Word use of outpatients with a personality disorder and concurrent or previous major depressive disorder
Introduction
Depression is one of the most common forms of psychopathology, affecting one in four women and one in six men sometime during their lives (Kessler et al., 2005). Due to its nature and tendency to be recurrent, depression has significant impact on many personal, social, and health-care domains (Burcusa & Iacono, 2007). Major clinical and research efforts have sought to understand the features associated with depression. One way to understand depression is provided by cognitive theory, originally proposed by Aaron Beck (1967). This theory postulates that maladaptive cognitive patterns underlie depressive symptoms, particularly in interaction with stressors. The theory includes as a core hypothesis that depressed and depression prone individuals have negative thinking styles, driven by so called “depressogenic schemata” (Beck, 1987). Beck defined schemata as stored bodies of knowledge that are enduring, automatic and characteristic for a person's cognitive organization. In addition, Beck hypothesized that depressogenic schemata do not affect mood until activated by stress. This pattern, which is often referred to as the vulnerability component in Beck's theory, has indeed been observed in many studies (Burcusa and Iacono, 2007, Miranda et al., 1990), although not in all (e.g. Coyne, 1992). Moreover, it is as yet not fully understood whether depressogenic schemata play a causal role in the etiology of depression, or whether they are merely correlates (Monroe, Slavich, Torres, & Gotlib, 2007). Another debate pertains to the question of whether depressogenic schemata are truly specific to mood disorders. The ‘cognitive content-specificity hypothesis’ predicts that each diagnosis on Axis-I and Axis-II is associated with a predominant thinking style (Beck, 1987). This hypothesis, however, is questioned by for instance Lamberton and Oei (2008), who conclude that depressogenic schemata reflect a common factor in a range of psychiatric disorders.
A second cognitive theory on depression speculates that, in addition to negatively toned automatic thoughts, depressed individuals have an enduring tendency to focus on the ‘self’ (Pyczsinski & Greenberg, 1987). Self-focus is proposed to function as a coping mechanism by which an individual tries to reduce discrepancies between the ‘real-self’ and a more ‘ideal-self’ (Robinson & Alloy, 2003). However, when attempts to reduce negative discrepancies fail, an increased self-focus magnifies negative emotions and constitutes a disposition to depression (Higgins, 1987, Pyczsinski and Greenberg, 1987).
Of particular relevance for these perspectives are recent findings by Rude et al. (2004). They conceptualized cognitive distortions in terms of word use, and offer the only documented data to date on differences in writing styles between depressed, formerly depressed and never depressed individuals. These authors asked their participants (currently, formerly, and never depressed students) to write an essay about going to college. Essays then were subjected to linguistic analysis using the Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count software (LIWC) (Pennebaker, Francis, & Booth, 2001). Rude and colleagues predicted that depressed students would use words of negative valence and the word ‘I’ more often in their essays as compared to formerly and never depressed students. In addition, they expected that previously depressed students would use the word ‘I’ increasingly while progressing through their essay. Both predictions were confirmed. The finding that depressed students used words of negative valence and the word ‘I’ more often, as compared to previously and never depressed students was interpreted as evidence for the existence of negative schemata and an enhanced self-focus in depressed students. The finding that previously depressed students used the word ‘I’ increasingly was interpreted as activation of latent depressogenic schemata while writing a self-relevant essay.
Notwithstanding these remarkable results, the study by Rude et al. (2004) had several limitations. Firstly, they used a sample of relatively healthy, young (mean age = 18.3 years), and well educated subjects. Secondly, they neglected the critical factor discrepancy between ideal-self and actual-self that theoretically is required to make self-focus maladaptive and instead only focused on use of the word ‘I’. Thirdly, only depressive symptoms were assessed, hence predictions regarding the specificity of the depressive thinking style could not be tested. We therefore aimed: (1) to replicate the Rude et al. (2004) results by contrasting clinical and nonclinical samples, (2) to elucidate the self-focus hypothesis further by including a validated current-ideal self discrepancy measure, and (3) to assess whether manifestations of negatively toned self-schemata are specific to depression. We expected depressogenic schemata and an enhanced self-focus to be evident throughout the essays of depressed subjects and to be gradually activated in the essays of formerly depressed patients, relative to never depressed psychiatric patients and healthy controls. To test this, we divided our patients, all of whom had at least one personality disorder (PD), into patients who (1) were currently depressed, (2) had a history of depression, and (3) had never been depressed. This division of patients was based on the current or lifetime presence of a depressive disorder and was made regardless of the presence of an additional anxiety disorder. In extending the Rude et al. findings, we expected use of the word ‘I’ to be positively related to self-ideal discrepancies and depression severity. This expectation followed from the observation by Rude et al. (2004) that depressed individual use the word ‘I’ more often while writing an essay and from the work by Higgins (1987) and Pyczsinski & Greenberg (1987). Pyczsinski & Greenberg (1987) report that the dispositional tendency to be highly self-focused is positively correlated to depression; Higgins (1987) proposed that self-ideal discrepancies signify the absence of positive outcomes and the presence of negative outcomes, which is related to dissatisfaction, sadness, and depression.
To further test the cognitive content-specificity hypothesis, we changed the way the sample was divided. We divided the sample of individuals with a PD into those with (a) a comorbid current and/or previous mood disorder, (b) a comorbid anxiety disorder, and (c) no additional current or lifetime diagnosis of depressive or anxiety disorder. The rationale for combining the previously and the currently depressed group was that both groups are thought to endorse depressogenic schemata and in this regard thus form a homogenous group (see for example Hamilton & Abramson, 1983). We expected that the word use of the currently depressed group would reflect the presence of depressogenic schemata to a higher degree, relative to the other two groups.
Computerized word counts (such as the LIWC) are sometimes considered to be of limited psychological relevance because this software does not consider context and therefore is unable to grasp a communicated message (Alpers et al., 2005). We recognized this to be a potential flaw. In order to gain concurrent validity for the LIWC as a method to study psychological states and for our study, we attempted a comparison of LIWC performance with human ratings. These ratings were compared with LIWC dimensions equivalent to the features on which the essays were judged by 2 independent humans.
Section snippets
Participants
Five- hundred eighty-nine potential participants were screened for inclusion in a collaborative randomized controlled trial on the (cost-)effectiveness of schema-focused therapy for PDs. Inclusion criteria were: (a) avoidant, dependent, obsessive–compulsive, paranoid, narcissistic, or histrionic PD according to the DSM-IV criteria as primary diagnosis (i.e. the diagnosis that is the principal focus of treatment), and (b) age between 18 and 62. Exclusion criteria were: (a) IQ less than 80; (b)
Demographics and psychiatric profile
Demographic and clinical characteristics for the four groups (depressed, previously depressed, never depressed, and healthy controls) are summarized in Table 1. These groups did not differ from each other on age, gender distribution, and educational level.
Lower prevalence rates of additional anxiety disorders (χ2(2) = 14.54, p = <.01) and lower prevalence rates of more than one diagnosis on Axis-II (χ2(6) = 15.93, p = <.05) were observed in the formerly and never depressed groups as compared to
Discussion
We aimed to replicate and extend the results of Rude et al. (2004). Their findings that word-use is related to depression and to vulnerability to depression could not be replicated in a clinical sample. The depressed individuals in our sample did not differ in their word-use from previously depressed and never depressed outpatients. Instead, we found that the three psychiatric groups (depressed, previously depressed and, never depressed) were highly similar to each other but markedly different
Conclusion
To conclude, empirical examination of some of the key components of cognitive theories of depression suggests that the negative content of written essays about one's life, an enhanced self-focus, and discrepancy between the current and ideal self reflect a negative thinking style. This thinking style is not specific to depression, but rather is common to a range of psychiatric disorders and thus presumably can be regarded as a trans-diagnostic process. Further prospective studies of the
Funding
Data on psychiatric outpatients were collected in a study funded by ZonMw; the Netherlands organization for health research and development (grant number OG-945-06-406 awarded to prof. dr. A. Arntz).
Acknowledgement
We want to thank the people that participated in this study, the cooperating mental health institutes, Rosanne Janssen, and Elsbeth Gelissen.
References (37)
- et al.
Evaluation of computerized text analysis in an Internet breast cancer support group
Computers in Human Behavior
(2005) - et al.
Psychosocial impairment and treatment utilization by patients with borderline personality disorder, other personality disorders, mood and anxiety disorders, and a healthy comparison group
Comprehensive Psychiatry
(2007) - et al.
Beliefs in personality disorder: a test with the personality belief questionnaire
Behaviour research and Therapy
(2004) - et al.
Risk for recurrence in depression
Clinical Psychology Review
(2007) - et al.
The VKP, a self-report instrument for DSM-III-R and ICD-10 personality disorders: construction and psychometric properties
Personality and Individual Differences
(1996) - et al.
A test of the cognitive content specificity hypothesis in depression and anxiety
Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry
(2008) Emotional processing, three modes of mind and the prevention of relapse in depression
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(1999)- et al.
Effectiveness of treatment of childhood memories in cognitive therapy for personality disorders: a controlled study contrasting methods focusing on the present and methods focusing on childhood memories
Behaviour Research and Therapy
(2007) - et al.
SCL-90. Handleiding bij een multidimensionele psychopathologie indicator
(1986) Depression: Clinical, experimental, and theoretical aspects
(1967)
Cognitive models of depression
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy
Dysfunctional beliefs and psychopathology in borderline personality disorder
Journal of Personality Disorders
Common and specific dimensions of self-reported anxiety and depression: implications for the cognitive and tripartite models
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Cognition in depression: a paradigm in crisis
Psychological Inquiry
SCL-90: an outpatient psychiatric rating scale preliminary report
Psychopharmacology Bulletin
Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV personality disorders (SCID-II)
Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV axis-I disorders (SCID-I/P)
The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care
Psychological Medicine
Cited by (34)
Familiar language in treatment-resistant depression: Effects of deep brain stimulation of the subcallosal cingulate
2023, Journal of NeurolinguisticsCitation Excerpt :Despite its recent emergence as an important theme, pragmatic language competence in depression has been relatively understudied, especially with respect to familiar language. More is known about semantics and syntax, where there are noted deficits in syntactic processing (Emery & Breslau, 1989), confrontation naming, defining concepts, repetition (da Silva Novaretti, D’Avila Freitas, Mansur, Nitrini, & Radanovic, 2011; Sexton et al., 2011), and negative word-use and self-referencing (Alison & Burgess, 2003; Bernard, Baddeley, Rodriguez, & Burke, 2015; Bucci & Freedman, 1981; Fossati et al., 2003; Hilimire et al., 2015; Lemogne et al., 2009, 2010; Molendijk et al., 2010; Rude, Gortner, & Pennebaker, 2004; Smirnova et al., 2018; Stirman & Pennebaker, 2001). The way language is used in social interaction is important to consider when determining whether interactions are typical or atypical (Krauss & Chiu, 1998, pp. 41–88) and should be studied further, particularly in clinical populations where negative social interaction is selectively affected, such as in schizophrenia (Titone, Holzman, & Levy, 2002).
Linguistic analysis of Latinx patients’ responses to a text messaging adjunct during cognitive behavioral therapy for depression
2022, Behaviour Research and TherapyCitation Excerpt :Recent research using LIWC has assessed thoughts, behaviors, and emotions of people with depression, including Spanish-speakers, from written or spoken language (Kahn et al., 2007; Ramírez-Esparza et al., 2012). For example, several studies have found that depressive symptoms are associated with greater use of words from the LIWC category of Negative Emotions (e.g. “sad”) and lower use of words from the LIWC category of Positive Emotions (e.g. “happy”) (Molendijk et al., 2010; Rude et al., 2004). In addition, Grant (2010) found that the frequent use of words from the LIWC category of Discrepancy (e.g., “should”) may reflect the cognitive distortion of self-criticism, which is typically endorsed amongst people with depression.
A meta-analysis of correlations between depression and first person singular pronoun use
2017, Journal of Research in PersonalityCitation Excerpt :This resulted in two correlations which were collapsed, leaving one effect size for the study. Molendijk et al. (2010) provided correlations for patients (r = 0.07) and controls (r = 0.11) separately and thus were combined. Rodriguez et al. (2010) reported correlations for personal diary entries (r = 0.15) and online blog writing (r = −0.10) and thus were combined.
On the Narrative about Vincent van Gogh's End of Life - Psychological Processes in his Letters
2023, Deutsche Medizinische WochenschriftGroup schema therapy for cluster-C personality disorders: A multicentre open pilot study
2023, Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy