Alimentary Tract
Survival rate and prognostic factors in patients with intestinal failure

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dld.2003.09.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Background. Intestinal failure impairs nutritional status and survival expectance. Though intestinal adaptation and enteral independence may be achieved, artificial nutrition is needed in about half of the patients.

Aims. This study is aimed at assessing the causes of death, survival rate, enteral independence in time, and factors affecting the clinical outcome in a group of patients with intestinal insufficiency.

Patients. Sixty-eight patients with intestinal insufficiency, due to major intestinal resection in 60 cases (short bowel syndrome) (remnant intestine length 101–150 cm in 31 cases, 50–100 cm in 23 cases, <50 cm in 6 cases), and due to chronic idiopathic pseudo-obstruction in 8 cases, were enrolled and followed-up for (median) 36 months (25th and 75th percentile in 12 and 60 months, respectively). In 60 short bowel syndrome patients, the main conditions that led to intestinal failure were ischemic bowel (28), major surgery complications or severe adhesions (17), radiation enteritis (10), Chron’s disease, intestinal tuberculosis, small bowel lymphoma and trauma (others).

Methods. Seventeen variables age, underlying disorders, length of remnant bowel, type of surgery, hospital stay, type of nutrition (hospital and home) and its variations in time, causes of death, survival rate and time were considered. Statistical analysis was carried out by Mann–Whitney U-test, Pearson χ2, Spearman correlation test, Kaplan–Meyer method and Cox’s proportion hazards regression model.

Results. At the time of admission to the hospital, none of the patients had nutritional independence, 54 (79.4%) were on parenteral nutrition and 14 (20.6%) were on enteral nutrition. At the time of discharge, 23 (33.8%) patients showed enteral independence, 39 were on home parenteral nutrition, 3 on enteral nutrition + i.v. feeding, 1 on enteral nutrition, and 2 needed oral supplementation with hydroelectrolyte solutions only. After a median value of 36 months, 30 and 2 patients were on home parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition + i.v. feeding, respectively, 2 on enteral nutrition, 2 on oral supplementation with hydroelectrolyte solutions, and 26 cases reached enteral independence. A significant relationship was detected between the length of remnant bowel and types of nutrition at both admission (r=0.38; P=0.001) and discharge (r=0.48; P=0.001), parenteral nutrition being more frequent in patients with very short bowel. Twenty-two patients (32.4%) died (4 from newly occurring malignancies), 40 (58.8%) survived, and 6 (8.8%) were lost to the follow-up. Eleven of 22 patients died from conditions related to intestinal failure (8 cases) and/or home parenteral nutrition complications (3 cases). At 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 and 72 months, survival rates were 95.4, 93.3, 88.1, 78.6, 78.6 and 65.5%, respectively, but it was significantly lower for patients with <50 cm of remnant bowel than those with longer residual intestine (P<0.05), and in patients who started home parenteral nutrition above the age of 45 years (P<0.02). Survival rate was higher in patients with enteral independence than those with enteral dependence (P<0.05). Better survival rates were registered in patients with chronic obstructive intestinal pseudo-obstruction and major surgery complications, whereas ischemic bowel and even more radiation enteritis were associated with a lower survival expectance.

Conclusions. Actuarial survival rate of patients with intestinal failure quotes 88 and 78% at 3 and 5 years, respectively. It is influenced by the length of remnant intestine, age at the start of home parenteral nutrition, enteral independence and, to some extent at least, by the primary disorder. Enteral independence can be achieved in time by about 40% of the patients with intestinal insufficiency, but for home parenteral nutrition-dependent cases, intravenous feeding can be stopped in less than one out of five patients during a median 3-year period.

Introduction

Intestinal failure is a rare condition, usually secondary to major intestinal surgery, leading to short bowel syndrome (SBS). This disorder is characterised by inadequate intestinal function for absorption of nutrients and electrolytes, which would affect nutritional status and survival expectance without intravenous administration of nutrients and electrolytes. Though enteral independence can be achieved in time [1], [2], [3], in about half of the cases, parenteral nutrition (PN) is indicated for irreversible and chronic intestinal failure (CIF) [4], [5], [6]. Artificial nutrition contributes to socially rehabilitate these patients with an acceptable quality of life, at least in the younger ones [7]. Home parenteral nutrition (HPN) compares favourably with intestine transplantation [1], the latter however being available only in a few qualified centres.

Intestinal dysfunction has a wide range of clinical and nutritional pictures: some cases can be managed with PN only (complete intestinal failure), whereas other patients are affected by transient or less severe intestinal insufficiency. Intestinal adaptation can occur in time and early oral or enteral nutrition (EN) can foster it [8], [9], [10]. In any case, the most adequate, simple and less expensive nutritional treatment should be prescribed. Dietary advice is usually given [11] and regular food intake promoted too [1], [4], [8].

A certain number of reports have described the outcome of patients with intestinal failure, giving information on intestinal adaptation [8], [10], survival, nutritional treatment, complications, dependence on artificial nutrition, hospital readmissions, factors affecting the outcome and cost/benefits [1], [6], [12], [13], [14], [15].

During the last 13 years, we have had the opportunity to follow a group of patients with intestinal insufficiency sent to our specialised gastrointestinal rehabilitation unit by other Italian centres. This study is aimed at evaluating survival rate, causes of death, enteral independence, in-hospital and in-home artificial nutrition, factors affecting the outcome in a group of patients with intestinal insufficiency.

Section snippets

Patients

A group of 68 consecutive patients (30 males, 38 females), aged 55.4 years (S.E.M. 2.09; median 57.5; range 12–86) with intestinal insufficiency, admitted to and discharged from our unit between 1990 and 2001, were recruited in this study. None of the patients were affected by cancer at the time of enrolment, except for one patient with intestinal lymphoma with no sign of active GI disease and/or extraintestinal involvement. The series includes 10 patients with radiation enteritis (undergone

Nutritional treatments

This series includes 68 patients who, on admission, were allocated to different nutritional supports. On the basis of a comprehensive clinical and nutritional evaluation, nutrition was usually modified according to a step-down strategy. Further attempts to make nutritional therapy easier and less expensive were also made during the follow-up. Median hospital stay lasted 29.5 days (range 7–240; 75th percentile 48), length being longer in patients discharged on PN (mean 50.27; S.E.M. 14.7; median

Discussion

We have described the clinical outcome of a group of patients affected by intestinal insufficiency associated with different primary disorders, nutritional treatments, death rate and causes, survival time and rates, and factors influencing their life expectance. Twenty-two patients (32.35%) died during the follow-up, 6 of them because of malignancies occurring for the first time (4 cases) or from cancer relapse (2 cases), the cancer having occurred more than 5 years before enrolment in the

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to all the nurses of our unit for the highly professional assistance given to patients with intestinal failure, and to Mrs. Carol Thomas for reviewing English language.

References (41)

  • A. Van Gossum et al.

    Home parenteral nutrition in adults: a European multicentre survey in 1997

    Clin. Nutr.

    (1999)
  • F.V. Guglielmi et al.

    Hepatobiliary complications of HPN: an Italian multicentre study

    Dig. Liver Dis.

    (2001)
  • S. Chan et al.

    Incidence, prognosis and etiology of end-stage liver disease in patients receiving home parenteral nutrition

    Surgery

    (1999)
  • L. Howard et al.

    Current use and clinical outcome of home parenteral nutrition and enteral nutrition therapies in the Unites States

    Gastroenterology

    (1995)
  • J.M. Nightingale et al.

    Jejunal efflux in short bowel syndrome

    Lancet

    (1990)
  • F.W. Guglielmi et al.

    Clinical nutrition practice in Italian Gastroenterology Units

    Dig. Liver Dis.

    (2000)
  • L. Pironi

    Cost-benefit of home artificial nutrition regulation

    Clin. Nutr.

    (2001)
  • K.J. Moriarty et al.

    Clinical nutrition support in accredited nutritional units

    Dig. Liver Dis.

    (2000)
  • D.M. Richards et al.

    Assessing the quality of life of patients with intestinal failure on home parenteral nutrition

    Gut.

    (1997)
  • E. Levy et al.

    Continuous enteral nutrition during the early adaptive stage of the short bowel syndrome

    Br. J. Surg.

    (1988)
  • Cited by (96)

    • Survival in patients initiating home parenteral support due to nonmalignant short bowel syndrome compared with background population

      2022, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN
      Citation Excerpt :

      Hence, SBS-IF patients are expected to have a reduced survival compared with healthy individuals. Survival of patients receiving HPS has been estimated to be between 60 and 92% after 5 years [5–13]. When interpreting survival rates, physicians and patients tend to consider an ideal long-term survival of 100%, which in nature is not feasible.

    • Outcome of adult patients receiving parenteral support at home: 36 years’ experience at a tertiary referral centre

      2021, Clinical Nutrition
      Citation Excerpt :

      These include avoidance of soybean-oil based lipid content in PS and early recognition and improved management of sepsis in particular CRBSI [3]. Overall long-term survival rates for patients receiving home PS have shown a 1 year survival between 86% and 97% [4,7,25–33], a 5 year survival of between 60 and 87% [4,7,25–28,30,32–37], a 10 year survival of 44%–71% [4,7,26,27,33]. Only one paper to date has documented 20 year survival at 28% [7].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text