Systemic therapy of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Major-developments of the last 5-years

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.11.021Get rights and content

Abstract

The standard palliative treatment for advanced stage NSCLC remains a platinum doublet but by tailoring chemotherapy according to tumour histology the results can be improved through using pemetrexed-containing schemas in non-squamous-cell disease. In addition, maintenance chemotherapy appears to be effective in patients achieving clinical benefit by induction therapy. Targeted therapy based on the presence of activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) activating mutations or EML4ALK gene rearrangement is becoming standard practice with high median survival rates, up to 30 months. There are still numerous other molecular targeted drugs in development. This review presents the most recent relevant progress in systemic anti-cancer therapy of advanced NSCLC in the past 5 years and delineates today’s new treatment options.

Introduction

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in men and women and a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) representing approximately 85% of all cases.1 More than half of the patients are still diagnosed with advanced metastatic, disease and have a poor prognosis.2 Platinum-based palliative chemotherapy is considered a standard therapy for advanced disease, resulting in a median survival of 8–10 months with only 5% patients alive at 2 years.3 A recent randomised trial4 highlighted the importance of early palliative care given these poor outcomes. Patients assigned to early palliative care had a better quality of life (QoL) and lived longer compared to patients on standard care (which in most of the patients includes chemotherapy) alone.

Even though, some patients benefit from chemotherapy, the result of the ‘one size fits all’ approach to treatment in NCSLC is finally changing. During the last few years we have learnt that by tailoring chemotherapy according to tumour histology and/or the response to the first four cycles of chemotherapy, the results obtained by standard chemotherapy can be improved upon. Recent improved understanding of the molecular biology of NSCLC has been followed by new, targeted therapies, and represents a major step forward in the treatment of this disease. This review presents the most recent relevant progress in systemic anti-cancer therapy of advanced NSCLC and delineates today’s new treatment options.

Section snippets

Platinum-based chemotherapy

The meta-analysis published in 1995 established the benefit of chemotherapy compared with supportive care alone (without chemotherapy) for advanced NSCLC.5 The updated meta-analysis, published in 2008 assessing newer platinum-based regimens incorporating third-generation cytotoxic drugs (gemcitabine, vinorelbine and paclitaxel), showed a further chemotherapy benefit (23% reduction of risk of death, 1-year survival gain of 9% and 1.5 months absolute increase in median survival).6 The results

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-directed therapy

The major advances in the treatment of NSCLC during the last 5 years are due to the discovery of activating EGFR mutations as well as the introduction of reversible tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) of EGFR in all lines of treatment of EGFR mutated disease. First-generation EGFR TKIs, gefitinib and erlotinib, were initially studied in unselected populations of NSCLC patients in which they have demonstrated modest activity in second- and third-line treatment.36, 37, 38 The predictive value of

Conclusions

During the last 5 years major advances have been made in individualising systemic therapy for advanced NSCLC. The standard chemotherapy can already be tailored based on tumour histology, with pemetrexed being effective mainly in patients with non-squamous-cell histology. Overall survival benefits in maintenance chemotherapy are dominated by pemetrexed results in the switch or continuing maintenance setting. Major developments in NSCLC biology and identification of druggable targets, such as EGFR

Conflict of interest statement

None declared.

References (70)

  • E. Kim et al.

    Gefitinib vs. docetaxel in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer (INTEREST): a randomised phase III trial

    Lancet

    (2008)
  • T. Mitsudomi et al.

    Gefitinib versus cisplatin plus docetaxel in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer harboring mutations of the epidermal growth factor receptor (WJTOG3405): an open label, randomized phase 3 trial

    Lancet Oncol

    (2010)
  • C. Zhou et al.

    Erlotinib versus chemotherapy in first-line treatment for patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (OPTIMAL, CTONG 0802): a multi-centre, open-label, randomized, phase 3 study

    Lancet Oncol

    (2011)
  • R. Rosell et al.

    Erlotinib versus standard chemotherapy as first-line treatment for European patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (EURTAC): a multicentre, open-label, randomised phase 3 trial

    Lancet Oncol

    (2012)
  • J.C. Yang et al.

    Afatinib for patients with lung adenocarcinoma and epidermal growth factor receptor mutations (LUX-Lung 2): a phase 2 trial

    Lancet Oncol

    (2012)
  • R. Pirker et al.

    Cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (FLEX): an open-label randomised phase III trial

    Lancet

    (2009)
  • K.J. O’Byrne et al.

    Molecular biomarkers in non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of data from the phase 3 FLEX study

    Lancet Oncol

    (2011)
  • R. Pirker et al.

    EGFR expression as a predictor of survival for first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of data from the phase 3 FLEX study

    Lancet Oncol

    (2012)
  • A.T. Shaw et al.

    Effect of crizotinib on overall survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer harbouring ALK gene rearrangement: a retrospective analysis

    Lancet Oncol

    (2011)
  • F. Cappuzzo et al.

    Erlotinib as maintenance treatment in advanced non-small cell lung cancer; a multicenter, randomized, placebo controlled phase III study

    Lancet Oncol

    (2010)
  • L. Zhang et al.

    Gefitinib versus placebo as maintenance therapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (INFORM; C-TONG 0804): a multicentre, double-blind randomized phase 3 trial

    Lancet Oncol

    (2012)
  • R.M. Gaafar et al.

    A double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III intergroup study of gefitinib (G) in patients (Pts) with advanced NSCLC, non-progressing after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (EORTC 08021-ILCP 01/03)

    Eur J Cancer

    (2011)
  • R. Calderone et al.

    Under usage of zoledronic acid in non-small cell lung cancer patients with metastatic bone disease-a short communication

    Eur J Cancer

    (2011)
  • M.P. Žakelj et al.

    Lung cancer in Slovenia

    Endoscopic Rev

    (2008)
  • J.H. Schiller et al.

    Comparison of four chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2002)
  • J.S. Temel et al.

    Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer

    N Engl J Med

    (2010)
  • Chemotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis using updated data on individual patients from 52 randomised clinical trials. Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Collaborative Group

    BMJ

    (1995)
  • NSCLC Meta-analyses Collaborative Group

    Chemotherapy in addition to supportive care improves survival in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data from 16 randomized controlled trials

    J Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • A. Ardizzoni et al.

    Cisplatin- versus carboplatin-based chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: an individual patient data meta-analysis

    J Natl Cancer Inst

    (2007)
  • Ferry D, Billingham L, Jarrett H. British Thoracic Oncology Group Trial. BTOG2: randomised phase III clinical trial of...
  • G.V. Scagliotti et al.

    Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer

    J Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • G. Scagliotti et al.

    The differential efficacy of pemetrexed according to NSCLC histology: a review of two Phase III studies

    Oncologist

    (2009)
  • P. Ceppi et al.

    Squamous cell carcinoma of the lung compared with other histotypes shows higher messenger RNA and protein levels for thymidylate synthase

    Cancer

    (2006)
  • R.A. Hubner et al.

    Excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) status and lung cancer outcomes: a meta-analysis of published studies and recommendations

    PLoS One

    (2011)
  • J. Jiang et al.

    ERCC1 expression as a prognostic and predictive factor in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis

    Mol Biol Rep

    (2012)
  • Cited by (98)

    • Value of serum tumor markers for predicting EGFR mutations and positive ALK expression in 1089 Chinese non-small-cell lung cancer patients: A retrospective analysis

      2020, European Journal of Cancer
      Citation Excerpt :

      Over the past two decades, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) matched to targetable oncogenic drivers have shown remarkable efficacy and have become a mainstay in the treatment of lung cancer. TKIs targeting EGFR and ALK have dramatically improved the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of NSCLC patients, especially those with advanced lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) [10–12]. The frequency of EGFR mutations among Asian NSCLC populations with ADC (51.4%) is significantly higher than that among Caucasians (approximately 20%), and among the former cohort, the mutation rate is shockingly high in females (61.1%) and never-smokers (60.7%) [13–16].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text