Elsevier

Clinics in Perinatology

Volume 44, Issue 3, September 2017, Pages 713-728
Clinics in Perinatology

Alarm Safety and Alarm Fatigue

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clp.2017.05.005Get rights and content

Section snippets

Key points

  • The proliferation of alarming devices in neonatal intensive care (NICU) has created significant risk of patient harm due to alarm desensitization and missed alarms.

  • A large proportion of clinical alarms in NICUs are nonactionable, creating a cry wolf phenomenon that promotes alarm fatigue.

  • Safe alarm practices require attention to device functionality, alarm settings, staff operating the devices, patient condition, and environment of care.

  • Sound quality improvement methods can significantly reduce

The alarm safety problem

Medical device alarms present care providers with a dilemma: they contribute crucially to effective patient care; however, they may also cause unintended adverse consequences. Safe and effective use of device alarms requires an understanding of the technology sufficiently clear to balance inherent benefits and risks. For some patients in intensive care settings, the number of alarm signals may reach several hundred per day, creating such a high alarm burden that desensitized staff may miss,

Human Factors and Alarms

Human response to clinical alarms has correlates in other fields, including aviation, nuclear power, and many others. A significant body of human factors research exists related to alarms. Binary alarm systems are automated decision aids that classify current condition into either normal or critical. The positive predictive value (PPV) of an alarm system represents the probability that there is a true critical event in case of an alarm: PPV = true alarms/(true alarms + false alarms).6 When PPV

Key Drivers of Alarm Fatigue

Many factors contribute to clinical alarm burden and alarm fatigue. Quality improvement (QI) efforts to address alarm fatigue may benefit from classification of such factors into a key driver diagram (Fig. 1).

Primary Driver: Devices

There may be situations in which alarming devices are used unnecessarily. A stable term infant treated for hypoglycemia may not require pulse oximetry monitoring. Unnecessary oximetry monitoring in a vigorous infant likely begets motion artifact and false alarms. Similarly, the device may

Total alarm count

When implementing changes to address alarm fatigue, the most commonly used measure is total number of alarms per day. Many devices store a time-stamped alarm history, creating an easily collected source of QI data. Numerous studies and quality reports have used total alarm quantity as their primary outcome.2, 22, 26, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39 One team in a pediatric bone marrow transplant unit implemented a standardized cardiac monitor care process and noted a reduction in median number of alarms per

Monitor

Downloads or recordings directly from the alarming device are efficient ways to obtain alarm data.50 Biomedical or clinical engineering or information technology support may be helpful to optimize device alarm data storage configuration and to understand electronic data export and analysis options.26, 36, 39

Third-Party Systems

Long-term, efficient alarm data collection and analysis may be enhanced through the use of clinical data warehouse or middleware systems. Such third-party systems may be customized to

Summary

Alarm fatigue is a real safety concern in NICUs because the high alarm burden, coupled with a high proportion of nonactionable alarms, leads to a cry wolf phenomenon, causing missed alarms and patient harm. PBPs to address alarm fatigue include policies and staff training that clarify safe alarm practices, use of evidence-based and data-driven alarm settings to standardize response to alarms, and leveraging device alarm features to reduce nuisance and false alarms.

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (50)

  • J.P. Bliss et al.

    Human probability matching behaviour in response to alarms of varying reliability

    Ergonomics

    (1995)
  • J.P. Bliss et al.

    Dual-task performance as a function of individual alarm validity and alarm system reliability information

    Proc Hum Factors Ergon Soc Annu Meet

    (1996)
  • J.P. Bliss et al.

    Behavioural implications of alarm mistrust as a function of task workload

    Ergonomics

    (2000)
  • Medical electrical equipment — Part 1-8: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance — Collateral standard: General requirements, tests and guidance for alarm systems in medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems

    (2006)
  • C.W. Paine et al.

    Systematic review of physiologic monitor alarm characteristics and pragmatic interventions to reduce alarm frequency

    J Hosp Med

    (2016)
  • S.T. Lawless

    Crying wolf: false alarms in a pediatric intensive care unit

    Crit Care Med

    (1994)
  • C.L. Tsien et al.

    Poor prognosis for existing monitors in the intensive care unit

    Crit Care Med

    (1997)
  • A.C. van der Eijk et al.

    “New-generation” pulse oximeters in extremely low-birth-weight infants: how do they perform in clinical practice?

    J Perinat Neonatal Nurs

    (2012)
  • M.M. Cvach et al.

    Daily electrode change and effect on cardiac monitor alarms: an evidence-based practice approach

    J Nurs Care Qual

    (2013)
  • B. Schmidt et al.

    Effects of targeting higher vs lower arterial oxygen saturations on death or disability in extremely preterm infants

    JAMA

    (2013)
  • C. Poets et al.

    Association between intermittent hypoxemia or bradycardia and late death or disability in extremely preterm infants

    JAMA

    (2015)
  • K. Lansdowne et al.

    Retrospective analysis of pulse oximeter alarm settings in an intensive care unit patient population

    BMC Nurs

    (2016)
  • A.K. Sowan et al.

    Changes in default alarm settings and standard in-service are insufficient to improve alarm fatigue in an Intensive Care Unit: a pilot project

    JMIR Hum Factors

    (2016)
  • B. Mills et al.

    Improving compliance with pulse oximetry alarm limits for very preterm infants?

    J Paediatr Child Health

    (2010)
  • A. Brantley et al.

    Clinical trial of an educational program to decrease monitor alarms in a medical Intensive Care Unit

    AACN Crit Care

    (2016)
  • Cited by (0)

    Disclosure Statement: The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose.

    View full text