Detection of suspected placental invasion by MRI: Do the results depend on observer’ experience?
Introduction
Disorders of placental implantation are currently classified as abnormal localization and abnormal attachment. Abnormalities in placental localization are far more commonly encountered (1/250 pregnancies) than abnormalities in placental attachment (1/5000 pregnancies). Attachment abnormalities include three entities: placenta accreta, increta and percreta, which represent a spectrum of placental adhesive disorders, with increasing severity (Fig. 1). These placental implantation disorders are a significant cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Their prevalence is currently on the rise because of the growing percentage of older pregnant women and those with previous abortions and/or caesarean sections [1], [2].
The diagnosis and management of women at risk is not only based on clinical parameters, but also driven by imaging, namely ultrasound (US) and, more recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Prenatal US is formerly considered as the routine diagnostic standard examination, but fetal MRI is emerging as an alternative and complementary method, used in case of ultrasonographic suspicion of placenta attachment anomalies, but equivocal diagnosis. In the past decade, several MR imaging features have been described and considered useful for predicting abnormal placental implantation [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. However, these MR signs may be subtle and difficult to detect, in particular when the radiologist has limited experience.
The purpose of this study was to exactly assess the diagnostic value of specific MR features for detecting suspected placental invasion according to the radiologists’ working experience.
Section snippets
Patients
Our study population included 25 pregnant women (mean age 35.16) who had been consecutively investigated by prenatal MRI between June 2007 and December 2009 after obstetrician referral for suspected placental invasion upon standard pregnancy US examinations. The patients were followed and treated in one of the three different University Hospitals that took part in this retrospective study. Nineteen patients presented placenta previa and three out of them had an additional history of previous
Patients population
Demographics between the two groups were similar. Neither the mean age of the patients (p = 0.692) nor the gestational age at MR examination (p = 0.672) differed significantly. For the group with placental invasion, the mean age of the women was 35.5 years and the mean gestational age 31.1 weeks, whereas for the control group they were 34.8 years and 31.9 weeks, retrospectively.
Nineteen (76%) out of the 25 women had placenta previa, including 11 of 12 patients with proven placental invasion.
Discussion
Abnormalities in placental attachment include three entities: placenta accreta, increta and precreta. These are a spectrum of placental adhesive disorders, with increasing grade of placental invasion into the myometrium (Fig. 1). Placenta accreta is the most frequent and less severe form, caused by the penetration of the deciduas by the chorionic villi. Placenta increta consists in a partial invasion of the myometrium by the villi, and placenta percreta, the most severe form, implies the
Conclusions
In conclusion, the medical practice faces an increased prevalence of placental adhesive disorders in the near future because of a higher mean maternal age and an increase of uterine surgery procedures. Today, MRI of the placenta has become a complementary method to US for patients at risk and in selected, equivocal cases. Different MR features have been described in association with placental disorders, but our results suggest that their recognition and correct interpretation very much depend
Acknowledgment
We would like to thank Ms. Kevin Decitre for the drawing of Fig. 1.
References (15)
- et al.
The value of specific MRI features in the evaluation of unsupected placental invasion
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
(2007) - et al.
MRI appearance of placenta percreta and placenta accreta
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
(1999) - et al.
Use of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluation of placental invasion
Clinical Radiology
(2009) - et al.
Placenta creta and placenta previa creta
Placenta
(1987) - et al.
Abnormal placentation: twenty-year analysis
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
(2005) - et al.
Placenta accrete: a review of current advances in prenatal diagnosis
Placenta
(2007) - et al.
Placenta accreta: spectrum of US and MR imaging findings
Radiographics
(2008)
Cited by (90)
New insights into the etiopathology of placenta accreta spectrum
2022, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologySearching for placenta percreta: a prospective cohort and systematic review of case reports
2022, American Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyCitation Excerpt :Overall, the reporting of placenta percreta in the literature is based on the gross findings of hysterectomy specimens presenting with villous tissue having penetrated through the entire uterine wall,5–12 and textbook descriptions are illustrated by diagrams showing placental villi protruding into the peritoneal cavity after crossing the myometrium and uterine serosa.7 These diagrams have been used until today by many authors of diagnostic14,15 and management16 studies to describe the different grades of PAS. Luke et al5 reported that most hysterectomy specimens arrive at the laboratory distorted by attempts to remove the placenta during delivery, limiting considerably the macroscopic examination and sampling and adding to the confusion in reporting different grades of PAS in both epidemiologic and clinical studies.
Placental MRI: Identification of radiological features to predict placental attachment disease regardless of reader expertise
2022, European Journal of Radiology