Elsevier

Critical Care Clinics

Volume 34, Issue 1, January 2018, Pages 97-106
Critical Care Clinics

Management of Sepsis-Induced Immunosuppression

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccc.2017.08.007Get rights and content

Section snippets

Key points

  • Profound acquired immunosuppression develops within a few days after septic shock in patients.

  • Magnitude and/or persistence of sepsis-induced immunosuppression are associated with increased occurrence of nosocomial infections and mortality.

  • In animal models, immunostimulation is associated with clinical improvement.

  • Results from clinical trials based on interleukin 7 and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor immunoadjuvant therapies in septic shock patients are expected for 2018.

Introduction: the process of sepsis-induced immunosuppression

Although sepsis has been frequently described as solely inducing a tremendous systemic inflammation, current data indicate that it leads to a more complex immune response that evolves over time, with the simultaneous implication of both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory mechanisms.1 As a result, after a short unbridled proinflammatory phase, an important subgroup of septic patients presents with profound acquired immunosuppression, which could be associated with difficulties to efficiently

Is There Still Room for Anti-inflammatory Strategies in Sepsis?

Although the main focus of this review is on immunostimulatory therapies in sepsis, there is likely still room for anti-inflammatory treatments in the very first hours of the syndrome. As discussed previously for immunostimulation, however, a major challenge is to identify patients who could benefit from such treatments (ie, in this case, patients who are still on ascending curve of the proinflammatory response). To date, despite a few promising reports,12 data are still missing regarding this

Novel Design for Randomized Controlled Trial in Sepsis

Because there is no clinical sign of immune dysfunctions, it is crucial to use appropriate biomarkers for patients’ stratification according to their immune status.11 Some patients spontaneously restore their immune functions overtime and, therefore, do not need to receive any immunoadjuvant intervention.9 Most importantly, before treating patients with immunostimulatory therapies, clinicians have to ascertain that the first unbridled inflammatory phase is over because immunostimulatory

Summary

The weight of sepsis-induced immunosuppression is now well established. Nevertheless, the demonstration of efficacy of immunostimulation in improving some or all deleterious outcomes remains to be made. That given, innovative immunomonitoring strategies characterizing the host immune response and thus permitting personalized immunostimulation seem a reasonable perspective. This would allow better taking into account the rapidly changing immune response overtime after initial infection, from

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (68)

  • F. Genel et al.

    Monocyte HLA-DR expression as predictor of poor outcome in neonates with late onset neonatal sepsis

    J Infect

    (2010)
  • R.S. Hotchkiss et al.

    Sepsis-induced immunosuppression: from cellular dysfunctions to immunotherapy

    Nat Rev Immunol

    (2013)
  • C. Torgersen et al.

    Macroscopic postmortem findings in 235 surgical intensive care patients with sepsis

    Anesth Analg

    (2009)
  • J.S. Boomer et al.

    Immunosuppression in patients who die of sepsis and multiple organ failure

    JAMA

    (2011)
  • C. Landelle et al.

    Low monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR is independently associated with nosocomial infections after septic shock

    Intensive Care Med

    (2010)
  • G. Monneret et al.

    ICU-acquired immunosuppression and the risk for secondary fungal infections

    Med Mycol

    (2011)
  • A.H. Walton et al.

    Reactivation of multiple viruses in patients with sepsis

    PLoS One

    (2014)
  • D.S.Y. Ong et al.

    Epidemiology of multiple herpes viremia in previously immunocompetent patients with septic shock

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2017)
  • M.J. Delano et al.

    Sepsis-induced immune dysfunction: can immune therapies reduce mortality?

    J Clin Invest

    (2016)
  • E.A. Panacek et al.

    Efficacy and safety of the monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody F(ab')2 fragment afelimomab in patients with severe sepsis and elevated interleukin-6 levels

    Crit Care Med

    (2004)
  • E.F. Yekebas et al.

    Attenuation of sepsis-related immunoparalysis by continuous veno-venous hemofiltration in experimental porcine pancreatitis

    Crit Care Med

    (2001)
  • O. Joannes-Boyau et al.

    High-volume versus standard-volume haemofiltration for septic shock patients with acute kidney injury (IVOIRE study): a multicentre randomized controlled trial

    Intensive Care Med

    (2013)
  • F. Zhou et al.

    Blood purification and mortality in sepsis: a meta-analysis of randomized trials

    Crit Care Med

    (2013)
  • D.N. Cruz et al.

    Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in abdominal septic shock: the EUPHAS randomized controlled trial

    JAMA

    (2009)
  • D.M. Payen et al.

    Early use of polymyxin B hemoperfusion in patients with septic shock due to peritonitis: a multicenter randomized control trial

    Intensive Care Med

    (2015)
  • H.J. Mao et al.

    Effects of coupled plasma filtration adsorption on immune function of patients with multiple organ dysfunction syndrome

    Int J Artif Organs

    (2009)
  • T. Rimmele et al.

    High-volume haemofiltration with a new haemofiltration membrane having enhanced adsorption properties in septic pigs

    Nephrol Dial Transplant

    (2009)
  • A. Rhodes et al.

    Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016

    Intensive Care Med

    (2017)
  • I. Schwab et al.

    Intravenous immunoglobulin therapy: how does IgG modulate the immune system?

    Nat Rev Immunol

    (2013)
  • M.M. Alejandria et al.

    Intravenous immunoglobulin for treating sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2013)
  • K.G. Kreymann et al.

    Use of polyclonal immunoglobulins as adjunctive therapy for sepsis or septic shock

    Crit Care Med

    (2007)
  • T. Tagami et al.

    Intravenous immunoglobulin and mortality in pneumonia patients with septic shock: an observational nationwide study

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2015)
  • W.D. Docke et al.

    Monocyte deactivation in septic patients: restoration by IFN-gamma treatment

    Nat Med

    (1997)
  • G. Nakos et al.

    Immunoparalysis in patients with severe trauma and the effect of inhaled interferon-gamma

    Crit Care Med

    (2002)
  • Cited by (56)

    • Host response dysregulations amongst adults hospitalized by influenza A H1N1 virus pneumonia: A prospective multicenter cohort study

      2022, European Journal of Internal Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although knowledge of the mechanisms underlying sepsis-related immune-dysfunction have advanced in recent years, the lack of adequate markers to guide patient-specific intervention makes it unsurprising that clinical trials that have tested immune intervention strategies in septic patients have had so far been unsuccessful [4]. With regard to success in future studies, Venet et al. [5] propose that the key should be the stratification of patients, not only according to the characteristics of the infection and specific parameters of the patient, but also according to their immune status at a given time. The need for biomarker stratification of patients therefore seems a prerequisite in clinical trials to evaluate what the most appropriate immunomodulatory therapy should be in a given patient.

    • Hematological Support in Sepsis

      2022, The Sepsis Codex
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Disclosure Statement: The authors declare they do not have any conflicts of interest regarding this article.

    View full text