Elsevier

Cellular Signalling

Volume 25, Issue 7, July 2013, Pages 1567-1573
Cellular Signalling

Review
Diverse pathological implications of YKL-40: Answers may lie in ‘outside-in’ signaling

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.03.016Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Involvement of YKL-40 as a versatile biomarker in diverse pathologies

  • YKL-40-mediated multiple signaling pathways

  • Using these pathways to elucidate probable cell surface binding partners of YKL-40

Abstract

The developing paradigms about YKL-40, a member of the “mammalian chitinase-like proteins”, from across the globe, project it as a vital parameter for the detection of disease onset and progression. It is expressed and secreted by cancer cells of different origins along with a variety of non-malignant cells including inflammatory and structural cells. Numerous studies demonstrate that YKL-40 over-expression is associated with increased patient mortality though the cellular receptors responsible for mediating these effects have not yet been identified. The putative YKL-40 ligands are thought to be carbohydrate structures, since it is capable of binding chitin, chito-oligosaccharides and heparin. Binding of collagen to YKL-40, identified it as the only non-carbohydrate extracellular matrix (ECM) ligand for YKL-40. Our broad understanding of YKL-40 as a versatile biomarker and its involvement in activating several signaling pathways make us anticipate that its specific receptors/binding partners may exist on the cell surface also. The cell surface heparan sulfate (HS) moieties seem to be the potential candidates for this role, suggesting that it could interact with HS-proteoglycans. It is recommended to clearly delineate YKL-40-mediated signaling mechanisms before promoting the YKL-40 know-how for translational research, in both diagnostic and therapeutic applications. The present review provides an overview of YKL-40 as a versatile biomarker, discussing the related pathological mechanisms and aims to reassess and unify the already proposed diverse hypotheses in YKL-40-regulated signaling mechanisms.

Introduction

YKL-40, an extensively discussed biomarker, playing an important pathological role in a myriad of diseases belongs to the glycosyl hydrolases family 18, which includes the chitinases [1]. Chitin, a polymer of N-acetyl glucosamine, is the second most abundant polysaccharide in nature, following cellulose. It is found in the walls of fungi; the exoskeleton of crabs, shrimp and insects; the micro filarial sheath of parasitic nematodes; and the lining of the digestive tracts of many insects [2], [3]. Chitin accumulation is regulated by the balance of chitin synthase-mediated biosynthesis and degradation by chitinases. Although humans do not have chitin and chitin synthase, studies have shown that they do express true chitinases, including acidic mammalian chitinase (AMCase) and chitotriosidase [3], [4]. YKL-40 was first discovered as a 40 kDa protein secreted by the MG63 human osteosarcoma cell line [5]. The CHI3L1 gene for human YKL-40 is localized in a highly conserved area on chromosome 1q31-q32 [6] and its crystal structure has already been described [7]. Though YKL-40 contains highly conserved chitin-binding domains; it functionally lacks chitinase activity [8]. YKL-40 is also named as human cartilage glycoprotein-39 (HC-gp39) [9], 38-kDa heparin-binding glycoprotein (gp38k) [10], chitinase-3-like-1 (CHI3L1) [11], and chondrex [12]. Although the biological characteristics of YKL-40 and other chitinase-like proteins (CLPs) remain partly understood, its diverse roles in cell proliferation, differentiation, survival, inflammation and tissue remodeling have been suggested [13]. Aberrant expression of YKL-40 is associated with the pathogenesis of an array of human diseases (Fig. 1) [14], [15], [16], [17], [18] and its use as a biomarker is largely agreed upon [19]. Some of the primary immune cells like macrophages and neutrophils have been shown to secrete YKL-40, along with some cancer cells [11], [20], [21]. Biologically, YKL-40 has been shown to activate cancer signaling pathways and promote tumor angiogenesis [22], [23] and also a wide range of inflammatory responses (Fig. 2). Elevated serum YKL-40 levels are also associated with a wide range of inflammatory diseases. YKL-40 can act as a fibroblast mitogen, activating several signaling pathways; however, no cell surface receptor for YKL-40 has been identified so far. Type I collagen is its only known ECM protein-binding partner till date [24]. Though the exact functions of YKL-40 remain enigmatic, its ability to bind both proteins and carbohydrates allows us to view it as a linking factor between proteomics and glycomics. It remains to be determined whether routine measurement of YKL-40 can provide useful clinical information for risk assessment in patients, or for monitoring patients after intervention with different therapies. The present article provides an overview of YKL-40, as a versatile biomarker, discussing the related pathological mechanisms.

Section snippets

YKL-40 footprints in pathology

Over the past decade, considerable attention has been focused on the potential role of YKL-40 in the development of a variety of human cancers. Immunohistochemical studies have demonstrated elevated YKL-40 protein expression in many types of cancer cells, including adenocarcinoma cells from breast, colon, liver, and pancreas; and squamous carcinoma cells from the uterine cervix, the head/neck area, melanoma cells, and glioblastoma cells [25]. Furthermore, YKL-40 is produced by tumor-associated

Quest for hidden clues

We are definitely reaching to a point where we can view YKL-40 accountability in every possible ailment, though the related mechanisms are still to be exposed. There are several synergistic and antagonistic factors that modulate the regulatory functions of YKL-40 in both normal and pathological conditions (Fig. 3). The exact function of YKL-40 is not yet clear, though a considerable body of evidence projecting its pattern of expression and associations with various pathologies, indicates its

Conclusion

A protein biomarker is, in general defined, as ‘a measurable protein that is an indicator of normal biological or pathogenic processes, and/or the response to therapeutic or other interventions’ [89]. Protein biomarkers are associated with the disease and have applications in the clinical detection (screening and early diagnosis) and management (prognosis, treatment response and monitoring) of the disease. The prognostic biomarkers indicate survival, independent of the treatment administered.

Acknowledgments

We thankfully acknowledge SIDA (Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency), as the idea for writing this review is based on some current societal work being carried out with SIDA.

References (90)

  • R.G. Boot et al.

    Journal of Biological Chemistry

    (2001)
  • J.A. Elias et al.

    The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology

    (2005)
  • M. Rehli et al.

    Journal of Biological Chemistry

    (2003)
  • F. Fusetti et al.

    Journal of Biological Chemistry

    (2003)
  • B.E. Hakala et al.

    Journal of Biological Chemistry

    (1993)
  • L.M. Shackelton et al.

    Journal of Biological Chemistry

    (1995)
  • M. Rehli et al.

    Genomics

    (1997)
  • F. De Ceuninck et al.

    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

    (2001)
  • R.A. Francescone et al.

    Journal of Biological Chemistry

    (2011)
  • J. Bi et al.

    Human Pathology

    (2009)
  • H.F. Bigg et al.

    Journal of Biological Chemistry

    (2006)
  • J.S. Johansen et al.

    Respiratory Medicine

    (2005)
  • S. Cuzzocrea et al.

    European Journal of Pharmacology

    (2000)
  • K.C. Nishikawa et al.

    Experimental Cell Research

    (2003)
  • W. Hochholzer et al.

    American Heart Journal

    (2010)
  • H.M. Kim et al.

    Cardiovascular Diabetology

    (2012)
  • J.S. Johansen et al.

    Journal of Hepatology

    (2000)
  • D. Bonneh-Barkay et al.

    American Journal of Pathology

    (2008)
  • K. Garbett et al.

    Neurobiology of Disease

    (2008)
  • B. Hu et al.

    Journal of Biological Chemistry

    (1996)
  • K.M. Malinda et al.

    Experimental Cell Research

    (1999)
  • D. Hanahan et al.

    Cell

    (1996)
  • D. Hanahan et al.

    Cell

    (2000)
  • J.A. Park et al.

    Journal of Biological Chemistry

    (2010)
  • M. Kawada et al.

    Laboratory Investigation

    (2008)
  • C.C. Chen et al.

    Clinical Immunology

    (2011)
  • B. Henrissat et al.

    Biochemical Journal

    (1993)
  • Y. Shibata et al.

    Journal of Immunology

    (2000)
  • J.S. Johansen et al.

    Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

    (1992)
  • J.S. Johansen et al.

    Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention

    (2006)
  • S. Harvey et al.

    Clinical Chemistry

    (1998)
  • G.L. Chupp et al.

    The New England Journal of Medicine

    (2007)
  • C.N. Rathcke et al.

    Inflammation Research

    (2006)
  • J.S. Johansen et al.

    British Journal of Rheumatology

    (1993)
  • J.S. Johansen et al.

    Clinical and Experimental Immunology

    (2005)
  • J.S. Johansen

    Danish Medical Bulletin

    (2006)
  • B. Volck et al.

    Proceedings of the Association of American Physicians

    (1998)
  • R.G. Boot et al.

    Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology

    (1999)
  • R. Shao et al.

    Oncogene

    (2009)
  • J.S. Johansen et al.

    Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets

    (2007)
  • C.N. Rathcke et al.

    Cardiovascular Diabetology

    (2009)
  • L. Shuhui et al.

    International Archives of Allergy and Immunology

    (2009)
  • M. Kuepper et al.

    The New England Journal of Medicine

    (2008)
  • M.L. Gavala et al.

    Clinical and Experimental Allergy

    (2013)
  • H. Matsuura et al.

    American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text