Lived experiences of women with recurring ovarian cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejon.2013.08.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Women with recurring ovarian cancer are living longer, due to advances in treatment options. They are now often outpatients, experiencing rapid encounters on treatment days. Whether this shift in care meets women's needs has been scarcely explored scientifically.

Purpose of the study

This study aimed to illuminate the phenomenon of living with recurring ovarian cancer as experienced by women in that condition.

Methods and sample

A descriptive phenomenological method was used. Eight open-ended interviews with four women were performed approximately three and five years after the first recurrence of ovarian cancer. During these years the women had repeated clinically and radiologically verified recurrence requiring chemotherapy.

Key results

The phenomenon of living with recurring ovarian cancer meant that the women felt forced to pay attention to the failing body in order to avoid a potential breakdown. The growing limitation of their intermittent strength meant that strength had to be captured and protected. Sharing their lives with others was difficult, due to the different living conditions. The women found no space to mediate their experiences, either in close relationships or with health care professionals. But, the circumstances they lived under also generated a gratitude for the unexpected extra time.

Conclusions

The findings revealed that the four women were grateful to live a while longer, but needed to share their state of being. The findings are indeed directed to health care professionals, who need to provide a more patient-centred care to meet the women's needs.

Introduction

Ovarian cancer and its consequences for the women are described as not getting enough attention from the general population and the medical settings, as well as being inadequately studied by the research community (Power et al., 2008), although the diagnosis has a significant impact on women's lives throughout the disease trajectory (Howell et al., 2003). Women who suffer a recurrence of ovarian cancer are today able to continue treatment, due to the many advances in chemotherapy options and antiemetics (Jelovac and Armstrong, 2011). This implies that women live with the disease for longer than ever before (Herzog and Pothuri, 2006). Lockwood-Rayermann (2006) stated that the former palliative care of patients with advanced ovarian cancer, who was expected to live a short time, has now been replaced by outpatient chemotherapy spanning years. This change is in accordance with experiences from clinical practice. The increased outpatient care and improved time of survival is a challenge for health care providers (Martin, 2002), and it is unclear whether this shift responds to the patients' needs. Prior studies regarding this issue found that the length of the treatment, and number of chemotherapy cycles, are significant factors when it comes to daily living (Tabano et al., 2002), because repeated cycles have a cumulative toxic effect (Almadrones, 2003) that burdens patients both temporarily and permanently (Sun et al., 2007). Women receiving aggressive cancer treatments are described as being at risk for developing psychiatric morbidity (McCorkle et al., 2003). However, there is still a gap in knowledge regarding how women describe their world when living with recurring ovarian cancer from a life-world perspective. There is a need to highlight this area. The aim of this study was to illuminate the phenomenon of living with recurring ovarian cancer as lived and experienced by women in that condition.

Section snippets

Method

A phenomenological approach was adopted throughout the whole study. Data were collected through interviews and analysed using a descriptive phenomenological method developed by Giorgi (Giorgi, 2009), which focuses on lived experience. With this method we aimed to illuminate the structure/essence of the phenomenon of living with recurring ovarian cancer over two years, starting approximately three years after the first recurrence.

Findings

The structure is initially presented, followed by the five key constituents, including a description of the variations among the participants.

Reflections on findings

In this phenomenological study the findings extend from the knowledge reported in the introduction and provide a deeper understanding of the experience of living with recurring ovarian cancer. In a prior study, the aim was to explore the phenomenon of living with the first recurrence of ovarian cancer, five to ten months after the first recurrence of the cancer. The findings from that study showed that the twelve women described themselves as “living in limbo” on the threshold to the unknown.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

References (22)

  • T.J. Herzog et al.

    Ovarian cancer: a focus on management of recurrent disease

    Nature Clinical Practice Oncology

    (2006)
  • Cited by (11)

    • Life experiences and disease trajectories in women coexisting with ovarian cancer

      2020, Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Ovarian cancer ranked the seventh in the top ten cancers for women in Taiwan 2016 [1]. Ovarian cancer is life-threatening and may induce anxiety and depression resulting in reduced quality of life (QOL) [2–4]. Surgery and chemotherapy are the main treatment methods for ovarian cancer while precision and immunotherapy medications are still at trial; however, the outcomes of cancer treatment are yet satisfactory [5].

    • A systematic review of patient values, preferences and expectations for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer

      2017, Gynecologic Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Patients receiving curative therapy are willing to accept twice the toxicity of treatments compared with those receiving palliative therapy [14]. In addition patients demonstrate a wish to continue to pursue a progression free survival or overall survival improvement until symptoms become intolerable [11,16,18]. Compared with patients receiving first-line treatments, recurrent EOC patients are reportedly more tolerant of adverse effects [22].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text