In addition, salvage breast surgery with free flaps can carry slightly higher risks than primary and secondary flap reconstructions. The breast region usually requires tissue replacement as a result of the deleterious effects of radiotherapy and previous scar tissue. Among the technical alternatives, the latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap (LDMF) has been an option, but indication of this procedure for previously unsuccessful LDMF reconstruction is limited, because contralateral free flap transfer is required and the quality of recipient vessels can be unpredictable.8, 9, 10
Although immediate breast reconstruction is a well-described procedure and there are previous series evaluating the results of LDMF,11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 there are few reports of the outcomes following contralateral free LDMF breast reconstruction (CL–LDMF).8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 Moreover, less information is available concerning surgical planning for “reoperating” on failed breast reconstruction.1, 2, 3 Thus, this article describes the free CL–LDMF surgical approach and reports our experience with secondary or tertiary reconstruction, while focusing attention on preoperative and intraoperative planning, advantages, and the outcome of this technique.
Section snippets
Patients and methods
All patients undergoing immediate reconstruction between January 1999 and December 2013 were reviewed. All patients undergoing secondary and tertiary breast reconstruction after failure of pedicled LDMF breast reconstruction and submitted to free CL–LDMF reconstruction during this period were selected. Oncological information on tumor size and location, axillary lymph node surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy, and chemotherapy and postoperative course were obtained. Patient characteristics included
Results
Of 1510 patients who underwent immediate breast reconstruction, 12 patients required a secondary or tertiary free CL–LDMF reconstruction. None of the patients presented an adequate abdominal donor area. Initial tumors were invasive breast carcinomas in eight patients, and eight patients underwent total axillary lymph node dissection. Eight patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy following the first oncological surgery. The dimension of the chest wall defect ranged from 24
Discussion
The LDMF has been an option for partial11, 12, 13, 14 and total breast reconstruction.15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 However, recommendations for its use in previous unsuccessful LDMF reconstruction are limited.8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 This retrospective observational study included 12 patients with previous total failed breast reconstructions. In this sample, there was no set algorithm applied to determine who underwent secondary and tertiary reconstructions and the method employed.
The most common
Conclusion
The results of this study demonstrate that the free CL–LDMF is a reliable technique and should be considered in cases of tertiary reconstructions. We believe that in selected patients, especially those without the available donor-site areas, free CL–LDMF has advantages and should be another tactic in the tool kit of plastic surgeons dealing with failed breast reconstruction.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors did not have any financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that could inappropriately influence (bias) their work.
References (20)
- et al.
Trends in tertiary breast reconstruction: literature review and single centre experience
Breast
(2013) - et al.
Post-mastectomy breast reconstruction in an irradiated field using a contralateral latissimus dorsi free flap
Br J Plast Surg
(1982) - et al.
Microneurovascular transfer of contralateral latissimus dorsi in Poland's syndrome
Br J Plast Surg
(1999) Breast-sparing reconstruction with latissimus dorsi miniflaps
Eur J Surg Oncol
(2002)- et al.
Immediate chest wall reconstruction during pregnancy: surgical management after extended surgical resection due to primary sarcoma of the breast
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg
(2014) - et al.
Is a second free flap still an option in a failed free flap breast reconstruction?
Plast Reconstr Surg
(2010) - et al.
Secondary breast reconstruction
- et al.
Surgical results, aesthetic outcome, and patient satisfaction after microsurgical autologous breast reconstruction following failed implant reconstruction
Plast Reconstr Surg
(2010) - et al.
Unilateral failures in bilateral microvascular breast reconstruction
Plast Reconstr Surg
(2010) - et al.
Long-term outcomes of failed prosthetic breast reconstruction
Ann Plast Surg
(2013 Sep)