Elsevier

Contemporary Clinical Trials

Volume 41, March 2015, Pages 129-138
Contemporary Clinical Trials

Resistance Exercise in Already-Active Diabetic Individuals (READI): Study rationale, design and methods for a randomized controlled trial of resistance and aerobic exercise in type 1 diabetes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2014.12.017Get rights and content

Abstract

The Resistance Exercise in Already Active Diabetic Individuals (READI) trial aimed to examine whether adding a 6-month resistance training program would improve glycemic control (as reflected in reduced HbA1c) in individuals with type 1 diabetes who were already engaged in aerobic exercise compared to aerobic training alone. After a 5-week run-in period including optimization of diabetes care and low-intensity exercise, 131 physically active adults with type 1 diabetes were randomized to two groups for 22 weeks: resistance training three times weekly, or waiting-list control. Both groups maintained the same volume, duration and intensity of aerobic exercise throughout the study as they did at baseline. HbA1c, body composition, frequency of hypoglycemia, lipids, blood pressure, apolipoproteins B and A-1 (ApoB and ApoA1), the ApoB–ApoA1 ratio, urinary albumin excretion, serum C-reactive protein, free fatty acids, total daily insulin dose, health-related quality of life, cardiorespiratory fitness and musculoskeletal fitness were recorded at baseline, 3 (for some variables), and 6 months. To our knowledge, READI is the only trial to date assessing the incremental health-related impact of adding resistance training for individuals with type 1 diabetes who are already aerobically active. Few exercise trials have been completed in this population, and even fewer have assessed resistance exercise. With recent improvements in the quality of diabetes care, the READI study will provide conclusive evidence to support or refute a major clinically relevant effect of exercise type in the recommendations for physical activity in patients with type 1 diabetes.

Introduction

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is characterized by the absence or near-absence of insulin secretion. Long-term complication risk is comparable to similarly-aged individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) [1], [2], even though those with T1DM usually have fewer additional cardiovascular risk factors. Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) reflects average glucose concentrations over the previous 2–3 months. A 1% higher HbA1c is associated with a 37% higher risk of developing advanced diabetes microvascular complications [3]. While aerobic exercise clearly improves glycemic (blood glucose) control in T2DM [4], [5], aerobic exercise interventions in T1DM have generally not found significant effects on HbA1c [6], [7], despite reduced insulin requirements [8], [9], [10], and improved insulin sensitivity [11], [12]. In a cross-sectional study of 1030 people with T1DM, physical activity explained none of the HbA1c variance in men, and less than 2% in women [13]. This may be because those with T1DM are at higher risk of hypoglycemia and tend to overcompensate with carbohydrate intake (and reduced insulin administration) to avoid exercise-induced drops in glucose, negating potential benefits on HbA1c. It may also be that aerobic training has little impact on HbA1c in T1DM, and HbA1c is impacted primarily by other factors (diet, insulin regimen and other behavioral/physiological processes).

Resistance exercise produces slower glucose declines than aerobic exercise [14], and might offer other exercise-related metabolic benefits with less hypoglycemia risk. Acutely, there is less glucose instability after a bout of resistance exercise versus aerobic exercise [14]. Small studies suggested resistance training reduced HbA1c in T1DM. Durak et al. [15] studied eight males using a crossover design, and found that HbA1c averaged 6.9% following rest and 5.8% following resistance training (3–4 sets of 14 exercises three days/week). Mosher et al. [16] found that a 12-week combined aerobic and resistance exercise program decreased HbA1c (7.72% to 6.76%, n = 10). Similarly, Ramalho et al. [17] found a non-statistically significant decline in HbA1c (8.2 ± 2.9% to 7.6 ± 1.6%) after a 12-week resistance exercise program (three times/week, n = 13).

Earlier studies could not capitalize on recent advances in T1DM care. Rapid-acting insulin analogues have decreased the risk of hypoglycemia and consequently the need for excessive exercise-related carbohydrate consumption. Small, light-weight, rapid-acting glucose meters have made capillary glucose testing more convenient. Few published exercise intervention studies incorporated background diabetes care that would meet current guidelines [18], and none possessed the methodological rigor currently expected in clinical trials [19].

New research examining the effects of resistance exercise on glycemic control in the context of modern diabetes care is necessary. Most previous exercise trials enrolled only previously inactive subjects [6], [7]. However, people who already perform aerobic exercise regularly may be more likely than sedentary individuals to begin, and maintain, resistance exercise. We therefore undertook the Resistance Exercise in Already-active Diabetic Individuals (READI) clinical trial to evaluate the impact of resistance exercise on metabolic control in people with T1DM who were already aerobically active. Herein we describe the READI trial methods; trial results will be submitted for publication separately.

Section snippets

Design

READI was a four-center randomized parallel-group controlled trial in individuals with T1DM already performing aerobic activity regularly. Prior to randomization, participants entered a five-week stabilization/run-in period, including assessment and optimization of participant diet and insulin therapy and, starting in the second week, low-volume moderate-intensity resistance exercise. Those previously on only two insulin injections per day were encouraged to switch to a basal–bolus regimen

Measurements

All measurements and the timing of their collection are listed in Table 2. All participants (exercise and control) met with the diabetes nurse-educator and the dietitian at baseline, one month (immediately pre-randomization), three months and six months. Participants were questioned about the following at each visit: episodes of hypoglycemia, smoking, blood glucose monitoring, medication changes and major medical events.

Sample size calculation

In the controlled trial of resistance exercise in individuals with type 1 diabetes by Durak [15], the absolute HbA1c difference between resistance exercise and control was 1.1% with SD 0.9%. We polled 10 academic endocrinologists and 10 diabetes educators, and they unanimously felt that a HbA1c difference as low as 0.5% would be clinically significant, given the strong relationship between HbA1c and the risks of both microvascular [37] and macrovascular disease [38], [39]. This difference would

Discussion

READI is the first randomized clinical trial to examine the incremental effects of resistance exercise in individuals with type 1 diabetes who already habitually perform aerobic exercise. Most previous trials have either not considered participant activity levels at study entry, or have only involved previously sedentary participants. It is also one of very few exercise studies where background diabetes care meets modern clinical standards. READI trial participation required a significant time

Acknowledgements

The READI trial was supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) grant MCT-154710. Dr. Sigal is supported by a Health Senior Scholar award from Alberta Innovates-Health Solutions (grant 200800688), and was supported by a Research Chair from the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (OHRI) during part of this trial. Dr. Yardley was supported by a Doctoral Student Research Award (grant DS-3-05-1769_JY) from the Canadian Diabetes Association, and funds from CIHR grants MCT-15470 and

References (39)

  • C. Tonoli et al.

    Effects of different types of acute and chronic (training) exercise on glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis

    Sports Med

    (2012)
  • A. Kennedy et al.

    Does exercise improve glycaemic control in type 1 diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • Henriksson H. Wallberg

    Exercise and diabetes mellitus

    Exerc Sport Sci Rev

    (1992)
  • R. Stratton et al.

    Improved glycemic control after supervised 8-wk exercise program in insulin-dependent diabetic adolescents

    Diabetes Care

    (Sep–Oct 1987)
  • R. Lehmann et al.

    Impact of physical activity on cardiovascular risk factors in IDDM

    Diabetes Care

    (1997)
  • K.W. Landt et al.

    Effects of exercise training on insulin sensitivity in adolescents with type I diabetes

    Diabetes Care

    (1985)
  • H. Wallberg-Henriksson et al.

    Increased peripheral insulin sensitivity and muscle mitochondrial enzymes but unchanged blood glucose control in type I diabetics after physical training

    Diabetes

    (1982)
  • J. Waden et al.

    Leisure time physical activity is associated with poor glycemic control in type 1 diabetic women: the FinnDiane study

    Diabetes Care

    (2005)
  • J.E. Yardley et al.

    Resistance versus aerobic exercise: acute effects on glycemia in type 1 diabetes

    Diabetes Care

    (2013)
  • Cited by (9)

    • HDL functionality in type 1 diabetes

      2017, Atherosclerosis
      Citation Excerpt :

      T1D accounts for 7–12% of the total diabetes population and leads to long-term complications [5]. The inadequate supply of insulin in T1D results in elevated glucose concentrations or hyperglycemia, which is reflected by elevated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c); it has been shown that 1% increase in HbA1c is associated with 37% higher risk of developing advanced diabetes microvascular complications such as diabetic neuropathy and retinopathy [6]. In addition to HbA1c, serum glycated albumin, produced by early and advanced glycation, has been considered as a predictor of macrovascular complications [7].

    • Exercise for type 1 diabetes mellitus management: General considerations and new directions

      2017, Medical Hypotheses
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, the impact of ST and/or HIIT programs on glycaemic control in the T1DM is still unclear. Conversely, another meta-analysis has shown that aerobic training does not change HbA1c levels in T1DM [21], despite the improved insulin sensitivity and reduced insulin requirements [3] in this population. The absence of HbA1c changes from exercise training in some studies may occur as a result of an overcompensation of carbohydrate intake and/or insulin administration that T1DM people commonly use to avoid the exercise-induced hypoglycemia symptoms [3].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text