Task Group/Practice ParameterAmerican Brachytherapy Society: Brachytherapy treatment recommendations for locally advanced cervix cancer for low-income and middle-income countries
Introduction
Cervical cancer is a large and growing problem in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). Cervical cancer is the fourth most common cancer diagnosed in women worldwide with nearly 530,000 cases diagnosed in 2012 (1). Of these, nearly 85% occurred in LMIC. The burden is disproportionately large in LMIC in part due to limited screening, lack of the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination, and co-infection with viruses predisposing to HPV infection, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In addition to the high burden of disease, a disproportionate number of cervical cancer deaths—nearly 90%—occur in LMIC (1). Due to lack of screening and public health awareness of cancer symptomatology, many women present with advanced stage disease (2). Timely access to appropriate cancer care may also be limited in many LMICs (3).
Cervical cancer treatment is stage dependent and often includes surgical resection, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or a combination of these treatments (4). Cervical cancer is curable, even with locally advanced disease, and therefore the importance of stage-appropriate treatment cannot be underestimated. For locally advanced disease, concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by brachytherapy has been the standard of care in the United States since the late 1990s when several clinical trials showing an improvement in survival with the addition of chemotherapy were published [5], [6], [7], [8].
Brachytherapy is an essential part of cervical cancer treatment, as it allows the cervical tumor to be treated with very high-dose radiotherapy, while providing protection to the bladder, rectum, and sigmoid colon. Many studies have demonstrated improvements in local control and survival when incorporating brachytherapy as part of cervical cancer treatment paradigm [9], [10], [11], [12]. However, brachytherapy administration requires investment in equipment, as well as skills and expertise on the part of the radiation oncologist, physicist, and treatment team. Poor-quality brachytherapy implants have been shown to result in higher local recurrence (13). In the United States, most patients with intact cervical cancer receive brachytherapy as part of their cancer management plan (14). In countries that lack external beam facilities, brachytherapy alone may be the only curative option available. Brachytherapy advances in recent years have focused on using advanced imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to improve tumor localization and enhance treatment planning. However, high-quality brachytherapy can be delivered even in the absence of advanced imaging modalities (15).
The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) has previously published articles on proper brachytherapy administration for locally advanced cervical cancer [16], [17]. However, these guidelines are not intended for use in LMIC with limited radiotherapy resources. Given the high burden of cervical cancer in these countries, as well as the disproportionately poor outcomes from cervix cancer (18), there is an urgent need to improve treatment availability and delivery. The International Atomic Energy Agency has issued a primer for radiation oncologists on management of cervical cancer in resource-limited settings (19). In addition, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network and the American Society for Clinical Oncology have issued guidance of management of cervix cancer in resource-limited settings [20], [21], however, these do not address brachytherapy specifically. The ABS aims to provide recommendations for brachytherapy administration for cervical cancer in resource-limited settings.
Section snippets
Methods
The 2012 ABS recommendations were reviewed by clinicians with expertise in radiotherapy and brachytherapy administration in LMIC. A survey was developed to identify practice patterns at the authors' institutions and was also extended to participants of the Cervix Cancer Research Network meeting held in Bangkok, Thailand in January, 2016. Of the 40 participants invited to respond to the survey, 32 responded (response rate 80%). The survey represents 14 different countries including both
Staging
The ABS recommends appropriate staging, defined as documentation of disease extent and volume. In addition to clinical examination, imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), MRI, and positron emission tomography (PET)/CT can be useful to understand the full extent of local and distant disease. However, in many resource-constrained settings, advanced imaging modalities are not available. Many centers use ultrasound for staging when cross-sectional imaging is not available. Clinical
Conclusion
The use of brachytherapy is an integral component of treatment for locally advanced, intact cervical cancer, the burden of which is disproportionately large in LMIC. The ABS has made recommendations for guidelines modification that are appropriate for use in resource-limited settings. Importantly, no one set of guidelines can uniformly fit all LMIC. There is likely to be substantial variation between high-income countries and LMIC—as well as variation between LMIC—in health beliefs, access to
References (43)
Overview of cervical cancer in the developing world. Figo 26TH annual report on the results of treatment in Gynecological Cancer
Int J Gynaecol Obstetrics
(2006)- et al.
Pretreatment and treatment factors associated with improved outcome in squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a final report of the 1973 and 1978 patterns of care studies
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1991) - et al.
Patterns and sites of failure in cervix cancer treated in the U.S.A. in 1978
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1991) - et al.
Trends in the quality of treatment for patients with intact cervical cancer in the United States, 1999 through 2011
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2015) - et al.
American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part II: high-dose-rate brachytherapy
Brachytherapy
(2012) - et al.
American Brachytherapy Society consensus guidelines for locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix. Part I: general principles
Brachytherapy
(2012) - et al.
Concurrent mitomycin C, 5-fluorouracil, and radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced carcinoma of the cervix: a randomized trial
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2003) - et al.
Overall treatment time in advanced cervical carcinomas: a critical parameter in treatment outcome
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1993) - et al.
Carcinoma of the uterine cervix. I. Impact of prolongation of overall treatment time and timing of brachytherapy on outcome of radiation therapy
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1995) - et al.
The adverse effect of treatment prolongation in cervical carcinoma
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(1995)