Original StudyDoes Post-Transplant Maintenance Therapy With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Improve Outcomes of Patients With High-Risk Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Leukemia?
Introduction
Understanding the role of the fusion oncoprotein BCR-ABL1 in the pathogenesis of Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) leukemia led to the development of targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and dramatic improvements in the outcomes. For chronic phase (CP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the 8-year overall survival (OS) increased from < 20% to 80% to 90%, and the outcomes of TKI-responsive accelerated phase (AP) have been increasingly comparable with those for CP-CML.1, 2, 3 In Ph+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), remission rates of 90% to 95% are commonly achievable when TKIs are combined with chemotherapy, and these remissions can be sustained.4, 5 Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the upfront standard-of-care treatment of Ph+ ALL in first complete remission (CR1) and blast phase (BP) CML and is reserved for TKI failure in CP- and AP-CML. However, the transplant outcomes have not improved, despite greater remissions with the use of pretransplantation TKIs,6 largely owing to the high incidence of post-transplant relapse.7, 8
Prophylactic or therapeutic TKIs can be safely administered after transplantation.9 The administration of post-transplant TKIs as prophylactic maintenance is feasible using imatinib.10, 11, 12 However, given that allografting is increasingly being performed in patients in whom first-line and later TKI therapy has failed, data on the safety and efficacy of newer generation TKIs administered after transplantation would be of great interest, especially if activity is demonstrated before transplantation. We report our single-institution outcomes of allograft recipients transplanted for advanced-phase CML and Ph+ ALL who received post-transplant maintenance TKI therapy.
Section snippets
Materials and Methods
Patients with AP- and BP-CML or Ph+ ALL diagnosed and treated at our institution or referred in remission for transplantation who received non–T-cell–depleted allogeneic HSCT at Emory University Hospital from 2004 to 2014 were identified using a computerized database search. The following data were extracted: the baseline disease characteristics, including phase, response to TKI therapy, ABL1 domain mutation, and disease status at transplantation; transplant-specific characteristics, including
Results
From 2004 to 2014, 19 patients with advanced-phase CML and 30 with Ph+ ALL underwent allografting, and 26 received post-transplant maintenance TKI therapy. Another 23 patients (10 with AP- or BP-CML, 13 with Ph+ ALL) did not receive any post-transplant maintenance owing to early relapse (n = 5), enrollment in a clinical trial (n = 5), physician preference (n = 5), or death (n = 8). These patients were not included in the present analysis.
Discussion
The remarkable anti-leukemic activity of TKIs has unquestionably affected the short-term outcomes of patients with advanced-phase CML and Ph+ ALL. However, this therapeutic advance has yet to translate into better transplant survival.6, 7, 8, 16 Given that allografting is increasingly performed after failure of first-line imatinib and that newer TKIs are potent against imatinib-resistant disease, data on the safety and efficacy of these agents administered after transplantation are of great
Conclusion
We report favorable outcomes in high-risk Ph+ leukemia allograft recipients who received post-transplant TKI maintenance therapy. Dose-reduced second-generation TKIs were well tolerated, and the 5-year survival rate is encouraging (78%). These preliminary results argue that the role of maintenance post-transplant TKIs in advanced-phase CML deserves further evaluation in prospective trials.
Disclosure
H.J.K. received honoraria from Bristol-Meyer-Squibb, Ariad, and Pfizer for attending advisory boards. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Michael Graiser for his assistance in facilitating data retrieval.
References (22)
- et al.
Improved survival in chronic myeloid leukemia since the introduction of imatinib therapy: a single-institution historical experience
Blood
(2012) - et al.
Tyrosine kinase inhibitors as initial therapy for patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in accelerated phase
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk
(2014) - et al.
First report of phase 2 study of dasatinib with hyper-CVAD for the frontline treatment of patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia
Blood
(2010) - et al.
Current status and perspectives of tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment in the posttransplant period in patients with chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML)
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
(2010) - et al.
Prophylactic administration of imatinib after hematopoietic cell transplantation for high-risk Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia
Blood
(2007) - et al.
Posttransplantation imatinib as a strategy to postpone the requirement for immunotherapy in patients undergoing reduced-intensity allografts for chronic myeloid leukemia
Blood
(2007) - et al.
European LeukemiaNet recommendations for the management of chronic myeloid leukemia: 2013
Blood
(2013) - et al.
National Institutes of Health consensus development project on criteria for clinical trials in chronic graft-versus-host disease: I. Diagnosis and staging working group report
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
(2005) - et al.
Early molecular response to posttransplantation imatinib determines outcome in MRD+ Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph+ ALL)
Blood
(2005) - et al.
Re: Imatinib mesylate administration in the first 100 days after stem cell transplantation
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant
(2004)