ReviewExercise intervention in people with cancer undergoing neoadjuvant cancer treatment and surgery: A systematic review
Section snippets
Background
Cancer is associated with cachexia which, in the pre-operative period, has been shown to influence perioperative outcome, increasing the risk of complications, mortality and length of stay in major gastrointestinal surgery.1 Chemotherapy has been related to skeletal muscle wasting, oxidative stress, mitochondrial death2 and reduced in vivo mitochondrial function.3 Furthermore, cancer treatment has been linked to decreased physical fitness levels, which appears to be related to the type of
Objectives
The objective of this systematic review is to evaluate methods, safety and feasibility, outcome (in terms both of physical fitness and post-operative outcome) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL), in studies of exercise interventions in people with cancer undergoing both neoadjuvant cancer treatment and surgery.
Research questions
i) Is exercise training in people with cancer during neoadjuvant cancer treatment safe and feasible? ii) Does it improve physical fitness (including physical capacity and physical activity)? iii) Does it improve HRQoL? iv) Does it improve surgical outcome?
Overview of methods and hypotheses
All clinical trials that involved an exercise training programme in people with cancer undergoing both neoadjuvant cancer treatment and surgery were included in the systematic search. Abstracts were screened and reviewed against pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria by two independent assessors (LL and MW), and assessed using the Downs and Black quality assessment tool.17 Data was extracted by one investigator in accordance with pre-defined criteria.
The primary hypothesis was: exercise
Meta-analysis
A decision to conduct a meta-analysis was based on the following pre-defined criteria;
- •
To increase power; detecting a real effect as statistically significant if it exists. However, many individual studies are too small to detect small effects, but when several are combined there is a higher chance of detecting an effect.
- •
To improve precision; the estimation of an intervention effect can be improved when it is based on more information.
- •
To answer questions not posed by the individual studies.
- •
To
Database search
The database search yielded 6489 candidate abstracts (Appendix 2 illustrates a flow chart of the comprehensive systematic search conducted for this review). After review of the candidate abstracts by two independent reviewers (LL and MW), 94 references included the required terms, of which 92 references were excluded as they did not meet all inclusion criteria. Two references were extracted for full text review. A manual search through all the references cited in the two full text papers
Summary of findings
This is the first systematic review of reports of exercise training interventions in people with cancer undergoing neoadjuvant cancer treatment and surgery. All studies reported that exercise training was safe and feasible in the neoadjuvant setting in both breast and rectal cancer, although sample sizes were small. Overall adherence was reasonable, 66–96%. Supervised, moderate-severe intensity exercise training, tailored to individual CPET's, significantly improved important physical fitness
Implications for research
To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review including all reported studies of people with cancer undergoing neoadjuvant cancer treatment and surgery. Because of the lack of adequately powered RCTs in this area, it remains unclear what is the optimal time to initiate an exercise programme and what kind of programme is most effective in improving clinically important outcome measures. Future studies will need to examine the mechanisms of cancer treatment and different exercise
Conflict of interest
M.P.W.G. received honoraria for speaking, for travel expenses, or both from Edwards Life science, Fresenius-Kabi, BOC Medical (Linde Group), Ely-Lilly Critical Care, and Cortex GmBH. He has also received research grants from National Institute of Health Research, Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, Sir Halley Stuart Trust, and Francis and Augustus Newman Foundation. He leads the Xtreme-Everest hypoxia research consortium, who have received unrestricted research grant
References (36)
- et al.
The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on physical fitness and survival in patients undergoing oesophagogastric cancer surgery
Eur J Surg Oncol
(2014) - et al.
The effects of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy on physical fitness and morbidity in rectal cancer surgery patients
Eur J Surg Oncol
(2014) - et al.
Exercise intervention to improve exercise capacity and health related quality of life for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review
Lung Cancer
(2011) - et al.
Exercise intervention for patients surgically treated for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): a systematic review
Surg Oncol
(2014) - et al.
A systematic review of pre-surgical exercise intervention studies with cancer patients
Surg Oncol
(2013) - et al.
Evidence-based physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors: current guidelines, knowledge gaps and future research directions
Cancer Treat Rev
(2014) - et al.
Perioperative cardiopulmonary exercise testing in the elderly
Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol
(2011) - et al.
Preoperative aerobic exercise training in elective intra-cavity surgery: a systematic review
Br J Anaesth
(2013) - et al.
Supervised exercise program improves aerobic fitness in patients awaiting abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
Ann Vasc Surg
(2014) - et al.
Risk factors and operative mortality in surgery for colorectal cancer
Ann R Coll Surg Engl
(1991)