Elsevier

Cancer Epidemiology

Volume 38, Issue 3, June 2014, Pages 227-234
Cancer Epidemiology

Descriptive epidemiology of cancer of unknown primary site in Scotland, 1961–2010

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2014.03.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Cancers of unknown primary site (CUP) pose problems for diagnosis, treatment, and accurate prediction of prognosis. However, there are limited published data describing the epidemiology of this disease entity. Our aim was to describe the epidemiology of CUP in Scotland.

Methods

Anonymised data, covering the period 1961–2010, were extracted from the Scottish Cancer Registry database, based on the following ICD-10 diagnostic codes: C26.0, C26.8, C26.9, C39, and C76–C80. Age-standardised incidence rates were calculated by direct standardisation to the World Standard Population. Estimates of observed survival were calculated by the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

Between 1961 and 2010, there were 50,941 registrations of CUP, representing 3.9% of all registrations of invasive cancers. Age-standardised rates increased to a peak in the early to mid-1990s, followed by a steeper decrease in rates. During 2001–2010, age-standardised rates of CUP were higher in the most compared with the least deprived fifth of the population. Observed survival was marginally higher in patients diagnosed during 2001–2010 (median 5.6 weeks) compared with those diagnosed in the previous two decades. During the most recent decade, survival decreased with age at diagnosis, and was higher in patients with squamous cell carcinoma and with lymph node metastases.

Conclusion

Patterns of CUP in Scotland are largely consistent with those reported from the few other countries that have published data. However, in comparing studies, it is important to note that there is heterogeneity in terms of definition of CUP, as well as calendar period of diagnosis or death. Variation in the definition of CUP between different epidemiological studies suggests that there would be merit in seeking international agreement on guidelines for the registration of CUP as well as a standard grouping of diagnostic codes for analysis.

Introduction

Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) is a heterogenous group of cancers with, it has been argued, a distinct biology [1]. Estimates of the incidence of CUP depend crucially on how it is defined. In recent population-based studies, CUP has been estimated to account for around 2–4% of cancers depending on definition, population, and period of diagnosis [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. However, estimates of the proportion of CUP in some developing countries can exceed 10% [10].

Since cancer management depends considerably on knowledge of the primary site of origin of the tumour, the absence of this information poses particular challenges for diagnosis, therapy and accurate prediction of prognosis.

The purpose of the present study is to describe the epidemiology of CUP in Scotland, which has a population of approximately five million.

Section snippets

Definition of cancer of unknown primary site

CUP is widely defined as “histologically confirmed metastatic cancer for which clinicians are unable to identify a primary tumour after a standard diagnostic approach” [1]. However, since this definition excludes, for example, cancers that are not microscopically verified, it is almost certain to under-estimate the population burden of disease. There does not appear to be an internationally accepted definition of CUP in terms of diagnostic codes. At one extreme, the National Institute for

Results

Between 1961 and 2010, there were 50,941 registrations of CUP, representing 3.9% of all registrations of invasive cancers. While the numbers of registrations of all invasive cancers increased over successive decades, the numbers of registrations of CUP decreased in the most recent decade (Table 1). The number and percentage of CUP registrations has been consistently higher in females, but the percentage has decreased in both sexes in the most recent two decades. Between 2001 and 2010, CUP was

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first detailed description of the epidemiology of CUP in Scotland. Although registrations for CUP might be expected to be inherently unstable, we have shown that there are few changes to diagnostic coding once a registration has been completed.

Using a relatively inclusive definition of CUP, we found that 3.2% of all cancers registered in Scotland were CUP during the period 2001–2010. This is largely consistent with the findings of previous studies in

Conflict of interest statement

None of the authors have any relevant conflicts of interest to declare in relation to this manuscript.

Funding

No specific funding was obtained for this study.

References (32)

  • X. Shu et al.

    Time trends in incidence, causes of death, and survival of cancer of unknown primary in Sweden

    Eur J Cancer Prev

    (2012)
  • Cancer Research UK. Cancer of Unknown Primary Statistics. Available at:...
  • D. Urban et al.

    Cancer of unknown primary: a population-based analysis of temporal change and socioeconomic disparities

    Br J Cancer

    (2013)
  • O.T. Brustugun et al.

    Rapid reduction in the incidence of cancer of unknown primary: a population-based study

    Acta Oncol

    (2014)
  • World Health Organisation (WHO)

    International statistical classification of diseases and related problems, 10th revision

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text