Significance of the platelet distribution width as a severity marker for the development of preeclampsia

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.12.036Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the platelet distribution width (PDW) and other platelet indices as potential severity markers of preeclampsia (PE).

Study design

A total of 935 pregnant women who had received continuous prenatal care and had undergone delivery were included. The participants were classified into 3 groups: healthy pregnant women (n = 816), pregnant women with mild PE (n = 59), and pregnant women with severe PE (n = 60). Blood samples were collected during antenatal care or at the time of admission, and the platelet indices were compared among the three groups.

Results

Among the three groups, the platelet count and plateletcrit decreased as the disease progressed. The mean platelet volume and the PDW, however, increased as the disease progressed. When compared to the levels of other platelet indices, the PDW showed significant elevation in the severe PE group. In the mild and severe PE groups, the PDW was statistically correlated with the mean arterial pressure (MAP) (r = 0.231, p < 0.05), whereas other platelet indices were not. In the receiver operating characteristics curve analysis, the area under the curve of the PDW to predict severe PE was 0.74.

Conclusions

Among platelet indices, the PDW is significantly higher in women with severe PE than in women with mild PE, and is positively correlated with the MAP. Therefore, the PDW can serve as a candidate marker for predicting the severity of PE.

Introduction

Preeclampsia (PE) is a major cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality in pregnancy [1]. PE is a multi-organ disease with an unknown etiology, and many studies have investigated this condition. A decreased platelet count is observed during the progression of PE, and is considered a marker of the severity of PE. Although PE is defined by hypertension and proteinuria, transition of the coagulation function between platelet and endothelial vascular cells is believed to play an important role in the pathogenesis of PE [2].

PE involves a multi-organ system, and it is therefore difficult to identify severity markers of PE. Severe PE is diagnosed by the presence of one or more of the following symptoms in a pregnant woman on bed rest: a systolic blood pressure of ≥160 mmHg or a diastolic blood pressure of ≥110 mmHg obtained on two occasions after a difference of 6 h or more; proteinuria with the excretion of ≥5 g of protein in a 24-h urine specimen or ≥3+ protein obtained in two random samples of urine collected after four hours or more; oliguria with the excretion of <500 mL of urine in 24 h; pulmonary edema or cyanosis; impairment of liver function; visual or cerebral disturbances; pain in the epigastric area or right upper quadrant; decreased platelet count; and intrauterine growth restriction.

Among these clinical signs and symptoms, decreased platelet count is an important character and is associated with hemolysis, elevated liver enzyme levels, and low platelet counts (HELLP), a syndrome where there is an increased risk of adverse maternal and fetal outcomes [3], [4]. A low platelet count is supposed to be a characteristic of worsening PE. When pregnant women with PE have a normal platelet count, platelet-related parameters are not seriously analyzed until it significantly changes. However, although the etiology of PE is unknown, several studies have demonstrated that uncontrolled platelet activation and aggregation are expected in thrombocytopenic PE and even in non-thrombocytopenic PE [5], [6].

Platelet indices calculated from the platelet count include the mean platelet volume (MPV), plateletcrit (PCT), and platelet distribution width (PDW). Platelet indices are potentially useful markers for thromboembolic disease, and MPV and PDW in particular represent platelet activation [7]. The PDW is calculated by measuring the width of the size distribution curve (in femtoliters (fL)) at the 20% level when the peak distribution curve is taken as 80% or 100% [8]. It represents the heterogeneity in platelet morphology and is clinically related to platelet activation [7]. Large platelets are usually more reactive than smaller ones due to the increased number and size of the pseudopodia [9]. This possibly causes an increase in the PDW value. Many studies have evaluated the platelet indices and have reported that the MPV increases during pregnancy, and is higher in women with PE. The MPV may therefore be a valuable tool for evaluating the severity of PE [10], [6], [11], [12], [13]. Also, in some studies, it has been suggested that the PDW instead of MPV can be a practical tool to evaluate the activation of coagulation or thrombocytosis-related disease [7], [9].

Due to alterations in coagulation, the PDW has an important role in the progression of PE: therefore, not only the platelet count but also the platelet function should be carefully assessed. Considering the role of the PDW and platelet indices during the disease as well as the alteration of coagulation, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using platelet indices as a severity marker for PE in the present study.

Section snippets

Participants

This study included 935 women with a singleton pregnancy over 20 weeks of gestation who received continuous prenatal care and underwent delivery at the Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between January 2009 and December 2012. All study participants were classified into three groups: healthy pregnant women (n = 816), pregnant women with mild PE (n = 59), and pregnant women with severe PE (n = 60). The diagnosis of PE was made using the definitions described by the American College of

Results

The characteristics of the participants are shown in Table 1. There were several differences of PE-related parameters observed among the healthy pregnant women, pregnant women with mild PE, and pregnant women with severe PE, using the ANOVA test. When comparing the platelet indices between the groups, all changes in parameters were statistically significant (Fig. 1).

In Table 2, the MPV and the PDW increased as the disease progressed, as demonstrated by the Scheffe post hoc multiple comparison

Discussion

As PE has an unknown etiology, the diagnosis of PE depends on blood pressure measurements and identification of proteinuria in patients. Some clinical data have reported the potentially severe outcomes of PE. Intravascular HELLP has been described as a major complication in women with severe preeclampsia for many decades [15]. For a strict definition of HELLP, Sibai et al. defined “true HELLP” which included all the categories of HELLP. Additionally, “partial HELLP” has been used to describe

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a Konkuk University Medical Center Research Grant 2013.

References (24)

  • J.C. Osselaer et al.

    Platelet distribution width for differential diagnosis of thrombocytosis

    Clin Chem

    (1997)
  • C. Briggs et al.

    Continuing developments with the automated platelet count

    Int J Lab Hematol

    (2007)
  • Cited by (62)

    • Platelet count in preeclampsia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

      2023, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology MFM
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text