Azacitidine in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.05.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Azacitidine is recommended front-line treatment for older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are not candidates for intensive treatment regimens, and was recently granted approval in the European Union for treatment of adult AML. Reviewed here is azacitidine experience in AML, including: mechanistic and pharmacokinetic data; safety and efficacy in controlled trials; treatment effects in AML subpopulations defined by disease characteristics; experience in unselected patients treated in the community setting; clinical outcomes relative to other approved AML therapies; and experience with azacitidine-based combination treatment regimens. Collectively, these data suggest that (a) azacitidine may prolong overall survival to a similar or greater extent than do other approved AML treatments, but with less toxicity, (b) azacitidine may be the preferred treatment option for older patients with unfavorable cytogenetics, and (c) experience and outcomes with azacitidine in the clinic are similar to those seen in clinical trials. Continued investigation of combination regimens on an azacitidine backbone is warranted.

Introduction

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive malignancy of hematopoietic progenitor cells that carries a poor prognosis (Klepin, 2015). Primarily a disease of older patients, the majority of patients with AML are aged ≥65 years, with the estimated overall median age being about 70 years (Juliusson et al., 2009, Klepin, 2015, National Cancer Institute, 2016, Ossenkoppele and Lowenberg, 2015). There is currently no standard approach to AML treatment in older patients due to a variety of factors, including heterogeneity of disease biology, age-related comorbidities and potential toxicities, patient choice, and physician preference (Juliusson et al., 2009, Klepin, 2015, Ossenkoppele and Lowenberg, 2015). In clinical practice, treatment decisions are based on careful consideration of disease- and patient-related factors. For example, while an elderly patient may be deemed fit to tolerate intensive treatment by the treating physician, disease features may render the likelihood of durable benefit so low, that a non-intensive alternative therapy might be the preferred option (Erba, 2015, Kantarjian et al., 2010, Michaelis and Erba, 2015, Ossenkoppele and Lowenberg, 2015, Thepot et al., 2014).

Age-related differences in tumor biology and a diminished ability to tolerate intensive therapy influence survival outcomes for older patients. While the overall 5-year survival rates for AML have improved over the past four decades, they remain unsatisfactory, declining from 39% for those younger than age 65 years, to 8.5% for patients aged 65–74 years, and less than 2% for patients age 75 or older (Klepin, 2015). In the United States (US), less than 50% of aged ≥65 years with newly-diagnosed patients AML currently receive active anti-leukemic treatment (Walter and Estey, 2015), and the frequently chosen best supportive care (BSC) option is associated with a median survival of only about 2–3 months (Oran and Weisdorf, 2012, Wang et al., 2014). Accumulating evidence suggests, however, that older patients precluded from intensive chemotherapy (IC) should be offered alternative treatment strategies that can prolong OS without undue toxicity (Michaelis and Erba, 2015, Oran and Weisdorf, 2012, Shah et al., 2013, Thein et al., 2013, Walter and Estey, 2015). Hence, there is a continuing need for low-intensity AML treatments for patients who are not candidates for IC or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT).

By virtue of lying on a biological continuum (Deschler et al., 2006), advances in treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) have led to advances in treatment of AML (Estey, 2013b, Walter, 2015, Wong and Juneja, 2015). Until 2004, BSC with transfusions and symptomatic treatment were the mainstay of MDS therapy. In that year, azacitidine (Vidaza®; Celgene Corporation, Summit, NJ) became the first drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of MDS (Kaminskas et al., 2005b). Azacitidine studies in MDS used the French-American-British (FAB) classification scheme and included patients with 20–30% bone marrow (BM) blasts who are now classified by the World Health Organization (WHO) as having AML (see Section 3a). Thus, the azacitidine phase 3 MDS study results included a subset of patients with WHO-defined AML (Fenaux et al., 2010c). Currently, azacitidine has regulatory approval for the treatment of MDS and AML with 20–30% BM blasts in the US, Canada, and the European Union (EU). Azacitidine is also approved in the EU, and in several other countries, for the treatment of patients with AML with >30% BM blasts. As described here, encouraging data from clinical trials, azacitidine treatment registries, and retrospective analyses, suggest that azacitidine has wide therapeutic application in AML.

Section snippets

Early use of azacitidine

Azacitidine is a cytidine analog DNA methyltransferase inhibitor and hypomethylating agent (HMA) (Jones, 1985a, Jones, 1985b, Jones et al., 1983). Azacitidine is phosphorylated by uridine-cytidine kinase to a monophosphate derivative and then further to diphosphate and triphosphate forms. The triphosphate form is incorporated predominantly into RNA (∼80–90%), but also some into DNA (10–20%) (Li et al., 1970). Originally, it was thought that the primary antineoplastic activity of azacitidine was

AZA-MDS-001: azacitidine in low-blast-count AML (20–30% BM blasts)

Early clinical trial experience with azacitidine in WHO-defined AML emerged from the large international, randomized, phase 3 AZA-MDS-001 study which inlcuded patients with higher-risk MDS (HR-MDS) defined according to the FAB MDS classification system with up to 30% BM blasts, and with an International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) (Greenberg et al., 1997)] Intermediate-2 or High risk MDS risk score (Fenaux et al., 2009). As there was no standard treatment for patients with HR-MDS at the

Experience with azacitidine in community practice

An inherent limitation of clinical trials is that patients are often excluded from study entry due to comorbidities, poor performance status, prior treatment, and other disease-related factors, with the result that study populations may not reflect typical patients seen in clinical practice. It is thus essential to determine outcomes in unselected patients treated in routine clinical practice. Accordingly, a number of large community-based registry studies (Itzykson et al., 2015, Maurillo et

Azacitidine vs. standard induction chemotherapy

Although there is a trend toward considering “physiological age” over chronological age when making AML treatment decisions, clinicians typically exercise greater caution when recommending IC to patients aged ≥75 years (Kantarjian et al., 2010, Klepin, 2015, Oran and Weisdorf, 2012, Ossenkoppele and Lowenberg, 2015). While age per se is not a contraindication to intensive AML treatment, (Juliusson et al., 2009, Oran and Weisdorf, 2012), elderly patients considered unfit for IC are at high risk

Oral azacitidine (CC-486)

An oral formulation of azacitidine, CC-486, is in clinical development and preliminary outcomes for AML patients in a phase 1/2 trial have been reported (Garcia-Manero et al., 2016b, Garcia-Manero et al., 2011). Methylation reduction with HMAs is transient. Extending azacitidine dosing over more of the treatment cycle – which is more practical with an oral formulation – may increase azacitidine exposure to cycling malignant cells. When CC-486 is administered in extended dosing schedules (ie,

Summary/Discussion

The prevalence of AML is projected to continue to increase for the foreseeable future due to population aging and the increasing availability of better treatments for MDS and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), which prolong patient survival but unfortunately do not always prevent transformation to AML (Fenaux et al., 2009). Ongoing changes in clinical practice have resulted in treatment of more, and of older, patients. However, improvements in AML outcomes over recent decades have not been

Conflict of interests

Dr. Schuh: nothing to disclose

Dr. Döhner: Consultation with honoraria: Agios, Amgen, Astex Pharmaceuticals, Celator, Celgene, Novartis, Roche, Seattle Genetics, Sunesis, Tolero

Dr. Pleyer: has been a consultant for Agios, Celgene, Janssen-Cilag, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novartis, and reports receiving honoraria and travel support from Agios, Celgene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, and AOP Orphan Pharmaceuticals

Dr. Seymour: AbbVie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of

Acknowledgments

All authors equally contributed to, revised, and approved manuscript content, and approved submission to the journal. The authors received editorial support during manuscript development from Sheila Truten and Kelly Dittmore of MC2 Inc., Wynnewood, PA, who were funded by Celgene Corporation. Celgene did not contribute to content or participate in the development of this paper. The authors are fully responsible for all content and editorial decisions.

References (134)

  • H. Dohner et al.

    Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in adults: recommendations from an international expert panel, on behalf of the European LeukemiaNet

    Blood

    (2010)
  • H. Dombret et al.

    Acute myeloid leukemia in the elderly

    Semin. Oncol.

    (2008)
  • H. Dombret et al.

    International phase 3 study of azacitidine vs conventional care regimens in older patients with newly diagnosed AML with >30% blasts

    Blood

    (2015)
  • H.P. Erba

    Finding the optimal combination therapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed AML in older patients unfit for intensive therapy

    Leuk. Res.

    (2015)
  • P. Fenaux et al.

    Efficacy of azacitidine compared with that of conventional care regimens in the treatment of higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a randomised, open-label, phase III study

    Lancet Oncol.

    (2009)
  • P. Fenaux et al.

    Practical use of azacitidine in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: an expert panel opinion

    Leuk. Res.

    (2010)
  • P. Fenaux et al.

    Challenges of phase III trial design for novel treatments in diseases with no standard treatment: the AZA-001 myelodysplasia study model

    Leuk. Res.

    (2014)
  • P. Greenberg et al.

    International scoring system for evaluating prognosis in myelodysplastic syndromes

    Blood

    (1997)
  • D. Grimwade et al.

    The importance of diagnostic cytogenetics on outcome in AML: analysis of 1,612 patients entered into the MRC AML 10 trial. the medical research council adult and children's leukaemia working parties

    Blood

    (1998)
  • D. Grimwade et al.

    The predictive value of hierarchical cytogenetic classification in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia (AML): analysis of 1065 patients entered into the United Kingdom Medical Research Council AML11 trial

    Blood

    (2001)
  • R. Itzykson et al.

    Azacitidine for the treatment of relapsed and refractory AML in older patients

    Leuk. Res.

    (2015)
  • P.A. Jones

    Altering gene expression with 5-azacytidine

    Cell

    (1985)
  • P.A. Jones

    Effects of 5-azacytidine and its 2'-deoxyderivative on cell differentiation and DNA methylation

    Pharmacol. Ther.

    (1985)
  • G. Juliusson et al.

    Age and acute myeloid leukemia: real world data on decision to treat and outcomes from the Swedish Acute Leukemia Registry

    Blood

    (2009)
  • G. Juliusson

    Most 70- to 79-year-old patients with acute myeloid leukemia do benefit from intensive treatment

    Blood

    (2011)
  • H. Kantarjian et al.

    Intensive chemotherapy does not benefit most older patients (age 70 years or older) with acute myeloid leukemia

    Blood

    (2010)
  • S. Nand et al.

    A phase 2 trial of azacitidine and gemtuzumab ozogamicin therapy in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia

    Blood

    (2013)
  • G. Ossenkoppele et al.

    How I treat the older patient with acute myeloid leukemia

    Blood

    (2015)
  • T. Prebet et al.

    Combination of vorinostat and low dose cytarabine for patients with azacitidine-refractory/relapsed high risk myelodysplastic syndromes

    Leuk. Res.

    (2014)
  • F. Ramos et al.

    Azacitidine frontline therapy for unfit acute myeloid leukemia patients: clinical use and outcome prediction

    Leuk. Res.

    (2015)
  • N.K. Aaronson et al.

    The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology

    J. Natl. Cancer Inst.

    (1993)
  • J.M. Bennett et al.

    Proposals for the classification of the myelodysplastic syndromes

    Br. J. Haematol.

    (1982)
  • A.K. Burnett et al.

    A comparison of low-dose cytarabine and hydroxyurea with or without all-trans retinoic acid for acute myeloid leukemia and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome in patients not considered fit for intensive treatment

    Cancer

    (2007)
  • B.D. Cheson et al.

    Revised recommendations of the international working group for diagnosis, standardization of response criteria, treatment outcomes, and reporting standards for therapeutic trials in acute myeloid leukemia

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2003)
  • B. Deschler et al.

    Treatment decision-making for older patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome or acute myeloid leukemia: problems and approaches

    Haematologica

    (2006)
  • C. DiNardo et al.

    A phase 1b study of venetoclax (ABT-199/GDC-0199) in combination with decitabine or azacitidine in treatment-naive patients with acute myelogenous leukemia who are <65 years and not eligible for standard induction therapy

    Blood

    (2015)
  • H. Dohner et al.

    Overall survival in older patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with >30% bone marrow blasts treated with azacitidine by cytogenetic risk status: results of the AZA-AML-001 study

    Blood

    (2014)
  • H. Dohner et al.

    Overall survival (OS) and clinical outcomes in older patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with azacitidine (AZA) or intensive chemotherapy (IC) in the AZA-AML-001 study

    Haematologica

    (2015)
  • H. Dohner et al.

    Acute myeloid leukemia

    N. Engl. J Med.

    (2015)
  • A. Emadi et al.

    Presence of isocitrate dehydrogenase mutations may predict clinical response to hypomethylating agents in patients with acute myeloid leukemia

    Am. J. Hematol.

    (2015)
  • E.H. Estey

    Epigenetics in clinical practice: the examples of azacitidine and decitabine in myelodysplasia and acute myeloid leukemia

    Leukemia

    (2013)
  • E.H. Estey

    Therapeutic options for patients who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy mediterr

    J. Hematol. Infect. Dis.

    (2013)
  • European Medicines Agency

    Vidaza (azacitidine). EMA/450923/452016

    (2016)
  • B. Falini et al.

    Perspectives for therapeutic targeting of gene mutations in acute myeloid leukaemia with normal cytogenetics

    Br. J. Haematol.

    (2015)
  • P. Fenaux et al.

    Prolonged survival with improved tolerability in higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: azacitidine compared with low dose ara-C

    Br. J. Haematol.

    (2010)
  • P. Fenaux et al.

    Azacitidine prolongs overall survival compared with conventional care regimens in elderly patients with low bone marrow blast count acute myeloid leukemia

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2010)
  • G. Garcia-Manero et al.

    Phase I study of oral azacitidine in myelodysplastic syndromes, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and acute myeloid leukemia

    J. Clin. Oncol.

    (2011)
  • G. Garcia-Manero et al.

    Final results from a phase 2 study of pracinostat in combination with azacitidine in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML)

    Blood

    (2015)
  • G. Garcia-Manero et al.

    A phase 2 study of pracinostat and azacitidine in elderly patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) not eligible for induction chemotherapy: response and long-term survival benefit

    Blood

    (2016)
  • G. Garcia-Manero et al.

    Efficacy and safety of extended dosing schedules of CC-486 (oral azacitidine) in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes

    Leukemia

    (2016)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text