Low-dose computed tomography to detect body-packing in an animal model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.09.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To assess the possible extent of dose reduction for low-dose computed tomography (CT) in the detection of body-packing (ingested drug packets) as an alternative to plain radiographs in an animal model.

Materials and methods

Twelve packets containing cocaine (purity >80%) were introduced into the intestine of an experimental animal (crossbred pig), which was then repeatedly examined by abdominal CT with stepwise dose reduction (tube voltage, 80 kV; tube current, 10–350 mA). Three blinded readers independently evaluated the CT datasets starting with the lowest tube current and noted the numbers of packets detected at the different tube currents used. In addition, 1 experienced reader determined the number of packets detectable on plain abdominal radiographs and ultrasound.

Results

The threshold for correct identification of all 12 drug packets was 100 mA for reader 1 and 125 mA for readers 2 and 3. Above these thresholds all 3 readers consistently identified all 12 packets. The effective dose of a low-dose CT scan with 125 mA (including scout view) was 1.0 mSv, which was below that of 2 conventional abdominal radiographs (1.2 mSv). The reader interpreting the conventional radiographs identified a total of 9 drug packets and detected 8 packets by abdominal ultrasound.

Conclusions

Extensive dose reduction makes low-dose CT a valuable alternative imaging modality for the examination of suspected body-packers and might replace conventional abdominal radiographs as the first-line imaging modality.

Introduction

Body-packing is the concealment of illicit substances in the human body for the purpose of smuggling. A body-packer usually swallows small packets containing heroin, cocaine, amphetamine, ecstasy, or marihuana. Thereby, up to approximately 1 kg of illicit drugs in 50–100 packets, each containing 8–14 g of drugs, can be incorporated [1], [2]. Alternatively, drug packets are concealed by inserting them into the rectum or vagina [3], [4], [5], [6]. Body-packers concealing the drug packets by swallowing use constipating substances such as diphenoxylate or ioperamide during transport [4], [7] and laxatives to accelerate excretion after arrival [7]. International drug trafficking is on the rise, and more body packers are being detected, not least of all because of increasing level of security controls at airports in recent years [8], [9], [10]. Apart from the social implications of drug smuggling, swallowers put themselves at considerable risk as rupture of a single packet inside the body may be fatal, depending on the type and concentration of drug being ingested [11], [12], [13]. Conventional abdominal radiographs in one or two planes have traditionally been used to demonstrate incorporation in suspected body packers [3], [14], [15]; detection rates of 60–90% have been reported for this method [7], [16], [17]. False-positive results of radiographs may be due to bladder stones [18], scybala [19], or intra-abdominal calcifications [20]. Inexperience of the radiologist interpreting the images is another problem [21] as the numbers of cases are very few and different packaging techniques are used. Verification of the actual detection rate is difficult because legal considerations preclude obtaining evidence for false-negative results.

Another diagnostic tool that has been used in this setting, abdominal ultrasound, was also found to detect foreign bodies with high sensitivity and correlate with abdominal radiographs; however, ultrasound was reported to be inaccurate with regard to the number of packets detected [14], [22], [23]. The best imaging modality for revealing foreign bodies is computed tomography (CT), which is superior to abdominal radiographs and ultrasound in terms of sensitivity, localization, and characterization of density [24], [25], [26], [27]. A drawback is the relatively high radiation exposure, which is why CT is not generally used as the first-line imaging modality. In most European countries, it's use is restricted to confirmation of complete elimination or suspected rupture of drug packets [28]. It would be desirable to employ CT as a first-line diagnostic tool in suspected body-packers, preferably with a substantial dose reduction but maintenance of its diagnostic performance.

We performed an experimental investigation to estimate the minimal CT-dose that still allows reliable detection of ingested drug packets.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

A total of 12 drug packets were investigated. These were seized by local customs officials and made available to us for a short period under surveillance by the authorities for the purpose of this study. The packets consisted of cocaine (purity >80%; admixture of lactose) packed in several layers of plastic wrap. The mean length was 3.5 cm (range, 2.7–4.0 cm) with a mean width of 1.3 cm (range, 1.1–1.6 cm; see Fig. 1).

The packets were first placed in one row on the CT couch for acquisition of a

Detection

The mean attenuation of the cocaine packets was −69.6 HU (range, −135 to 247 HU). The threshold for correct identification of all 12 drug packets was 100 mA for reader 1 and 125 mA for readers 2 and 3 (see Table 1 and Fig. 3). Above these thresholds all 3 readers consistently identified all 12 packets. No false-positives were observed. On the conventional radiographs a total of 9 drug packets was identified, 8 were visible on ultrasound (see Fig. 4, Fig. 5). Compared with the scan at 350 mA, the

Discussion

Among the imaging modalities, plain abdominal radiography is the most widely used initial imaging test to detect body packing [3], [14], [15], [16], [25]. This technique is available everywhere but involves a relevant radiation exposure. The effective dose varies between 0.8 and 1.7 mSv [31]. The effective dose that we calculated (1.2 mSv) was within this range. A key finding on abdominal radiographs is the so-called double-condom sign, i.e., a density surrounded by a crescent of air resulting

Conclusions

In conclusion, the results of our experimental investigation suggest that low-dose CT is of interest not only as a second-line imaging modality for the examination of suspected body-packers. With its high sensitivity and specificity at low radiation exposure, this CT technique might replace conventional radiography as the first-line imaging modality. However, regarding the actual dose threshold in humans and regarding all types of smuggled substances and wrappings, further studies are warranted.

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank R. Juran, Institut für Radiologie, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, for his great help in calculating the radiation exposure of the different CT scans.

References (41)

  • M.M. McCarron et al.

    The cocaine ‘body packer’ syndrome. Diagnosis and treatment

    JAMA

    (1983)
  • A. Krishnan et al.

    Plain abdominal radiography in the diagnosis of the “body packer”

    J Accid Emerg Med

    (1999)
  • B. Marc et al.

    The cocaine body-packer syndrome: evaluation of a method of contrast study of the bowel

    J Forensic Sci

    (1990)
  • Claffey M. Stampede of drug mules at Kennedy: after 9/11 lull, heroin & ecstasy busts soar, New York Daily News May 5;...
  • P.R. Algra et al.

    Role of radiology in a national initiative to interdict drug smuggling: the Dutch experience

    Am J Roentgenol

    (2007)
  • B.P. Joynt et al.

    Sudden death of a heroin body packer

    J Anal Toxicol

    (1985)
  • K.D. Hutchins et al.

    Heroin body packing: three fatal cases of intestinal perforation

    J Forensic Sci

    (2000)
  • J. Hierholzer et al.

    Drug smuggling by ingested cocaine-filled packages: conventional x-ray and ultrasound

    Abdom Imaging

    (1995)
  • R. Beerman et al.

    Radiographic evaluation of the cocaine smuggler

    Gastrointest Radiol

    (1986)
  • N.E. Beck et al.

    Cocaine ‘body packers’

    Br J Surg

    (1993)
  • Cited by (34)

    • Using CT scout view to scan illicit drug carriers may reduce radiation exposure

      2021, Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Various methods have been proposed to minimize CT radiation dose in these cases. Low-dose CT,12 Ultra-low-dose CT,8 and low tube voltage with automated tube-current modulation28 are among the methods that have been put forth as alternative imaging modalities to replace radiography as the primary imaging method. In our study, it was found that the number of CT scans increased when the capsules had gastric localization at admission or were in a solid form.

    • Imaging of Drug Smuggling by Body Packing

      2015, Seminars in Ultrasound, CT and MRI
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text