Elsevier

European Journal of Radiology

Volume 81, Issue 11, November 2012, Pages 3577-3580
European Journal of Radiology

The comparison of radiation dose between C-arm flat-detector CT (DynaCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT): A phantom study

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.09.006Get rights and content

Abstract

Purpose

To assess and compare the radiation dose of DynaCT in phantoms to that of MSCT.

Methods and materials

A male Anderson Radiation Therapy 200 phantom with embedded thermoluminescence dosimeters (TLDs) was scanned with DynaCT (Axiom Artis dTA, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany) and MSCTs (MSCT1: Lightspeed VCT, GE, Milwaukee, USA; MSCT2: Sensation Cardiac 64, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), respectively. For DynaCT, radiation exposure data with automatic exposure control were obtained from scanning of head, chest and abdomen. For MSCT, scanning protocols for head, chest, and abdomen were examined under conventional exposure conditions. Effective doses were calculated from LiF–TLD measurements according to ICRP103. A Catphan phantom (Phantom Lab, USA) was used to evaluate the spatial resolution and low contrast detectability of DynaCT and MSCT.

Results

The effective doses for DynaCT from head, chest and abdomen scanning were 1.18, 7.32, 7.48 mSv (20 s scan) and 0.85, 6.01, 7.04 mSv (8 s scan); the effective doses for MSCT from head, chest and abdomen scanning were 3.33, 7.62 and 8.42 mSv (MSCT1), and 1.89, 7.52, 8.23 mSv (MSCT2). Significant difference between the organ doses from DynaCT and from MSCT (p < .05) was shown. The spatial resolution of 12 lp/cm was achieved and it was able to recognize a 3 mm low contrast object at 0.5% contrast level in DynaCT, which was on the same level as in the MSCT images.

Conclusion

The phantom study indicates that DynaCT applies significantly less dose to patient and achieves similar spatial resolution and low contrast detectability to standard diagnostic MSCT.

Introduction

C-arm flat panel CT combines the C-arm design and three-dimensional (3D) cone-beam CT imaging, enables both traditional angiographic imaging, and soft tissue differentiation [1]. In C-arm flat panel angiographic systems, the CT-like images are generated from two-dimensional (2D) X-ray projection images acquired with flat-panel detector [2], [3], [4], [5].

With new improvements in detector technology, cone-beam reconstruction algorithm and image correction [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], C-arm flat panel CT imaging has been widely used in different clinical applications. Previous studies have demonstrated the value of C-arm CT in therapy planning, image guidance and diagnosis, especially in complex interventional procedures [8], [9], [10], [11].

The objective of this phantom study is mainly to show the difference of radiation dose level between C-arm CT system and MSCT and the image quality achieved by C-arm CT, in comparison with MSCT.

Section snippets

Phantoms and scanning technique

Dose measurements were performed on two multi-slice CT scanners (MSCT) (Lightspeed VCT (MSCT1), GE, Milwaukee, USA; and Sensation Cardiac 64 (MSCT2), Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), and one C-arm CT marketed as DynaCT (Axiom Artis dTA, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany), respectively. For DynaCT, radiation exposure data were obtained from routine scanning of head, chest and abdomen; automatic exposure control (AEC) and (20 s and 8 s rotation time) scans were used. For MSCT, scanning

Results

For DynaCT 20 s scan, the effective doses from head, chest and abdomen scanning were 1.18, 7.32 and 7.48 mSv; for DynaCT 8 s scan, the effective doses from head, chest and abdomen scanning were 0.85, 6.01 and 7.04 mSv; for MSCT, the effective doses from head, chest and abdomen scanning were 3.33, 7.62, 8.42 mSv (from MSCT1), and 1.89, 7.52, 8.23 mSv (from MSCT2). The relative dose reduction ranged from 2.7% to 74.5% for DynaCT scan, compared to MSCT. The organ doses in position of brain for DynaCT

Discussion and conclusion

Under conventional exposure conditions, the radiation dose of DynaCT as well as its image quality has been measured and some features of DynaCT imaging have been revealed by the phantom study.

DynaCT with large size detector, such as the 30 cm × 40 cm Pixium 4700 flat-panel detector (Trixell, Moirans, France), offers a native pixel pitch of 154 μm in a 1920 × 2480 matrix. In clinical condition, the spatial resolution seen in bar-pattern experiments can be achieved about 12 lp/cm, this value is slightly

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by IAEA Research Contract No.16155/R0, the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (NSFC), Grant No. 30870751, and Beijing Municipal Health Bureau, Grant No. 2009-3-57.

References (18)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (74)

  • Radiation Dose during Transarterial Radioembolization: A Dosimetric Comparison of Cone-Beam CT and Angio-CT Technologies

    2021, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Angio-CT may result in increased patient radiation exposure due to high-dose single-phase or multi-phase CT acquisitions (2,18). While both angio-CT and cone-beam CT universally have been shown to decrease overall radiation use with transarterial chemoembolization compared to conventional fluoroscopy alone, the differences in radiation dose incurred between cone-beam CT and angio-CT have been less studied (9,10,20). In the current study, among patients who underwent TARE with both angio-CT and cone-beam CT (for either mapping or administration), the effective dose per scan in the angio-CT room (5.99 mSv) was not significantly different than the cone-beam CT room (6.42 mSv), despite the wider field of view and larger craniocaudal scan range in the angio-CT room.

  • Immediate and 1-year success rate of type 2 endoleak treatment using three-dimensional image fusion guidance

    2020, Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging
    Citation Excerpt :

    CBCT guidance provides volumetric 3D acquisitions that can be combined with live fluoroscopy. When combined with a navigation software, this allows better visualization of the endoleak, facilitates catheterization, and limits the radiation dose and the use of iodinated contrast [10,11]. In our study, 3D imaging fusion guidance resulted in a 100% and 94% technical success rate for DPSI and TAE procedures, respectively, compared to 14% and 73% for Marcelin et al. [26] using conventional endovascular and percutaneous injection techniques.

  • Parenchymal hyperdensity on C-arm CT images after endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke predicts a poor prognosis

    2019, Clinical Radiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Moreover, C-arm CT was performed with an angiography machine; thus, the image quality was not as high as that provided by multisection CT. The spatial resolution of C-arm CT is similar to that of multisection CT;25 however, in this study, imaging was performed under general anaesthesia, which allowed us to capture images that were clear enough for identification of parenchymal hyperdensity. Furthermore, consistency between the two radiology assessment reports was good.

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

Tel.: +86 1083198353; fax: +86 1063183391.

2

Tel.: +86 2138895685; fax: +86 2138895613.

View full text