Clinical Study
Combined biomarkers discriminate a low likelihood of bacterial infection among surgical intensive care unit patients with suspected sepsis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2016.01.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Among surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients, it is difficult to distinguish bacterial sepsis from other causes of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). Biomarkers have proven useful to identify the presence of bacterial infection. We enrolled a prospective cohort of 69 SICU patients with suspected sepsis and assayed the concentrations of 9 biomarkers (α-2 macroglobulin [A2M], C-reactive protein, ferritin, fibrinogen, haptoglobin, procalcitonin [PCT], serum amyloid A, serum amyloid P, and tissue plasminogen activator) at baseline, 24, 48, and 72 hours. Forty-two patients (61%) had bacterial sepsis by chart review. A2M concentrations were significantly lower, and PCT concentrations were significantly higher in subjects with bacterial sepsis at 3 of 4 time points. Using optimal cutoff values, the combination of baseline A2M and 72-hour PCT achieved a negative predictive value of 75% (95% confidence interval, 54–96%). The combination of A2M and PCT discriminated bacterial sepsis from other SIRS among SICU patients with suspected sepsis.

Introduction

It is difficult to distinguish bacterial sepsis from other causes of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) in critically ill patients. The presence of 2 or more SIRS criteria with suspected infection has become the standard for sepsis diagnosis (ARISE Investigators et al., 2014, COIITSS Study Investigators et al., 2010, Holst et al., 2014, Mouncey et al., 1992, Opal et al., 2013, Perner et al., 2012, Ranieri et al., 2012, Sprung et al., 2008). However, the SIRS criteria have been criticized for lacking specificity for infection (Levy et al., 2003, Liao et al., 2014, Sprung et al., 2006, Vincent, 1997, Vincent et al., 2013). Given the morbidity and mortality associated with bacterial sepsis as well as evidence that early antibiotic therapy improves mortality in severe sepsis, guidelines recommend that empiric, broad-spectrum antibacterial agents be administered to patients who meet the 2-SIRS-criteria standard (Kaukonen et al., 2015, Brun-Buisson et al., 2004, Gaieski et al., 2010, Gaieski et al., 2013, Dellinger et al., 2013, Ferrer et al., 2014). The poor specificity of the SIRS criteria may thus contribute to excess use of broad, empiric antibiotics.

Surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients, in particular, represent a population in whom SIRS criteria may demonstrate poor specificity for bacterial infection. The incidence of SIRS in the SICU exceeds the incidence in medical and cardiovascular intensive care units (ICUs). Prior studies have shown that greater than 90% of SICU patients meet SIRS criteria during their ICU stay (Pittet et al., 1995, Sigfrido Rangel-Frausto et al., 1995). The SICU has a higher proportion of culture-negative SIRS and sepsis than do medical or cardiovascular ICUs (Sigfrido Rangel-Frausto et al., 1995, Andersson and Tracey, 2011, Vincent et al., 2013).

Biomarkers have proven to be useful tools to distinguish the presence or absence of bacterial infection in specific patient populations. Procalcitonin (PCT) in particular has shown promise as a component of diagnostic and antibiotic stewardship strategies for respiratory tract infection and sepsis (Assicot et al., 1993, Schuetz et al., 2009, Schuetz et al., 2012a, Schuetz et al., 2012b, Schuetz et al., 2013, Christ-Crain et al., 2004, Simon et al., 2004, Uzzan et al., 2006, Tang et al., 2007, Nobre et al., 2008). A combination of biomarkers may be even more useful than a single biomarker by increasing specificity for infection and improving the ability to discriminate true bacterial sepsis from other causes of SIRS (Meisner et al., 1999, Harbarth et al., 2001, Castelli et al., 2004). To date, studies of biomarkers in sepsis have been limited in the number of biomarker combinations evaluated, and few studies have restricted analysis to SICU patients, a population in whom bacterial sepsis may be more difficult to discriminate (Hensel et al., 1998, Meisner et al., 1998, Uzzan et al., 2006, Castelli et al., 2009, Prkno et al., 2013, Wacker et al., 2013). The identification of SICU patients in whom antibacterial therapy can be safely stopped has the potential to aid antibiotic stewardship efforts, avoid adverse drug effects, and combat the evolution of drug-resistant pathogens (Fishman, 2006, Dellit et al., 2007, Roberts et al., 2009, Luyt et al., 2014). We designed this study in companion with a study of biomarker performance in medical ICU (MICU) patients with suspected sepsis (Han et al., 2015), with the hypothesis that optimal biomarker combinations and cutoffs may be specific to the SICU population.

We sought to systematically evaluate the ability of 9 biomarkers, individually and in combination, to distinguish bacterial sepsis from other causes of SIRS in SICU patients. We further sought to define optimal biomarker cutoffs and sampling times to identify SICU patients with a low likelihood of bacterial infection.

Section snippets

Study design and setting

We prospectively enrolled patients admitted to the SICU of the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania from February 2012 to May 2014. The study was approved by the institutional review board of the University of Pennsylvania. Because residual blood from routine clinical samples was used for biomarker analysis, a waiver of informed consent was granted.

Study population

Patients were deemed eligible for study enrollment if they were identified as having presumed bacterial sepsis, defined by meeting 2 or more

Study population characteristics

A total of 199 patients were screened. Of these, 130 were excluded, leaving 69 subjects for analysis. Reasons for exclusion included immunosuppression (52), ongoing treatment for a known infection (28), unavailable or incomplete laboratory samples (26), antibiotics broadened more than 4 hours prior to initial biomarker measurement (13), not meeting SIRS criteria (10), and cardiac arrest (1).

Of the 69 enrolled subjects, 42 (61%) had true bacterial sepsis based on 2-physician chart review

Discussion

In this prospective cohort study of critically ill surgical patients, we found that combinations of biomarkers and repeat measurements of the same biomarker were better able to discriminate true bacterial sepsis from other causes of SIRS than single biomarker measurements. A2M and PCT each demonstrated a good ability to discriminate true bacterial sepsis from other causes of SIRS, but their combination had greater discriminatory ability. The combination of “72-hour” PCT with either “baseline”

Conclusions

In conclusion, A2M and PCT demonstrate good discrimination between bacterial sepsis and other causes of SIRS among SICU patients. The combination of these 2 biomarkers performs better than either in isolation. Further study should be directed to antibiotic stewardship algorithms based upon this combination of biomarkers to reduce unnecessary antibiotic use among SICU patients with suspected bacterial sepsis.

The following are the supplementary data related to this article.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the CDC Cooperative Agreement FOA#CK11-001-Epicenters for the Prevention of Healthcare Associated Infections (E.L.) and the National Institutes of Health (K01-AI103028 to J.H.H.). The funding agencies had no role in the study design or conduct; data collection, management, analysis, or interpretation; and manuscript preparation, review, or approval. The authors report no conflicts of interest.

References (65)

  • C. Wacker et al.

    Procalcitonin as a diagnostic marker for sepsis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Lancet Infect Dis

    (2013)
  • J.J. Abbink et al.

    Quantification of functional and inactivated alpha 2-macroglobulin in sepsis

    Thromb Haemost

    (1991)
  • U. Andersson et al.

    HMGB1 is a therapeutic target for sterile inflammation and infection

    Annu Rev Immunol

    (2011)
  • ARISE Investigators et al.

    Goal-directed resuscitation for patients with early septic shock

    N Engl J Med

    (2014)
  • P.C. Austin et al.

    Interpreting the concordance statistic of a logistic regression model: relation to the variance and odds ratio of a continuous explanatory variable

    BMC Med Res Methodol

    (2012)
  • C. BalcI et al.

    Usefulness of procalcitonin for diagnosis of sepsis in the intensive care unit

    Crit Care

    (2002)
  • G. Birkenmeier et al.

    Polymyxin B-conjugated alpha 2-macroglobulin as an adjunctive therapy to sepsis: modes of action and impact on lethality

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (2006)
  • C. Brun-Buisson et al.

    EPISEPSIS: a reappraisal of the epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis in French intensive care units

    Intensive Care Med

    (2004)
  • J. Carlet et al.

    Epidemiology and control of antibiotic resistance in the intensive care unit

    Curr Opin Infect Dis

    (2004)
  • G.P. Castelli et al.

    Procalcitonin and C-reactive protein during systemic inflammatory response syndrome, sepsis and organ dysfunction

    Crit Care

    (2004)
  • G.P. Castelli et al.

    Procalcitonin as a prognostic and diagnostic tool for septic complications after major trauma

    Crit Care Med

    (2009)
  • COIITSS Study Investigators et al.

    Corticosteroid treatment and intensive insulin therapy for septic shock in adults: a randomized controlled trial

    JAMA

    (2010)
  • R. Core Team

    R: a language and environment for statistical computing

    (2014)
  • J. Dalli et al.

    Microparticle alpha-2-macroglobulin enhances pro-resolving responses and promotes survival in sepsis

    EMBO Mol Med

    (2014)
  • R.P. Dellinger et al.

    Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012

    Intensive Care Med

    (2013)
  • T.H. Dellit et al.

    Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Guidelines for Developing an Institutional Program to Enhance Antimicrobial Stewardship

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2007)
  • R. Ferrer et al.

    Empiric antibiotic treatment reduces mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock from the first hour: results from a guideline-based performance improvement program

    Crit Care Med

    (2014)
  • for Healthcare Epidemiology of America S.

    Policy statement on antimicrobial stewardship by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA), the Infectious Diseases Society of America …. Policy Statement R Coll Gen Pract

    JSTOR

    (2012)
  • D.F. Gaieski et al.

    Impact of time to antibiotics on survival in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in whom early goal-directed therapy was initiated in the emergency department

    Crit Care Med

    (2010)
  • D.F. Gaieski et al.

    Benchmarking the incidence and mortality of severe sepsis in the United States

    Crit Care Med

    (2013)
  • J. Garnacho-Montero et al.

    Prognostic and diagnostic value of eosinopenia, C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and circulating cell-free DNA in critically ill patients admitted with suspicion of sepsis

    Crit Care

    (2014)
  • J.H. Han et al.

    Use of a combination biomarker algorithm to identify medical intensive care unit patients with suspected sepsis at very low likelihood of bacterial infection

    Antimicrob Agents Chemother

    (2015)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Alternate corresponding author. Tel.: +1-215-900-1066.

    View full text