Impact of specialized multi-disciplinary approach and an integrated pathway on outcomes in hilar cholangiocarcinoma

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2013.10.009Get rights and content

Abstract

Aims

To assess the outcomes of patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma following referral to a specialist multi-disciplinary team.

Methods

Over an 11-year period, patients referred with hilar cholangiocarcinoma were identified from a prospectively maintained registry. Collated data included demographics, operative findings and histo-pathological data. Survival differences and prognostic factors were determined.

Results

345 patients were referred with hilar cholangiocarcinoma, of which 57 (16.5%) patients had surgery. Prior to 2008, of 143 patients referred, only 17 (11.9%) patients underwent surgery, compared to 40 (19.8%) of 202 patients referred from 2008 onwards (p = 0.051). In the surgery group, the majority of patients underwent left hemi-hepatectomy (n = 19). In addition, portal vein (n = 5), hepatic artery (n = 2) and inferior vena cava (n = 3) resections were performed. The R0 resection rate was 73.7%. The morbidity and mortality rates were 59.6% and 14.0%, respectively. The median disease-free survival was 16 (4–101) months. The presence of lymph node metastasis (p = 0.002) was the only predictor of poorer disease-free survival. The 5-year overall survival was 39.5% and was significantly better than that of the palliative group (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Surgery is the optimal treatment option for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma and is associated with better overall survival. Prompt referral to tertiary centres with a core team of clinicians to manage this difficult condition may allow more patients to come to potentially curative surgical resections.

Introduction

Biliary malignancies constitute approximately 2% of all cancers found at autopsy, of which hilar or “Klatskin” tumours represent around 50–80% of these cases.1, 2, 3 At present, it is unclear whether there is a true increase in the incidence of hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HC), or additional cases are being identified with more accurate cross-sectional imaging being performed.

The overall 5-year survival rates following hepatic resection of HC varies from 20 to 40%.4, 5, 6, 7 Although surgery remains the only potential curative therapy, it is technically demanding due to the presence of locally advanced disease, proximity of the tumour to hilar vasculature and tumour biology. Various clinico-pathological variables have been shown to influence survival, including margin status, nodal status, tumour differentiation and peri-neural and/or vascular invasion.4, 7, 8, 9 However, the majority of patients with HC are unresectable at either presentation, following staging laparoscopy or during laparotomy. Criteria for unresectable disease include locally advanced tumours involving portal and hepatic vasculature, distant metastases and nodal metastases beyond the hepato-duodenal ligament. In addition, patients must have limited co-morbidities; as most cases require an extended hepatectomy against a background of cholangitis and obstructive jaundice.

The improved treatment of HC over the last decade is not only related to changes in surgical strategy, but also improvement in selection and pre-operative work-up of patients considered for curative resection. With the introduction of specialist multi-disciplinary team (MDT) management, this treatment process may contribute to better outcomes.10 The aim of this study was to assess the outcomes of patients with HC following such a specialist MDT approach.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

Patients with HC referred during an 11-year period from January 2001 to December 2012 were identified from a prospectively maintained hepatobiliary database and specialist multi-disciplinary recording system.

Patients that had potentially resectable and unresectable HC were included. In addition, intra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma affecting the portal hilum (often termed peri-hilar cholangiocarcinoma) were included, as the treatment is similar and often difficult to differentiate from true HC.

Pre-operative evaluation

Collated data included patient demographics, surgery, histopathology analysis and outcome. Pre-operative assessment included multi-slice triple phase contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CT) scan of the thorax, abdomen and pelvis, and liver-specific contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the liver (from 2008).

Pre-operative biliary drainage was considered in patients with obstructive jaundice. Biliary drainage of the future liver remnant was achieved endoscopically, percutaneous

Multi-disciplinary approach

All patients were discussed in a specialist MDT meeting that consisted of hepatobiliary surgeons, hepatologist, oncologist, radiologist and pathologist prior to surgery. Since 2008, an integrated care pathway was implemented, and jaundiced patients with a proximal biliary stricture were managed by a specialist MDT.

Surgical and post-operative details

Parenchymal transection was performed using the Cavi-Pulse Ultrasonic Surgical Aspirator (CUSA) or Kellyclasia. Intra-operative ultrasound was performed to confirm the findings of pre-operative imaging. The number of hepatic (Couinaud's) segments13 resected was determined by the procedure performed as stated in the Brisbane nomenclature.14 The type of surgical procedure was dependent on the resection of all macroscopic disease and achieving a clear resection margin, while preserving sufficient

Histo-pathological analysis

The Bismuth–Corlette classification11 was used to pre-operatively define tumour extension along the intra-hepatic bile ducts based on cross-sectional imaging. Intra-operatively, tumour extension and margins were examined by histo-pathological evaluation of frozen sections. The histological staging of the disease was determined according to the TNM classification following the criteria of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC).16 Tumour differentiation was graded as well, moderately and

Follow-up protocol

Patients were followed up in specialist hepatobiliary clinics. Following initial post-operative review at one month after discharge, all patients were seen in the outpatient clinic at 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months and annually thereafter. At each clinic review, blood tests were drawn for liver function tests and CA 19.9 levels. Patients underwent 6-monthly surveillance CT scan during the first two post-operative years, followed by annual CT scans thereafter.

Overall and disease-free survival data

Statistical analysis

Categorical data were analysed using the Pearson's chi-squared test. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to assess the actuarial survival and disease-free survival. Uni-variate analysis was performed to assess for a significant difference in clinico-pathological characteristics that influenced survival following resection. Statistical analyses were performed using the SPSS for Windows™ version 16.0 (SPSS Inc, Chicago, Ill, USA), and statistical significance was taken at the 5% level.

Results

During the study period, 345 patients with HC were referred and discussed at the unit's specialist MDT meeting, of which 244 patients were deemed unresectable on initial cross-sectional imaging (Fig. 1). One hundred and one patients considered potentially resectable on imaging underwent staging laparoscopy which subsequently excluded 18 (17.8%) patients due to locally advanced tumour or the presence of liver and/or peritoneal metastasis. Eighty-three patients underwent laparotomy, of which 57

Prognostic factors influencing survival outcome

Fourteen patients that underwent potentially curative surgery developed recurrent disease. The median disease-free survival was 16 (4–101) months. The presence of lymph node metastasis (p = 0.002) was the only predictor of poorer disease-free survival on uni-variate analysis [median survival N1 = 10 (5–87) months versus N0 = 21 (5–101) months, Table 3, Fig. 2].

The 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival was 73.5%, 49.6% and 39.5%, respectively in the surgical group. In comparison, the 1- and 3-year

Discussion

Due to both tumour proximity to the hilar vasculature and tumour biology, HC remains a surgical challenge. Nevertheless, surgical resection represents the only potentially curative option for these patients and improves long-term outcome. A radical resection with negative margins is the only factor with a demonstrated impact on outcome that can be influenced by the surgeon, and therefore should be the main aim of treatment.3

Whether there is a true increase in the incidence of HC, these patients

References (44)

  • E.C. Burke et al.

    Hilar cholangiocarcinoma: patterns of spread, the importance of hepatic resection for curative operation, and a presurgical clinical staging system

    Ann Surg

    (1998)
  • W.R. Jarnagin et al.

    Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma

    Ann Surg

    (2001)
  • A. Nakeeb et al.

    Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors

    Ann Surg

    (1996)
  • G.M. Gazzaniga et al.

    Surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: an Italian experience

    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg

    (2000)
  • Y. Seyama et al.

    Long-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate

    Ann Surg

    (2003)
  • H. Bismuth et al.

    Intrahepatic cholangioenteric anastomosis in carcinoma of the hilus of the liver

    Surg Gynecol Obstet

    (1975)
  • Grunhagen DJ, Dunne DF, Sturgess RP, et al. Metal stents: a bridge to surgery in hilar cholangiocarcinoma. HPB...
  • C. Couinaud

    Anatomic principles of left and right regulated hepatectomy: technics

    J Chir (Paris)

    (1954)
  • S.M. Strasberg

    Nomenclature of hepatic anatomy and resections: a review of the Brisbane 2000 system

    J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg

    (2005)
  • P.A. Clavien et al.

    The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience

    Ann Surg

    (2009)
  • American Joint Committee on Cancer

    Extrahepatic bile ducts

  • F. Ito et al.

    Resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: concomitant liver resection decreases hepatic recurrence

    Ann Surg

    (2008)
  • Cited by (31)

    • Long-term morbidity after surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: A cohort study

      2022, Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Surgery for pCCA remains a formidable undertaking usually requiring a major liver resection in addition to a radical bile duct resection and complex biliary reconstruction. The magnitude of this surgery is reflected in its operative mortality, reported between 7 and 15% in most Western centres [4,5,9–12]. In addition, almost half of patients will suffer a major complication prior to discharge from hospital [5,9,12].

    • Increased multimodality treatment options has improved survival for Hepatocellular carcinoma but poor survival for biliary tract cancers remains unchanged

      2019, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Surgery is the only effective curative option for cholangiocarcinoma, yielding 5-year survival rates of approximately 40% [12]. Our current resection rate for hilar cholangiocarcinomas of 19% is a modest, yet important advance on our previous figure of 16.5% published 4 years ago [12]. Most series agree that resection rates for cholangiocarcinoma are low but there is heterogeneity in resectability rates, a range of 10–40% of presenting patients being reported by a recent review [13].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text