Elsevier

Cities

Volume 47, September 2015, Pages 45-52
Cities

Key characteristics of age-friendly cities and communities: A review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.02.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The rapid growth of ageing populations makes ageing a global priority.

  • Age-friendly initiatives mainly occur in the developed world.

  • Multi-stakeholder collaborations should be encouraged to optimise ageing strategies.

  • Age related issues and policies should recognise the importance of older people.

  • The incorporation of outcome measures is suggested as part of an evaluation process.

Abstract

The creation of age-friendly environments worldwide has been promoted by the World Health Organization as a strategy to address the challenges posed by the converging trends of urbanisation and population. This has resulted in an increased discussed of strategies and initiatives which ensure policies, services and products meet the needs of older persons. This article aims to examine the current evidence of approaches and interventions used to create age-friendly cities and communities identified in recent research and practice. This review identified clear characteristics that contribute towards an age-friendly city. Multi-stakeholder collaborations, government commitment, inclusion of older persons and policies that tackled both the physical and social environments were key factors that contributed towards approaches and interventions used to create age-friendly cities and communities. The characteristics of age-friendly initiatives identified provide a promising basis for the development of ageing policy and planning globally to make cities more supportive of older people.

Introduction

The world is currently experiencing two demographic transitions: population ageing and urbanisation. By 2050, the global population of people over the age of 60 years is expected to reach almost two billion (UNDESA, 2013). However, ageing populations are not just restricted to the developed world: it is estimated that in five decades, over 80% of the global older population will be living in developing countries compared with 60% in 2005 (UNDESA, 2009). At the same time, there has been a shift towards urbanisation: as of 2007, more than half of the world’s population now live in cities (WHO & FUND, 2008). Current trends suggest that the number and proportion of urban dwellers will continue to rise over the coming decades, with growth occurring more rapidly in developing countries (Montgomery & Ezeh, 2005).

As issues involving ageing society in each country are unique, growing older requires a flexible and evolving environment to compensate for physical and social changes associated with ageing (Beard & Petitot, 2010). Therefore, it is important to consider the impact of the urban and rural environments on older people. This is especially relevant in the current economic climate, where service providers face a difficult challenge in trying to provide for the needs of older people in a time of austerity and budget reductions.

As they age, older people’s requirements for more specialised and resource intensive services increase. In recent years, there have been a variety of strategies and policies that meet the specific needs of older people. The terms ‘age-friendly’ and ‘active ageing’ have been used to describe some these initiatives. These terms arise from an ecological perspective of ageing that suggests a link between an individual and their physical and social environment. In this review, the term ‘age-friendly’ encompasses this perspective and is defined as ageing initiatives which are based on the idea that places should enable older persons to be able to participate in their community.

The focus on ageing populations in cities is because in recent years, the urban environment presents a complex setting in which to promote the wellbeing and contributions of older people (WHO, 2007a). As urban living becomes the predominant social context for most of the world’s population, it has the potential to both directly and indirectly shape a variety of factors within populations (Galea & Vlahov, 2005). This article will focus on the urban environment and will summarise the current evidence of approaches and interventions used to make our cities more supportive of older persons.

The structure of this paper is as follows. First an overview of the literature review methodology is presented. Next, a summary of age-friendly models and frameworks will be outlined. Then, the key findings of the ageing literature are discussed with reference to specific ageing initiatives and interventions within the urban environment. Finally, the concluding critique provides recommendations for potential future research on older persons within the urban environment.

Section snippets

Methodology

The structured review focused on international literature and where possible, included ageing studies from low and middle income countries. Articles for inclusion were identified through a search of PubMed, Web of Knowledge and PAIS international (Fig. 1). Articles were searched from January 1st 2009 to September 31st 2014, including the following key words in the title or abstract field: ‘age-friendly’, ‘older person’, ‘ageing in place’, ‘community’ and ‘city’. A search of the World Wide Web

Results and discussion

The literature review identified different terminologies were used to describe and define the age-friendly environment. These include ‘age-friendly city’, ‘age-friendly community’, ‘liveable city’ and ‘active ageing’. The difference in terminologies is not problematic but illustrates the range of policies and initiatives emphasised by policy makers, local community programmes and researchers. The difference in terminology used is also illustrated in the age-friendly models and frameworks that

Conclusion

The urban living environment presents a complex setting in which to promote the well-being and contributions of older people in both the developed and developing world. The WHO Global Network of Age-Friendly Cities and Communities has encouraged cities to adopt an age-friendly approach to urban interventions. However, to meet the challenges of ageing in the urban environment, it is important that policy makers create supportive and enabling environments through interventions for their older

References (71)

  • L. Rioux et al.

    Residential satisfaction among aging people living in place

    Journal of Environmental Psychology

    (2011)
  • Advantage (2002). What is the AdvantAge...
  • L.L. Alpay et al.

    Easing Internet access of health information for elderly users

    Health Informatics Journal

    (2004)
  • K.S. Ambigga et al.

    Bridging the gap in ageing: Translating policies into practice in Malaysian Primary Care

    Asia Pacific Family Medicine

    (2011)
  • J.R. Beard et al.

    Ageing and urbanization: Can cities be designed to foster active ageing?

    Public Health Reviews

    (2010)
  • D. Boldy et al.

    Older people’s decisions regarding ‘ageing in place’: A Western Australian case study

    Australasian Journal on Ageing

    (2011)
  • K. Broome et al.

    Age-friendly buses? A comparison of reported barriers and facilitators to bus use for younger and older adults

    Australasian Journal on Ageing

    (2010)
  • K. Broome et al.

    Age-friendly buses? A comparison of reported barriers and facilitators to bus use for younger and older adults

    Australasian Journal on Ageing

    (2010)
  • T. Buffel et al.

    Ageing in urban environments: Developing ‘age-friendly’ cities

    Critical Social Policy

    (2012)
  • G.O. Canada

    Age-friendly rural and remote communities—A guide

    (2006)
  • CMHC (2008). Research highlight: Community indicators for an ageing population [Online]. Ontario: Canada Mortgage and...
  • S. Coronini-Cronberg et al.

    The impact of a free older persons’ bus pass on active travel and regular walking in England

    American Journal of Public Health

    (2012)
  • J. Costa-Font et al.

    Ageing in place? Exploring elderly people’s housing preferences in Spain

    Urban Studies

    (2009)
  • K. Dandy et al.

    Seniors in rural Canada

    Rural and Small Town Canada Bulletin

    (2008)
  • Development, N. Z. M. O. S. (2007). Positive ageing indicators 2007. Wellington: Ministry of Social...
  • I.P. Donald

    Housing and health care for older people

    Age and Ageing

    (2009)
  • C.A. Emlet et al.

    The importance of social connectedness in building age-friendly communities

    Journal of Ageing Research

    (2012)
  • P.H. Feldman et al.

    The AdvantAge Initiative: Developing community indicators to promote the health and well-being of older people

    Family & Community Health

    (2003)
  • S. Galea et al.

    Urban health: Evidence, challenges, and directions

    Annual Review of Public Health

    (2005)
  • A. Glass et al.

    China: Facing a long-term care challenge on an unprecedented scale

    Global Public Health: An International Journal for Research, Policy and Practice

    (2013)
  • D. Hanson et al.

    Assessing a community’s Elder-Friendliness: A case example of the AdvantAge Initiative

    Family and Community Health

    (2006)
  • E. Hanson et al.

    Working together with persons with early stage dementia and their family members to design a user-friendly technology-based support service

    Dementia

    (2007)
  • Health Canada (2006). Healthy aging in Canada: A new vision, a vital investment from evidence to action,...
  • J.D. Healy

    Excess winter mortality in Europe: a cross country analysis identifying key risk factors

    Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health

    (2003)
  • U.W. Hellstrom et al.

    Experiences of self-determination by older persons living in sheltered housing

    Nursing Ethics

    (2007)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text