Angiomyolipoma with minimal fat: Differentiation from papillary renal cell carcinoma by helical CT
Introduction
Angiomyolipoma (AML) is the most common solid benign renal tumour.1 Histopathological analysis reveals that AML is composed of abnormal blood vessels, adipose tissue, and smooth muscle in proportions that vary greatly among individual tumours.1, 2 In most cases, AML can be diagnosed accurately by identifying the intra-tumoural fat component on computed tomography (CT) images. Unfortunately, approximately 4–5% of AML tumours either do not contain any fat cells or contain an insufficient amount of fat cells to provide a CT image-based diagnosis; this tumour type is termed atypical AML or AML with minimal fat.3, 4
One of the challenges for a radiologist in diagnosing AML with minimal fat is differentiation from papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC). PRCC is the second most common carcinoma of the proximal renal tubules and accounts for 10–15% of renal neoplasms.5 It is difficult to differentiate the two tumour types because they both appear as solid tumours without obvious enhancement at CT; however, differentiating these two diseases is of significant clinical significance. Most asymptomatic or small AML can be left untreated or followed, whereas PRCC is typically resected.
A previous study has demonstrated several methods of differentiation between the two tumours with overlapping CT features,6 but the authors did not include a detailed analysis. Therefore, the purpose of the present study was to investigate the CT attenuation values and characteristics of morphology and enhancement to differentiate the two diseases.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board of the first affiliated hospital of China Medical University, and informed consent was waived. Between January 2006 and November 2010, 21 patients with AML with minimal fat (18 women and three men; mean age 45.1 years; range 23–70 years) and 23 patients with PRCC (10 women and 13 men; mean age 52.35 years; range 24–72 years) who were identified from a pathological database were enrolled in this study. All patients had a
Results
All of the lesions were nearly circular and had smooth margins. There was no significant difference in age or tumour size between the two patient groups (p > 0.05). The AML with minimal fat group had an apparent female prevalence compared with the PRCC group (85.7% versus 43.5%, p < 0.01). Intra-tumoural calcification was found in one case of AML with minimal fat and three cases of PRCC (p > 0.05). Intra-tumoural haemorrhage was found only in one case of AML with minimal fat but not in any PRCC
Discussion
CT has been widely used for the evaluation of renal tumours because CT can provide detailed tumour information. Furthermore, with the use of helical CT, it is possible to analyse the dynamic enhancement pattern of the tumour, which enables the differentiation of many renal neoplasms.8, 9, 10, 11, 12
According to the results of the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the unenhanced attenuation characteristic, intra-tumoural vessels, and the CAVs of unenhanced and early excretory phase
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by grants from the Foundation of Education Department of Liaoning Province, P.R. China (L2010665) to R. X. and the Foundation of Science and Technology Department of Liaoning Province, P.R. China (20092250085) to Y.L.
References (19)
- et al.
Diagnosis of angiomyolipoma using computed tomography-region of interest < or = −10 HU or 4 adjacent pixels < or = −10 HU are recommended as the diagnostic thresholds
Clin Radiol
(2006) - et al.
Radiologic evaluation of small and indeterminant renal masses
Urol Clin North Am
(1997) - et al.
Histopathology of surgically managed renal tumors: analysis of a contemporary series
Urology
(2003) - et al.
Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size
J Urol
(2003) - et al.
Renal angiomyolipoma: relationships between tumor size, aneurysm formation, and rupture
Radiology
(2002) - et al.
Angiomyolipoma: imaging findings in lesions with minimal fat
Radiology
(1997) - et al.
Hyperattenuating renal masses: etiologies, pathogenesis, and imaging evaluation
RadioGraphics
(2007) - et al.
CT and MRI in fat-containing papillary renal cell carcinoma
Br J Radiol
(2007) - et al.
Solid renal cortical tumors: differentiation with CT
Radiology
(2007)
Cited by (43)
Ultrasound Image–Based Deep Features and Radiomics for the Discrimination of Small Fat-Poor Angiomyolipoma and Small Renal Cell Carcinoma
2023, Ultrasound in Medicine and BiologyCitation Excerpt :The imaging diagnosis of classic renal AMLs relies on the discrimination of macroscopic fat, which is a reliable method for differentiating renal AMLs from RCCs (Sherman et al. 1981; Israel et al. 2005; Richmond et al. 2014). But 5% of renal AMLs, which are called fat-poor AMLs (fp-AMLs), exhibit insufficient fat content on CT and magnetic resonance (MR) medical images, can pose a crucial diagnostic dilemma with RCC (Hindman et al. 2012; Zhang et al. 2013). The fp-AML does not require partial or radical nephrectomy generally unless it causes symptoms (Lai et al. 2006).
The value of quantitative CT texture analysis in differentiation of angiomyolipoma without visible fat from clear cell renal cell carcinoma on four-phase contrast-enhanced CT images
2019, Clinical RadiologyCitation Excerpt :The diagnosis of AML is based on the detection of adipose tissue within a renal mass using computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); however, approximately 4.5% of AMLs may not show identifiable macroscopic fat and are indistinguishable from RCCs on imaging studies alone.3 These are called AMLs without visible fat, which contain <25% fat content per high-power field at the histopathological level or non-visible fat on unenhanced CT.4 Many previous reports have studied determinative factors for differentiation of AML without visible fat from RCC using CT,1,5–8 MRI2,4,9–13 and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CE US)14; however, Yang et al.,7 demonstrated that both AML without visible fat and clear cell RCC (ccRCC) show early strong enhancement and a washout pattern. In addition, there are controversial reports about the usefulness of opposed-phase and in-phase gradient-echo MRI images for differentiating AML from RCC.2,9
Renal angiomyolipoma: New perspectives
2016, Urologia ColombianaImaging features of renal lipid-poor angiomyolipomas: a pictorial review
2022, Chinese Journal of Academic Radiology