Elsevier

Brain Research Reviews

Volume 53, Issue 1, January 2007, Pages 17-26
Brain Research Reviews

Review
Patterning the developing diencephalon

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresrev.2006.06.004Get rights and content

Abstract

The diencephalon is the embryonic precursor to the caudal forebrain. The major diencephalic derivative is the thalamus, which functions as a relay station between the cortex and lower nervous system structures. Although the diencephalon has been recognized as a vital brain region, our understanding of its development remains superficial. In this review, we discuss recent progresses in understanding one essential aspect of diencephalic development, diencephalic patterning. Signaling centers identified in the zona limitans intrathalamica and along the dorsal and ventral midlines have emerged as essential organizers in diencephalic patterning. The cumulative data reveal that the diencephalon shares some developmental principles with more caudal brain regions, whereas other mechanisms are unique to this region.

Introduction

In vertebrates, the anterior neural epithelium undergoes morphological subdivisions to generate vesicle-like structures known as the prosencephalon (forebrain), mesencephalon (midbrain), and rhombencephalon (hindbrain). The prosencephalon becomes further divided into the telencephalon and diencephalon. The telencephalon gives rise to the cerebral cortex, basal ganglia, and hippocampus, whereas the diencephalon develops into the thalamus, epithalamus, and pretectum in the mature brain (the status of the hypothalamus as a part of the diencephalon structure remains controversial). Thus, the telencephalon and diencephalon are the embryonic anlagen of higher cognition and integration centers in the brain. Although these two regions of the forebrain are functionally linked, their structural organization is distinct. For example, in mammals, the thalamus (the major diencephalic derivative) consists of clusters of neurons organized into nuclei, which are morphological and functional units, whereas the cerebral cortex (telencephalic derivative) is a laminar sheet of neurons where each layer serves specific function. Therefore, one can presume that distinct developmental strategies must be utilized by these two brain regions. Although many studies have focused on molecular regulation of telencephalic development (for reviews, see Campbell, 2003, Grove and Fukuchi-Shimogori, 2003, Rallu et al., 2002, Rubenstein et al., 1998, Schuurmans and Guillemot, 2002), relatively few studies have addressed development of the diencephalon.

The key feature of diencephalic development is the formation of nuclei along the anterior–posterior (AP) and dorsal–ventral (DV) axes. In the diencephalon, neural progenitor cells undergo proliferation in the ventricular zone of the third ventricle. Once they exit the cell cycle, post mitotic cells migrate to the mantle zone and they aggregate into various clusters called nuclei. Differentiated neurons in each nucleus have distinct morphologies, employ specific neural transmitters, and generate neural connection to different regions of the brain (Jones et al., 1997). In order to build accurate neural circuits, it is essential to form each nucleus in the correct location and at the appropriate time in development. Based on birthdating studies in mammals, it has been hypothesized that the progenitor cells in the ventricular zone (the germinal epithelium) are organized as mosaic patches, each giving rise to neurons in specific nuclei of the diencephalon (Altman and Bayer, 1988). As a result, it was assumed that the initial requirement for the accurate allocation of each nucleus is the precise establishment of AP and DV identities in the neural progenitor cells. Studies from the spinal cord suggest that the progenitor cells acquire their regional identities through transcription factor expression codes, which are regulated by secreted signaling molecules such as Shh (Jessell, 2000). Although it has not been studied as thoroughly, a similar mechanism has been suggested in the diencephalon (Hashimoto-Torii et al., 2003).

The diencephalic derivatives, and the thalamic nuclei in particular, have intricate connections with functional areas in the cortex (Jones et al., 1997). For instance, sensory relay nuclei in the thalamus – including ventrobasal, lateral geniculate, and medial geniculate nuclei – send projections specifically to somatosensory, visual, and auditory cortices, respectively (Fig. 1) (Jones et al., 1997, Lopez-Bendito and Molnar, 2003). Furthermore, the thalamocortical projections play essential roles in shaping cortical area development (Kaas et al., 1999, Pallas, 2001). Although clearly important, the timing of this influence is controversial; thalamocortical projections do not appear to influence the initial cortical area specification but are necessary for proper differentiation of cortical areas (Cohen-Tannoudji et al., 1994, Kaas et al., 1999, Miyashita-Lin et al., 1999, Nakagawa et al., 1999, Nothias et al., 1998, Pallas, 2001). Therefore, considering its intimate relationship with the cortex as well as its function as an independent brain structure, understanding diencephalic development provides many insights into brain development.

In this review, we attempt to integrate the current data addressing the molecular mechanisms underlying diencephalic development to the existing studies on AP and DV patterning of the diencephalon. For AP patterning, several studies debating whether or not the diencephalon is a segmented structure will be discussed along with the formation and function of a diencephalic signaling center, the ZLI (zona limitans intrathalamica). Also, molecular patterning at the anterior and posterior boundaries of the diencephalon will be covered. For DV patterning, we will focus on the two signaling centers, the floor plate and roof plate, and the signaling molecules that they produce.

Section snippets

AP patterning of the diencephalon

One of the fundamental questions in neural development is how the neuroepithelia along the AP neuraxis is parceled into the prosencephalon, mesencephalon, rhombencephalon, and spinal cord. This question has become inseparable from a second question, how is neural fate first specified during early development (Bainter et al., 2001, Stern, 2001, Stern, 2002, Wilson and Edlund, 2001)? One hypothesis with considerable support is that the neural induction is tightly coupled with axial patterning

DV development of the diencephalon

Understanding DV patterning in the diencephalon is more difficult than in more caudal regions as a result of the neural tube curvature in this region. The cephalic neural tube undergoes several flexures, which results in complicated topological relationship between anatomic structures relative to the AP and DV axes of the neural tube, thus generating confusing positional terminology. For example, ventral and dorsal thalami (conventional nomenclature) do not actually indicate DV domains but

Conclusions and perspectives

The embryonic diencephalon employs a well-organized strategy during development that resembles that of more caudal neural tube derivatives: subdividing its homogenous field into discrete domains along AP and DV axes and providing cells with positional identity through local signaling centers. Along the AP axis, several subregions can be identified with distinct transcription factor expression and morphological boundaries. However, these subregions do not conform to traditional segments due to a

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Golden lab members for the comments on the manuscript. We appreciate Sue Marone's help for the illustrations.

References (101)

  • R. Garcia-Lopez et al.

    Fate map of the diencephalon and the zona limitans at the 10-somites stage in chick embryos

    Developmental Biology

    (2004)
  • K. Hashimoto-Torii et al.

    Differential activities of Sonic hedgehog mediated by Gli transcription factors define distinct neuronal subtypes in the dorsal thalamus

    Mechanisms of Development

    (2003)
  • J.M. Hebert et al.

    BMP signaling is required locally to pattern the dorsal telencephalic midline

    Neuron

    (2002)
  • A.W. Helms et al.

    Specification of dorsal spinal cord interneurons

    Current Opinion in Neurobiology

    (2003)
  • J.H. Kaas et al.

    Subcortical contributions to massive cortical reorganizations

    Neuron

    (1999)
  • A.S. Kim et al.

    Wnt receptors and Wnt inhibitors are expressed in gradients in the developing telencephalon

    Mechanisms of Development

    (2001)
  • Y. Lim et al.

    Expression pattern of cLhx2b, cZic1 and cZic3 in the developing chick diencephalon

    Mechanisms of Development

    (2002)
  • Y. Lim et al.

    Altered BMP signaling disrupts chick diencephalic development

    Mechanisms of Development

    (2005)
  • A. Lumsden

    Segmentation and compartition in the early avian hindbrain

    Mechanisms of Development

    (2004)
  • J. Muhr et al.

    Assignment of early caudal identity to neural plate cells by a signal from caudal paraxial mesoderm

    Neuron

    (1997)
  • J. Muhr et al.

    Convergent inductive signals specify midbrain, hindbrain, and spinal cord identity in gastrula stage chick embryos

    Neuron

    (1999)
  • S.L. Pallas

    Intrinsic and extrinsic factors that shape neocortical specification

    Trends in Neurosciences

    (2001)
  • L. Puelles et al.

    Expression patterns of homeobox and other putative regulatory genes in the embryonic mouse forebrain suggest a neuromeric organization

    Trends in Neurosciences

    (1993)
  • L. Puelles et al.

    Forebrain gene expression domains and the evolving prosomeric model

    Trends in Neurosciences

    (2003)
  • P.C. Salinas et al.

    Regional expression of the Wnt-3 gene in the developing mouse forebrain in relationship to diencephalic neuromeres

    Mechanisms of Development

    (1992)
  • C. Schuurmans et al.

    Molecular mechanisms underlying cell fate specification in the developing telencephalon

    Current Opinion in Neurobiology

    (2002)
  • C.D. Stern

    Induction and initial patterning of the nervous system—The chick embryo enters the scene

    Current Opinion in Genetics and Development

    (2002)
  • C.M. Trujillo et al.

    The rostral and caudal boundaries of the diencephalon

    Brain Research-Brain Research Reviews

    (2005)
  • C. Vieira et al.

    Thalamic development induced by Shh in the chick embryo

    Developmental Biology

    (2005)
  • L. Wilson et al.

    The mechanisms of dorsoventral patterning in the vertebrate neural tube

    Developmental Biology

    (2005)
  • W. Ye et al.

    FGF and Shh signals control dopaminergic and serotonergic cell fate in the anterior neural plate

    Cell

    (1998)
  • J. Altman et al.

    Development of the rat thalamus: I. Mosaic organization of the thalamic neuroepithelium

    Journal of Comparative Neurology

    (1988)
  • G. Alvarez-Bolado et al.

    Model of forebrain regionalization based on spatiotemporal patterns of POU-III homeobox gene expression, birthdates, and morphological features

    Journal of Comparative Neurology

    (1995)
  • I. Araki et al.

    Engrailed defines the position of dorsal di-mesencephalic boundary by repressing diencephalic fate

    Development

    (1999)
  • A. Bach et al.

    Msx1 is required for dorsal diencephalon patterning

    Development

    (2003)
  • I. Bachy et al.

    The LIM-homeodomain gene family in the developing Xenopus brain: conservation and divergences with the mouse related to the evolution of the forebrain

    Journal of Neuroscience

    (2001)
  • J.J. Bainter et al.

    Neural induction takes a transcriptional twist

    Developmental Dynamics

    (2001)
  • E. Birgbauer et al.

    Violation of cell lineage restriction compartments in the chick hindbrain

    Development

    (1994)
  • M.M. Braun et al.

    Wnt signaling is required at distinct stages of development for the induction of the posterior forebrain

    Development

    (2003)
  • M. Cohen-Tannoudji et al.

    Early determination of a mouse somatosensory cortex marker

    Nature

    (1994)
  • K. Dale et al.

    Differential patterning of ventral midline cells by axial mesoderm is regulated by BMP7 and chordin

    Development

    (1999)
  • J. Ding et al.

    Cripto is required for correct orientation of the anterior–posterior axis in the mouse embryo

    Nature

    (1998)
  • J. Dubrulle et al.

    Coupling segmentation to axis formation

    Development

    (2004)
  • T. Ebendal et al.

    Bone morphogenetic proteins and their receptors: potential functions in the brain

    Journal of Neuroscience Research

    (1998)
  • M.C. Figdor et al.

    Segmental organization of embryonic diencephalon

    Nature

    (1993)
  • A.C. Foley et al.

    Reconciling different models of forebrain induction and patterning: a dual role for the hypoblast

    Development

    (2000)
  • S. Fraser et al.

    Segmentation in the chick embryo hindbrain is defined by cell lineage restrictions

    Nature

    (1990)
  • Y. Furuta et al.

    Bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs) as regulators of dorsal forebrain development

    Development

    (1997)
  • A. Garcia-Bellido et al.

    Developmental compartmentalisation of the wing disk of Drosophila

    Nature. New Biology (London)

    (1973)
  • J.A. Golden et al.

    Clones in the chick diencephalon contain multiple cell types and siblings are widely dispersed

    Development

    (1996)
  • Cited by (49)

    • Patterning of thalamus

      2020, Patterning and Cell Type Specification in the Developing CNS and PNS: Comprehensive Developmental Neuroscience, Second Edition
    • The evolution of asymmetric photosensitive structures in metazoans and the Nodal connection

      2017, Mechanisms of Development
      Citation Excerpt :

      Kuan et al. (2015) hypothesized that habenular sub-domain formation and L/R patterning might be two independent time-separated targets of the Wnt pathway. These data are consistent with a well-established role of Wnt signaling in diencephalon patterning (Lim and Golden, 2007). Fgf8 whose activity is concentrated in the dorsal diencephalon is also an important morphogenetic signal in habenulae morphogenesis.

    • A New Mammalian Brain Ontology Based on Developmental Gene Expression

      2016, Evolution of Nervous Systems: Second Edition
    • Brainstem disconnection in a late preterm neonate with classic features of fetal alcohol syndrome

      2014, Pediatric Neurology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Vascular findings in this child support this theory. Multiple gene mutations such as En2, FLNA, pax6, Wnt1, and Pax2/En1 have been identified in animal models, but none have been reported in humans.4 Although there are nine other individuals with BSD reported in the literature, none had a documented history of exposure to a teratogen.1,3,5,6

    • A developmental ontology for the mammalian brain based on the prosomeric model

      2013, Trends in Neurosciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      The hypothalamus is divided into terminal (rostral) and peduncular (caudal) neuromeric portions, continuous dorsally with the preoptic area (unevaginated telencephalon) and the evaginated telencephalic hemisphere, respectively [16] (hypothalamic prosomeres hp2 and hp1; Figure 2A). At this third level, the diencephalon is divided caudorostrally into three diencephalic prosomeres: the pretectum (prosomere 1), the thalamus (prosomere 2), and the prethalamus (prosomere 3), including corresponding tegmental components [14,16,31–33] (Figure 2A). Conventional ontologies assign the diencephalic tegmental territory to either midbrain or posterior hypothalamus.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text