Newly developed ulcer-like projection (ULP) in aortic intramural haematoma on follow-up CT: is it different from the ULP seen on the initial CT?
Introduction
Ulcer-like projections (ULPs) were, not was first described in 1965 as a “defect in the intima leading to a clotted second channel” in aortic dissection (thrombosed type).1 ULP has been considered to represent the site of an intimal tear or the site of occlusion or detachment of the orifice of aortic branches or penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers (PAUs),1, 2, 3 but the definition still remains unclear.
The role of ULPs is still unclear as a prognostic factor in IMH. The presence of ULP was considered as the important factor for predicting the prognosis of intramural haematoma (IMH). In previous studies, authors have suggested that IMH with ULPs or PAUs was significantly associated with a progressive disease course.4, 5 Conversely, other authors have suggested that most ULPs are asymptomatic and do not expand.6 New ULPs (nULPs) can arise during the follow-up period in patients with IMH without an ULP seen on the initial computed tomography (CT) examination. It is suggested that many nULPs on follow-up CT examinations progress to complications, such as aneurysm, aortic dissection, or aortic rupture.5, 7 However, to the authors' knowledge, no studies have been performed to compare ULPs on initial CT (iULPs) and nULPs, in terms of incidence, complications, and prognosis.
The purpose of this study was to ascertain whether the clinical and CT features of nULPs on follow-up CT in patients with aortic IMH are different from those of the iULPs, and to ascertain whether the complication rate differs between IMH without ULPs and IMH with ULPs.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
Between January 1998 and January 2005, 2755 consecutive patients clinically suspected of having acute aortic dissection underwent contrast-enhanced CT in a tertiary referral hospital with 2200 beds. A retrospective analysis of the imaging reports was performed to detect the presence of IMH or “thrombosed aortic dissection” by searching the radiology information systems database for patients with clinically suspected acute aortic dissection and in whom contrast-enhanced CT examinations had been
Results
There were 42 patients without iULPs or nULPs throughout follow-up periods (group A); 27 patients with 45 iULPs at the initial CT examination (group B), 16 patients with 17 nULPs on follow-up CT without iULPs on the initial CT images (group C); and 21 nULPs developed in 13 patients with iULPs (group D). Fifty-eight iULPs were identified in 40 patients and 38 nULPs developed in 29 patients. Seventy-nine percent of the nULPs (30 of 38) developed within 1 month of the initial CT examination. The
Discussion
The main finding of this study was that the CT features and complication rates of patients with nULP on follow-up CT in patients with aortic IMH do not differ from those with ULP found on the initial CT images. However, patients with ULPs had more complications than patients without ULPs.
Aortic IMH has been recognized as a variant of aortic dissection.2, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13 IMH was first described in 1920 as dissection without intimal tear. With the development of non-invasive imaging techniques,
References (22)
- et al.
Aortic dissection without intimal rupture: diagnosis and management
Ann Thorac Surg
(1992) - et al.
Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes of aortic intramural hemorrhage compared with acute aortic dissection
Am J Cardiol
(1998) - et al.
Natural history and serial morphology of aortic intramural hematoma: a novel variant of aortic dissection
Am Heart J
(1997) - et al.
Magnetic resonance imaging of intramural haematoma of the ascending aorta in Marfan's syndrome
Clin Radiol
(2000) - et al.
Helical (spiral) CT in the evaluation of emergent thoracic aortic syndromes: traumatic aortic rupture, aortic aneurysm, aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer
Radiol Clin North Am
(1999) - et al.
Pathologic variants of thoracic aortic dissections: penetrating atherosclerotic ulcers and intramural hematomas
Cardiol Clin North Am
(1999) - et al.
Dissecting aneurysms of the aorta: roentgen manifestations including a comparison with other types of aneurysm
Radiology
(1965) - et al.
Intramural hemorrhage of the thoracic aorta: diagnostic and therapeutic implications
Circulation
(1995) - et al.
Thoracic aorta: comparison of gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional MR imaging
Radiology
(1997) - et al.
Prognosis of aortic intramural hematoma with and without penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer: a clinical and radiological analysis
Circulation
(2002)
Fate of intramural hematoma of the aorta: CT evaluation
J Comput Assist Tomogr
Cited by (30)
Prognostic Implications of Initial Focal Contrast Enhancement in Acute Type B Intramural Hematoma
2024, Journal of the American College of CardiologyPrediction of adverse events in patients with initially medically treated type A intramural hematoma
2020, International Journal of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :IMH was initially described as aortic dissection without an intimal tear [23,24], however, intimal defects were detected in 70% with CT and 70–80% of the surgically treated IMH [13,24,25], and some tiny intimal defects might not be well identified by CT. ULP, also described as localized intimal defect, was detected by imaging techniques in 20% to 50% of IMH in previous studies [12,26,27], and was detected in 46.5% patients by CT in our initially medically treated type A IMH cohort. This raised a question to the traditional theory with vasa vasorum bleeding, conventional definition of IMH might be changed [24].
Intimal disruption in type B aortic intramural hematoma. Does size matter? A systematic review and meta-analysis
2018, International Journal of CardiologyClinical Implications of Focal Intimal Disruption in Patients With Type B Intramural Hematoma
2017, Journal of the American College of CardiologyCitation Excerpt :Remarkably, our pathology studies showed the presence of FID (>3 mm) with preservation of the adventitia in 3 patients in chronic phase on necropsy studies, and confirmed complete aortic rupture in 4 patients during hospitalization: 3 in necropsy studies and 1 who underwent open surgery. Management recommendations for intimal disruption in type B IMH have been highly controversial given the different mechanisms and clinical outcome of these lesions (3,9–14,25). Jang et al. (11) reported that 40% of patients presented intimal disruptions on the initial imaging study.
Prognostic factors in patients with uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection
2014, Annals of Thoracic SurgeryCitation Excerpt :In our study, any blood-filled pouch projecting into the thrombosed false lumen was defined as a ULP, which were detected by CT in 62.3% of patients with a completely thrombosed false lumen. The ULP is considered to represent the site of an entry tear [23]. Based on their experience with surgical treatment for type A intramural hematoma, Park and colleagues [24] reported that a large proportion of type A intramural hematomas had entry tears.
Predictive value of small ulcers in the evolution of acute type B intramural hematoma
2012, European Journal of Radiology