Predictive impact of DNA repair functionality on clinical outcome of advanced sarcoma patients treated with trabectedin: A retrospective multicentric study
Introduction
Trabectedin (Yondelis®, ET-743) is a marine-derived isoquinoline discovered in the tunicate Ecteinascidia turbinata1 and currently produced using a semi-synthetic technique. The drug is approved in Europe and in other countries for use in patients with advanced previously treated sarcomas2 and in ovarian cancer.
The clinical data generated for trabectedin in sarcoma patients have consistently reported long lasting remissions and tumour control in a clinically relevant proportion of patients.3, 4 Moreover, the full set of phase II and comparative studies with trabectedin in advanced pre-treated sarcomas5 have reported 6-month progression free survival (PFS6) rates of 20-80% and median survival of 10 -14 months, with 30-40% of the patients alive at 24 months, which compares well with other active drugs used in this setting.
Experimental data has provided evidence of a unique mechanism of action of trabectedin as compared to conventional agents active in sarcomas.6 Beyond the action of trabectedin as a minor groove DNA binder,7 a set of elegant studies have reported diverse interactions at the transcriptional level.8, 9
Trabectedin binds to G residues in DNA through the minor groove,7 inducing DNA damage that is recognised by the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway, resulting in stalled DNA-protein repair complexes and cell death.10, 11 Therefore, in contrast to what would be expected from a DNA damaging agent, sensitivity to trabectedin is correlated to functional NER in vitro.12 In addition, trabectedin induces DNA double strand breaks, chiefly during early S phase, and this damage is repaired by the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway.13
Taking into account both clinical and molecular rationales, we investigated DNA repair-based signatures linked to sensitivity/resistance to trabectedin in sarcoma patients. We report the final results from a large retrospective clinical-pharmacogenomic study with trabectedin in patients with previously treated sarcomas. The data gathered in this study suggest the possibility of enriching patient populations for future clinical trials with trabectedin based on this signature.
Section snippets
Patients
A total of 245 tumour samples were retrospectively collected from sarcoma patients treated with single agent trabectedin in the context of a compassionate use programme, to determine BRCA1 (breast cancer susceptibility 1 gene), ERCC1 (excision-repair cross complementing group 1 gene), XPD (Xeroderma pigmentosum group D gene) and XPG (Xeroderma pigmentosum group G gene) mRNA expression levels. Paraffin-embedded tissue samples obtained at diagnosis were collected between May 1999 and February
Treatment outcome in the overall population
Patients were exposed to a median of 3 cycles of trabectedin (range 1–43). In line with previous phase II data5 one third of this population received 6 or more cycles of therapy. Information on objective response was retrieved in 177 cases; data on PFS and survival were obtained in 181 patients. Patient characteristics are detailed in Supplementary data, Table S1.
The objective response rate by RECIST in this patient cohort was 14% (95% CI 9–20%); 25 patients achieved a partial response (PR). In
Discussion
This retrospective study confirms the efficacy of trabectedin in unselected patients with pre-treated sarcomas. Long-lasting responses and tumour control were noted across a variety of histological sub-types that are known to bear different molecular profiles.16 Apart from the retrospective nature of our analysis, it should be highlighted that the patient population in this series was very heterogeneous. They had a variety of mesenchymal malignancies, their previous treatment was not
Conflict of interest statement
None declared.
Acknowledgements
This work has primarily been financed by PharmaMar and has been partially supported by CONTICANET, Network of Excellence of the European Union (Contract number: FP6-018806). Robert Maki is also supported in part by NCI grants CA47179, CA148260, NCI-ASCO Cancer Foundation Clinical Investigator Team Leadership Supplemental Award, Cycle for Survival and the Shuman Fund for GIST Research.
References (27)
- et al.
Progression free rate as the principal end-point for Phase II trials in soft-tissue sarcomas
Eur J Cancer
(2002) - et al.
Quantitative gene expression analysis in microdissected archival formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tumor tissue
Am J Pathol
(2001) - et al.
DNA and non-DNA targets in the mechanism of action of the antitumor drug trabectedin
Chem Biol
(2005) - et al.
The inefficiency of incisions of ecteinascidin 743-DNA adducts by the UvrABC nuclease and the unique structural feature of the DNA adducts can be used to explain the repair-dependent toxicities of this antitumor agent
Chem Biol
(2001) - et al.
Ecteinascidins 729, 743, 745, 759A, 759B, and 770: potent antitumor agents from the Caribbean tunicate Ecteinascidia turbinata
J Org Chem
(1990) - European Medicines Agency. Pre-Authorisation Evaluation of Medicines for Human Use. Committee for Medical Products for...
- et al.
Trabectedin and its potential in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma
Ther Clin Risk Manag
(2008) - et al.
Clinical impact of trabectedin (ecteinascidin-743) in advanced/metastatic soft tissue sarcoma
Expert Opin Pharmacother
(2008) - et al.
Therapeutic impact of ET-743 (Yondelis®, Trabectidin) a new marine derived compound in Sarcoma
Curr Opin Orthop
(2003) - et al.
Unique features of the mode of action of ET-743
Oncologist
(2002)
DNA sequence- and structure-selective alkylation of guanine N2 in the DNA minor groove by ecteinascidin 743, a potent antitumor compound from the caribbean tunicate Ecteinascidia turbinata
Biochemistry
Effect of ecteinascidin-743 on the interaction between DNA binding proteins and DNA
Anticancer Drug Des
Interference of transcriptional activation by the anti-neoplastic drug ET-743
Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
Cited by (86)
Pharmacogenomics of soft tissue sarcomas: New horizons to understand efficacy and toxicity
2022, Cancer Treatment and Research CommunicationsTreatment opportunities and future perspectives for pancreatic cancer patients with germline BRCA1-2 pathogenic variants
2021, Cancer Treatment ReviewsPemetrexed plus cisplatin in patients with previously treated advanced sarcoma: a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial
2021, ESMO OpenCitation Excerpt :By contrast, several studies have investigated the prognostic or predictive value of the ERCC1, excision repair cross-complementation group 5/xeroderma pigmentosum group G (ERCC5/XPG), and breast cancer 1 (BRCA1) genes, which represent a potential DNA repair signature. Controversial results have been reported in patients with advanced STS who received other chemotherapies such as trabectedin.37-39 High expression levels of the common allele of ERCC5 and ERCC1 and BRCA1 haplotypes were significantly associated with improved clinical response to trabectedin,38 and the composite signature including low BRCA1, high ERCC1, and/or ERCC5/XPG mRNA expression was identified to indicate response to trabectedin treatment in advanced sarcoma.39
Trabectedin: useful in leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma, but less so in other soft tissue sarcomas
2021, Annals of OncologyHomologous recombination repair deficiency as a therapeutic target in sarcoma
2020, Seminars in Oncology
- k
Conticanet (LSHC-CT-20050-18806).