Elsevier

Cortex

Volume 123, February 2020, Pages 1-11
Cortex

Behavioural Neurology
Grey matter abnormalities are associated only with severe cognitive decline in early stages of Parkinson's disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2019.09.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Cognitive impairment is common in Parkinson's disease (PD), yet with large heterogeneity in the range and course of deficits. In a cross-sectional study, 124 PD patients underwent extensive clinical and neuropsychological assessment as well as a 3T MRI scan of the brain. Our aim was to identify differences in grey matter volume and thickness, as well as cortical folding, across different cognitive profiles as defined through a data-driven exploratory cluster analysis of neuropsychological data. The identified cognitive groups ranged from cognitively intact patients to patients with severe deficits in all cognitive domains, whilst showing comparable levels of motor disability and disease duration. Each group was compared to the cognitively intact PD group using voxel- and vertex-based morphometry. Results revealed widespread age-related grey matter abnormalities associated with progressive worsening of cognitive functions in mild PD. When adjusted for age, significant differences were only seen between cognitively intact and severely affected PD patients and these were restricted to the right posterior cingulate and the right precuneus. Reduced cortical thickness was seen in the right inferior temporal gyrus and reduced folding in the right temporal region. As these differences were not associated with age, we assume that they are associated with underlying pathology of the cognitive decline. Given the limited involvement of grey matter differences, and the absence of differences in vascular changes across the groups, we hypothesize a more important role for white matter tract changes in cognitive decline in PD.

Introduction

Cognitive deficits are common in Parkinson's disease (PD) and are increasingly recognized as an integral part of the disease. Up to 40% of PD patients report mild cognitive deficits already at the time of diagnosis (Yarnall et al., 2014). Approximately 30% of patients convert to dementia during the course of the disease (Svenningsson, Westman, Ballard, & Aarsland, 2012), which increases up to 80% within 20 years after diagnosis (Aarsland et al., 2003, Hely et al., 2008). Yet, a substantial number of PD patients does not show any significant cognitive deficit, even years after being diagnosed (Foltynie et al., 2004, Janvin et al., 2003, Weintraub et al., 2011). Recent studies support the large heterogeneity in the range of cognitive deficits in PD, and several studies have attempted to identify distinctive cognitive profiles (Kehagia, Barker & Robbins, 2010). However, many studies investigated cognitive dysfunction using the diagnostic categories as defined by the Movement Disorders Society (MDS) criteria published by Litvan et al. (2012). These include PD patients without cognitive impairment, patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and patients with Parkinson's disease dementia (PDD). This approach does not allow the study of milder stages of cognitive decline, including cognitive deficits that do not reach the level for a diagnosis of MCI. In addition, although recent neuroimaging studies showed clear evidence for widespread cortical atrophy associated with MCI in PD and PD dementia (Burton et al., 2004, Pereira et al., 2014, Song et al., 2011, Weintraub et al., 2011), using a classification approach may not only have masked neuroanatomical changes associated with more subtle cognitive deficits, but also obscure differences in possible sub-phenotypes that may correspond to different comorbid pathologies in more advanced stages of cognitive decline. This may be important, especially since a substantial number of PD patients appear to have neuropathological changes related to Alzheimer's disease in addition to diffuse Lewy body pathology (Jellinger et al., 2002, Kalaitzakis and Pearce, 2009, Kurosinski et al., 2002).

In a prior study (Dujardin et al., 2013), we conducted a data-driven exploratory cluster analysis using retrospective neuropsychological test data from a large sample (n = 557) of PD patients. We identified five cognitive phenotypes, that were replicated and confirmed in a more recent study by performing a model-based confirmatory cluster analysis on prospective neuropsychological data from an independent sample of mild PD patients (n = 156) (Dujardin et al., 2015). The five phenotypes represent different stages of cognitive decline ranging from cognitively intact patients to patients with severe dysfunction in all cognitive domains. In the present study, we aimed at identifying the neuroanatomical correlates of each of the identified cognitive phenotypes using structural MRI. More specifically, we were looking for regional differences in the rate of grey matter volume, cortical thickness, and cortical folding between the different groups. Considering the heterogeneity of the clinical presentation and course of cognitive deficits in PD, we expect that different patterns of cerebral changes may underlie these different phenotypes. Detection of differences in grey matter may therefore increase our understanding of the underlying neurobiological changes that accompany the spectrum of cognitive disorders in PD. Moreover, if we find alterations in patients with only slight cognitive deficits, this exploratory approach could reveal a group at risk of further cognitive decline, who may be considered for early treatment options. Thirdly, studying grey matter alterations in PD may shed light on possible sub-phenotypes in more advanced stages of cognitive decline other than PD dementia, such as phenotypes with comorbid pathologies, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD).

We hypothesized that all groups would show a decline in grey matter volume, thickness and cortical folding compared with the cognitively intact group, with a progressive severity gradient. We further hypothesized to see profound hippocampal or medial temporal lobe grey matter deviations in those patients with more profound memory deficits, possibly reflecting a sub-phenotype of PD patients with comorbid AD pathology. We followed an explorative whole brain approach, with post hoc region-of-interest analyses.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

In this section we report how we determined our sample size, all data exclusions, all inclusion/exclusion criteria, whether inclusion/exclusion criteria were established prior to data analysis, all manipulations, and all measures used in the study. The study was performed accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and was approved by the local institutional review boards (METC azM/UM, NL42701.068.12; CPP Nord-Ouest IV, 2012-A 01317-36) ad registered in a clinical trial register (//ClinicalTrials.gov

Demographics

Of the 156 included patients, 133 patients had an MRI scan. An extensive data quality check resulted in the exclusion of 9 patients (6 due to large motion artifacts and 3 due to large lesions). Table 1 shows the demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients over the 4 cognitive profiles. Patients in group 1 were significantly younger than those in the three other groups and received more years of formal education than patients in group 3 and 4. Patients from group 4 showed more

Discussion

The age-corrected results of this study show a significant difference in grey matter volume only between the group with severe cognitive decline (group 4) and the cognitively intact group (group 1). More specifically, group 4 showed a reduced grey matter volume within the right posterior cingulate gyrus (BA 31) and right precuneus (BA 7). Furthermore, our results gave no indication for a regional progressive severity gradient of reduced grey matter volume associated with more severe cognitive

Open practices

The study in this article earned a Preregistered badge for transparent practices.

Funding

This study was funded by the Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research.

Competing interests

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Amée F. Wolters: Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. Anja J.H. Moonen: Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing - original draft. Renaud Lopes: Formal analysis, Writing - review & editing. Albert F.G. Leentjens: Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Annelien A. Duits: Supervision, Writing - review & editing. Luc Defebvre: Writing - review & editing. Christine Delmaire: Writing - review & editing. Paul A. Hofman: Writing - review & editing. Frank C. van Bussel:

References (56)

  • C.M. Lacadie et al.

    More accurate Talairach coordinates for neuroimaging using non-linear registration

    NeuroImage

    (2008)
  • J.P. Lerch et al.

    Cortical thickness analysis examined through power analysis and a population simulation

    NeuroImage

    (2005)
  • P. Svenningsson et al.

    Cognitive impairment in patients with Parkinson's disease: Diagnosis, biomarkers, and treatment

    The Lancet Neurology

    (2012)
  • D. Aarsland et al.

    Prevalence and characteristics of dementia in Parkinson disease: An 8-year prospective study

    Archives of Neurology

    (2003)
  • D. Aarsland et al.

    The rate of cognitive decline in Parkinson disease

    Archives of Neurology

    (2004)
  • A.L. Benton et al.

    Visuospatial judgment: A clinical test

    Archives of Neurology

    (1978)
  • J. Brandt et al.

    Hopkins verbal learning test-revised, psychological assessment resources, Lutz. Fl

    (2001)
  • E.J. Burton et al.

    Cerebral atrophy in Parkinson's disease with and without dementia: A comparison with Alzheimer's disease, dementia with Lewy bodies and controls

    Brain: a Journal of Neurology

    (2004)
  • Y. Compta et al.

    Lewy-and Alzheimer-type pathologies in Parkinson's disease dementia: Which is more important?

    Brain: a Journal of Neurology

    (2011)
  • K. Dujardin et al.

    The spectrum of cognitive disorders in Parkinson's disease: A data-driven approach

    Movement Disorders

    (2013)
  • G.W. Duncan et al.

    Gray and white matter imaging: A biomarker for cognitive impairment in early Parkinson's disease?

    Movement Disorders

    (2016)
  • M. Emre et al.

    Clinical diagnostic criteria for dementia associated with Parkinson's disease

    Movement Disorders

    (2007)
  • F. Fazekas et al.

    MR signal abnormalities at 1.5T in Alzheimer's dementia and normal aging

    American Journal of Neuroradiology

    (1987)
  • T. Foltynie et al.

    The cognitive ability of an incident cohort of Parkinson's patients in the UK. The Campaign Study

    Brain: a Journal of Neurology

    (2004)
  • N.J.H.M. Gerrits et al.

    Cortical thickness, surface area and subcortical volume differentially contribute to cognitive heterogeneity in Parkinson's disease

    PLoS One

    (2016)
  • W. Gibb et al.

    The relevance of the Lewy body to the pathogenesis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease

    Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry

    (1988)
  • C.G. Goetz et al.

    Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): Scale presentation and clinimetric testing results

    Movement Disorders

    (2008)
  • R.E. Graves et al.

    Boston naming test short forms: A comparison of previous forms with new item response theory based forms

    Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

    (2004)
  • Cited by (15)

    • Neuroimaging outcomes associated with mild cognitive impairment subtypes in Parkinson's disease: A systematic review

      2022, Parkinsonism and Related Disorders
      Citation Excerpt :

      Finally, we did not include data-driven studies in the present systematic review. Although these studies found interesting results and may reveal cognitive clusters similar to the PD-MCI subtypes identified in this review, it is difficult to determine whether patients in these clusters had PD-MCI according to consensus criteria [43–47]. The selected studies reported brain modifications in PD-MCI subtypes.

    • Tetrahedral spectral feature-Based bayesian manifold learning for grey matter morphometry: Findings from the Alzheimer's disease neuroimaging initiative

      2021, Medical Image Analysis
      Citation Excerpt :

      In particular, remarkable progress has been made in detecting, tracing, predicting, and quantifying brain morphological properties and changes by using SSMs for cortical morphometry (Zhang and Golland, 2016; Zheng et al., 2017; Labayru et al., 2019; Huang et al., 2020). As neurodegenerative disorders can greatly affect cortical morphological characteristics (Lin et al., 2017; Xiao et al., 2017; Mateos et al., 2019; Wolters et al., 2019; Thompson et al., 2001), cortical SSMs have become a popular tool for the analysis of conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease (AD) (Mateos et al., 2019; Cuingnet et al., 2011), autism spectrum disorder (Di Martino et al., 2014; Xiao et al., 2017), and Parkinson’s disease (Wolters et al., 2019; Kluger et al., 2019). A variety of three-dimensional SSM-based tools have been designed to understand cerebral cortex morphology, including cortical thickness (Clarkson et al., 2011; Jones et al., 2000; Fischl and Dale, 2000), grey matter density (GMD) (Wright et al., 1995; Ashburner and Friston, 2000; Thompson et al., 2001; Sowell et al., 1999), cortical surface area and volume (Fischl, 2012; Zhao et al., 2019), and grey matter morphometry signatures (Wang and Wang, 2017).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    These authors contributed equal to this paper and are duel first authors.

    View full text