Elsevier

Clinical Neurophysiology

Volume 117, Issue 8, August 2006, Pages 1708-1714
Clinical Neurophysiology

Quantitative EEG in low-IQ children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2006.04.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

This study investigated EEG differences between children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD) and matched control subjects, with either normal or low IQs.

Methods

Twenty normal-IQ and 20 low-IQ children with AD/HD, and 40 age-, IQ- and sex-matched control subjects participated in this study. EEG was recorded from 21 sites during an eyes-closed resting condition and Fourier transformed to provide estimates for total power, and absolute and relative power in the delta, theta, alpha and beta bands.

Results

Children with AD/HD had increased theta activity with decreased levels of alpha and beta activity compared to control subjects. IQ was not found to impact on the EEG. No significant differences were found between subjects with normal and low IQs, with the low- and high-IQ AD/HD groups having similar EEG profiles.

Conclusions

Low-IQ children with AD/HD have similar EEG abnormalities to those with normal IQs, and IQ does not appear to impact on EEG power measures.

Significance

This is the first study to investigate EEG differences in low-IQ children with and without AD/HD.

Introduction

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (AD/HD) is one of the most common psychiatric disorders treated by child and adolescent psychiatrists in the US (Cantwell, 1996), with studies estimating the prevalence rate in children at between 3 and 6% (Lindgren et al., 1990, Pelham et al., 1992). AD/HD is characterized by varying levels of hyperactivity, impulsivity and inattention, which may change with development from preschool through adulthood (APA, 1994). The disorder interferes with many areas of normal development and functioning in a child's life, and if untreated, predisposes a child to social and psychiatric problems in later life.

EEG studies of children with AD/HD have typically found increased theta activity (Clarke et al., 1998, Clarke et al., 2001a, Clarke et al., 2001b, Clarke et al., 2001c, Janzen et al., 1995, Mann et al., 1992, Satterfield et al., 1972), occurring primarily in the frontal regions (Chabot and Serfontein, 1996, Lazzaro et al., 1998), increased posterior delta (Clarke et al., 1998, Clarke et al., 2001a, Clarke et al., 2001b, Matousek et al., 1984) and decreased alpha and beta activity (Callaway et al., 1983, Dykman et al., 1982), also most apparent in the posterior regions (Clarke et al., 1998, Clarke et al., 2001a, Clarke et al., 2001b, Lazzaro et al., 1998); see Barry et al. (2003) for a review. However, most of these studies have used children who are in the normal intelligence range. Studies that have used an IQ level as part of the exclusion criteria typically have a cutoff of between 85 and 90 (Clarke et al., 1998, Clarke et al., 2001a, Clarke et al., 2001b, Clarke et al., 2001c, Dykman et al., 1982, Harmony et al., 1988), above 80 (Capute et al., 1968), or simply report that IQ is in the normal range for children in their study (Mann et al., 1992).

The exclusive use of research subjects in the normal IQ range has resulted primarily from a concern that problems of poor attention, and increased impulsivity and hyperactivity, are considered normal phenomena in many forms of mental retardation. The DSM-III-R states that ‘In mental retardation there may be many of the features of AD/HD because of the generalized delay in intellectual development’ (APA, 1987, p. 52). However, the diagnostic criteria used in most electrophysiological studies of AD/HD do not prohibit diagnosis of this disorder in individuals with low IQs. Both the DSM-IV (APA, 1994) and DSM-III-R (APA, 1987) allow a diagnosis to be made if the symptoms are excessive for the child's mental age. Only the DSM-III (APA, 1980) specifically stated that AD/HD was not to be diagnosed in individuals with severe or profound mental retardation.

To date, only one study in the area has examined the EEG of children with low IQs (Chabot and Serfontein, 1996). That study examined 76 children with an IQ<85, who met the DSM-III (APA, 1980) criteria for attention-deficit disorder with or without hyperactivity, and children with attentional problems. Results were largely similar to those in subjects with normal IQs, with increased theta activity being the most common finding. However, patient results were compared to a normative database constructed using normal children, not allowing determination of how low-IQ children with AD/HD differ from low-IQ children without behavioural problems.

The aim of this study was to investigate the nature of EEG differences between children with and without AD/HD, who also have low IQs, and to determine how their EEGs differ from AD/HD children of normal intelligence.

Section snippets

Subjects

Four groups of 20 subjects, with 18 boys and 2 girls in each group, participated in this study. The groups consisted of a normal-IQ control group, a low-IQ control group, a normal-IQ AD/HD group and a low-IQ AD/HD group. All children were between the ages of 8 and 13 years, and were right handed and footed. Children with a full-scale WISC-III (Wechsler, 1992) IQ score of 85 or higher were allocated to the normal-IQ groups, and children with an IQ<80 were placed in the low-IQ groups. All

Results

The mean ages and IQs of the AD/HD and control groups are shown in Table 1. No significant differences exist between any groups for age. There was no significant difference in IQ between the low-IQ AD/HD and the low-IQ control groups, or the normal-IQ AD/HD and the normal-IQ control groups, but the high-IQ groups were significantly different from the low-IQ groups (F(1,78)=342.7, P<0.001).

Discussion

The traditional omnibus approach to statistical testing is obviously less sensitive than our preferred planned-contrasts approach, in that the former generally showed weaker group by topography interactions. If the omnibus effects were to be then followed up by post hoc tests to establish the origin of the interaction, it is readily apparent that the required correction of alpha for multiple testing would severely impact further on the apparent significance of those findings. Hence we encourage

References (30)

  • DSM-III. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (1980)
  • DSM-III-R. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (1987)
  • DSM-IV. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders

    (1994)
  • E. Bosaeus et al.

    Correlation between paedopsychiatric findings and EEG-variables in well-functioning children of ages 5 to 16 years

    Scand J Psychol

    (1977)
  • E. Callaway et al.

    Hyperactive children's event-related potentials fail to support underarousal and maturational-lag theories

    Arch Gen Psychiatry

    (1983)
  • Cited by (48)

    • A systematic review of quantitative EEG as a possible biomarker in child psychiatric disorders

      2019, Psychiatry Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      When used as a diagnostic aid in ADHD, three studies collected qEEG readings with the subjects’ eyes open (EO) (Bresnahan et al., 1999; Kuperman et al., 1996; Markovska-Simoska and Pop-Jordanova, 2017), three studies collected qEEG with eyes closed (EC) (Clarke et al., 2006; Fonseca et al., 2008; Hermens et al., 2005), three studies had both EO and EC conditions (Coolidge et al., 2007; Fonseca et al., 2013; Ogrim et al., 2012) and one study provided no information (Kim et al., 2015). While the majority of diagnostic studies compared qEEG variables in children with ADHD to healthy controls (HC) (Bresnahan et al., 1999; Clarke et al., 2006; Fonseca et al., 2013, 2008; Hermens et al., 2005; Kim et al., 2015; Kuperman et al., 1996; Markovska-Simoska and Pop-Jordanova, 2017; Ogrim et al., 2012), one studied qEEG variables as a tool to differentiate ADHD from other psychiatric disorders (Coolidge et al., 2007). Half of the diagnostic studies reported the participants were medication free (Clarke et al., 2006; Fonseca et al., 2013, 2008; Hermens et al., 2005; Markovska-Simoska and Pop-Jordanova, 2017); the other half did not specify if participants were taking any psychoactive medications (Bresnahan et al., 1999; Coolidge et al., 2007; Kim et al., 2015; Kuperman et al., 1996; Ogrim et al., 2012).

    • EEG development in Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: From child to adult

      2019, Clinical Neurophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Previous research, that compared the EEG from children diagnosed with ADHD to non-ADHD control subjects, has identified a consistent EEG profile of greater theta activity, which is generally maximal in frontal electrode sites (Clarke et al., 2001b, 2001d, 2002a, 2002b, 2002c, 2002d, 2003a, 2003b, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2011; Hobbs et al., 2007). Greater delta activity in posterior regions (Clarke et al., 1998, 2001a, 2001c) is also often present, as is a reduction in activity in both the alpha and beta bands (Clarke et al., 1998, 2001a, 2001c, 2006, 2007, 2008, Loo et al., 2009; Nazari et al., 2011; Woltering et al., 2012; Dupuy et al., 2013). Several studies have interpreted their EEG findings as representing a maturational lag in the development of the central nervous system (CNS) (Mann et al., 1992; Clarke et al., 2001b, 2001c, 2001d, 2002c, 2011).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text