Elsevier

Clinical Breast Cancer

Volume 17, Issue 5, August 2017, Pages e225-e227
Clinical Breast Cancer

Case Report
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Screening in Transgender Patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clbc.2016.08.003Get rights and content

Introduction

Although it is difficult to estimate the number of individuals in the United States who identify as transgender, studies have estimated that this cohort includes as many as 0.5% of the population, or 700,000 people, and it is one that is rapidly growing.1, 2 Historically, this population has had poor access to medical care; even today, they are much less likely to pursue breast cancer screening than individuals who do not identify as transgender.3 A 2015 survey of OB/GYN providers showed that almost 60% were unaware of the existence of breast cancer screening guidelines for transgender individuals, and as little as 29% were comfortable caring for transgender individuals.4

Although literature is limited on the subject, there are several reports describing breast cancer in both male-to-female (MtF) and female-to-male (FtM) transgender patients. Despite reports of breast cancer occurrence in this patient population, no evidence-based guidelines currently exist for screening, and high-risk assessment in these patients as academic research within this group has largely been limited to case studies. Assessing breast cancer risk in transgender patients is complicated by the fact that many of these individuals elect to pursue hormone treatment as part of their transition, and some elect to pursue surgical alternatives to achieve a desired cosmetic effect.5 Because of the lack of formal screening guidelines and the complicated nature of the care of transgender patients, many decisions regarding classification of patients as high risk and appropriate screening is left to providers' discretion.

MtF patients are genotypically male but have the gender identity of female. Many of these patients elect to pursue estrogen therapy as they transition to the female gender.6 The most comprehensive analysis of breast cancer occurrence in transgender individuals was performed by Brown7 within the Veterans Administration hospital system. Brown reported on 10 such cases, 3 of which were MtF and all of whom had metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. The World Professional Association for Transgender Health guidelines indicate that estrogen may contribute to an increased risk of breast cancer in MtF patients.8, 9, 10, 11 Current published breast cancer screening recommendations for MtF patients who have history of hormone use includes annual mammography if patients meet the following criteria: hormone use > 5 years, body mass index > 35 kg/m2, or family history of breast cancer. For MtF not currently receiving estrogen therapy, recommendations indicate no routine screening is necessary.12 These guidelines do not include recommendations for MtF patients who have elected to pursue breast implants as part of their transition, but current research indicates standard mammography is not as sensitive in augmented breasts. Alternative, more sensitive methods may include breast ultrasound, magnetic resonance imaging, or displacement mammography.13

FtM patients are genotypically female but have the gender identity of male. Many of these patients elect to pursue testosterone therapy as they transition to the female gender.6

Some research indicates that testosterone may theoretically contribute to a small increase in breast cancer risk as it is aromatized to estrogen.8, 9, 10, 11 Seven cases of breast cancer were reported in FtM patients in the aforementioned Veterans Administration study; these patients presented with earlier-stage disease than MtF patients.7 In FtM transgender patients who desire top surgery (surgery to produce the chest appearance corresponding to the gender with which he or she identifies), the typical procedure is a subcutaneous mastectomy that does not completely extirpate remaining breast tissue. A 2012 case report by Nikolic et al14 examined the case of a FtM transgender patient who was diagnosed with late-stage breast cancer after nipple-sparing subcutaneous mastectomy.15 Published screening guidelines for FtM transgender patients who elect not to pursue top surgery are for screening to occur as for natal females. For patients after bilateral mastectomy, yearly chest wall and axillary examinations are recommended. For patients who underwent reduction mammoplasty, breast examinations and screening mammography are recommended as for natal women.12

The case presented here is that of a FtM patient with a notable family history of premenopausal breast cancer. This case strongly illustrates the need for further study on appropriate screening and high-risk assessment for this small but growing cohort of patients.

Section snippets

Case Report

The patient was a 36-year-old FtM patient who was committed to undergoing top surgery and had a positive family history of breast cancer. This patient presented to our breast surgery practice because he was considering bilateral complete mastectomies given his strong family history of breast cancer.

The patient's personal history was notable for menarche at age 13; he was nulliparous. He reported testosterone use for approximately 1 year. The patient's family history was remarkable for a strong

Discussion

When discussing clinical decision making for breast screening in the transgender population, 3 important considerations must be made. First, patients must be assessed for risk status. Second, surgical selection must take into account risk status and patient preferences. Third, postsurgical surveillance should be performed on the basis of risk status and surgical selection.

Conclusion

Breast cancer risk assessment should be performed in all transgender individuals. If an individual desires top surgery, a full risk assessment is essential in selecting appropriate surgical intervention. Postsurgical surveillance should be performed as appropriate, given the patient's risk factors and choice of surgery. We suggest that given the dearth of large population series and the sparsity of transgender cancer cases, a registry should be produced among providers of care to transgender

Disclosure

The authors have stated that they have no conflict of interest.

References (23)

  • G.R. Brown

    Breast cancer in transgender veterans: a ten-case series

    LGBT Health

    (2015)
  • Cited by (21)

    • A rare case of breast cancer in a transgender woman

      2021, Radiology Case Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      While incompletely understood, the suggested increased risk of breast cancer in transgender women may follow this same association, especially taking into consideration that approximately 90% of male breast cancers are ER+ [10]. Thus, breast cancer screening is generally recommended for transgender women at the age of 50 after 5 years of CSH therapy [11]. The woman discussed in this case may have benefited from screening but would not have met these criteria, as she was 70 years old but had only taken CSH therapy for 2 years.

    • Gynecologic cancer screening in the transgender male population and its current challenges

      2019, Maturitas
      Citation Excerpt :

      Patients identified as high-risk could consider more complete mastectomies including nipple areolar grafts to further reduce their risk of cancer [15,25]. Even with this surgery however, the risk of cancer drops only 90% and therefore screening is still important [26]. Mammograms do not have much utility in this population, but these patients should be followed with yearly clinical breast exams of the chest wall and axilla, and with ultrasounds of any palpable lesions [23,24,27].

    • Gender Confirmation Surgery for the Endocrinologist

      2019, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinics of North America
    • Testosterone and Breast Cancer in Transmen: Case Reports, Review of the Literature, and Clinical Observation

      2019, Clinical Breast Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      For all patients, a detailed family history should be obtained, including history of breast and ovarian cancer and age at diagnosis.24 In the absence of formal guidelines, the communication between patient and clinician regarding relative risk and benefits of each procedure must occur for informed surgical decision-making, and postsurgical surveillance should be performed on the basis of risk status and surgical selection.9 There are several challenges regarding the management of our patients.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text