Elsevier

Clinical Radiology

Volume 70, Issue 11, November 2015, Pages 1177-1184
Clinical Radiology

Transarterial embolisation of renal arteriovenous malformation: safety and efficacy in 24 patients with follow-up

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crad.2015.06.079Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The efficacy and safety of renal artery embolization for renal arteriovenous malformation as well as its long-term outcome are evaluated.

  • Renal artery embolization is safe and effective for the treatment of renal arteriovenous malformation.

  • Multiple sessions of embolization may lead to successful treatment of incompletely treated or recurrent renal arteriovenous malformation.

Aim

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of renal artery embolisation (RAE) for renal arteriovenous malformation (AVM) as well as its outcomes.

Materials and methods

The technical and clinical success rates, radiological and laboratory findings, and complications of RAE for 31 renal AVMs in 24 patients (M:F=9:15, mean age 46 years) at two separate medical institutions were retrospectively evaluated. Technical success was defined as complete occlusion of feeding arteries with no residual nidus seen on post-treatment angiography. Clinical failure was defined as recurrence of haematuria, presence of AVM on follow-up ultrasound or computed tomography, repeated RAE or surgery for the control of haematuria. Overall clinical success was defined as resolution haematuria or disappearance of AVM on follow-up imaging after single or multiple sessions of RAE.

Results

Types of renal AVM were AVM, arterio-venous fistula (AVF) with intranidal aneurysm, and acquired AVF in 19, 1, and 4 patients, respectively. 18 patients (75%) underwent a single session of RAE, while 6 patients (25%) had two or more sessions of RAE. The level of embolisation was feeder, segmental artery, and main renal artery in 28 (90%), 2 (6%), and 1 (4%) procedures, respectively. Coil, n-butyl 2-cyanoacrylate, and polyvinyl alcohol were the most frequently chosen embolic materials and were used in 19, 14, and 8 procedures, respectively. The clinical success rate after initial RAE was 67% (16/24). Overall clinical success rate, including multisession RAE, was 88% (21/24). The technical success rate of 31 procedures was 65% (20/31). Among 11 technical failures in 10 patients, 4 achieved clinical success without additional RAE, 3 underwent second session RAE to achieve clinical success, and 3 patients underwent nephrectomy due to recurrence.

Conclusion

RAE is a safe and effective treatment for renal AVM. Technical failure of RAE does not always lead to clinical failure and multiple embolisation sessions may be effective for recurrent renal AVM.

Introduction

Renal arteriovenous malformation (AVM) is a pathological communication between the arterial and venous circulation that bypasses capillary bed. AVM could be either congenital or acquired.1 Acquired AVM, arterio-venous fistula (AVF), tend to manifest as a single linear connecting vessel, comprise 70–80% of renal arteriovenous abnormalities and usually result from trauma, biopsy, surgery, malignancy, or inflammation.2 Two types of congenital renal AVM, cirsoid and cavernous type, are described. Cirsoid AVM should fulfil certain criteria, which includes no prior history of renal injury or disease and typical angiographic findings with tortuous vascular channels between segmental or interlobar renal arteries and veins.3 Cavernous AVM shows a single dilated vessels and is less common.4

Patients with renal AVM usually present with gross haematuria or flank pain with occasional accompanying hypertension or heart failure.3, 5, 6 Renal angiography is used to confirm the presence of renal AVM and in planning treatment. To date, renal AVM has been treated by surgery, such as nephrectomy. Endovascular approaches for treating AVM are gaining popularity.7 The introduction of smaller delivery catheters and more precise delivery of embolic materials have drastically reduced the morbidity associated with this technique.1, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 Therefore, currently, this treatment modality is becoming popular as it provides maximal preservation of functioning renal parenchyma as well as treating the disease and symptoms.

Several case reports and case series of renal artery embolisation (RAE) and ablation of renal AVM have reported successful results1, 13, 14, 15; however, there are few studies regarding the comprehensive analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes and effectiveness of multiple RAE sessions based on long-term follow-up data. The present study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RAE for renal AVM as well as its long-term outcomes.

Section snippets

Patients

From January 2001 to December 2014, 31 RAE procedures were performed for 24 renal AVMs in 24 patients at two, separate medical institutions. A total of 24 patients, i.e., 9 men (age range, 16–71 years; mean age 43 years) and 15 women (age range, 30–69 years; mean age 47 years) were included in this study.

Clinical medical records were retrospectively reviewed for symptoms and signs of renal AVM, underlying medical status and baseline renal function, i.e., blood urea nitrogen/creatinine (BUN/Cr).

Patient characteristics

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of the 24 patients and 31 procedures are summarised in Table 1. 18 patients (75%) underwent a single session of RAE, whereas 6 patients (25%) had two or more sessions of RAE. Therefore, a total of 31 RAE procedures were performed in 24 patients. 17 patients (71%) had haematuria or flank pain, and 7 (29%) were asymptomatic. One patient had a single kidney with a past medical history of nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma.

All patients underwent CT or

Discussion

Renal AVM is an uncommon cause of haematuria and is a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge in clinical practice. The present study revealed that single or multiple RAE sessions could be an effective and safe treatment strategy for patients with renal AVM.

The technical success rate of 65% and the overall clinical success rate of 88% seem to be comparable to those reported in previous studies.1 Primary and secondary success rates were 73.7 and 94.7%, respectively, based on a review of 19 patients

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and future Planning (2014R1A2A2A01005857).

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (19)

  • Wunderlich Syndrome: Wonder What It Is

    2022, Current Problems in Diagnostic Radiology
  • A Case of Right Renal Arteriovenous Malformation Mimicking the Symptoms of Urinary Tract Infection in the Emergency Department

    2020, Journal of Emergency Medicine
    Citation Excerpt :

    Computed tomography angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance arteriogram reconstruction has improved noninvasive imaging of AVMs (3). Of note, diagnostic renal angiography should be performed when computed tomography or Doppler ultrasonography could not distinguish the cause of hematuria (5). Treatment options for AVM include selective arterial embolization, surgical intervention, and conservative management (8).

  • Recurrent hematuria in renal angio-venous malformation, delay diagnosis and endovascular treatment, a case report

    2018, Urology Case Reports
    Citation Excerpt :

    Renal atriovenous malformation (AVM) is an abnormal communication between the renal blood vessels in which the arterial and venous circulation communicate with each other bypassing capillary bed.1

  • Transarterial embolisation for congenital renal arteriovenous malformations improves clinical condition even with partial obliteration

    2017, Clinical Radiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The complete obliteration rate was 56.3%, and the clinical success rate was 87.5% over a median follow-up period of 398.5 days. PubMed was searched for relevant English-language publications that appeared between 1998 and 2017; seven case series describing the use of TAE to treat CRAVM were identified (Table 2).6–12 Although it is difficult to compare studies because the definitions of clinical success varied, the results seem comparable to those reported previously.6–12

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text