Tumour reviewTreatment outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma using chemoembolization in combination with other therapies
Introduction
Liver cancer is the fifth most common cancer in the world and its incidence is increasing worldwide. In 80% of cases hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a complication of cirrhosis and is the main cause of death among these patients in Europe.1
Consensus about a common treatment strategy for patients with HCC has not been reached worldwide, even if several proposals have been published. The most recent one is the Barcelona-Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging classification and treatment schedule.1 Since radical therapies, including resection, liver transplantation and percutaneous ablation (percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) and radiofrequency (RF)), are applicable in only 30–40% of patients with HCC1 according to this algorithm, the majority need different approaches.
Several alternative therapeutic strategies have been proposed but only chemoembolization has been shown to improve survival.2 Although this procedure is becoming more common in clinical practice, there is no consensus about the optimal schedule or technique of embolization.3
In particular, the role of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) either compared to other therapies or combined with other therapies has not been subject to guidelines or been part of therapeutic algorithms. Therefore, the aim of this review is to evaluate the evidence for improved outcomes with TACE added to other therapies for HCC.
Section snippets
Search strategy and selection criteria
Studies were identified by searching Medline using the following key words: “hepatocellular carcinoma” or “HCC” or “hepatic tumour” or “liver tumour” or “hepatic cancer” or “liver cancer” and “TACE” or “TAE” or “chemoembolization” or “embolization” and “clinical trials” in English and non-English language. We also manually searched general reviews on HCC and references from published clinical trials.
Articles were excluded if they dealt with liver metastases, recurrence of HCC after hepatectomy,
Chemoembolization as sole therapy versus other therapies
There were 11 studies involving 5131 patients comparing TACE to other treatments: radiofrequency ablation (n = 1), percutaneous acetic acid injection (PAI) (n = 1), percutaneous ethanol injection (n = 1) 131iodine-lipiodol radiotherapy (n = 2), liver resection (n = 5) and transplantation (n = 1).
The median number of patients in each study was 117 (range: 39–3225). Two were RCTs4, 5 and three were multicenter;6, 7, 8 the mean duration of each study was 4 ± 1.5 years. Six were conducted in Asia (3 Japanese, 1
Conclusion
Chemoembolization has been used in patients with HCC not suitable for curative therapy according to the BCLC treatment schedule. In this subset of selected patients it improves survival compared to supportive treatment or systemic chemotherapy.2 Currently, none of the therapeutic algorithms used for HCC consider the role of TACE combined with other therapies. The aim of our review was to evaluate the evidence for improved outcomes in HCC with a multimodal treatment approach involving TACE.
Four
References (64)
- et al.
Hepatocellular carcinoma
Lancet
(2003) - et al.
Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: chemoembolization improves survival
Hepatology
(2003) - et al.
Prospective randomized trial of chemoembolization versus intra-arterial injection of 131I-labeled-iodized oil in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma
Hepatology
(1997) - et al.
Combination of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using cisplatin-lipiodol suspension and percutaneous ethanol injection for treatment of advanced small hepatocellular carcinoma
Am J Surg
(2002) - et al.
Sequential transarterial chemoembolization and percutaneous acetic acid injection therapy versus repeated percutaneous acetic acid injection for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective study
Ann Oncol
(2003) - et al.
The influence on liver parenchymal function and complications of radiofrequency ablation or the combination with transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma
Hepatol Res
(2004) - et al.
Prospective trial of combined transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for portal vein tumor thrombus in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys
(2003) - et al.
Role of transarterial chemoembolization before liver resection for hepatocarcinoma
Liver Transplant
(2000) - et al.
Adjuvant intra-arterial iodine-131-labelled lipiodol for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a prospective randomised trial
Lancet
(1999) - et al.
Adjuvant intra-arterial injection of iodine-131-labeled lipiodol after resection of hepatocellular carcinoma
Hepatology
(2003)
Arterial chemoembolization before liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: marked tumor necrosis, but no survival benefit?
J Hepatol
Chemoembolization followed by liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma impedes tumor progression while on the waiting list and leads to excellent outcome
Liver Transplant
Comparison of liver resection with sequential transarterial chemoembolization in stage pT3 or pT4 hepatocellular carcinoma
Langenbecks Arch Chir Suppl Kongressbd
Diagnostic imaging and interventional therapy in hepatocarcinoma. Multicenter study of 290 cases
Radiol Med (Torino)
The role of transcatheter arterial embolization in patients with resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a nation-wide, multicenter study
Liver Int
Therapeutic results of resection, transcatheter arterial embolization and percutaneous transhepatic ethanol injection in 3225 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective multicenter study
Jpn J Clin Oncol
Epirubicin-lipiodol chemotherapy versus 131iodine-lipiodol radiotherapy in the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
Cancer
Comparison of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, laparoscopic radiofrequency ablation, and conservative treatment for decompensated cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma
World J Gastroenterol
Combination therapy with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and percutaneous ethanol injection compared with percutaneous ethanol injection alone for patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized control study
Cancer
Hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with a combination therapy of transcatheter arterial embolization and percutaneous ethanol injection
Radiology
Treatment of large HCC: transcatheter arterial chemoembolization combined with percutaneous ethanol injection versus repeated transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
Radiology
Combined TACE and PEI for palliative treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma
World J Gastroenterol
Survival benefit of patients with inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma treated by a combination of transarterial chemoembolization and percutaneous ethanol injection – a single-center analysis including 132 patients
Int J Cancer
Evaluation of transcatheter arterial embolization prior to percutaneous tumor ablation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized controlled trial
Liver Int
Percutaneous radio-frequency thermal ablation of nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after occlusion of tumor blood supply
Radiology
Percutaneous radiofrequency thermal ablation combined with transcatheter arterial embolization in the treatment of large hepatocellular carcinoma
Ultraschall Med
Combination therapy with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma
Cancer
Combination therapy with radiofrequency ablation and transcatheter chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: short-term recurrences and survival
Oncol Rep
Radiofrequency thermal ablation (RFA) after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) as a combined therapy for unresectable non-early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)
Eur Radiol
Hepatocellular carcinoma after transcatheter hepatic arterial embolization. A histopathologic study of 84 resected cases
Cancer
Cited by (0)
- d
Tel.: +44 20 7274 6229; fax: +44 20 7472 6226.
- e
Tel.: +44 20 7794 0500x38767.
- f
Tel.: +44 20 7794 0500x34150.
- g
Tel.: +44 20 7830 2601.
- h
Tel.: +44 20 7794 0500x38097; fax: +44 20 7472 6226.