Reliability and validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale in 2 special adult samples from rural China
Introduction
In China, suicide was responsible for about 287 000 deaths each year and was the fifth most important cause of death not long ago [1]. In the past decade, suicide rate in China has declined probably because of the tremendous economic growth in China [2], [3], and the trend different from the West arouses great interest in the Chinese mental health issue. Furthermore, of the 1.37 billion population in China, about 70% live in rural areas [4], and about 93% of suicides in the nation happened in the rural areas [5], [6], [7]. The rural rate of suicide is about 3 times that of the Chinese urban rate [8], [9]. All these facts warrant our attention toward Chinese rural mental health.
Depression, as a major diagnosis among all types of mental disorders that occur before suicide [10], [11], [12], is an important variable for research. Depression has been conceptualized and operationalized in 2 ways in previous research: (1) as a depressed mood (as evidenced by a large number of depressive symptoms) and (2) as a psychiatric disorder that meets conventional diagnostic criteria (eg, major depressive disorder) [13]. In most studies that use the method of the general population or community survey, the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) [14] is the most commonly used to measure depressive symptoms [13].
The CES-D is a self-report scale, and it covers affective, cognitive, behavioral, and somatic symptoms associated with depression. The CES-D was originally developed for assessing depression symptoms and was specifically designed for research use in the general and nonclinical populations [14]. Numerous studies have documented the good reliability and validity of the CES-D in both community and clinical samples. The scale has been used in research on children and adolescents [15], [16], [17], adult and older populations [18], [19], [20], and the physically ill [21] and the mentally ill populations [22].
The CES-D Chinese versions have been used among various Chinese populations for hypothesis testing, such as overseas Chinese in the United States [23], [24], [25], Chinese in Hong Kong [26], and Chinese in mainland China [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33]. In some other studies, the reliability and validity [23], [25], [29], [34], [35] of the CES-D have been tested among Chinese populations. They have demonstrated that this scale could be applied in these Chinese.
However, few studies on the CES-D have been conducted using Chinese rural samples. People in rural areas account for about 54.3% of the Chinese total populations [36], and there is a great demand to study the rural mental health in China. It has been reported that the rate of suicide in Chinese rural people was 3 times that of Chinese urban people [8], [28]. Therefore, introducing a widely spread method to screen and test the mental health in rural Chinese will be significant and beneficial not only for exploring the mental disorder status but also for the cross-culture comparison. Using a large-scale rural population, the current study aimed to assess the psychometric properties of the CES-D applied in 2 rural Chinese samples with different demographic characteristics.
In the report of Radloff [14], a principal component factor analysis with Varimax rotation was used and obtained the 4 interpretable factors: (1) depressed affect—feeling blue, depressed, lonely, crying, and sad; (2) positive affect—feeling good, hopeful, and happy and enjoying things; (3) somatic and retarded activity—bothered, loss of appetite, needing effort, poor sleep, and trouble getting going; and (4) interpersonal—unfriendly and feel disliked. Following Radloff's original factor structure, a number of studies explored the factor structure of the CES-D by exploratory factor analysis (EFA) or by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) or by both methods.
Investigators also examined the factor structure in Chinese, but the results varied in different groups. Ying [23] found that the factor structure by EFA and CFA derived from Chinese Americans revealed 3 primary factors: positive affect, interpersonal problems, and depressive mood and somatic symptoms combined. With EFA, the 3-factor structure attained from the data of urban people in mainland Chinese is as follows: somatic/retarded activity, interpersonal problems, and depressed affect [29]. A Chinese American student sample yielded a 5-factor solution [23]. A study in Chinese high school students suggested that the 4-factor model showed the best fit than the 3-factor model, 2-factor model, and 1-factor model [37]. Using CFA in the Chinese data from Hong Kong, Cheung and Bagley [26] reported 2 factors: affective and somatic symptoms and interpersonal problems. Another research from Hong Kong community adolescents demonstrated, using CFA, adequate fit both with Radloff's 4-factor structure and the 3-factor structure of Yen et al [35] including positive, somatic (mixing items from Radloff's somatic and depressed affect factors), and affective [34].
In a review of the above studies, most of the findings included the factor of “interpersonal problems,” whereas “somatic symptoms” and “depressive mood” were likely combined into 1 factor. Actually, the latter indicated that, for the factor structure of the CES-D in Chinese, the pivot of debates was somatization vs “psychologization” of distress in Chinese (eg, Cheung and Bagley [26]). The debate implied a cross-culture issue when a Western scale was introduced into non-Western culture. Some researchers noted that Chinese patients have fewer complaints of emotional conflicts and tend to express their emotional disturbance through somatic symptoms [38], [39]. As early as last century, Kleinman and Kleinman [40] found that Chinese tend to minimize the difference between depressive and somatic symptoms: they somatize depressive symptoms by voicing bodily complaints and seeking medical help. Under this cultural background, the factors “depressed affect” and “somatic and retarded activity” in Radoff's original structure model might be merged into 1 factor. Other studies suggested that compared with the factor structures found in American community samples, there is a closer link between depressive affect and somatic symptoms for the Chinese populations [23], [26], [34], [35].
In another study using the general population in a urban area of China, Lin [29] reported that Chinese in urban areas could present complaints of depressed mood according to the result of factor structure analysis (3-factor structure was found and included both somatic symptoms and depressed affect) [29]. In the present study, we hypothesized that Chinese in rural area were more likely to report somatize depressive mood compared with urban Chinese because rural Chinese were relatively more traditional and less educated with lower social economic status in China. It is noted that the annual per capita net income in rural population is 5919 RMB, whereas that in urban population, it is 19 109 RMB [41]. They are also less exposed to psychiatric education than their urban counterparts [42]. All those rural factors have contributed to the somatization of mental symptoms among the rural people in China. As Kleinman reminded, after he analyzed the causes of the experience of depression being physical rather than psychological in Chinese society, Chinese clinicians should pay special attention that “poverty and joblessness frequently intensify cultural issues” [43].
This current study tries to contribute to the current literature on the CES-D with Chinese rural and nonclinical samples. It is also our aim to make a preliminary attempt to find out special cultural relevance and interpretation when the scale was used in Chinese context.
Section snippets
Background of data collecting
Data for the current study were from a large project investigating suicide risk factors in the population of rural China. Here, all participants have rural household registration (rural hukou), which distinguished them from those with urban household registration (urban hukou). The project was a psychological autopsy (PA) study with a case-control design to investigate the environmental and other characteristics of rural young suicides (suicides occurring within last 6 months) and controls
Descriptive analysis
The characteristics of the 2 samples are shown in Table 1. There were significant differences in age, sex, education, and family annual income between the 2 distinct samples. Of the suicide informants, the mean age was 45.09 years and 56.3% were male, whereas among the control informants, the mean age was 35.21 and 58.8% were female. However, there was no significant difference in marital status. For both groups of informants, around 80% were married. Thus, 2 samples can be said to be
Discussion
In terms of psychometric properties of the CES-D, we found adequate internal reliability of the CES-D in the 2 rural samples in China, and it was even higher than that in other Chinese populations [25], [27], [29], [30], [33]. Tests of concurrent validity and criterion validity further confirmed the use of the scale for measuring the prevalence of depressive symptoms among these 2 rural Chinese samples.
The fit test of the 3-factor structure (positive affect, interpersonal problems, depressive
Acknowledgment
This study was supported by the grants (R03 MH60828 and R01 MH68560) from the National Institute of Mental Health, and the first author of the study is the principal investigator for both grants. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institute of Mental Health or the National Institutes of Health. This work was also partially supported by a China Ministry of Education 211 Project Grant awarded to the Central
References (64)
- et al.
Suicide rates in China, 1995-99
Lancet
(2002) - et al.
Economic growth and suicide rate changes: a case in China from 1982 to 2005
Eur Psychiatry
(2010) - et al.
Utilization of a self-report symptoms scale to study the epidemiology of depressive symptomatology in early adolescence
J Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry
(1989) - et al.
Major and minor depression in later life: a study of prevalence and risk factors
J Affect Disord
(1995) - et al.
Pain and depression in acute traumatic spinal cord injury: origins of chronic problematic pain?
Arch Phys Med Rehabil
(1996) - et al.
The CES-D in Chinese American women: construct validity, diagnostic validity for major depression, and cultural response bias
Psychiatry Res
(2010) The nature of somatic complaints among psychiatric patients: the Chinese case
Compr Psychiatry
(1975)Psychological autopsy studies—a review
Eur Psychiatry
(2001)- et al.
Risk factors for suicide in China: a national case-control psychological autopsy study
Lancet
(2002) - et al.
Psychometric characteristics of the Scale for Suicide Ideation with psychiatric outpatients
Behav Res Theory
(1997)
The role of cultural explanations in somatization and psychologization
Soc Sci Med
Psychological symptoms among Chinese in urban Hong Kong
Soc Sci Med
A sociological analysis of the decline in the suicide rate in China
Chin J Soc Sci China
Communiqué of the National Bureau of Statistics of People's Republic of China on Major Figures of the 2010 Population Census[1] (No. 1)
Suicide in contemporary China: a review of China's distinctive suicide demographics in their sociocultural context
Harv Rev Psychiatry
Suicide in China: an overview
Culture, risk factors and suicide in rural China: a psychological autopsy case control study
Acta Psychiatr Scand
Attempted suicide among young rural women in the People's Republic of China: possibilities for prevention
Suicide Life-Threat Behav
Studying suicide with psychological autopsy: social and cultural feasibilities of the methodology in China
Suicide Life-Threat Behav
Suicide and serious suicide attempts in youth: a multiple-group comparison study
Am J Psychiatry
Adolescent suicide attempts: risks and protectors
Pediatrics
Lifetime prevalence of suicide ideation, plan, and attempt in metropolitan China.
Acta Psychiatr Scand
Social support and the outcome of major depression
Br J Psychiatry
The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population
Appl Psychol Meas
Assessment of depression in childhood and adolescence: an evaluation of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale for Children (CES-DC)
Am J Psychiatry
The use of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in adolescents and young adults
J Youth Adolesc
Measurement properties of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in older populations
Psychol Assess
Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) as a screening instrument for depression among community-residing older adults
Psychol Aging
The relationship of selfreported distress to depressive disorders and other psychopathology
J Consult Clin Psychol
Depressive symptomatology among Chinese-Americans as measured by the CES-D
J Clin Psychol
Prevalence of depression among Asian-Americans
J Nerv Ment Dis
Validating an American scale in Hong Kong: the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D)
J Psychol
Cited by (68)
Self-administered generational surveys combine with genetic analysis to reveal foundations of depression in Japanese adults
2024, Journal of Affective DisordersAssociation between serum uric acid levels and depressive symptoms according to menopausal status
2024, Journal of Affective DisordersWork and Wellbeing among Arts Professionals in China during COVID-19 (August 2020 and October 2021)
2023, Social Sciences and Humanities OpenSex ratios and mental health: Evidence from China
2021, Economics and Human BiologyThe impact of acute exercise on implicit cognitive reappraisal in association with left dorsolateral prefronta activation: A fNIRS study
2021, Behavioural Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :Participants were asked to complete the Positive Affect and Negative Affect Scale, the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, the subscale (managing negative affect) of Regulatory Emotional Self-efficacy, the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scales, and the Zung's Self-Rating Anxiety Scale before allocation [27–31]. All these scales and Questionnaires are Chinese versions and show good psychometric characteristics in a Chinese sample [32–35]. The raw data were converted into concentration changes of oxy-hemoglobin using the modified Beer-Lambert Law [36].
The impact of suicidal death of rural older people to their relatives: Results from a national psychological autopsy study in China
2019, Journal of Affective DisordersCitation Excerpt :A total score of 16 or greater can aid in identifying individuals at risk for clinical depression (Lewinsohn et al., 1997). The CES-D (simplified Chinese version) has been used in PA in China, showing good reliability and validity and is suitable to be used in the Chinese cultural background (Zhang and Norvilitis, 2002; Zhang et al., 2012). Suicidal ideation was defined by a positive answer to the question “Have you ever seriously thought about ending your life in the previous 12 months?”.