Elsevier

Clinical Lung Cancer

Volume 18, Issue 5, September 2017, Pages 572-582.e1
Clinical Lung Cancer

Original Study
A Comprehensive Analysis of Programmed Cell Death Ligand-1 Expression With the Clone SP142 Antibody in Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2017.02.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) have been identified as novel targets for immunotherapy, with anti–PD-1 therapy currently the standard treatment for non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after the failure of first-line chemotherapy treatment. The recent phase II POPLAR and phase III OAK studies showed that atezolizumab, a representative PD-L1 inhibitor, exhibited a survival benefit compared with standard therapy in patients with NSCLC.

Patients and Methods

We examined PD-L1 expression in NSCLC using the clone SP142 of POPLAR and OAK studies. PD-L1 expression in 499 surgically resected NSCLC patients was evaluated using immunohistochemistry using SP142. We set cutoff values as 1%, 5%, 10%, and 50%.

Results

The samples from 189 (37.9%), 119 (23.8%), 71 (14.2%), and 39 (7.8%) patients were positive for PD-L1 expression at cutoff values of 1%, 5%, 10%, and 50%, respectively. Fisher exact tests showed that PD-L1 positivity was significantly associated with male sex, smoking, advanced stage, the presence of vascular invasion, squamous cell carcinoma, and wild type epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation status at all cutoff values. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses revealed that PD–L1-positive patients had a worse prognosis than PD–L1-negative patients only at the 1% cutoff value. Forest plot analyses showed that the 1% cutoff provided a more sensitive value for the prediction of postoperative prognosis.

Conclusion

PD-L1 expression varied greatly according to different cutoff values. This study might be a useful reference to understand the results of POPLAR and OAK studies and to select patients likely to benefit from atezolizumab.

Introduction

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide.1 Multidisciplinary therapy in the form of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy has been the standard treatment for lung cancer, but targeted molecular therapy has recently greatly improved the clinical course for patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) having common driver mutations, such as those in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase genes.2 However, despite advances in such therapies, the prognosis of NSCLC patients lacking driver mutations remains poor.3

Immunotherapy targeting programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand (PD-L)-1 has recently been shown to improve prognoses in multiple types of cancers.4, 5 PD-1 is expressed on the surface of T cells and regulates their activity through interaction with its ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2 expressed on the surface of many cancers, including NSCLC. This interaction attenuates the T-cell activity, resulting in the downregulation of the immune response against cancer cells.4, 6, 7 Recently, PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors have been developed as anticancer therapy in several cancer types.8, 9 PD-1 inhibitors, such as nivolumab in the CheckMate study and pembrolizumab in the KEYNOTE study, exhibited a survival benefit compared with conventional standard therapy,10, 11, 12 and the treatment has become standard for NSCLC patients after the failure of first-line chemotherapy. The recent clinical trials, the POPLAR and OAK studies, showed that the representative PD-L1 inhibitor atezolizumab yielded significant survival benefits compared with standard therapy in NSCLC,13, 14 and could be used as standard treatment for NSCLC patients as an alternative to nivolumab and pembrolizumab. Moreover, the subset analyses of the studies revealed a close correlation between PD-L1 expression and atezolizumab efficacy.13, 14 It would therefore be useful to examine PD-L1 expression in patients undergoing immunotherapy with atezolizumab using the clone SP142 antibody from the POPLAR and OAK studies supplied by Ventana, Tucson, AZ.

In this translational study, we examined PD-L1 expression in surgically resected primary NSCLC including adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma using the clone SP142 antibody, and investigated the associations of PD-L1 expression with clinicopathological features and patient outcomes. We set the cutoff values as 1%, 5%, 10%, and 50% for PD-L1, and conducted further analyses using these cutoff values.

Section snippets

Patients and Samples

We retrospectively examined patients who underwent complete surgical resection of their primary NSCLC including adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma between January 2003 and December 2012 at the Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University. Patients with a history of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck or esophagus were excluded from this study because of the possibility of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma from these cancers.

Association Between PD-L1 Expression and Clinicopathological Characteristics in Patients With Primary NSCLC

A total of 499 patients with primary NSCLC (417 with adenocarcinoma and 82 with squamous cell carcinoma) who underwent surgical resection were included in the present study (Table 1). Two hundred seventy-six patients (55.3%) were male, and 224 (44.9%) had never smoked; the median age of all patients was 69 years (range, 29-86 years). EGFR status was available for 235 patients with adenocarcinoma; of these, 123 (52.3%) had wild type EGFR, and 112 (47.7%) had mutant EGFR.

Immunohistochemical

Discussion

Anti–PD-1 therapy has become the standard treatment for NSCLC patients after the failure of first-line chemotherapy with a platinum doublet. Additionally, PD-L1 expression on tumor cells is expected to be a prognostic and predictive biomarker for responses to anti–PD-1/PD-L1 antibodies in lung cancer.8, 9 Therefore, it is important to examine PD-L1 expression in tumor cells of lung cancer patients.

Some clinical trials for NSCLC used independent monoclonal anti–PD-1 and anti–PD-L1 antibodies,

Conclusion

Expression of PD-L1 varied greatly according to different cutoff values, and was associated with poor survival in NSCLC patients. This study might be a useful reference to understand the results of the POPLAR and OAK studies, and to select patients who would potentially benefit from atezolizumab therapy.

Disclosure

The authors have stated that they have no conflicts of interest.

References (38)

  • J.M. Boland et al.

    Tumor B7-H1 and B7-H3 expression in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung

    Clin Lung Cancer

    (2013)
  • M. Shimoji et al.

    Clinical and pathologic features of lung cancer expressing programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1)

    Lung Cancer

    (2016)
  • R. Siegel et al.

    Cancer statistics, 2012

    CA Cancer J Clin

    (2012)
  • G.R. Oxnard et al.

    New targetable oncogenes in non–small-cell lung cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2013)
  • D.M. Pardoll

    The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy

    Nat Rev Cancer

    (2012)
  • M.A. Postow et al.

    Immune checkpoint blockade in cancer therapy

    J Clin Oncol

    (2015)
  • Z. Gatalica et al.

    Programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) in common cancers and their correlation with molecular cancer type

    Cancer Epidemiol

    (2014)
  • S.P. Patel et al.

    PD-L1 expression as a predictive biomarker in cancer immunotherapy

    Mol Cancer Ther

    (2015)
  • S.L. Topalian et al.

    Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2012)
  • Cited by (50)

    • Role of lymphocytes, macrophages and immune receptors in suppression of tumor immunity

      2023, Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science
    • Programmed death ligand 1 protein expression is positively correlated with the solid predominant subtype, high MIB-1 labeling index, and p53 expression and negatively correlated with epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in lung adenocarcinoma

      2021, Human Pathology
      Citation Excerpt :

      There was a difference in PD-L1 expression according to the histological subtype. PD-L1 expression was higher in the patients with SQCC than in patients with ADC, as reported in previous studies [12–14]. There are several differences between ADC and SQCC in terms of etiology, mutation status, and biological behavior.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text