Elsevier

Comprehensive Psychiatry

Volume 51, Issue 2, March–April 2010, Pages 115-120
Comprehensive Psychiatry

Pathologic gambling and bankruptcy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.04.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Although prior studies have examined rates of bankruptcy in pathologic gambling (PG), there are only limited data regarding the clinical correlates of those with PG who declare bankruptcy because of gambling.

Method

Five hundred seventeen consecutive subjects with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, PG (54.7% females; mean age 47.6 years) were grouped into 2 categories: those who had (n = 93; 18.0%) and had not (n = 424; 82.0%) declared bankruptcy secondary to gambling. Groups were compared on clinical characteristics, gambling severity (using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale Modified for Pathological Gambling, Gambling Symptom Assessment Scale; Clinical Global Impression—severity scale, and time and money spent gambling), and psychiatric comorbidity.

Results

Gamblers who had declared bankruptcy were more likely to be single (P = .004); have an earlier age of problem gambling onset (P = .032); and have more financial (P < .001), work-related (P = .006), marital (P < .001), and legal (P < .001) problems secondary to their gambling. They also reported higher rates of depressive disorders (P < .001), substance use disorders (P = .005) and were more likely to be daily users of nicotine (P = .022). Money spent gambling did not differ significantly between groups.

Conclusion

These preliminary results suggest that bankruptcy in PG may be associated with specific clinical differences. Treatment strategies may want to assess bankruptcy status to develop more effective treatments that take account of these clinical differences.

Introduction

Most Americans, about 86%, report having gambled once in their lifetime [1]. Most people gamble for recreational purposes without the behavior becoming a problem. Research studies, however, estimate that 0.4% to 1.6% of the US population suffer from pathologic gambling (PG) [2], [3], a persistent and recurrent maladaptive pattern of gambling behavior [4]. Pathologic gambling is commonly associated with relationship problems [5], [6], employment issues [7], and significant financial difficulties [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12].

Because money is the catalyst for gambling behavior, a main financial problem that gamblers face is debt, and debt often leads to bankruptcy. As legalized gambling has increased, so too have the rates of personal bankruptcy filings. Before 1988, Nevada and New Jersey were the only states that had legalized forms of casino gambling [13]. In 1999, 48 states allowed some form of legalized gambling [14]. Between the years of 1980 and 2005, personal bankruptcy filings in the United States increased approximately 350% [8].

There is little research, however, on the relationship between PG and personal bankruptcy. According to the Gambling Impact and Behavior Study, 19.2% of pathologic gamblers have filed bankruptcy, whereas only 5.5% and 4.7% of low-risk and at-risk gamblers, respectively, have filed bankruptcy [7]. Studies have also shown that 18% to 28% of males and 8% of females attending Gamblers Anonymous have filed bankruptcy [7]. Similarly, Breen and Zimmerman [15] found that 18.2% of pathologic gamblers had declared bankruptcy with an average debt of $42 750 (debts ranged from $17 000 to $80 000). In a replication study 2 years later, Breen [16] found that a higher percentage (22.8%) of pathologic gamblers had declared bankruptcy with an average debt of $53 103 (debts ranging from $5 000 to $250 000).

Although many individuals with PG face financial problems, most do not declare bankruptcy. However, bankruptcy may be an important symptom in PG because it may be a behavioral marker of a more severe variant. To better understand and effectively treat problem gambling, it is important to investigate the differences between individuals with PG who do and do not declare bankruptcy. Do gamblers who declare bankruptcy have more financial difficulties or legal problems? Are they more likely to struggle with substance abuse issues? Are they more likely to stick with one type of gambling rather than to multiple forms of gambling? To answers these questions and to obtain a better grasp on the complexity of PG, we examined in the current study the clinical characteristics of individuals with PG who have and have not declared bankruptcy because of their gambling.

Section snippets

Subjects

Five hundred seventeen subjects older than 18 years meeting current (past-year) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV) criteria for PG were included in the sample. Subjects were enrolled in several clinical research trials investigating the effectiveness of pharmacotherapies and psychosocial treatments for PG [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23]. General inclusion and exclusion criteria across all studies included a current DSM-IV-TR diagnosis or PG

Subject characteristics

Five hundred seventeen adults with PG were included in this study. Ninety-three (18.0%) subjects had declared bankruptcy because of gambling. Of those who declared bankruptcy, the mean amount of debt at the time of bankruptcy was $33 086.96 (±23 562.13).

Demographic data are presented in Table 1. Individuals with PG and a bankruptcy history were significantly more likely to be single (41.3% compared to 27.0%) (P = .004). No other significant demographic differences were found.

Clinical characteristics

Subjects with and

Discussion

In this study, we explored the clinical differences between treatment-seeking pathologic gamblers with and without a history of bankruptcy. Interestingly, gamblers who had declared bankruptcy did not lose a greater percentage of their income gambling or spend more time gambling than those who had never declared bankruptcy, nor did the severity of their gambling differ from those without bankruptcy histories. What did emerge from these data, however, was a complex picture of gamblers with an

Acknowledgment

This research was supported in part by a Career Development Award by the National Institute of Mental Health (JEG-K23 MH069754-01A1).

References (40)

  • ScherrerJ.F. et al.

    Factors associated with pathological gambling at 10-year follow-up in a national sample of middle-aged men

    Addiction

    (2007)
  • LorenzV.C. et al.

    Pathological gambling: psychosomatic, emotional and marital difficulties as reported by the spouse

    J Gambl Behav

    (1988)
  • GersteinD.R. et al.

    Gambling impact and behavior study: report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission

    (1999)
  • GarrettT.A.

    The rise in personal bankruptcies: the Eighth Federal Reserve District and beyond

    Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review

    (2007)
  • ThalheimerR. et al.

    The relationship of pari-mutuel wagering and casino gaming to personal bankruptcy

    Contemporary Econ Pol

    (2004)
  • BarronJ.M. et al.

    The impact of casino gambling on personal bankruptcy filing rates

    Contemporary Econ Pol

    (2002)
  • EvansR.L. et al.

    Legalized gambling: for or against

    (1999)
  • BreenR.B. et al.

    Rapid onset of pathological gambling in machine gamblers

    J Gambl Stud

    (2002)
  • BreenR.B.

    Rapid onset of pathological gambling in machine gamblers: a replication

    Int J Ment Health Addict

    (2004)
  • GrantJ.E. et al.

    A multicenter investigation of the opioid antagonist nalmefene in the treatment of pathological gambling

    Am J Psychiatry

    (2006)
  • Cited by (54)

    • Diverse predictors of treatment response to active medication and placebo in gambling disorder

      2021, Journal of Psychiatric Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Gambling can be a normal recreational activity; however, in some individuals, gambling behavior can become persistent, recurrent and maladaptive, leading to problems with relationships, employment and financial difficulties (Grant et al., 2010b).

    • Gambling-related consumer credit use and debt problems: a brief review

      2020, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
      Citation Excerpt :

      Quantitative and qualitative research have linked both consumer credit use and debt problems with problem gambling-related psychological distress [57•,58–60]. Rates of depression are higher among disordered gamblers who declare bankruptcy secondary to gambling compared to those without a history of bankruptcy [42]. These relationships may occur as a consequence of gambling to escape symptoms of distress or hopelessness, which may also impair financial decision-making.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text