Liver CT image processing: A short introduction of the technical elements
Introduction
Considerable reports regarding hepatic tumors have been presented in the past and recent radiology articles [1], [2], [3]. Such literatures include evaluation and development of imaging modalities and techniques, mainly focusing on their detectability of hepatic abnormalities. On the other hand, reports on image processing technology applied to medical images have been increasing according to the rapid development of recent computer technology. Such application (or often called as “solution”) oriented technologies attract researchers in the field of medical science and information technology. In addition, such technologies are expected to help radiologists and surgeons indeed, for example, in detecting hepatic neoplasm imaged in a massive amount of CT images, and in resecting tumors while considering hepatic vasculature. These new and interdisciplinary research fields are called as computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) (or detection) and computer-assisted surgery (CAS) (and therapy).
In the viewpoint of image processing, there exist several challenging aspects remaining in image analysis for liver. One of the major factors for the difficulty is based on the physical characteristics of the organ. For example, in X-ray CT, there are several adjacent organs such as the pancreas and the stomach that have signal levels similar to the liver. It prevents us from segmenting the liver region from the images with simple algorithms such as region-growing or simple thresholding, which are often used in lung and bronchi segmentation. One of the good solutions for that is use of contrast agent, that is, multi-phase data sets of dynamic CT with contrast enhancement. In such CT data sets, however, another problem arises due to the feature of the liver consisting of soft tissues. In most of the multi-phase CT images, the time lag between one phase and the other allows the liver moves and/or deforms mainly due to respiratory motion of patients. These difficulties become very clear if we compare with the brain-neuro image analysis that is one of the most successful areas for CAD and CAS. In this sense, more advanced approaches are needed for abdominal area.
In this paper, we describe those technical aspects of image analysis for liver diagnosis and treatment, including the state-of-the-art of liver image analysis and its applications. First, several important modalities in the viewpoint of liver CAD and CAS are introduced among the available imaging modalities. Next, technical elements used in liver image analysis are categorized and are described by using actual examples based on clinical data. Then finally, perspective in such technologies is reviewed and is discussed.
Section snippets
Modalities in the viewpoint of image analysis
Current major modalities used in clinical routines for hepatic diagnosis and therapy are: X-ray computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) images, positron emission tomography (PET) images, and ultrasound (US) images. As with development of image analysis technologies, these imaging modalities are also technically evolving. In particular, X-ray CT and MR images have virtually isotropic resolution also in abdominal area. This allows us to use true 3D image analysis techniques rather than
Technical elements in liver image analysis
Many technical elements of medical image processing and analysis techniques have been proposed and presented so far, for diagnostic, therapeutic, and educational purpose [5]. Following are the five major categories of the elements. Naturally, these categorized technical elements are closely related to each other. That is, a successful processing result of one technical element yields another successful result by subsequent analysis.
Other than these key technologies, there exist several
Discussion and summary
In this short review paper, we introduced the elements of key technologies applied in liver CT image analysis. More and more new techniques will be developed and be reported in each category. However, it is also a fact that several new techniques seem to be attractive and promising, but not clinically feasible indeed. In other words, such techniques often assume that there is no abnormality included in the image data to be processed, and the use is limited to normal case data sets. It is
Acknowledgement
The authors thank to all the members in the Department of Radiology and the Radiologic Center of the University of Tokyo hospital for helpful and inspiring discussion and collaboration.
References (18)
- et al.
Preliminary report of competition for liver region extraction algorithms from three-dimensional CT images
- et al.
Proposal of computer-aided detection system for three dimensional CT images of liver cancer
- et al.
From the RSNA refresher courses: screening the cirrhotic liver for hepatocellular carcinoma with CT and MR imaging: opportunities and pitfalls
RadioGraphics
(2001) - et al.
CT and MR imaging of benign hepatic and biliary tumors
RadioGraphics
(1999) - et al.
Cystic focal liver lesions in the adult: differential CT and MR imaging features
RadioGraphics
(2001) - et al.
Clinical applications of PET in oncology
Radiology
(2004) - Berliner L. Computer-assisted radiology and surgery at 20 years, Elsevier International Congress Series 1281...
- Montagnat J (Coordinator). MICCAI 2004 tutorial: grids services for medical image analysis and registration; 2004,...
Cited by (39)
Validation of a Semiautomated Liver Segmentation Method Using CT for Accurate Volumetry
2015, Academic RadiologyCitation Excerpt :Campadelli et al. (6) described oversegmentation errors near the stomach and body muscles. Masutani et al. (4) mentioned similar density of adjacent organs as a source of error. We limited such error by adjusting windowing relative to the mean liver density.
Evaluation of the registration of temporal series of contrast-enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance 3D images of the liver
2012, Computer Methods and Programs in BiomedicineCitation Excerpt :Next we mention other approaches that, either because of the resemblance of the method they use or because they share common objectives, are most closely related to our ideas. First of all, the general problems and procedures used in liver image processing are stated in [19], a study more focused on CT images but with comments equally valid for MR images and that can be useful to understand our framework. The most related works are those in which a contrast is used and its diffusion is analyzed such as angiography of functional MRI (fMR images)).
Possibilities of MR volumetry with hepatotropic contrast in planning surgical treatment of liver tumors
2024, P.A. Herzen Journal of OncologyDetection and classification of liver cancers using computed tomography images
2022, Research SquareRisk Assessment of Computer-Aided Diagnostic Software for Hepatic Resection
2022, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences