A randomized trial comparing the efficacy of cognitive–behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa delivered via telemedicine versus face-to-face

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2008.02.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

A major problem in the delivery of mental health services is the lack of availability of empirically supported treatment, particularly in rural areas. To date no studies have evaluated the administration of an empirically supported manual-based psychotherapy for a psychiatric condition via telemedicine. The aim of this study was to compare the relative efficacy and acceptability of a manual-based cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) for bulimia nervosa (BN) delivered in person to a comparable therapy delivered via telemedicine.

Method

One hundred twenty-eight adults meeting DSM-IV criteria for BN or eating disorder—not otherwise specified with binge eating or purging at least once per week were recruited through referrals from clinicians and media advertisements in the targeted geographical areas. Participants were randomly assigned to receive 20 sessions of manual-based, CBT for BN over 16 weeks delivered either face-to-face (FTF-CBT) or via telemedicine (TV-CBT) by trained therapists. The primary outcome measures were binge eating and purging frequency as assessed by interview at the end of treatment, and again at 3- and 12-month follow-ups. Secondary outcome measures included other bulimic symptoms and changes in mood.

Results

Retention in treatment was comparable for TV-CBT and FTF-CBT. Abstinence rates at end-of-treatment were generally slightly higher for FTF-CBT compared with TV-CBT, but differences were not statistically significant. FTF-CBT patients also experienced significantly greater reductions in eating disordered cognitions and interview-assessed depression. However, the differences overall were few in number and of marginal clinical significance.

Conclusions

CBT for BN delivered via telemedicine was both acceptable to participants and roughly equivalent in outcome to therapy delivered in person.

Introduction

There is general consensus among researchers in the field of eating disorders that at this time cognitive–behavioral therapy (CBT) is the treatment of choice for individuals with bulimia nervosa (BN) (Mitchell, Agras, & Wonderlich, 2007). Although undoubtedly not the final stage in the development of effective therapies for BN, CBT remains the most widely studied and the best-supported treatment for BN.

Despite this finding there is considerable evidence that most patients who are treated for BN do not receive an empirically supported psychotherapy for their condition (Arnow, 1999). In a survey of psychologists, Mussell, Crosby, Knopke, Peterson, and Mitchell (2000) found that the vast majority of clinicians who said that at least 5% of their practice included eating disorders reported not using CBT as the treatment of choice, and only 21.7% reported any significant training experience in CBT for any condition. In another study (Crow, Mussell, Peterson, Knopke, & Mitchell, 1999), a cohort of 353 potential subjects who called an eating disorders research program requesting treatment were asked about prior therapy. Of these, 65.4% had received treatment before and 96.7% of these had received psychotherapy but only 6.9% reported that the treatment they received included even minimal elements of CBT. Most recently, von Ransom and Robinson (2006) found that clinicians who work with eating disorders reported that they prefered to tailor their treatment to the patient rather than choose an approach based on the level of empirical support. Therefore, although CBT may be the treatment of choice for these patients, many therapists working with BN patients choose not to use it, and do not know how to deliver it. Furthermore, most patients who have been treated for BN have not received it.

A related problem is the lack of availability of empirically supported treatments for patients with BN and other forms of psychopathology in rural areas. This is particularly true in the region in which this study was conducted (e.g., North Dakota and Minnesota), where much of the population lives in smaller urban and rural settings. In attempting to identify ways to deliver therapies to this population, several possibilities exist. One would be to train therapists in these areas; however, this would be expensive and impractical and many therapists would not have the time or economic resources to undertake such training. Also, their skills would likely atrophy over time if they were not seeing a critical number of such patients. A second possibility would be to utilize a traveling therapist who would periodically go to various rural areas to provide treatment. However, this would typically be considered undesirable work and third party payors would not reimburse for travel time, resulting in a major financial disincentive. A third possibility, and the one we studied in this protocol, is to deliver therapy through new technologies such as telemedicine.

Two prior studies have examined the utility of telemedicine in treating psychiatric patients. A modest study by Nelson, Barnard, and Cain (2003) assigned a series of 28 depressed children to in-person therapy or telemedicine therapy and found no evidence of a difference in outcomes. A second, larger study by Ruskin et al. (2004) was reported in which a series of 119 depressed patients were randomized to in-person versus telemedicine-delivered therapy. The therapy delivered was supportive psychotherapy, psycho-education and medication management. Again, no significant differences were found in outcome and both approaches were helpful.

Although, several reports have detailed the use of psychotherapy via telemedicine (see for example, Frueh, Henderson, & Myrick, 2005; Cluver, Schuyler, Frueh, Brescia, & Arana, 2005; Griffiths, Blignault, & Yellowlees, 2006; Metropolitan Life Insurance Table, 1983; Passik et al., 2004; Shepherd et al., 2006; Ugarriza & Schmidt, 2006), to our knowledge there have been no studies testing telemedicine administration of an empirically supported manual-based psychotherapy for a psychiatric condition. In this research, we studied the relative efficacy and acceptability of a manual-based psychotherapy for BN, CBT, delivered in person by a therapist who traveled to the local community, compared with CBT delivered via telemedicine wherein the treated subject never actually met the therapist in person.

Section snippets

Participants

This study was conducted at nine regions in eastern North Dakota and northwestern Minnesota (which adjoins North Dakota to the east). Participants were recruited in waves through mailings to local physicians and psychologists and through advertisements in the media.

Recruitment took place between October 1999 and September 2003. This study was approved by institutional review boards at the University of North Dakota (Grand Forks, North Dakota) and MeritCare Health System (Fargo, North Dakota).

Study flow

Fig. 1 presents the participant flow through the study. The proportion of participants completing EDE assessments did not differ between TV-CBT and FTF-CBT at end of treatment (Fisher's Exact p=.467), 3-month follow-up (Fisher's Exact p=.480), or 12-month follow-up (Fisher's Exact p=.590).

Participant characteristics at baseline

Participants in the treatment groups were similar in baseline sociodemographic and clinical characteristics (Table 1). Most participants were female and Caucasian, with an average age in the late 20's. The

Discussion

This randomized trial, comparing CBT for BN delivered via telemedicine versus in person, demonstrated that telemedicine-delivered CBT was both acceptable to patients and roughly equivalent in outcome to therapy delivered in person. The strengths of this study include a relatively large sample size, careful training and supervision of assessors and therapists, the use of a manual-based approach for psychotherapy and the broadening of inclusion criteria to include subthreshhold cases that are

References (34)

  • C.G. Fairburn et al.

    A comparison of two psychological treatments for bulimia nervosa

    Behaviour Research and Therapy

    (1986)
  • L. Shepherd et al.

    The utility of videoconferencing to provide innovative delivery of psychological treatment for rural cancer patients: Results of a pilot study

    Journal of Pain and Symptom Management

    (2006)
  • W.S. Agras et al.

    A multicenter comparison of cognitive–behavioral therapy and interpersonal psychotherapy for bulimia nervosa

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (2000)
  • B.A. Arnow

    Why are empirically supported treatments for bulimia nervosa underutilized and what can we do about it?

    Journal of Clinical Psychology

    (1999)
  • B. Bakke et al.

    Administering cognitive–behavioral therapy for bulimia nervosa via telemedicine in rural settings

    International Journal of Eating Disorders

    (2001)
  • A.T. Beck et al.

    An inventory for measuring depression

    Archives of General Psychiatry

    (1961)
  • J.S. Cluver et al.

    Remote pspychotherapy for terminally ill cancer patients

    Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

    (2005)
  • S. Crow et al.

    Full syndromal versus subthreshold anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and binge eating disorder: A multicenter study

    International Journal of Eating Disorders

    (2002)
  • S. Crow et al.

    Prior treatment received by patients with bulimia nervosa

    International Journal of Eating Disorders

    (1999)
  • C.G. Fairburn et al.

    The eating disorders examination

  • M.G. First et al.

    Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders—Patient edition (SCID=I/P, version 2)

    (1995)
  • B.C. Frueh et al.

    Telehealth service delivery for persons with alcoholism

    Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

    (2005)
  • L. Griffiths et al.

    Telemedicine as a means of delivering cognitive–behavioral therapy to rural and remote mental health clients

    Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare

    (2006)
  • M. Hamilton

    A rating scale for depression

    Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery and Psychiatry

    (1960)
  • D. Hedeker et al.

    Sample size estimation for longitudinal designs with attrition: Comparing time-related contrasts between two groups

    Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics

    (1999)
  • D. Hedeker et al.

    Sample size estimation for longitudinal designs with attrition: Comparing time-related contrasts between two groups

    Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics

    (2006)
  • C.E. Hill

    Development of a counselor verbal response category system

    Journal of Counseling Psychology

    (1978)
  • Cited by (170)

    • Virtual Care for Behavioral Health Conditions

      2022, Primary Care - Clinics in Office Practice
    • An Overview of Group Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: Science and Practice

      2022, Comprehensive Clinical Psychology, Second Edition
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Funding for this study was provided by a grant funded jointly by the National Institute of Mental Health and the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01-MHDK-58820), the National Institute of Mental Health (KO2 MH65919) and the Neuropsychiatric Research Institute.

    View full text