Elsevier

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Volume 174, 1 May 2017, Pages 113-120
Drug and Alcohol Dependence

Full length article
Among patients with unhealthy alcohol use, those with HIV are less likely than those without to receive evidence-based alcohol-related care: A national VA study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.01.018Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Disparities in receipt of alcohol-related care among HIV+ and HIV- patients exist.

  • Alcohol use is disproportionality under-addressed among PLWH relative to HIV-.

  • Special efforts may be needed to ensure that HIV+ patients receive adequate care.

Abstract

Background

Alcohol use has important adverse effects on people living with HIV (PLWH). This study of patients with recognized unhealthy alcohol use estimated and compared rates of alcohol-related care received by PLWH and HIV- patients.

Methods

Outpatients from the Veterans Health Administration who had one or more positive screen(s) for unhealthy alcohol use (AUDIT-C  5) documented in their medical records 10/2009-5/2013 were eligible. Primary and secondary outcomes were brief intervention documented ≤14 days after a positive alcohol screen, and a composite measure of any alcohol-related care (brief intervention, specialty addictions treatment or pharmacotherapy documented ≤365 days), respectively. Unadjusted and adjusted regression analyses compared alcohol-related care outcomes in PLWH and HIV- patients.

Results

The sample included 830,825 outpatients (3,514 PLWH), reflecting 1,172,606 positive screens (1–5 per patient). For PLWH, 57.0% (95% confidence interval 55.4–58.5%) of positive screens were followed by brief intervention, compared to 73.8% (73.7–73.9%) for HIV- patients [relative rate: 0.77 (0.75–0.79), p < 0.001]. After adjustment, comparable proportions were 61.0% (59.3–62.6%) for PLWH and 73.7% (73.6–73.8%) for HIV- patients [adjusted RR = 0.83 (0.80–0.85); p < 0.001]. Secondary outcome results were similar: for PLWH and HIV- patients, 67.1% (65.7–68.6%) and 77.7% (95% CI 77.7–77.8%) of positive screens, respectively, were followed by any alcohol-related care after adjustment [adjusted RR = 0.86 (0.85–0.88), p < 0.001].

Conclusions

In this large national sample of VA outpatients with unhealthy alcohol use, PLWH were less likely to receive alcohol-related care than HIV- patients. Special efforts may be needed to ensure alcohol-related care reaches PLWH.

Introduction

Alcohol use is associated with over 60 medical conditions and adversely impacts health in diverse ways (Rehm et al., 2010). Alcohol screening followed by brief intervention for patients screening positive for unhealthy alcohol use are recommended for all adult primary care patients (National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2007) and were designated as essential benefits under health care reform (HealthCare.gov, 2013a, HealthCare.gov, 2013b) based on efficacy trials demonstrating decreased drinking among primary care patients (Jonas et al., 2012). For patients with the most severe unhealthy alcohol use—alcohol use disorders—specialty addictions treatment and/or pharmacotherapy are effective and recommended (National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2007).

Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is now a chronic disease (Taddei et al., 2016) that is negatively influenced by alcohol use in multiple ways (Conigliaro et al., 2006, Williams et al., 2016b), including decreased engagement with and retention in HIV care (Hendershot et al., 2009, Monroe et al., 2016, Vagenas et al., 2015), complications of common comorbid conditions (Bryant et al., 2010, Freiberg et al., 2010, Gonzalez-Reimers et al., 2011, Neuman et al., 2012, Sarkar et al., 2015), increased frailty (Justice et al., 2016), and poorer survival (Justice et al., 2016). Further, evidence suggests that, at similar levels of drinking, alcohol use may have greater negative influences on patients living with HIV (PLWH) than HIV- patients, including such patients’ being more likely to “feel a buzz” and having a higher risk for mortality and frailty (Justice et al., 2016, McGinnis et al., 2016). Therefore, receiving evidence-based alcohol-related care may be particularly important for PLWH.

Despite increased risks of unhealthy alcohol use for PLWH, little is known about whether unhealthy alcohol use is appropriately addressed among PLWH (Conigliaro et al., 2003, Metsch et al., 2008). While previous studies have suggested gaps in the quality of alcohol-related care provided to PLWH with unhealthy alcohol use (Conigliaro et al., 2003, Korthuis et al., 2011, Metsch et al., 2008, Strauss et al., 2009), they did not compare receipt of alcohol-related care among those with and without HIV. Moreover, they were conducted in small (Chander et al., 2016) and/or recruited (Chander et al., 2016, Conigliaro et al., 2003, Metsch et al., 2008) samples and in settings that had not yet implemented routine alcohol screening and brief intervention. However, even in settings with routine implementation of alcohol-related care for unhealthy alcohol use, PLWH may be less likely to receive recommended alcohol-related care than HIV- patients due to the complex care needs of PLWH and/or the possibility that HIV specialty care providers might be less prepared to address unhealthy alcohol use than generalist providers (Strauss et al., 2009). On the other hand, PLWH are recommended to have regular and frequent visits to manage their HIV (The White House, 2013, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2016). Because frequent visits may offer increased opportunities to receive alcohol-related care, PLWH may be more likely to receive alcohol-related care than HIV- patients with less frequent visits.

The objective of this study was to estimate and compare rates of alcohol-related care received by PLWH and HIV- patients with recognized unhealthy alcohol use. We conducted this study in the Veterans Health Administration (VA), which is the largest provider of HIV care in the U.S. (Department of Veterans Affairs, 2010, Fultz et al., 2006) and has been recognized as a leader among healthcare systems in implementing alcohol screening and brief intervention (Moyer and Finney, 2010, Williams et al., 2011). Results of this study can help determine whether special efforts are needed to reach PLWH with unhealthy alcohol use when health systems implement screening and brief interventions for unhealthy alcohol use.

Section snippets

Setting, data source, and sample

The nationwide VA includes 139 large facilities and over 900 clinics nationally. Using national performance measures that are linked to financial incentives for network directors (Kerr and Fleming, 2007), VA implemented alcohol screening in 2004 (Bradley et al., 2006) and brief intervention for patients screening positive for unhealthy alcohol use in 2007 (Lapham et al., 2012). VA’s performance measures require annual screening with the validated Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test

Results

Between October 1, 2009 and May 30, 2013, 830,825 patients screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use (AUDIT-C  5), with 1,172,606 positive alcohol screens documented in the EHR. Mean number of screens per patient was 1.37 (median 1; interquartile range 1–2). Among all patients, 3514 (0.4%) had documented HIV, contributing 4649 positive screens to the analyses. Number of screens was similar across HIV status (mean 1.37, median 1, interquartile range 1–2 for HIV-; mean 1.35, median 1,

Discussion

Despite the impact of unhealthy alcohol use on HIV-related care and outcomes, in this sample of over 800,000 VA outpatients who screened positive for unhealthy alcohol use, PLWH were less likely than HIV- patients to have recommended alcohol-related care documented in their EHRs. Specifically, in primary analyses, PLWH were 17% less likely than HIV- patients to have a documented brief intervention in the 14 days following a positive screen for unhealthy alcohol use, and 14% less likely to have

Role of funding source

This research was funded by a grant from the National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (R21AA022866-01; Williams/Bradley PIs). Dr. Williams is supported by a Career Development Award from VA Health Services Research & Development (CDA 12-276), and Dr. Bradley is supported by a mid-career mentorship award from NIAAA (K24-AA022128).

A final version of the manuscript was approved for submission by VA Research & Development. However, the funders had no role in the design and conduct of the

Acknowledgment

No further acknowledgments are listed beyond those listed in the manuscript and above.

References (60)

  • G. Chander et al.

    Brief intervention decreases drinking frequency in HIV-infected, heavy drinking women: results of a randomized controlled trial

    J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr.

    (2015)
  • J. Conigliaro et al.

    How harmful is hazardous alcohol use and abuse in HIV infection: do health care providers know who is at risk?

    J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr.

    (2003)
  • J. Conigliaro et al.

    Role of alcohol in determining human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-relevant outcomes: a conceptual model to guide the implementation of evidence-based interventions into practice

    Med. Care

    (2006)
  • Department of Veterans Affairs

    HIV/Hepatitis C QUERI Strategic Plan

    (2010)
  • R.J. Fredericksen et al.

    Patient and provider priorities for self-reported domains of HIV clinical care

    AIDS Care

    (2015)
  • M.S. Freiberg et al.

    The association between alcohol consumption and prevalent cardiovascular diseases among HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected men

    J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr.

    (2010)
  • S.L. Fultz et al.

    Development and verification of a virtual cohort using the National VA Health Information System

    Med. Care

    (2006)
  • S. Greenland

    Avoiding power loss associated with categorization and ordinal scores in dose-response and trend analysis

    Epidemiology

    (1995)
  • J.A. Hahn et al.

    Alcohol and HIV disease progression: weighing the evidence

    Curr. HIV/AIDS Rep.

    (2010)
  • A.H. Harris et al.

    Pharmacotherapy of alcohol use disorders in the Veterans Health Administration

    Psychiatr. Serv.

    (2010)
  • D.S. Hasin et al.

    HealthCall for the smartphone: technology enhancement of brief intervention in HIV alcohol dependent patients

    Addict. Sci. Clin. Pract.

    (2014)
  • HealthCare.gov

    What Are My Preventive Care Benefits?

    (2013)
  • HealthCare.gov

    What Does Marketplace Health Insurance Cover?

    (2013)
  • C.S. Hendershot et al.

    Alcohol use and antiretroviral adherence: review and meta-analysis

    J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr.

    (2009)
  • D.E. Jonas et al.

    Behavioral counseling after screening for alcohol misuse in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

    Ann. Intern. Med.

    (2012)
  • E.A. Kerr et al.

    Making performance indicators work: experiences of US veterans health administration

    BMJ

    (2007)
  • P.T. Korthuis et al.

    Substance use and the quality of patient-provider communication in HIV clinics

    AIDS Behav.

    (2011)
  • G.T. Lapham et al.

    Increased documented brief alcohol interventions with a performance measure and electronic decision support

    Med. Care

    (2012)
  • K.Y. Liang et al.

    Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models

    Biometrika

    (1986)
  • K.A. McGinnis et al.

    Validating smoking data from the Veteran's Affairs Health Factors dataset, an electronic data source

    Nicot. Tob. Res.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (50)

    • Receipt of evidence-based alcohol-related care in a national sample of transgender patients with unhealthy alcohol use: Overall and relative to non-transgender patients

      2021, Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since 2004, VA has required that outpatients receive annual screening for unhealthy alcohol use with the validated Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test Consumption (AUDIT-C) questionnaire (Bradley et al., 2006). And, since 2011, brief intervention has been offered to over 75% of screen-positive patients and is documented in the electronic health record (Lapham et al., 2010; Williams, Lapham, Shortreed, et al., 2017). Administrative clinic visit codes and integrated pharmacy data allow measurement of specialty addictions treatment and medications (Harris et al., 2010; Harris et al., 2012).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text