Clinical Investigation
Left Ventricular Abnormal Response During Dynamic Exercise in Patients With Heart Failure and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction at Rest

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2008.02.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

The mechanisms that contribute to limit functional capacity are incompletely understood in patients with preserved resting ejection fraction (HFpREF). We assessed left ventricular (LV) systolic response to dynamic exercise in patients with HFpREF and in patients with similar comorbidities to HFpREF patients but without history or evidence of heart failure.

Methods and Results

Twenty-five HFpREF patients in steady-state clinical condition without significant coronary artery disease and 25 hypertensive controls underwent exercise echocardiography. At rest, systolic pulmonary artery pressure, left atrial area, E/A and E/e′ ratios were greater in patients with HFpREF than in control patients, whereas peak systolic mitral annular velocity was lower in HFpREF patients. The exercise-induced changes in LVEF, forward stroke volume, and cardiac output were significantly lower in HFpREF compared with control patients (–4 ± 8 vs. +6 ± 6 %, P = .001; –4 ± 9 vs. +10 ± 10 mL, P < .0001, and 1.6 ± 1.2 vs. 3.5 ± 1.8 L/min, P < .0001, respectively). Exercise-induced changes in effective arterial elastance significantly differed in HFpREF and control patients (0.5 ± 0.6 vs. –0.2 ± 0.5 mm Hg/mL, P < .0001). In addition, 7 of the 25 HFpREF patients developed functional mitral regurgitation during exercise and none in controls.

Conclusions

When compared with patients with similar comorbidities but without history or evidence of heart failure, patients with HFpREF experience greater arterial stiffening and thereby a deterioration of global LV systolic performance during dynamic exercise.

Section snippets

Patients with HFpREF

Between October 2005 and June 2006, we screened 125 patients who were hospitalized at our institution with clinical (pulmonary crackles/peripheral edema) and radiographic (pulmonary vascular redistribution/interstitial edema/pleural effusion) evidences of heart failure and a preserved LVEF on admission (≥50%). Patients presenting with arrhythmias (n = 29), bradycardia related to atrioventricular or sinoatrial blocks (n = 5), primary valvular disease (n = 22), acute coronary syndromes (n = 18),

Resting Parameters

The clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic parameters of the 25 patients with HFpREF and of the 25 patients who served as controls are summarized in Table 1. Except for the use of loop diuretics, none of the baseline parameters were statistically different between HFpREF and control patients. Of note, estimated glomerular filtration rate tended to be lower in HFpREF patients than in controls (P = .09), and BNP levels were significantly higher in HFpREF patients than in controls (P = .005). Among

Discussion

The present data indicate that, although apparently normal at rest, global LV systolic performance may deteriorate during dynamic exercise in patients with HFpREF. Heart rate, blood pressure, and LV end-diastolic volume increased similarly during exercise in HFpREF and control patients. In contrast, LV end-systolic volume increased during exercise in HFpREF patients, whereas it did not increase in control patients. As a result, LV stroke volume and cardiac output were significantly lower at

References (23)

  • B.A. Borlaug et al.

    Impaired chronotropic and vasodilator reserves limit exercise capacity in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction

    Circulation

    (2006)
  • Cited by (75)

    • Epidemiology, Diagnosis, Pathophysiology, and Initial Approach to Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

      2022, Cardiology Clinics
      Citation Excerpt :

      This not only reduces forward stroke volume, but also affects early diastolic filling.9,36 An inability to reduce vascular resistance with exercise is one reason that patients with HFpEF are unable to increase stroke volume with exercise.52,53 Reddy and colleagues52 evaluated 98 patients with HFpEF and 22 patients with hypertension without HFpEF using cardiopulmonary exercise testing, right heart catheterization, and invasive blood pressure (BP) monitoring.

    • Arterial stiffness and pulsatile hemodynamics in heart failure

      2022, Textbook of Arterial Stiffness and Pulsatile Hemodynamics in Health and Disease
    • Peripheral Oxygen Extraction and Exercise Limitation in Asymptomatic Patients with Diabetes Mellitus

      2021, American Journal of Cardiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Dhakal et al. performed CPX with invasive hemodynamic monitoring in 104 symptomatic patients with HF among whom 48 patients presented HFpEF and demonstrated that peripheral oxygen extraction (arterio-venous oxygen difference) was a major determinant of exercise capacity in HFpEF.4 Patients with HFpEF presented reduced stroke volume or cardiac output at peak compared to controls in their study, which was similar to other studies.29,30 In contrast, asymptomatic participants in our study presented maintained stroke volume as well as cardiac output at peak, even though systolic function assessed by LVLS was impaired at rest.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    P.V.E. and S.M. contributed equally to the preparation of the manuscript.

    View full text