Natural evolution of carpal tunnel syndrome in untreated patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.02.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To describe the clinical and electrophysiological evolution of a group of patients diagnosed with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) who have not undergone any type of treatment (injections, braces or surgery).

Methods

Clinical and electrophysiological monitoring was done consecutively in a series of patients who were admitted with a diagnosis of CTS. The average time for follow-up was 2 years. The Historic and objective Classification scale (HiOb) was used to establish the severity of the disease in the test group, and neuro conductions were done to determine the electrophysiological classification.

Results

A total of 132 patients were monitored. In 31 patients (23.4% of the cases), the HiOb classification deteriorated, 28.8% remained stable, and 47.6% showed recovery. In the nerve conduction studies, 10 cases (7.6%) exhibited electrophysiological deterioration, 67.4% remained constant and 25% improved.

Conclusions

A significant percentage of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome had no change in their clinical and electrophysiological condition, while some improved spontaneously without treatment.

Significance

Given that most patients diagnosed with CTS remain stable or even improve over time, a conservative treatment may be all that is needed in a selection of patients with this disorder.

Introduction

Carpal tunnel syndrome is a clinical condition that is frequently seen in medical evaluations by primary healthcare practitioners (Latinovic et al., 2006). The recommended therapies are substantiated by randomly allocated sample studies that demonstrate the benefits of injections or surgery. It is believed that due to its progressive nature, the disease produces severe sensory alterations and a greater disability if it is not treated in time. Transversal studies suggest that the disease progresses rapidly with age (Bland and Rudolfer, 2003). In the presence of co-morbidities such as diabetes or hypothyroidism, the progress of CTS is worse, due to the pathophysiological nature of these conditions (Kennedy and Zochodne, 2005). However, it is not yet known whether idiopathic CTS follows a defined pattern or that regardless of its severity, the duration of CTS itself is enough to produce functional and electrophysiological deterioration.

This study monitored patients diagnosed with CTS to determine the evolution of the disease, using clinical and electrophysiological classification.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Since 2001, in our Electrophysiological Laboratory at the Carlos Lleras Restrepo Clinic, a clinical examination and a standardized questionnaire were applied to every patient that was referred for the evaluation of CTS. Demographic, clinical and electrophysiological data were collected. Specifically, databases including age, sex, Rempel’s clinical criteria for CTS (Rempel et al., 1998), functional tests and musculoskeletal co-morbidities (rheumatoid arthritis, cervical pain, shoulder

Results

One hundred and eighty-nine patients accepted the invitation to return for the clinical and electrophysiological follow-up exam. Fifty-seven patients of this group were treated with surgery, a brace or injections. One hundred and thirty-two patients did not receive any form of treatment. These patients did not receive treatment because of institutional difficulties. Testing was done at 24.2 months (SD = 4.2). The average age was 48.8 years (SD = 10.2), and 81.1% of the patients were female. Primary

Discussion

This research examined the natural evolution of idiopathic CTS in a group of patients who did not undergo any form of treatment. It was observed that over a period of approximately 24 months, the disease remained in a relatively stable electrophysiological state. This study confirms the natural course of CTS. In general, the findings support the conclusions obtained by other authors (Padua et al., 2001).

Although a high number of patients did not return for a follow-up exam, we consider that the

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Patricia Sierra, Sandra Katerine Garzón, Darío Vargas and Miguel Gutierrez for their editorial assistance in preparation of this manuscript.

References (12)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (46)

  • Response to local corticosteroid injections in carpal tunnel syndrome with normal conduction studies

    2022, Reumatologia Clinica
    Citation Excerpt :

    Furthermore, there is also the possibility that in some patients this process will never turn into ANCS. There may be other variables that are not well understood; it has been published that in some patients with CTS and ANCS, after a period and without any active treatment, their symptoms vanish and, at least in some patients, their ANCS can even improve spontaneously.8–10 When the pressure in the carpal tunnel reaches 20–30 mmHg, we can have a mild reduction in epineurial blood flow, this being the first manifestation of the median nerve compression; clinically we will have very mild paresthesia.11

  • Clinical Course and Prognostic Factors in Conservatively Managed Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review

    2016, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
    Citation Excerpt :

    Three studies provided conservative management without specifying which mode exactly. In 4 studies,20-23 the course of (clinically) untreated CTS was observed. In some studies, parts of the cohort were treated surgically.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text