Comparison of 3 T and 7 T MRI clinical sequences for ankle imaging

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.05.023Get rights and content

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare 3 T and 7 T signal-to-noise and contrast-to noise ratios of clinical sequences for imaging of the ankles with optimized sequences and dedicated coils.

Ten healthy volunteers were examined consecutively on both systems with three clinical sequences: (1) 3D gradient-echo, T1-weighted; (2) 2D fast spin-echo, PD-weighted; and (3) 2D spin-echo, T1-weighted. SNR was calculated for six regions: cartilage; bone; muscle; synovial fluid; Achilles tendon; and Kager's fat-pad. CNR was obtained for cartilage/bone, cartilage/fluid, cartilage/muscle, and muscle/fat-pad, and compared by a one-way ANOVA test for repeated measures.

Mean SNR significantly increased at 7 T compared to 3 T for 3D GRE, and 2D TSE was 60.9% and 86.7%, respectively. In contrast, an average SNR decrease of almost 25% was observed in the 2D SE sequence. A CNR increase was observed in 2D TSE images, and in most 3D GRE images.

There was a substantial benefit from ultra high-field MR imaging of ankles with routine clinical sequences at 7 T compared to 3 T. Higher SNR and CNR at ultra-high field MR scanners may be useful in clinical practice for ankle imaging. However, carefully optimized protocols and dedicated extremity coils are necessary to obtain optimal results.

Introduction

Recently, the development of ultra-high-field MR scanners has grown rapidly. In theory, if the coil and the subject are considered equivalent, then the signal-to-noise ration (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) would be almost linearly related to the static magnetic field B0. SNR behavior, however, is apparently more complex, especially for human applications at 7 T (mostly due to susceptibility artifacts and a widened chemical shift) [1], [2].

In theory, the SNR between 3 T and 7 T should increase by a factor of 2.3. This is, however, not completely achievable in practical MRI. One of the main issues with ultra-high-field MR imaging is the specific absorption rate (SAR) limitation, which restricts a transfer of sequences from high-field scanners [3]. Recently developed parallel imaging techniques have great potential to overcome the SAR problem [4], [5]. To reduce artifacts, pulse properties and receiver bandwidth must be adjusted as well. Increased bandwidth should be employed to reduce the chemical shift artifacts between fat and water frequencies. Despite the intense developments in coil design for ultra-high-field imaging, there is still a lack of dedicated coils for musculoskeletal imaging, which are necessary to obtain a real benefit from higher field strengths. In this sense, multi-element phased array coils appear to be a promising solution [6].

MRI is widely used in ankle joint imaging for various anatomical regions, such as cartilage [7], tendons [8], or bones [9]. For most of these applications, high SNR is a prerequisite for successful diagnosis, or for advanced quantitative evaluation techniques. Higher field strengths via higher SNR and resolution may provide improvements in the biochemical assessment of cartilage, a better basis for trabecular bone segmentation, or in advanced imaging of tendons.

The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of clinical MR sequences in in vivo ankle imaging at ultra high-field (7 T), and compare it to the 3 T analogues. Different anatomical regions were compared for SNR and CNR. Ultra high-field MR imaging may substantially benefit from higher SNR and better spatial resolution.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

Ten healthy volunteers (mean age, 28.3 ± 6.4) were consecutively measured on 3 T (Tim Trio, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) and 7 T (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) MR scanners. The ethics commission of the Medical University of Vienna gave approval for this study, and written, informed consent was obtained from all volunteers before enrollment in the study. At 3 T, an eight-element dedicated knee coil (In Vivo, OR, USA) and at 7 T, a 28-channel dedicated knee coil (QED, USA) were used.

Results

The ICC revealed a very good agreement for nearly all measures for 3 T and 7 T (0.95 on average). The observed inter-observer variability was less than 8%. Overall mean SNR for 3 T was 23.64 ± 4.65, and for 7 T, 57.11 ± 13.7. SNR was significantly higher at 7 T compared to 3 T in most cases in the GRE and TSE sequences. The mean SNR increase for 3D GRE and 2D TSE was 60.9% and 86.7%, respectively. For 2D SE, an SNR decrease of almost 25% was observed. Non-significant differences were mostly found in SE

Discussion

In this study, the performance of standard clinical sequences was compared between 3 T and 7 T MRI. Imaging of the ankles at 7 T showed advantages compared with standard MR imaging protocols at 3 T. The study revealed a significantly better performance of clinical MR sequences in ankle joint imaging at 7 T compared to 3 T in two of three investigated sequences.

The greater benefit of increased SNR at 7 T has been previously demonstrated in brain imaging for detecting multiple sclerosis lesions [10],

Conclusion

A substantial benefit was shown for ultra high-field MR imaging of the ankles with routine clinical sequences at 7 T, compared to 3 T. Higher SNR and CNR at ultra high-field MR scanners may be useful in clinical practice for ankle imaging. However, carefully optimized protocols and dedicated extremity coils are necessary to obtain optimal results.

Acknowledgments

Funding for this study was provided by the Vienna Spots of Excellence des Wiener Wissenschafts-und Technologie-Fonds (WWTF) – Vienna Advanced Imaging CenterVIACLIC and the Slovak Scientific Grant Agency VEGA No. 2/0090/11.

References (20)

  • S.K. Pakin et al.

    Ultra-high-field MRI of knee joint at 7.0 T: preliminary experience

    Acad Radiol

    (2006)
  • R.R. Regatte et al.

    Ultra-high-field MRI of the musculoskeletal system at 7.0 T

    J Magn Reson Imaging

    (2007)
  • R. Krug et al.

    Imaging of the musculoskeletal system in vivo using ultra-high field magnetic resonance at 7 T

    Invest Radiol

    (2009)
  • F. Schick et al.

    MRI at high field: technical limits and clinical potential

    Eur Radiol

    (2005)
  • D.K. Sodickson et al.

    Simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH): fast imaging with radiofrequency coil arrays

    Magn Reson Med

    (1997)
  • K.P. Pruessmann et al.

    SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI

    Magn Reson Med

    (1999)
  • P.B. Roemer et al.

    The NMR phased array

    Magn Reson Med

    (1990)
  • S.A. Millington et al.

    Quantitative and topographical evaluation of ankle articular cartilage using high resolution MRI

    J Orthop Res

    (2007)
  • M.E. Schweitzer et al.

    MR imaging of disorders of the Achilles tendon

    Am J Roentgenol

    (2000)
  • T.M. Link et al.

    In vivo high resolution MRI of the calcaneus: differences in trabecular structure in osteoporosis patients

    J Bone Miner Res

    (1998)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (34)

  • Magnetic resonance imaging for three-dimensional printing of the bony orbit: is clinical use imminent?

    2020, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the future, it would be reasonable to expect a greater number of patients presenting to maxillofacial surgeons with orbital fractures who have not had CT imaging. Recent advancements in MRI such as 7T may increase the accuracy of MRI for orbital fractures, owing to increased definition of the soft and hard tissue, thus increasing the potential to detect even slight disruptions to the normal anatomy29–31. This may also lend itself to the potential for automated segmentation of MR images, particularly in combination with machine learning.

  • A new RF transmit coil for foot and ankle imaging at 7T MRI

    2018, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Citation Excerpt :

    The lack of Tx body coil for 7T MRI forces the development of transmit coils dedicated for certain parts of the body. Due to the absence of commercial RF coil specific for foot/ankle at 7T, most sites use knee coils [7,18–22] or head coils [23–26] for imaging the foot/ankle. This situation is not optimal for several reasons.

  • Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of the fibrocartilage disc of the temporomandibular joint - a feasibility study

    2014, Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Citation Excerpt :

    The dGEMRIC index, i.e., the T1 relaxation time following (Gd-DTPA)2- administration (T1(Gd)), is an indirect measure of the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) concentration of cartilage tissue [18–20]. At field-strengths of 3 T, the biochemical MRI measurement of smaller joint cartilage, such as the ankle joint or lumbar facets, becomes possible in satisfactory image resolution and clinically reasonable measurement time [21–23]. Recently, these biochemical techniques were adapted to fibrocartilaginous tissues, such as the menisci [24,25], where, similar to the fibrocartilage structure of the TMJ disc, GAGs are less abundant compared to hyaline cartilage [2,26].

  • Optimizing MRI of small joints and extremities

    2014, Clinical Radiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Groups investigating 7 T imaging of the wrist and ankle have demonstrated variable increases in the SNR between different tissue types. This has been attributed to the parameters and coils used, which are still in the early stages of development.7–9 For a given MRI machine, the choice of receiver coil is the most effective way to improve SNR, without cost to other imaging parameters.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text