Elsevier

Burns

Volume 42, Issue 8, December 2016, Pages 1831-1843
Burns

Modifiable risk factors for scald injury in children under 5 years of age: A Multi-centre Case–Control Study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burns.2016.06.027Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Largest case–control study examining risk factors for scalds in young children.

  • Identifies modifiable risk factors for scald injuries in young children, notably;

    • Leaving hot drinks in reach of young children.

    • Not teaching young children safety rules to prevent scalds.

Abstract

Objective

To determine the relationship between a range of modifiable risk factors and medically attended scalds in children under the age of 5 years.

Methods

Multicentre matched case–control study in acute hospitals, minor injury units and GP practices in four study centres in England. Cases comprised 338 children under 5 presenting with a scald, and 1438 control participants matched on age, gender, date of event and study centre. Parents/caregivers completed questionnaires on safety practices, safety equipment use, home hazards and potential confounders. Odds ratios were estimated using conditional logistic regression.

Results

Parents of cases were significantly more likely than parents of controls to have left hot drinks within reach of their child (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 2.33, 95%CI 1.63 to 3.31; population attributable fraction (PAF) 31%). They were more likely not to have taught children rules about climbing on kitchen objects (AOR 1.66, 95%CI 1.12 to 2.47; PAF 20%); what to do or not do when parents are cooking (AOR 1.95, 95%CI 1.33 to 2.85; PAF 26%); and about hot things in the kitchen (AOR 1.89, 95%CI 1.30 to 2.75; PAF 26%).

Conclusions

Some scald injuries may be prevented by parents keeping hot drinks out of reach of children and by teaching children rules about not climbing on objects in the kitchen, what to do or not do whilst parents are cooking using the top of the cooker and about hot objects in the kitchen. Further studies, providing a more sophisticated exploration of the immediate antecedents of scalds are required to quantify associations between other hazards and behaviours and scalds in young children.

Introduction

Globally, scald injuries are an important public health issue and cause considerable morbidity and mortality [1], [2], [3]. They can be the most distressing and painful injuries a child can receive and may result in long-term physical and psychological effects. Paediatric scald injuries also have significant economic implications for families and health services[1].

It is noteworthy that the majority of scalds in childhood occur at home [1], [4], [5], [6] and are most commonly caused by hot liquids from kettles, cups and baths [2], [5], [6], [7], [8]. Children under the age of 5 years are most at risk of sustaining a scald in the home [9], [10] and the burden of paediatric scalds falls most heavily on those from the most disadvantaged groups [4], [5], [11], [12]. Preventing scalds requires understanding of modifiable risk factors for scalds. Several small case control studies have been conducted which demonstrate increased risks of thermal injuries associated with composite burn and scald hazard scores [3], [13], with drinking hot drinks from their original containers rather than vacuum flasks [14] and with having cooking equipment within reach of children [15]. However, these studies were not restricted to scald injuries, some had small sample sizes and limited power, used hospital controls, explored only a limited number of exposures or used composite exposure measures which precluded assessment of risk associated with single items within the composite measure, included exposures not relevant to the UK or failed to adjust for a range of confounding factors. We therefore undertook this study to determine the relationship between a wide range of modifiable risk factors and medically attended scalds in children under the age of 5 years, and to inform development of prevention programmes designed to address this important public health problem.

Section snippets

Methods

The published protocol for this study fully describes the methods [16]. Approval was given by Nottingham Research Ethics Committee 1. Informed consent from parents of cases and controls was implied when parents returned the completed study questionnaire.

This multi-centre case–control study of scald injuries was one of five concurrent case–control studies, each for a different injury mechanism (3 types of falls (furniture, flat and stairways), poisonings and scalds). Cases were recruited from

Results

In total 338 cases and 1438 controls (of whom 340 were extra matched control participants) took part in this study (see Fig. 1). 32% of cases and 29% of controls agreed to participate. The gender and age group of participating and non-participating cases were similar (male, 55% vs 58% respectively; 0–12 months, 29% vs 26%; 13–36 months, 62% vs 61%; ≥37 months 9% vs 14%, respectively).

The mean number of controls per case was 4.25. The median number of days between the date of injury to

Key findings

The results show a number of modifiable risk factors were associated with risk of medically attended scald injuries; in particular leaving hot drinks in reach of children and not teaching children safety rules to prevent scalds.

There were some counter-intuitive findings, mainly relating to the potential for hot bathwater scalds; parents of case children reported being less likely to leave a child alone in the bath and if living in a single adult household less likely to report an unsafe hot

Conclusion

Some scald injuries may be prevented by parents keeping hot drinks out of reach of children and by teaching children rules about not climbing on objects in the kitchen, what to do or not do whilst parents are cooking using the top of the cooker and about hot objects in the kitchen. Further studies, providing a more sophisticated exploration of the immediate antecedents of scalds are required to quantify associations between other hazards and behaviours and scalds in young children.

Author contribution

Prof Kendrick had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Kendrick, Stewart, Coupland, Watson.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Stewart, Benford, Wynn, Watson, Coupland, Kendrick.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Benford, Wynn, Coupland, Kendrick.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Funding statement

This article presents independent research funded by grant RP-PG- 0407-10231 from the National Institute for Health Research through its Program Grants for the Applied Research Program. The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Disclaimer

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the National Health Service, the National Institute for Health Research, or the Department of Health.

Acknowledgements

We thank the parents who participated in the study. We also thank the principal investigators, liaison health visitors, research nurses, and other staff from the emergency departments and minor injury units who assisted with recruiting participants from the Nottingham University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Derby Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, James Paget University Hospitals

References (33)

  • J. Delgado et al.

    Risk factors for burns in children: crowding, poverty, and poor maternal education

    Inj Prev

    (2002)
  • A.M. Kemp et al.

    Patterns of burns and scalds in children

    Archiv Dis Childhood

    (2014)
  • D.A. Drago

    Kitchen scalds and thermal burns in children five years and younger

    Pediatrics

    (2005)
  • D.I. Schricke et al.

    Scald burns in children aged 14 and younger in Australia and New Zealand - an analysis based on the Bi-National Burns Registry (BiNBR)

    Burns

    (2013)
  • National SAFE KIDS Campaign (NSKC). Childhood Injury Fact Sheet. NSKC, Washington (DC): NSKC, [Online]. 2004. Available...
  • K.A. Cole et al.

    Protecting Children from unintentional injuries

    (2002)
  • Cited by (9)

    • Aetiology of severe burn incidents in children under 5 years of age in the Netherlands: A prospective cohort study

      2022, Burns
      Citation Excerpt :

      Among others, it showed that low household income, living in deprived areas, living in rented accommodation, young mothers, single-parent families and children from ethnic minorities are linked to an increased incidence of burns in these children. Risk factors in case-control studies for severe burn injury, such as a low level of parental education; a low parental socioeconomic status; immigrant status; poor living conditions and leaving hot drinks in reach of children are described by van Rijn [9], Petridou [10], Delgado [11], Othman [12] and Stewart [13]. It should be noted that some of these studies are outdated and risk factors and mechanisms of injury may change over time due to changes in technology or demographic shifts.

    • Understanding the associations among parents teaching safety rules to children, safety behaviors and unintentional injuries in Chinese preschool children

      2019, Preventive Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, one study showed that the number of family rules advocated by mothers was negatively correlated with the unintentional injuries of 8-year-old children (Peterson and Saldana, 1996). A case-control study including 1776 children under 5 years old observed the reduced odds ratio of a scald in families where parents taught children safety rules in the kitchen (Stewart et al., 2016). However, a prospective study revealed that greater use of safety rules teaching actually predicted an increased frequency of unintentional injuries for young children (Morrongiello et al., 2004).

    • Nationwide web survey of pediatric scalds: Prevalence and the relationship with household vacuum flasks

      2018, Burns
      Citation Excerpt :

      We recommend more attention should be paid to avoid scald accident in families with boys. The age distribution in our survey was similar with other reported investigations of hospitalized pediatric scalds [1,12,14]. While another three surveys reported the infants (0–12 months) were most susceptible to burn injuries [4,7,15], which might because more infant victims were admitted into hospital than elder ones.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Present address: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham Health Science Partners C Floor South Block Queen's Medical Centre Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.

    2

    Present address: Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences University of Nottingham, Division of Rehabilitation and Ageing’ School of Medicine, B Floor, The Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham NG7 2UH, United Kingdom.

    3

    Present address: Norfolk and Suffolk Primary and Community Care Research Office, Hosted by South Norfolk CCG, Lakeside 400, Broadland Business Park, Norwich NR7 0WG, United Kingdom.

    View full text