Original ArticleDifferences between genders in colorectal morphology on CT colonography using a quantitative approach: a pilot study
Introduction
Incomplete optical colonoscopy (OC) has been reported in up to 20% of patients who undergo colon cancer screening [1] and is more common in women than in men [2], [3], [4], [5]. Higher rates of incomplete OC in women are thought to reflect differences in colonic morphology, including colonic length and tortuosity, based on subjective visual analysis and endoscopic experience [5], [6], [7], [8]. However, differences in morphology between genders have been difficult to measure quantitatively, as the colon can be distended in three dimensions, and the cecum, sigmoid, and transverse colon are variably mobile, depending on the presence and extent of various colonic mesenteries. A quantitative, reproducible method for assessment of colonic morphology would permit detailed evaluation of differences between men and women with incomplete OC. We therefore performed a pilot study using CT colonography (CTC) to explore differences between men and women for specific colonic metrics and also to determine the reproducibility of CTC for these metrics by measuring intra- and inter-reader reliability.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
We identified 260 patients in our computerized database who underwent CTC at out institution during a 4-year period between February 2008 and April 2012. Further review of patient records revealed that 176 (68%) of these 260 patients underwent CTC after incomplete OC (Fig. 1). The CTC software used for our study requires a continuous column of gas to produce a satisfactory centerline. Therefore, thirty-four patients were excluded from analysis on preliminary review by two trained readers
Results
The mean ages of men (mean, 66.3 years; range 51–82 years) and women (mean, 62.2 years; range, 50–83 years) in the study were similar (p = 0.169). The mean lengths of the descending and transverse colon were significantly greater in men than in women (298.4 mm (SD 86.6) versus 261.0 mm (SD 49.7); p = 0.001, and 494.0 mm (SD 159.1) versus 550.4 mm (SD 131.1); p = 0.016, respectively), but there were no significant differences between men and women for the mean lengths of the remaining colonic segments or the
Discussion
This pilot study demonstrates that quantitative reproducible differences in colonic morphology between genders are feasible on CTC. Observed differences in colonic tortuosity, volume, compactness and sigmoid apex height between genders in our study may explain higher rates of incomplete OC in women compared to men. The increased colonic tortuosity in women found in our study is consistent with subjective visual observation at endoscopy [6], [7], [8]. In the past several studies have evaluated
Compliance with ethical standards
We received a waiver of HIPPA authorization from our institutional review board for this retrospective study. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Disclosures
Dr. Levine is a consultant for Bracco Diagnostics Inc. None of the other authors have any conflicts of interest to declare.
References (15)
- et al.
Factors associated with incomplete colonoscopy: a population-based study
Gastroenterology
(2007 Jun) - et al.
Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better
Am J Gastroenterol
(2000 Oct) Colonoscopy issues related to women
Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am
(2006 Jan)- et al.
Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women?
Gastrointest Endosc
(1996 Feb) Completing colonoscopy
Am J Gastroenterol
(2000 Oct)- et al.
Colon anatomy based on CT colonography and fluoroscopy: impact on looping, straightening and ancillary manoeuvres in colonoscopy
Dig. Liver Dis.
(2010 Apr) - et al.
A prospective study of colonoscopy practice in the UK today: are we adequately prepared for national colorectal cancer screening tomorrow?
Gut
(2004 Feb)
Cited by (0)
- 1
Deceased.