Intermediate filaments in cell migration and invasion: the unusual suspects
Introduction
Cell migration is a crucial cellular process during development of multicellular organisms. It also participates in immune responses, tissue renewal and wound healing in the adult. The acquisition of migratory properties plays a key role during pathological situations, and in particular promotes tumor spreading where cancer cells invade adjacent tissues and form metastases. Cell migration relies on a succession of events. The establishment of a front-to-rear polarity axis is followed by membrane protrusion at the leading edge and the formation of new adhesions between the cell and the underlying extracellular matrix. For the cell to move forward, these adhesion sites mature into focal adhesions connected with stress fibers responsible for the contraction of the cell body. The retraction of the cell rear results from the disassembly of focal adhesions and the cell detachment from the substrate [1]. These events are well coordinated in space and time through complex signaling networks which control cytoskeletal rearrangements to promote the structural and functional organization necessary for force generation and migration. Although the contribution of the actin and microtubule cytoskeletal networks is well established [2, 3, 4], the role of intermediate filaments (IFs) is less clear. Nevertheless, IFs form an extensive and elaborate network which connects the cell cortex to intracellular organelles and likely contributes its biophysical properties to the mechanical and motile properties of the cell.
For each cell type, the mode of migration, whether amoeboid or mesenchymal, individual or collective, is determined by specific cell characteristics, which depend on the differentiation stage, and extracellular cues, which can be either chemical or mechanical [5]. IFs are assembled from several protein families (Figure 1a). The expression pattern of IF proteins is tissue specific and developmentally regulated. The expression of specific subsets of IF proteins classically serves as biomarkers to identify the tissue of origin of the tumors. IF expression and composition are also used to determine the progression of cancers, suggesting that they are determining parameters in the cell invasive capacities [6, 7]. However, the specific functions of the ‘IF code’ remain to be unraveled. Here, we review the latest evidence showing that IF composition regulates cell invasion and the current view of how IFs participate to the major events leading to cell migration.
Section snippets
Too versatile to get caught: different IF compositions cause different effects on cell migration
IFs are homopolymers or heteropolymers formed of two, three or more IF proteins. Because we lack depolymerizing drugs targeting IFs, the simultaneous depletion of several proteins is often required to totally suppress the IF network. Alternatively, expression of truncated proteins, which act as dominant negative constructs, leads to a complete disorganization of the IF network. Both strategies perturb the polarity and migration of fibroblasts and astrocytes [8, 9, 10]. Some IF proteins play
Hiding behind a deceptive stability: the dynamic organization of the IF network
Live imaging shows that, like microfilaments and microtubules, the IF network undergoes major rearrangements during migration. In immobile cells, IFs are mainly localized around the nuclear envelope and extend toward the cell periphery [10, 37]. In migrating cells, IFs elongate in the lamella paralleling the microtubule network and reach focal adhesions near the leading edge [38••, 39••]. IFs, however, are not found in the active lamellipodia, where only non filamentous particles are present [10
Considered too inactive to raise suspicion: IFs participate in dynamic cellular processes
The lack of energy-driven dynamics and the absence of yet identified associated motors may suggest that IFs are ill-equipped for the regulation of such a dynamic process as cell migration. Yet, evidence is accumulating showing that IFs can play direct and indirect roles in cytoskeletal rearrangements, cell adhesion, cell mechanical properties and intracellular signaling.
The physical interaction between adhesive structures and IFs points to IFs as direct regulators of focal adhesion dynamics [51
Conclusions and perspectives
The integrity of the IF network is required for cell migration and invasion. But more importantly, the fine tuning of the expression of IF proteins, with various alternative splicing isoforms and a wide variety of PTMs, provides a complex stoichiometry which modulates the cell protrusive, adhesive and physical properties (stiffness, contractility) to control the migratory properties of each different cell type depending on its precise microenvironment. Rather than a global downregulation of the
References and recommended reading
Papers of particular interest, published within the period of review, have been highlighted as:
• of special interest
•• of outstanding interest
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Institut National du Cancer, l’Association pour la Recherche contre le Cancer, and La Ligue contre le Cancer. We thank Julien Elric for his contribution to the figures and Chiara De Pascalis for her careful reading of the manuscript. We gratefully acknowledge the PFID of Institut Pasteur (Paris) and the financial support of the Institut Pasteur (Paris), the France–BioImaging infrastructure network supported by the French National Research Agency (ANR-10–INSB–04,
References (84)
- et al.
Polarised cell migration: intrinsic and extrinsic drivers
Curr Opin Cell Biol
(2014) - et al.
Networking galore: intermediate filaments and cell migration
Curr Opin Cell Biol
(2013) - et al.
Nuclear positioning: mechanisms and functions
Int J Biochem Cell Biol
(2011) - et al.
CNS stem cells express a new class of intermediate filament protein
Cell
(1990) - et al.
Microvessel proliferation by co-expression of endothelial nestin and Ki-67 is associated with a basal-like phenotype and aggressive features in breast cancer
Breast
(2013) - et al.
Nestin delineates pancreatic cancer stem cells in metastatic foci of NOD/Shi-scid IL2Rgamma(null) (NOG) mice
Am J Pathol
(2014) - et al.
Inhibition of the stem cell marker nestin reduces tumor growth and invasion of malignant melanoma
J Invest Dermatol
(2013) - et al.
Collective invasion in breast cancer requires a conserved basal epithelial program
Cell
(2013) - et al.
Expression of complete keratin filaments in mouse L cells augments cell migration and invasion
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
(1993) - et al.
Plectin-controlled keratin cytoarchitecture affects MAP kinases involved in cellular stress response and migration
J Cell Biol
(2006)