The comparison of radiation dose between C-arm flat-detector CT (DynaCT) and multi-slice CT (MSCT): A phantom study
Introduction
C-arm flat panel CT combines the C-arm design and three-dimensional (3D) cone-beam CT imaging, enables both traditional angiographic imaging, and soft tissue differentiation [1]. In C-arm flat panel angiographic systems, the CT-like images are generated from two-dimensional (2D) X-ray projection images acquired with flat-panel detector [2], [3], [4], [5].
With new improvements in detector technology, cone-beam reconstruction algorithm and image correction [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], C-arm flat panel CT imaging has been widely used in different clinical applications. Previous studies have demonstrated the value of C-arm CT in therapy planning, image guidance and diagnosis, especially in complex interventional procedures [8], [9], [10], [11].
The objective of this phantom study is mainly to show the difference of radiation dose level between C-arm CT system and MSCT and the image quality achieved by C-arm CT, in comparison with MSCT.
Section snippets
Phantoms and scanning technique
Dose measurements were performed on two multi-slice CT scanners (MSCT) (Lightspeed VCT (MSCT1), GE, Milwaukee, USA; and Sensation Cardiac 64 (MSCT2), Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany), and one C-arm CT marketed as DynaCT (Axiom Artis dTA, Siemens Healthcare, Forchheim, Germany), respectively. For DynaCT, radiation exposure data were obtained from routine scanning of head, chest and abdomen; automatic exposure control (AEC) and (20 s and 8 s rotation time) scans were used. For MSCT, scanning
Results
For DynaCT 20 s scan, the effective doses from head, chest and abdomen scanning were 1.18, 7.32 and 7.48 mSv; for DynaCT 8 s scan, the effective doses from head, chest and abdomen scanning were 0.85, 6.01 and 7.04 mSv; for MSCT, the effective doses from head, chest and abdomen scanning were 3.33, 7.62, 8.42 mSv (from MSCT1), and 1.89, 7.52, 8.23 mSv (from MSCT2). The relative dose reduction ranged from 2.7% to 74.5% for DynaCT scan, compared to MSCT. The organ doses in position of brain for DynaCT
Discussion and conclusion
Under conventional exposure conditions, the radiation dose of DynaCT as well as its image quality has been measured and some features of DynaCT imaging have been revealed by the phantom study.
DynaCT with large size detector, such as the 30 cm × 40 cm Pixium 4700 flat-panel detector (Trixell, Moirans, France), offers a native pixel pitch of 154 μm in a 1920 × 2480 matrix. In clinical condition, the spatial resolution seen in bar-pattern experiments can be achieved about 12 lp/cm, this value is slightly
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by IAEA Research Contract No.16155/R0, the National Natural Sciences Foundation of China (NSFC), Grant No. 30870751, and Beijing Municipal Health Bureau, Grant No. 2009-3-57.
References (18)
- et al.
3D soft tissue imaging with a mobile C-arm
Comput Med Imaging Graph
(2007) - et al.
DynaCT during EVAR – a comparison with multidetector CT
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg
(2009) - et al.
Impact of C arm CT on hepatic arterial interventions for hepatic malignancies
J Vasc Interv Radiol
(2007) - et al.
Intraoperative C-arm cone-beam computed tomography in fenestrated/branched aortic endgrafting
J Vasc Surg
(2011) - et al.
C-arm flat detector computed tomography: the technique and its applications in interventional neuro-radiology
Neuroradiology
(2010) - et al.
3D imaging with flat-detector C-arm systems
- et al.
Cone-beam computed tomography with a flat-panel imager: initial performance characterization
Med Phys
(2000) - et al.
Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT)
Eur Radiol
(2007) - et al.
Towards cardiac C-arm computed tomography
IEEE Trans Med Imaging
(2006)
Cited by (74)
Radiation Dose during Transarterial Radioembolization: A Dosimetric Comparison of Cone-Beam CT and Angio-CT Technologies
2021, Journal of Vascular and Interventional RadiologyCitation Excerpt :Angio-CT may result in increased patient radiation exposure due to high-dose single-phase or multi-phase CT acquisitions (2,18). While both angio-CT and cone-beam CT universally have been shown to decrease overall radiation use with transarterial chemoembolization compared to conventional fluoroscopy alone, the differences in radiation dose incurred between cone-beam CT and angio-CT have been less studied (9,10,20). In the current study, among patients who underwent TARE with both angio-CT and cone-beam CT (for either mapping or administration), the effective dose per scan in the angio-CT room (5.99 mSv) was not significantly different than the cone-beam CT room (6.42 mSv), despite the wider field of view and larger craniocaudal scan range in the angio-CT room.
Immediate and 1-year success rate of type 2 endoleak treatment using three-dimensional image fusion guidance
2020, Diagnostic and Interventional ImagingCitation Excerpt :CBCT guidance provides volumetric 3D acquisitions that can be combined with live fluoroscopy. When combined with a navigation software, this allows better visualization of the endoleak, facilitates catheterization, and limits the radiation dose and the use of iodinated contrast [10,11]. In our study, 3D imaging fusion guidance resulted in a 100% and 94% technical success rate for DPSI and TAE procedures, respectively, compared to 14% and 73% for Marcelin et al. [26] using conventional endovascular and percutaneous injection techniques.
Endoscopic Endonasal Odontoidectomy in the Hybrid Operating Room
2019, World NeurosurgeryParenchymal hyperdensity on C-arm CT images after endovascular therapy for acute ischaemic stroke predicts a poor prognosis
2019, Clinical RadiologyCitation Excerpt :Moreover, C-arm CT was performed with an angiography machine; thus, the image quality was not as high as that provided by multisection CT. The spatial resolution of C-arm CT is similar to that of multisection CT;25 however, in this study, imaging was performed under general anaesthesia, which allowed us to capture images that were clear enough for identification of parenchymal hyperdensity. Furthermore, consistency between the two radiology assessment reports was good.
Combined Therapy with Transarterial Chemoembolization and Radiofrequency Ablation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Does the Degree of Ethiodized Oil Accumulation within the Tumor Affect the Therapeutic Efficacy?
2019, Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology