Alimentary TractSurvival rate and prognostic factors in patients with intestinal failure
Introduction
Intestinal failure is a rare condition, usually secondary to major intestinal surgery, leading to short bowel syndrome (SBS). This disorder is characterised by inadequate intestinal function for absorption of nutrients and electrolytes, which would affect nutritional status and survival expectance without intravenous administration of nutrients and electrolytes. Though enteral independence can be achieved in time [1], [2], [3], in about half of the cases, parenteral nutrition (PN) is indicated for irreversible and chronic intestinal failure (CIF) [4], [5], [6]. Artificial nutrition contributes to socially rehabilitate these patients with an acceptable quality of life, at least in the younger ones [7]. Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) compares favourably with intestine transplantation [1], the latter however being available only in a few qualified centres.
Intestinal dysfunction has a wide range of clinical and nutritional pictures: some cases can be managed with PN only (complete intestinal failure), whereas other patients are affected by transient or less severe intestinal insufficiency. Intestinal adaptation can occur in time and early oral or enteral nutrition (EN) can foster it [8], [9], [10]. In any case, the most adequate, simple and less expensive nutritional treatment should be prescribed. Dietary advice is usually given [11] and regular food intake promoted too [1], [4], [8].
A certain number of reports have described the outcome of patients with intestinal failure, giving information on intestinal adaptation [8], [10], survival, nutritional treatment, complications, dependence on artificial nutrition, hospital readmissions, factors affecting the outcome and cost/benefits [1], [6], [12], [13], [14], [15].
During the last 13 years, we have had the opportunity to follow a group of patients with intestinal insufficiency sent to our specialised gastrointestinal rehabilitation unit by other Italian centres. This study is aimed at evaluating survival rate, causes of death, enteral independence, in-hospital and in-home artificial nutrition, factors affecting the outcome in a group of patients with intestinal insufficiency.
Section snippets
Patients
A group of 68 consecutive patients (30 males, 38 females), aged 55.4 years (S.E.M. 2.09; median 57.5; range 12–86) with intestinal insufficiency, admitted to and discharged from our unit between 1990 and 2001, were recruited in this study. None of the patients were affected by cancer at the time of enrolment, except for one patient with intestinal lymphoma with no sign of active GI disease and/or extraintestinal involvement. The series includes 10 patients with radiation enteritis (undergone
Nutritional treatments
This series includes 68 patients who, on admission, were allocated to different nutritional supports. On the basis of a comprehensive clinical and nutritional evaluation, nutrition was usually modified according to a step-down strategy. Further attempts to make nutritional therapy easier and less expensive were also made during the follow-up. Median hospital stay lasted 29.5 days (range 7–240; 75th percentile 48), length being longer in patients discharged on PN (mean 50.27; S.E.M. 14.7; median
Discussion
We have described the clinical outcome of a group of patients affected by intestinal insufficiency associated with different primary disorders, nutritional treatments, death rate and causes, survival time and rates, and factors influencing their life expectance. Twenty-two patients (32.35%) died during the follow-up, 6 of them because of malignancies occurring for the first time (4 cases) or from cancer relapse (2 cases), the cancer having occurred more than 5 years before enrolment in the
Acknowledgements
We are very grateful to all the nurses of our unit for the highly professional assistance given to patients with intestinal failure, and to Mrs. Carol Thomas for reviewing English language.
References (41)
- et al.
Long-term survival and parenteral nutrition dependence in adult patients with the short bowel syndrome
Gastroenterology
(1999) - et al.
Home parenteral nutrition in United Kingdom and Ireland
Lancet
(1986) - et al.
Prognosis of patients with nonmalignant chronic intestinal failure receiving long-term home parenteral nutrition
Gastroenterology
(1995) - et al.
Nutritional support in the short bowel syndrome
Gastroenterol. Clin. North Am.
(1989) - et al.
Short-bowel syndrome in children and adults
Gastroenterology
(1997) Management of patients with short bowel
Nutrition
(1999)- et al.
Effects of oral versus intravenous nutrition on intestinal adaptation after small bowel resection in the dog
Gastroenterology
(1976) - et al.
Intestinal absorption of free oral hyperalimentation in the very short bowel syndrome
Gastroenterology
(1991) - et al.
Spectrum of intestinal failure in a specialised unit
Lancet
(1991) - et al.
Safety and efficacy of home parenteral nutrition for chronic intestinal failure: a 16 year experience at a single centre
Dig. Liver Dis.
(2003)
Home parenteral nutrition in adults: a European multicentre survey in 1997
Clin. Nutr.
Hepatobiliary complications of HPN: an Italian multicentre study
Dig. Liver Dis.
Incidence, prognosis and etiology of end-stage liver disease in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition
Surgery
Current use and clinical outcome of home parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition therapies in the Unites States
Gastroenterology
Jejunal efflux in short bowel syndrome
Lancet
Clinical nutrition practice in Italian Gastroenterology Units
Dig. Liver Dis.
Cost-benefit of home artificial nutrition regulation
Clin. Nutr.
Clinical nutrition support in accredited nutritional units
Dig. Liver Dis.
Assessing the quality of life of patients with intestinal failure on home parenteral nutrition
Gut.
Continuous enteral nutrition during the early adaptive stage of the short bowel syndrome
Br. J. Surg.
Cited by (96)
ESPEN guideline on chronic intestinal failure in adults – Update 2023
2023, Clinical NutritionSurvival in patients initiating home parenteral support due to nonmalignant short bowel syndrome compared with background population
2022, Clinical Nutrition ESPENCitation Excerpt :Hence, SBS-IF patients are expected to have a reduced survival compared with healthy individuals. Survival of patients receiving HPS has been estimated to be between 60 and 92% after 5 years [5–13]. When interpreting survival rates, physicians and patients tend to consider an ideal long-term survival of 100%, which in nature is not feasible.
Outcome of adult patients receiving parenteral support at home: 36 years’ experience at a tertiary referral centre
2021, Clinical NutritionCitation Excerpt :These include avoidance of soybean-oil based lipid content in PS and early recognition and improved management of sepsis in particular CRBSI [3]. Overall long-term survival rates for patients receiving home PS have shown a 1 year survival between 86% and 97% [4,7,25–33], a 5 year survival of between 60 and 87% [4,7,25–28,30,32–37], a 10 year survival of 44%–71% [4,7,26,27,33]. Only one paper to date has documented 20 year survival at 28% [7].
ESPEN practical guideline: Clinical nutrition in chronic intestinal failure
2021, Clinical NutritionUnderstanding short bowel syndrome: Current status and future perspectives
2020, Digestive and Liver Disease