Key characteristics of age-friendly cities and communities: A review
Introduction
The world is currently experiencing two demographic transitions: population ageing and urbanisation. By 2050, the global population of people over the age of 60 years is expected to reach almost two billion (UNDESA, 2013). However, ageing populations are not just restricted to the developed world: it is estimated that in five decades, over 80% of the global older population will be living in developing countries compared with 60% in 2005 (UNDESA, 2009). At the same time, there has been a shift towards urbanisation: as of 2007, more than half of the world’s population now live in cities (WHO & FUND, 2008). Current trends suggest that the number and proportion of urban dwellers will continue to rise over the coming decades, with growth occurring more rapidly in developing countries (Montgomery & Ezeh, 2005).
As issues involving ageing society in each country are unique, growing older requires a flexible and evolving environment to compensate for physical and social changes associated with ageing (Beard & Petitot, 2010). Therefore, it is important to consider the impact of the urban and rural environments on older people. This is especially relevant in the current economic climate, where service providers face a difficult challenge in trying to provide for the needs of older people in a time of austerity and budget reductions.
As they age, older people’s requirements for more specialised and resource intensive services increase. In recent years, there have been a variety of strategies and policies that meet the specific needs of older people. The terms ‘age-friendly’ and ‘active ageing’ have been used to describe some these initiatives. These terms arise from an ecological perspective of ageing that suggests a link between an individual and their physical and social environment. In this review, the term ‘age-friendly’ encompasses this perspective and is defined as ageing initiatives which are based on the idea that places should enable older persons to be able to participate in their community.
The focus on ageing populations in cities is because in recent years, the urban environment presents a complex setting in which to promote the wellbeing and contributions of older people (WHO, 2007a). As urban living becomes the predominant social context for most of the world’s population, it has the potential to both directly and indirectly shape a variety of factors within populations (Galea & Vlahov, 2005). This article will focus on the urban environment and will summarise the current evidence of approaches and interventions used to make our cities more supportive of older persons.
The structure of this paper is as follows. First an overview of the literature review methodology is presented. Next, a summary of age-friendly models and frameworks will be outlined. Then, the key findings of the ageing literature are discussed with reference to specific ageing initiatives and interventions within the urban environment. Finally, the concluding critique provides recommendations for potential future research on older persons within the urban environment.
Section snippets
Methodology
The structured review focused on international literature and where possible, included ageing studies from low and middle income countries. Articles for inclusion were identified through a search of PubMed, Web of Knowledge and PAIS international (Fig. 1). Articles were searched from January 1st 2009 to September 31st 2014, including the following key words in the title or abstract field: ‘age-friendly’, ‘older person’, ‘ageing in place’, ‘community’ and ‘city’. A search of the World Wide Web
Results and discussion
The literature review identified different terminologies were used to describe and define the age-friendly environment. These include ‘age-friendly city’, ‘age-friendly community’, ‘liveable city’ and ‘active ageing’. The difference in terminologies is not problematic but illustrates the range of policies and initiatives emphasised by policy makers, local community programmes and researchers. The difference in terminology used is also illustrated in the age-friendly models and frameworks that
Conclusion
The urban living environment presents a complex setting in which to promote the well-being and contributions of older people in both the developed and developing world. The WHO Global Network of Age-Friendly Cities and Communities has encouraged cities to adopt an age-friendly approach to urban interventions. However, to meet the challenges of ageing in the urban environment, it is important that policy makers create supportive and enabling environments through interventions for their older
References (71)
- et al.
Evaluation of flexible bus route transport for older people
Transport Policy
(2012) - et al.
Ageing, health and place in residential care facilities in Beijing, China
Social Science and Medicine
(2011) - et al.
Intergenerational interaction, social capital and health: Results from a randomised controlled trial in Brazil
Social Science and Medicine
(2007) - et al.
Generations of Hope Communities: An intergenerational neighborhood model of support and service
Children and Youth Services Review
(2009) - et al.
Social exclusion, location and transport disadvantage amongst non-driving seniors in a Melbourne municipality, Australia
Journal of Transport Geography
(2011) - et al.
Cities and population health
Social Science and Medicine
(2005) - et al.
A conceptual framework for examining the promise of the NORC program and Village models to promote aging in place
Journal of Aging Studies
(2012) - et al.
Relationship between employment status and obesity in a Korean elderly population, based on the 2007–2009 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES)
Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics
(2013) - et al.
Determinants of successful aging using a multidimensional definition among Chinese elderly in Singapore
American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry
(2009) - et al.
Making communities age friendly: State and municipal initiatives in Canada and other countries
Gaceta Sanitaria
(2011)