General and Supportive Care
Management of fatigue in patients with cancer – A practical overview

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.01.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a serious clinical problem and is one of the most common symptoms experienced by cancer patients. CRF has deleterious effects on many aspects of patient quality of life including their physical, psychological and social well-being. It can also limit their ability to function, socialise and participate in previously enjoyable activities. The aetiology of CRF is complex and multidimensional, involving many potentially contributing elements. These include tumour-related factors and comorbid medical/psychological conditions and also side effects associated with anti-cancer therapies or other medications. Barriers to the effective management of CRF exist both on the side of physicians and patients, and as a result CRF often remains unrecognised and undiscussed in clinical practice. A change of approach is required, where fatigue is treated as central to patient management during and after systemic anti-cancer treatment. In this review we summarise factors involved in the aetiology of CRF and the barriers to its effective management, as well as factors involved in the screening, diagnosis and treatment of cancer patients experiencing fatigue. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological approaches to its management are also reviewed. We suggest an algorithm for the process of managing CRF, guided by our experiences in The Netherlands, which we hope may provide a useful tool to healthcare professionals dealing with cancer patients in their daily practice. Although CRF is a serious and complex clinical problem, if it is worked through in a structured and comprehensive way, effective management has the potential to much improve patient quality of life.

Introduction

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a serious and complex clinical problem [1] and is one of the most common symptoms experienced by oncology patients [2], [3], [4]. The proportion of patients experiencing CRF varies widely in the literature, but has generally been reported as affecting between ∼40–100% of those with cancer overall [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]. The variation in rates is likely due to the fact that fatigue is impacted not only by disease stage and status, but also because there is a lack of commonly accepted diagnostic criteria and assessment tools. However, rates can still vary between studies when the same diagnostic criteria are used, reflecting a lack of consistency in how these criteria are applied [10]. CRF can occur before, during and even long after anti-cancer treatment has been completed [4]. Up to 40% of patients report fatigue at diagnosis and virtually all patients experience fatigue at some point during cancer therapy [4]; reported rates are 80% and 90% for patients being treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy, respectively [4]. In the post-treatment population, reported CRF rates range from 17% to 21% when strict ICD-10 criteria are applied [11] and from 33% to 53% when other criteria are used [12]. A further study found that 22% of cancer survivors had persistent, severe fatigue in the year following anticancer therapy [13]. Although there is no universally accepted definition of CRF, the National Comprehensive Cancer Network® (NCCN®) defines it as ‘a distressing, persistent, subjective sense of physical, emotional, and/or cognitive tiredness or exhaustion related to cancer or cancer treatment, that is not proportional to recent activity and interferes with usual functioning’ [9].

In comparison to the fatigue experienced by healthy individuals, CRF is differentiated by its severity and the fact that it is often not alleviated by rest or sleep [14]. CRF has deleterious effects on many aspects of patient quality of life [4], [5], [15], [16]. Specifically, it can significantly impact on a patient’s physical, psychological, social and spiritual well-being, as well as limiting their ability to function, socialise and participate in previously enjoyable activities [16]. It is not only a cause of stress and anxiety for patients but can also have an impact on their family members/caregivers [17].

The aetiology of CRF is complex and multidimensional and involves a vast array of potentially contributing factors (Fig. 1) [14]. Anaemia has been linked with poor prognosis and fatigue [18] and is a condition commonly encountered in cancer patients. Fatigue and anaemia are sometimes used interchangeably in the literature but anaemia is actually only one of many possible causes of CRF [14]. Other potentially contributing tumour-related factors include electrolyte abnormalities, dehydration, cachexia, thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, renal failure, liver failure, hypoxia, adrenal insufficiency, neurological deficit, etc. Physical symptoms caused by the underlying tumour or its treatment can also have an impact; the symptoms most strongly correlated with fatigue are pain and dyspnoea. Loss of appetite commonly occurs in cancer patients and can lead to malnutrition and fatigue. This can be exacerbated in patients with more advanced disease who may also experience difficulty with swallowing. The possible impact of any comorbid medical (e.g., hypothyroidism, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [COPD], cardiovascular disease, etc.) and psychological conditions (e.g., anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, etc.) also need to be considered. In our opinion, decreased physical activity may also be a factor leading to fatigue. Furthermore, anti-cancer treatments such as chemotherapy, targeted therapies, radiotherapy or surgery and other commonly prescribed medications (e.g., opioids, psychiatric drugs, antihistamines, beta blockers, and corticosteroids) are all associated with side effects that may result in fatigue.

As management of CRF is currently sub-optimal, ideally a change of approach is required, where fatigue is treated as central to patient management both during and after systemic anti-cancer treatment. The ultimate aim would be to develop a management programme including information and tools relevant to the screening, diagnosis and potential treatments/interventions for CRF, and combine these onto one platform for use by the wider oncology community. Various programmes and management tools are already available locally, which could perhaps guide best practice more widely. For example, www.oncoline.nl is a website produced by the Comprehensive Cancer Centre in The Netherlands (IKNL), which facilitates the development, implementation and evaluation of guidelines for oncological and palliative care. This comprehensive site includes guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of patients with various tumour types. It also contains guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of many symptoms and health complaints caused by the disease itself or its treatment – including fatigue.

Section snippets

Integrated management of CRF

In this section we will overview key factors involved in the screening, diagnosis and treatment of cancer patients experiencing fatigue. We also suggest an algorithm for the process of managing CRF in clinical practice (Fig. 2), which has been guided by our experiences in The Netherlands. This includes key stages involved in the screening and diagnosis of fatigue in patients undergoing anti-cancer therapy, as well as some of the potential treatment options. Further details relevant to each part

Summary and conclusions

CRF remains an under-recognised and under-discussed condition, despite its deleterious impact on patient quality of life [4], [5], [15], [16]. If we are to improve management of this condition, it is important to raise awareness about CRF in both healthcare professionals and cancer patients. To achieve successful symptom control, there is also a need for close dialogue between the patient, their caregivers and the members of the treating multidisciplinary team [87]. There are many different

Conflicts of interest

R.H.T. Koornstra: membership of a focus group on fatigue management, founded by Amgen and a member of advisory boards for Amgen (but none on this subject). M.E.W.J. Peters: membership of a focus group on fatigue management, founded by Amgen. S.M. Donofrio: membership of a focus group on fatigue management, founded by Amgen. B. van den Borne: membership of a focus group on fatigue management, founded by Amgen. F.A. de Jong: during initiation of this manuscript FdJ was an employee of Amgen BV,

Acknowledgement

Dawn Batty PhD from BioscriptMedical Ltd. provided medical writing assistance (funded by Amgen BV).

References (91)

  • L.S. Porter et al.

    Self-efficacy for managing pain, symptoms, and function in patients with lung cancer and their informal caregivers: associations with symptoms and distress

    Pain

    (2008)
  • C. Robb et al.

    Health and personal resources in older patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy

    J Geriatr Oncol

    (2013)
  • K. Reif et al.

    A patient education program is effective in reducing cancer-related fatigue: a multi-centre randomised two-group waiting-list controlled intervention trial

    Eur J Oncol Nurs

    (2013)
  • M.P. Campos et al.

    Cancer-related fatigue: a review

    Rev Assoc Med Bras

    (2011)
  • B. Hladschik-Kermer et al.

    Patients and staff perceptions of cancer patients’ quality of life

    Eur J Oncol Nurs

    (2013)
  • P. Stone et al.

    Cancer-related fatigue: inevitable, unimportant and untreatable? Results of a multi-centre patient survey. Cancer Fatigue Forum

    Ann Oncol

    (2000)
  • C. Payne et al.

    Interventions for fatigue and weight loss in adults with advanced progressive illness

    Cochrane Database Syst Rev

    (2012)
  • M. Hofman et al.

    Cancer-related fatigue: the scale of the problem

    Oncologist

    (2007)
  • S. De Waele et al.

    Cancer-related fatigue

    Acta Clin Belg

    (2010)
  • C.P. Escalante et al.

    A cancer-related fatigue clinic: opportunities and challenges

    J Natl Compr Canc Netw

    (2003)
  • J. Weis

    Cancer-related fatigue: prevalence, assessment and treatment strategies

    Expert Rev Pharmacoeconomics Outcomes Res

    (2011)
  • E.T. Yeh et al.

    An examination of cancer-related fatigue through proposed diagnostic criteria in a sample of cancer patients in Taiwan

    BMC Cancer

    (2011)
  • K.A. Donovan et al.

    A systematic review of research using the diagnostic criteria for cancer-related fatigue

    Psychooncology

    (2013)
  • D. Cella et al.

    Cancer-related fatigue: prevalence of proposed diagnostic criteria in a United States sample of cancer survivors

    J Clin Oncol

    (2001)
  • H. Knobel et al.

    Late medical complications and fatigue in Hodgkin’s disease survivors

    J Clin Oncol

    (2001)
  • K.M. Mustian et al.

    Integrative nonpharmacologic behavioral interventions for the management of cancer-related fatigue

    Oncologist

    (2007)
  • G.A. Curt et al.

    Impact of cancer-related fatigue on the lives of patients: new findings from the fatigue coalition

    Oncologist

    (2000)
  • T. Borneman et al.

    A qualitative analysis of cancer-related fatigue in ambulatory oncology

    Clin J Oncol Nurs

    (2012)
  • C.P. Escalante et al.

    Cancer-related fatigue: the approach and treatment

    J Gen Intern Med

    (2009)
  • P. Harper et al.

    Anaemia of cancer: impact on patient fatigue and long-term outcome

    Oncology

    (2005)
  • E.M. Smets et al.

    Fatigue in cancer patients

    Br J Cancer

    (1993)
  • P.B. Jacobsen et al.

    Screening for psychologic distress in ambulatory cancer patients

    Cancer

    (2005)
  • M.A. Tuinman et al.

    Screening and referral for psychosocial distress in oncologic practice: use of the distress thermometer

    Cancer

    (2008)
  • Integraal Kankercentrum Nederland (IKNL) oncoline. Editorial board: palliative care: practice guidelines – fatigue in...
  • A. Glaus

    Assessment of fatigue in cancer and non-cancer patients and in healthy individuals

    Support Care Cancer

    (1993)
  • T.R. Mendoza et al.

    The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients: use of the brief fatigue inventory

    Cancer

    (1999)
  • J.H. Vercoulen et al.

    The checklist individual strength (CIS)

    Gedragstherapie

    (1999)
  • U. Bultmann et al.

    Measurement of prolonged fatigue in the working population: determination of a cutoff point for the checklist individual strength

    J Occup Health Psychol

    (2000)
  • P. Jean-Pierre et al.

    Assessment of cancer-related fatigue: implications for clinical diagnosis and treatment

    Oncologist

    (2007)
  • L.J. Tiesinga et al.

    Sensitivity, specificity, and usefulness of the Dutch fatigue scale

    Nurs Diagn

    (2001)
  • M. Alberts et al.

    Bleijenberg G

    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd

    (1997)
  • M. Alberts et al.

    Assessment of fatigue-the practical utility of the subjective feeling of fatigue in research and clinical practice

  • A. Wanchai et al.

    Nonpharmacologic supportive strategies to promote quality of life in patients experiencing cancer-related fatigue: a systematic review

    Clin J Oncol Nurs

    (2011)
  • Cited by (78)

    • Impact of radiation therapy on fatigue at 1 year in breast cancer survivors in the prospective multicentre CANcer TOxicity cohort

      2022, European Journal of Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      Data on cancer survivors suggest that fatigue can persist up to 5 years after treatment [9] and in some cases even longer [10]. Nevertheless, this complex symptom remains underreported and poorly managed [11]. Fatigue related to BC has several dimensions and manifestations that can be physical, psychological or cognitive.

    • The effect of slow-stroke back massage on chemotherapy-related fatigue in women with breast cancer: An assessor blinded, parallel group, randomized control trial: Effect of Slow Stroke Back Massage on CRF

      2022, Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      Data were collected using the Patient Information Form and the Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI). After reviewing the relevant literature, this form developed by the investigators [2,5,7] consisted of questions about sociodemographic characteristics (age, marital status, number of children, education level, and work status), body mass index and hemoglobin levels which obtained from patient files. The BFI, developed by Mendoza et al. (1999), was used to rapidly assess the severity and impact of fatigue on activities of daily living [33].

    • How do family-caregivers of patients with advanced cancer provide symptom self-management support? A qualitative study

      2020, European Journal of Oncology Nursing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Despite fatigue being among the most prevalent and most distressing symptoms for patients and most time consuming for family-caregivers, there is a dearth of information available on the family-caregiver role in facilitating fatigue self-management strategies. There are also a number of effective, non-pharmacological strategies (Mustian et al., 2017) for fatigue management that participants in this study did not identify, suggesting education from HCPs to engage family-caregivers in health, everyday living and coping strategies for the self-management of fatigue and other symptoms could be improved (Chan et al., 2011; Koornstra et al., 2014). While engaging in specific symptom-related SMS accounted for many of the activities of the family-caregiver, the theme of family-caregivers interacting with HCPs for information, help, and support was a significant facilitator of symptom-related SMS.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Address: Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, PO Box 9101 (intern nr 452), 6500 HB Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 (0)24 3610 353; fax: +31 (0)24 3540 788.

    2

    Address: Department of Psychology, University of Groningen, Grote Kruisstraat 2/1, 9712 TS Groningen, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 (0)50 3637 034; fax: +31 (0)50 3636 304.

    3

    Address: Catharina Hospital, Department of Pulmonology, Michelangelolaan 2, 5623 EJ Eindhoven, The Netherlands. Tel.: +31 (0)40 2397 280; fax: +31 (0)40 2399 111.

    4

    Address: Merck KGaA, Merck Serono Division, HQ Medical Affairs, Mail code F133/302, Frankfurter Strasse 250, 64293 Darmstadt, Germany. Tel.: +49 (0)6151 725 5191; fax: +49 (0)6151 726 1781.

    View full text