Elsevier

Cognitive Brain Research

Volume 24, Issue 3, August 2005, Pages 702-714
Cognitive Brain Research

Research Report
Differential activation of object-selective visual areas by passive viewing of pictures and words

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.04.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Functional imaging has shown that pictures of faces (N. Kanwisher, J. McDermott, M.M. Chun, The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception, J. Neurosci. 17 (1997) 4302–4311) and buildings (R. Epstein, N. Kanwisher, A cortical representation of the local visual environment, Nature 391 (1998) 598–601) activate different regions within the lateral occipital complex (LOC). To investigate effects of stimulus format on activation in these areas, we used event-related fMRI to measure brain activity during the passive viewing of pictures showing buildings and faces, and of words identifying these pictures. Consistent with earlier findings, pictures of faces activated bilateral regions in the lateral fusiform gyri, whereas pictures of buildings activated bilateral regions in the parahippocampal gyri. Analyzing the activation elicited by visually presenting the written names of the pictures, however, we did not find an effect of word meaning on the fMRI signal change in these areas: fMRI signal changes for the names of faces and the names of buildings did not differ in any of the areas selectively activated by the corresponding pictures. In general, both word conditions and non-preferred picture conditions elicited similar signal amplitudes. While presentation of words did not lead to strong activation in object-specific areas, activation for words of both categories was found in the left occipito-temporal cortex, close to the location which has tentatively been called ‘visual word form area’ (L. Cohen, S. Dehaene, L. Naccache, S. Lehéricy, G. Dehaene-Lambertz, et al., The visual word form are: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients, Brain 123 (2000) 291–307), revealing that words were processed effectively during the experiment. Taken together, these results show that names of pictures do not automatically activate the corresponding object-selective areas.

Introduction

Functional imaging studies have shown that regions in the occipito-temporal cortex respond preferentially to pictures of specific types of objects. The most prominent examples for categories that have been reported to elicit object-selective activation are faces and houses or scenes. Specifically, it has been demonstrated that an area in the lateral fusiform gyrus, sometimes called the fusiform face area (FFA; [34]), is activated when subjects view pictures of faces in comparison to viewing scrambled pictures or pictures of other objects. In contrast, pictures of buildings selectively activate a more medial region within the ventral occipital cortex, which has been called the parahippocampal place area (PPA; [15]). This lateral-to-medial topography of face vs. house-related peak activations has reliably been reported (e.g., [7], [8], [15], [22], [39], [41]; see [24] for a recent review). It is highly consistent within individuals [60] and across studies [42].

In the present study, we investigated whether presentation of words leads to an automatic activation of object-category-specific areas in the ventral occipitotemporal cortex. This question is highly relevant for further studies in the field, because in order to separately investigate processing of pictures and words in neuroimaging studies, it is necessary to ensure that evoked responses can be disentangled.

Evidence for activation of perceptual information during word reading comes from behavioral studies showing word-picture priming [21], [38], [49] and from imaging studies showing similar patterns of activation in the left occipito-temporal cortex for objects and their denotations either during naming and silent reading [4] or during semantic judgment tasks [64]. It has further been shown that semantic processing of written words from different categories (animals and tools) can evoke category-related activation patterns in the fusiform gyri similar to those obtained during viewing and naming of pictures from the same categories [7], [51].

In contrast to these studies showing that it is possible to obtain category-specific activation during semantic retrieval, we wanted to know whether presentation of words leads to a rapid, automatic category-specific activation in human LOC. To achieve this goal, we presented pictures of faces and buildings and the corresponding words tachistoscopically in a rapid presentation event-related fMRI paradigm. Furthermore, the primary task of our subjects was a geometrical pattern detection task, for which the identification of the object pictures or words was not necessary. Taken together, the presentation mode and task demands favored shallow processing [12] of face and building stimuli. We expected that under these conditions, activation in ventral occipital complex will be largely bottom-up driven, and top-down effects [37] will be small. Therefore, we expected that pictures of faces and buildings would elicit a lateral to medial category specific activation, replicating previous studies. Corresponding words, on the other hand, were not expected to elicit a comparable category-specific activation in the FFA and PPA. In contrast, we expected a region in the left fusiform gyrus to respond maximally to word stimuli, corresponding to previous reports [10], [11]. Word-specific activation in this area has been found even in the absence of conscious processing [13], [53]. Such a pattern of results would suggest that (1) written words are initially processed as a distinct category of visual ‘objects’ (e.g., word forms; [10], [11], [43], but see [54]), in much the same way as pictures of different object categories such as faces and objects, and (2) that there is no automatic (top-down) activation of category specific visual object processing areas, e.g., via semantic processing.

Section snippets

Participants

Ten volunteers participated in this study (5 males). All subjects were consistent right handers according to their score in the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory [48]. Subjects' age was in the range of 20–37 years, with a mean age of 26.5 years. All subjects were native speakers of German and had no history of neurological or psychiatric disease. All subjects gave informed written consent according to the guidelines of the Max-Planck-Institute. The fMRI procedures were approved by the University

Behavioral data

On the target discrimination task, subjects performed well above chance (T9 = 3.893, P < 0.01) with a mean of 64% correct answers.

Identification of FFA and PPA

Consistent with previous reports, regions in the ventral occipito-temporal cortex could be identified that were selectively activated by pictures of the two stimulus categories. Directly comparing pictures of faces with pictures of buildings, bilateral regions in the fusiform gyrus responded more strongly to pictures of faces than pictures of buildings, whereas a

Discussion

We presented pictures of faces and buildings and corresponding words in order to investigate the responses of visual object processing areas dependent on the stimulus format.

The activation elicited by pictures of faces and buildings replicated the pattern described in numerous imaging studies. Pictures of faces activated most strongly regions in the lateral fusiform gyrus. Face-selective activations could be identified in both hemispheres, but with stronger activation in the RH. The same

Conclusion

In summary, the present fMRI study has confirmed that faces and buildings differentially activate regions within the LOC. The written labels of pictures from the preferred category, however, did not lead to responses any different from pictures or words of the non-preferred category in these areas. These results indicate that there are conditions under which, e.g., reading the word ‘castle’ is not the same as seeing the picture of a castle, at least with respect to areas in the LOC. They also

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (PO 548/3-1). We thank two anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

References (69)

  • G. Lohmann et al.

    Lipsia—A new software system for the evaluation of functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain

    Comput. Med. Imaging Graph.

    (2001)
  • E.A. Maguire et al.

    Distinct neural systems for the encoding and recognition of topography and faces

    NeuroImage

    (2001)
  • R. Malach et al.

    The topography of high-order human object areas

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2002)
  • B.D. McCandliss et al.

    The visual word form area: expertise for reading in the fusiform gyrus

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2003)
  • C.J. Moore et al.

    Three distinct ventral occipitotemporal regions for reading and object naming

    NeuroImage

    (1999)
  • R.C. Oldfield

    The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory

    Neuropsychologia

    (1971)
  • D. Perani et al.

    Word and picture matching: a PET study of semantic category effects

    Neuropsychologia

    (1999)
  • C.J. Price et al.

    The myth of the visual word form area

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • S.L. Rossell et al.

    Sex differences in functional brain activation during a lexical visual field task

    Brain Lang.

    (2002)
  • M. Spiridon et al.

    How distributed is visual category information in human occipito-temporal cortex? An fMRI study

    Neuron

    (2002)
  • H.T. Van Schie et al.

    An event-related potential investigation of the relationship between semantic and perceptual levels of representation

    Brain Lang.

    (2003)
  • K.J. Worsley et al.

    Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited—Again

    NeuroImage

    (1995)
  • G.K. Aguirre et al.

    Topographical disorientation, a synthesis and taxonomy

    Brain

    (1999)
  • R.H. Baayen, R. Piepenbrock, L. Gulikers, The CELEX Lexical Database (Release 2) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic...
  • M. Beauregard et al.

    The neural substrate for concrete, abstract, and emotional word lexical: a positron emission tomography study

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (1997)
  • S. Bookheimer et al.

    Regional cerebral blood flow during object naming and word reading

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (1995)
  • N. Brunswick et al.

    Explicit and implicit processing of words and pseudowords by adult developmental dyslexics: a search for Wenicke's Wortschatz?

    Brain

    (1999)
  • R.L. Buckner et al.

    Functional MRI evidence for a role of frontal and inferior temporal cortex in amodal components of priming

    Brain

    (2000)
  • L.L. Chao et al.

    Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (1999)
  • L.L. Chao et al.

    Are face-responsive regions selective only for faces?

    NeuroReport

    (1999)
  • L. Cohen et al.

    The visual word form area: spatial and temporal characterization of an initial stage of reading in normal subjects and posterior split-brain patients

    Brain

    (2000)
  • L. Cohen et al.

    Language specific tuning of visual cortex? Functional properties of the visual word form area

    Brain

    (2000)
  • S. Dehaene et al.

    Cerebral mechanisms of word masking and unconscious repetition priming

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • J.T. Devlin et al.

    Category-related activation for written words in the posterior fusiform is task specific

    Neuropsychologia

    (2004)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Sexual dimorphism in the human brain: Evidence from neuroimaging

      2013, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, evidence for sex differences in perception is mixed, and thus, the difference may be due to the emotional value of the odors. No sex differences in neural activation were found during perception and imagery of complex sounds [90], as well as passive viewing of neutral pictures of faces and buildings [91]. In contrast, during passive viewing of words, women showed higher activation for words presented in the right visual field, while there was no such difference for men.

    • A review and synthesis of the first 20years of PET and fMRI studies of heard speech, spoken language and reading

      2012, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      Reports of activation during visual word form processing continued to focus solely on the role of the left occipitotemporal cortex which was also referred to as the left mid-fusiform gyrus and visual word form area (VWFA). All studies agreed that this area was consistently activated by visual word processing across languages and orthographies (e.g. Cohen et al., 2002; Turkeltaub et al., 2002; Fu et al., 2002; Price and Devlin, 2003; Reinholz and Pollmann, 2005; Vigneau et al., 2005). Activation was also reported to be higher for written words than spoken words (Booth et al., 2002a, 2002b; Cohen et al., 2002), written words than chequerboards or consonants (Cohen et al., 2002); and to be invariant to the spatial location of the stimuli (Cohen et al., 2002) or the case and font of the letters (Dehaene et al., 2002).

    • The inversion effect in visual word form processing

      2010, Cortex
      Citation Excerpt :

      While both words and faces can increase activation in the fusiform, the peak activations occur in different parts of the left fusiform gyrus. The green and red symbols in Fig. 7 denote the locations of peak activation for words (Cohen et al., 2000, 2002; Cohen and Dehaene, 2004; Reinholz and Pollmann, 2005; Vigneau et al., 2005) and for faces (Kanwisher et al., 1997; Rossion et al., 2003; Chen et al., 2007) respectively. The peak locations were computed from the reported Talairach coordinates in those papers.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text