Cancer Letters

Cancer Letters

Volume 323, Issue 2, 28 October 2012, Pages 135-146
Cancer Letters

Mini-review
Bone-targeting radiopharmaceuticals for the treatment of prostate cancer with bone metastases

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2012.04.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) frequently have metastases to the bone, which may cause pain and lead to a deterioration in quality-of-life. Bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals are agents which, when administered systemically, localize to the site of bone metastases and deliver focal radiation there. In this review, we will summarize the current literature on bone-targeting radiopharmaceuticals for CRPC, focusing on strontium-89, samarium-153, rhenium-186 and radium-223. We will discuss their indications, clinical efficacy, and toxicities and highlight some of the challenges in optimizing treatment with these agents. Historically, clinical trials with these drugs have failed to demonstrate survival improvements, restricting their use for palliative purposes only. Radium-223 is the first agent in this class to show an overall survival advantage in CRPC patients with bone metastases. This landmark finding will likely have a considerable impact on the treatment paradigm of bone-metastatic CRPC, and will pave the way for further developments in the future.

Introduction

An estimated 241,740 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer in the United States this year [1], contributing to an estimated 28,170 cancer-related deaths. In patients with recurrent or advanced prostate cancer, use of androgen deprivation therapy (which acts by depleting or blocking the effects of androgens) is the standard-of-care [2], [3], [4]. Androgen deprivation usually results in initial tumor regressions with declines in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and relief of symptoms in many patients, but the disease eventually progresses to a castration-resistant state [5]. Many mechanisms for castration-resistance have been postulated, including persistent androgen receptor (AR) signaling, ectopic androgen synthesis, and activation of AR-independent pathways [6]. In patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), treatment options are expanding [7] and four modalities have been FDA-approved to date based on evidence of survival prolongation in men with metastatic CRPC: docetaxel is approved as first-line chemotherapy [8], cabazitaxel is approved as second-line chemotherapy [9], the immunotherapy product sipuleucel-T is approved for asymptomatic patients [10], and the androgen biosynthesis inhibitor abiraterone is approved for docetaxel-pretreated men [11].

CRPC metastasizes frequently to the bone, an event occurring in the majority of advanced prostate cancer patients [8], [12], [13]. Osseous metastases are most commonly found in the axial skeleton (vertebral bodies, pelvis, ribs and skull), but may also occur in long bones (femurs, humeri). Bone scintigraphy using 99technetium-methylene diphosphonate (99Tc-MDP) remains the standard method for detection of osseous metastases, and is an essential component of the staging of the disease [14]. Newer modalities for the identification of bone metastases are also being investigated, and have shown encouraging results when compared with 99Tc-MDP bone scans [15], [16].

The extent of osseous involvement in metastatic prostate cancer has been found to be associated with patient survival [17]. Clinically, bone lesions may manifest as pain or as skeletal-related events (SREs). SREs include bone complications such as spinal-cord compression, pathological fractures, hypercalcemia of malignancy, need for bone surgery, and need for bone radiation, some of which could have devastating consequences. Additionally, patients receiving chronic androgen deprivation are especially vulnerable to fragility fractures from reduced bone-mineral density [18]. These effects can result in diminished mobility and a considerable deterioration in quality-of-life [19].

In patients with advanced CRPC, PSA elevations usually precede detectable bone lesions which in turn usually precede bone pain [20]. The development of bone metastases is thought to involve multiple cytokines and growth factors including transforming growth-factor (TGF-β), bone-morphogenic proteins (BMPs), and epidermal growth-factor (EGF) that engage in processes involving migration of prostate cells to bone tissue and cellular adhesion to bone matrix [21], [22], [23], [24]. In patients with bone metastases, there is increased bone turnover with activation of both osteoblastic and osteoclastic activity [25], [26]. Bone pain manifests in multiple forms and the exact mechanism of this pain is poorly understood. Studies have suggested the role of tumor-induced cytokines, tumor infiltration of bone matrix causing osteolysis, direct nerve injury, and stimulation of peripheral nerve endings by various substances leading to nerve sensitization causing allodynia and hyperalgesia [27]. One of the roles of radiopharmaceuticals is the reduction of these growth factors and cytokines at the interface of tumor metastases and normal bone.

Adequate treatment of metastatic bone pain is impeded by underestimation of pain by physicians, patient reluctance to report pain, and poor knowledge of treatment options [28]. Approximately 80–90% of patients with cancer pain report effective pain relief with the WHO-recommended “three-step ladder” approach [29], [30]. Acetaminophen and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs constitute first-line agents for pain control, although these may provide insufficient relief requiring escalation to low-potency opioids. Subsequently, stronger opioids are added in a step-wise fashion as the disease progresses. Optimal management of bone pain requires a multi-disciplinary approach including chemotherapeutic options, osteoclast-inhibitory agents, corticosteroids, external-beam radiotherapy, or even surgery [31]. Radiopharmaceutical agents have emerged as another viable option in patients with multiple osseous metastases. These compounds are systemically-administered radioactive agents that localize to sites of bone metastases and deliver focal radiation through β-emission (strontium-89, samarium-153, rhenium-186) or α-particles (radium-223). Bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals have considerable advantages including easy administration, ability to treat multiple metastatic lesions simultaneously, and the possibility of combination with chemo-/radiotherapeutic agents for enhanced efficacy.

Agents comprising the current radiopharmaceutical armamentarium against prostate cancer include strontium-89, samarium-153, rhenium-186, and the novel α-emitter radium-223. These compounds have been the subject of multiple randomized controlled trials exploring their efficacy in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases [28], [32], [33], [34], [35]. Historically, outcomes of interest in radiopharmaceutical trials included pain response, analgesic consumption, and quality-of-life. Notably, radium-223 is the first radiopharmaceutical agent to demonstrate improved survival among patients with symptomatic bone-metastatic CRPC. This is a landmark development in the current treatment paradigm of metastatic prostate cancer, and places us at the cusp of an exciting period in the development of successful treatments against CRPC.

This review will summarize the role of traditional bone-targeting radiopharmaceuticals in the management of prostate cancer with osseous metastases, and will also highlight the impact that the novel agent radium-223 could potentially have on the treatment landscape of bone-metastatic CRPC.

Section snippets

Physical properties

The nuclear properties of the radiopharmaceutical agents discussed herein are summarized in Table 1. The first use of systemic radionuclide therapy was with the advent of strontium-89 (Sr-89) in the 1940s, which was quickly followed by the discovery of phosphorus-32 (P-32) as a potential radiotherapeutic agent for cancers metastatic to bone. However, use of P-32 became increasingly unpopular due to its high bone marrow toxicity. Sr-89, a calcium analog, was approved by the Food and Drug

Indications and contraindications

Bone-seeking radiopharmaceuticals are generally indicated for prostate cancer patients with painful osteoblastic metastases confirmed by bone scan [44]. External-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to bone metastases has also been shown to provide symptomatic pain relief in up to 80% of such patients [45]. Patients with unifocal disease are better treated with EBRT while those with multifocal bone disease are excellent candidates for radiopharmaceutical therapy. Other candidates may include patients

Strontium-89 chloride

Strontium-89 chloride (Sr-89) is a divalent ion that (like calcium) is incorporated into the inorganic matter of bone when injected intravenously. The fraction that localizes to the bone is proportional to the tumor burden and ranges from 20% to 80% of the administered dose, with a 10-fold proclivity for metastatic tumor compared to healthy bone [50], [51]. Several studies have investigated the relationship between the dose of strontium-89 and clinical responses in terms of bone pain

Summary

Both Sr-89 and Sm-153 have been shown through multiple clinical trials to be effective agents for bone pain palliation in men with symptomatic metastatic CRPC, without impacting the survival of these patients. They are currently the only FDA-approved bone-targeting radioisotopes for the treatment of metastatic CRPC. Ra-223 is the first radiopharmaceutical drug to demonstrate a prolongation of overall survival in these patients, but this agent also produces palliative benefits and reduces

References (98)

  • G.O. Oosterhof et al.

    Strontium(89) chloride versus palliative local field radiotherapy in patients with hormonal escaped prostate cancer: a phase III study of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Genitourinary Group

    Eur. Urol.

    (2003)
  • P.M. Quilty et al.

    A comparison of the palliative effects of strontium-89 and external beam radiotherapy in metastatic prostate cancer

    Radiother. Oncol.

    (1994)
  • S. Nilsson et al.

    Palliation of bone pain in prostate cancer using chemotherapy and strontium-89. A randomized phase II study

    J. Pain Symptom Manage

    (2005)
  • S.M. Tu et al.

    Bone-targeted therapy for advanced androgen-independent carcinoma of the prostate: a randomised phase II trial

    Lancet

    (2001)
  • I. Resche et al.

    A dose-controlled study of 153Sm-ethylenediaminetetramethylenephosphonate (EDTMP) in the treatment of patients with painful bone metastases

    Eur. J. Cancer.

    (1997)
  • R.K. Valicenti et al.

    A Phase I trial of samarium-153-lexidronam complex for treatment of clinically nonmetastatic high-risk prostate cancer: first report of a completed study

    Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.

    (2011)
  • T.F. Sandeman et al.

    Samarium-153-labelled EDTMP for bone metastases from cancer of the prostate

    Clin. Oncol. (R. Coll. Radiol.)

    (1992)
  • O. Sartor et al.

    Samarium-153-Lexidronam complex for treatment of painful bone metastases in hormone-refractory prostate cancer

    Urology

    (2004)
  • S. Nilsson et al.

    Bone-targeted radium-223 in symptomatic, hormone-refractory prostate cancer: a randomised, multicentre, placebo-controlled phase II study

    Lancet Oncol.

    (2007)
  • R. Siegel et al.

    Cancer statistics

    CA Cancer J. Clin.

    (2012)
  • B.A. Hellerstedt et al.

    The current state of hormonal therapy for prostate cancer

    CA Cancer J. Clin.

    (2002)
  • R.M. Connolly et al.

    Use of androgen deprivation therapy in prostate cancer: indications and prevalence

    Asian J. Androl.

    (2012)
  • N. Sharifi et al.

    Androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer

    J. Am. Med. Assoc.

    (2005)
  • H.I. Scher et al.

    Biology of progressive, castration-resistant prostate cancer: directed therapies targeting the androgen-receptor signaling axis

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2005)
  • E.S. Antonarakis et al.

    Evolving standards in the treatment of docetaxel-refractory castration-resistant prostate cancer

    Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis.

    (2011)
  • E.S. Antonarakis et al.

    Expanding treatment options for metastatic prostate cancer

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (2011)
  • I.F. Tannock et al.

    Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (2004)
  • P.W. Kantoff et al.

    Sipuleucel-T immunotherapy for castration-resistant prostate cancer

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (2010)
  • J.S. de Bono et al.

    Abiraterone and increased survival in metastatic prostate cancer

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (2011)
  • D.P. Petrylak et al.

    Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (2004)
  • E. Even-Sapir et al.

    The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT

    J. Nucl. Med.

    (2006)
  • B. Tombal et al.

    Modern detection of prostate cancer’s bone metastasis: is the bone scan era over?

    Adv. Urol.

    (2012)
  • P. Sabbatini et al.

    Prognostic significance of extent of disease in bone in patients with androgen-independent prostate cancer

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (1999)
  • J.P. Bilezikian

    Osteoporosis in men

    J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.

    (1999)
  • C.S. Cleeland et al.

    Pain and its treatment in outpatients with metastatic cancer

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (1994)
  • D.W. Newling et al.

    Orchiectomy versus goserelin and flutamide in the treatment of newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer. Analysis of the criteria of evaluation used in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer–Genitourinary Group Study 30853

    Cancer

    (1993)
  • G.H. Muir et al.

    Induction of transforming growth factor beta in hormonally treated human prostate cancer

    Br. J. Cancer

    (1994)
  • R. Rajan et al.

    Epidermal growth factor (EGF) promotes chemomigration of a human prostate tumor cell line, and EGF immunoreactive proteins are present at sites of metastasis in the stroma of lymph nodes and medullary bone

    Prostate

    (1996)
  • G.D. Roodman

    Mechanisms of bone metastasis

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (2004)
  • L.M. Demers et al.

    Biochemical markers and skeletal metastases

    Cancer

    (2000)
  • R.J. Cook et al.

    Markers of bone metabolism and survival in men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer

    Clin. Cancer Res.

    (2006)
  • C. Urch

    The pathophysiology of cancer-induced bone pain: current understanding

    Palliat. Med.

    (2004)
  • A.R. Jadad et al.

    The WHO analgesic ladder for cancer pain management. Stepping up the quality of its evaluation

    J. Am. Med. Assoc.

    (1995)
  • P.J. Christo et al.

    Cancer pain and analgesia

    Ann. NY Acad. Sci.

    (2008)
  • D. Tong et al.

    The palliation of symptomatic osseous metastases: final results of the study by the radiation therapy oncology group

    Cancer

    (1982)
  • A. Lin et al.

    Targeted and systemic radiotherapy in the treatment of bone metastasis

    Cancer Metastasis Rev.

    (2006)
  • D.J. Bourgeois et al.

    Radiation for bone metastases

    Curr. Opin. Support Palliat. Care

    (2011)
  • P.J. Saylor et al.

    Emerging therapies to prevent skeletal morbidity in men with prostate cancer

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2011)
  • M.J. Morris et al.

    Clinical approaches to osseous metastases in prostate cancer

    Oncologist

    (2003)
  • Cited by (82)

    • Laser-induced isotope selective photoionization of atomic samarium

      2022, Journal of Quantitative Spectroscopy and Radiative Transfer
    • Side effects of therapy for bone metastasis with alpha and beta emitters

      2022, Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging: Volume 1-4
    • Targeting nanoparticles for diagnosis and therapy of bone tumors: Opportunities and challenges

      2021, Biomaterials
      Citation Excerpt :

      Imaging modalities such as optical fluorescent imaging, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), X-ray and computed tomography (CT), radionucleide imaging (positron emission tomography, PET; single-photon emission computed tomography, SPECT), ultrasound and photoacoustic imaging were used to facilitate the diagnosis of bone tumors. To meet the clinical need of high sensitivity and specificity, nanotechnologies were combined with these imaging methods for targeted imaging [157–160]. Fluorescence imaging: Fluorescence imaging detect photons emitted from fluorescent probes excited by a laser.

    • Management of bone complications in patients with genitourinary malignancies

      2020, Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text