Elsevier

European Journal of Cancer

Volume 46, Issue 13, September 2010, Pages 2485-2493
European Journal of Cancer

Inhibin-alpha, -betaA and -betaB subunits in uterine non-endometrioid carcinomas: Prognostic significance and clinical implications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2010.06.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Inhibins, dimeric peptide hormones composed of an alpha-subunit and one of two possible beta-subunits (betaA or betaB), exhibit substantial roles in human reproduction and in endocrine-responsive tumours. However, the prognostic significance and clinical implications of the inhibin-alpha, -betaA and -betaB subunits in uterine non-endometrioid cancers are still quite unclear. A series of 41 uterine non-endometrioid carcinomas were immunohistochemically analysed with monoclonal antibodies against inhibin-subunits. The staining reactions were correlated with several clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcome. The inhibin-alpha subunit showed a significant association with age although the loss of this subunit did not affect the survival of patients with non-endometrioid carcinomas and did not constitute an independent prognostic parameter. The inhibin-betaA expression was not associated with any of the analysed clinicopathological parameters and did not affect patients’ survival. In contrast, a low betaB-subunit demonstrated a significant better cause-specific survival. Moreover, inhibin-βB did constitute an independent prognostic parameter in uterine non-endometrioid cancer patients. In contrast to inhibin-alpha and -betaA subunits, the inhibin-betaB subunit seems to have a substantial role in the carcinogenesis and pathology of uterine non-endometrioid carcinomas and might be used as a marker to identify high-risk patients and may aid in the selection of patients for a more aggressive adjuvant therapy.

Introduction

Endometrial cancer has become the most frequent gynaecologic malignancy in the Western World.1, 2, 3 An incidence of 15–20 to 100,000 women per year has been estimated with a life time risk to develop this type of cancer being approximately 2.5%.4 Meanwhile, several prognostic factors like histological type, histologic grade, surgical stage, pelvic lymph node involvement and myometrial invasion have been established.1, 2

Meanwhile, endometrial cancer has been described as consisting of two different clinicopathological categories with distinct biological and molecular characteristics.2, 5, 6, 7 Type I endometrial cancers are the most common histopathological form, being usually endometrioid adenocarcinomas, well-differentiated with a more favourable outcome compared to endometrial cancer of the second group.1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 Contrarily, type II endometrial cancers are often of the non-endometrioid type, poorly differentiated with a poor prognosis.6, 7, 8 These observations lead to the postulation of a dualistic model for the molecular carcinogenesis in endometrial carcinomas,7 although common characteristics of these groups of endometrial cancer exist. The carcinogenesis of type I endometrial carcinomas is thought to be due to oestrogenic risk factors,1, 2, 7 demonstrating genetic alterations like mutations in PTEN and K-ras.7 Type II cancers more often exhibit p53 mutations,9 HER-2/neu amplification10 and chromosomal instability.7

Inhibins and activins are secreted polypeptides, representing a subgroup of the TGF-β superfamily of growth and differentiation factors.11, 12, 13 Inhibins are heterodimers that consist of an α-subunit and one of two possible β-subunits (βA or βB), resulting in the formation of either inhibin A (α–βA) or B (α–βB), respectively. On the contrary, activins are homodimers of β-subunits linked by a disulphide bond, leading to the formation of activin A (βA–βA), activin B (βB–βB) or activin AB (βA–βB).11, 12, 13 The inhibin-subunits have been primarily detected in endocrine tumours14 and their differential expression has suggested an important role in malignant cell transformation in human endometrium.15, 16, 17

Interestingly, TGF-β has been recognised as a tumour suppressor in premalignant stages of carcinogenesis with an additional dual role as a pro-oncogene in later stages of the disease, leading to metastasis.18 The tumour suppressive activity of the inhibin-α subunit was first identified after functional deletion of the inhibin-α gene in male and female mice, resulting in primary gonadal sex cord-stromal tumours.19, 20 Recently, a significantly lower inhibin-α expression in well-differentiated adenocarcinomas compared to normal and hyperplastic endometrial tissue was demonstrated.21, 22 These results also led to the hypothesis that inhibin-α might be a tumour suppressor with crucial functions in endometrial carcinoma development.16 This assumption is underlined by demonstrating that inhibin-α subunit was an independent prognostic parameter in a large cohort analysis of human endometrial carcinomas.17 However, the prognostic significance and clinical implications of the inhibin-α, -βA and -βB subunits in non-endometrioid cancers are still quite unclear.

Section snippets

Tissue samples

Pathological and surgical records of 41 patients who have been operated in the 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, between 1990 and 2002 were reviewed for this retrospective analysis. The evaluated patient group has been previously well characterised.17, 23 In a previous large cohort study 302 endometrial cancer specimens were analysed for the expression of the inhibin-α, -βA and -βB subunits, including 265 endometrioid adenocarcinoma and 37

Clinicopathological characterisation

The clinicopathological features of the endometrial carcinomas are summarised in Table 1. The median patient’s age at the time of diagnosis was 65.98 years (range, 45.83–88.37 years). Twenty-four (58.5%) and 3 (7.3%) patients were diagnosed in FIGO stages I and II, respectively, while 13 (31.7%) patients had FIGO stage III and 1 patient (2.4%) presented with metastatic disease (FIGO IV). Pelvic and/or para-aortic lymph node sampling was performed for 32 patients (78%) while 6 patients (14.6%)

Discussion

Endometrial cancer is the most frequent gynaecologic malignancy in the Western World.1, 2, 4 Although more than 50% of patients with endometrial carcinoma are diagnosed with FIGO stage I, as many as 20% die of their disease.3 This is an unusual situation, compared to other solid tumours, and may reflect the failure of current diagnostic methods for identifying endometrial cancer patients with a poor prognosis. Especially non-endometrioid carcinomas pose a problem, since they are mostly poorly

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares that he has no competing interests. He received once a lecture fee in the year 2006 with the title ‘Endometrial cancer and inhibin-subunits’.

Acknowledgements

The author would like to thank Dr. S. Worbs, Dr. N. Shabani, Mrs. C. Kuhn, Mrs. S. Kunze, Mrs. S. Schulze, Dr. D. Dian, Dr. A. Gingelmaier, Dr. C. Schindlbeck, Dr. A. Bruning, Dr. U. Jeschke, Prof. H. Sommer and Prof. K. Friese for their help in conducting the primary study. Additionally we would like to thank Prof. D. Hölzel – Institute of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich and Mr. M. Schmidt of the Munich Tumor Registry for supplying the

References (49)

  • D.J. Phillips et al.

    Activin and related proteins in inflammation: not just interested bystanders

    Cytokine Growth Factor Rev

    (2009)
  • S.A. McCarthy et al.

    Inhibition of vascular endothelial cell growth by activin-A

    J Biol Chem

    (1993)
  • C.W. Seder et al.

    Upregulated INHBA expression may promote cell proliferation and is associated with poor survival in lung adenocarcinoma

    Neoplasia

    (2009)
  • T.B. Thompson et al.

    Beta A versus beta B: is it merely a matter of expression?

    Mol Cell Endocrinol

    (2004)
  • B. Jereczek-Fossa et al.

    Surgery followed by radiotherapy in endometrial cancer: analysis of survival and patterns of failure

    Int J Gynecol Cancer

    (1999)
  • L.A. Gloeckler Ries et al.

    Cancer survival and incidence from the surveillance, epidemiology, and end results (SEER) program

    Oncologist

    (2003)
  • L. Deligdisch et al.

    Endometrial carcinoma: two diseases?

    Cancer Detect Prev

    (1987)
  • S.F. Lax

    Molecular genetic pathways in various types of endometrial carcinoma: from a phenotypical to a molecular-based classification

    Virchows Arch

    (2004)
  • D. Faratian et al.

    A review of the pathology and management of uterine papillary serous carcinoma and correlation with outcome

    Int J Gynecol Cancer

    (2006)
  • N. Macwhinnie et al.

    The use of P53, PTEN, and C-erbB-2 to differentiate uterine serous papillary carcinoma from endometrioid endometrial carcinoma

    Int J Gynecol Cancer

    (2004)
  • J.A. Villella et al.

    HER-2/neu overexpression in uterine papillary serous cancers and its possible therapeutic implications

    Int J Gynecol Cancer

    (2006)
  • W. Vale et al.

    Activins and inhibins and their signaling

    Ann NY Acad Sci

    (2004)
  • G.P. Risbridger et al.

    Activins and inhibins in endocrine and other tumors

    Endocr Rev

    (2001)
  • F. Petraglia et al.

    Expression and secretion of inhibin and activin in normal and neoplastic uterine tissues. High levels of serum activin A in women with endometrial and cervical carcinoma

    J Clin Endocrinol Metab

    (1998)
  • Cited by (25)

    • Inhibin/activin betaE-subunit in uterine endometrioid adenocarcinoma and endometrial cancer cell lines: From immunohistochemistry to clinical testing?

      2011, Gynecologic Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Comparison of the IRS and the optical staining intensity was performed by using the Mann–Whitney-U test as previously described [11,15,27–30]. For the purposes of statistical survival analysis, the inhibin βE staining intensity and the median for all tumor samples were used (median for inhibin βE = 4) as previously described [11,16,31]. However, ROC analysis (Supplementary figures S1A–C) revealed that the area under the curve was higher when using specific immunohistochemical staining intensity with a cutoff value of zero for inhibin βE, instead of the IRS with a cutoff value of 4.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text